toki...@aol.com wrote:
I knew Trawick was a slacker most of the time.
Now there's cool pie charts and movies to prove it.
ROFL
Hmm... why do I get the feeling this tool's real usage
is so that IT managers can see who they can 'let go'?
Kevin Kiley
Uh oh... first I show on list up out of the
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:45 PM, t.n.a. t...@sharanet.org
mailto:t...@sharanet.org wrote:
I have designed a dedicated Subversion data warehouse and loading
logic
so that Subversion repository data can be analyzed using OLAP
tools. To
demonstrate the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
bill stoddard wrote:
I completely agree, it's not a slam-dunk conclusion that async/event
driven connection management in an http server is clearly superior.
However, Bing mentioned Windows... Apache on Windows is not a stellar
performer, especially compared
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 9/2/08 3:15 PM, bing swen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems the test (done by another guy) indeed used an everything plus the
kitchen sink default Apache httpd at first, but then dropping off 3/4 of
all of the default modules (maybe not that much, but only for serving
Akins, Brian wrote:
On 9/1/08 8:11 AM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 31, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Bing Swen wrote:
To my knowledge, the one thread per connection network i/o model
is a
suboptimal use
threads vs. events is certainly not, imo, a finalized debate
yet
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
I'm trying to understand why mod_proxy_ajp exists and what it provides
that mod_proxy_http doesn't.
ajp13 is a binary protocol which should make the ajp13 tomcat connector
a bit more efficient than the http11 connector; an incremental
performance improvement. obtained at the expense of added
Since Apache 2.0, we've had the MPM architecture, which means you can
plug in your choice of processing model. That's also how Apache 2
works cross-platform, rather than being (like Apache 1) a Unix server
ported with lots of compromises in performance/etc to other platforms.
i was
Jim Jagielski wrote:
mod_ftp is a protocol module for Apache 2.x which
adds in RFC-compliant FTP as a supported protocol
for httpd.
Work has been done in getting mod_ftp ported to the
Apache 2.x build environment, compatibility with
later versions of APR (for httpd 2.2.x) and other
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The default service name is Apache2, both in the 2.0 and 2.2 WinNT MPMs.
With the installer, I had tweaked (a separate setting) the service name
default to be Apache2.2. HOWEVER, when users transition from the .msi
installed version to the command line, they are
Jeff Trawick wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but
I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200608.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
A concern with the logging of server version has since been resolved,
Plüm wrote:
That seems to be an important point to me. Although I never used
the fd caching of mod_mem_cache this would mean we actually would
have to dump this feature. This looks bad to me. Isn't this
a showstopper
for implementing #3 as new interface?
Honestly,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Or the even more readable:
rv = do_something(args);
if (rv == APR_SUCCESS) {
}
+1 to this one
That's my preference as well. Unambiguous and easy to read.
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Project Committee Members...
Adopt [EMAIL PROTECTED],
+1
seeded from [EMAIL PROTECTED] current subscribers,
-1
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well, mod_arm4 will be very usefull for many of us, websphere users or
not ;)
:) An offer perhaps to RM such a release ;-?
Since we have to pick a graveyard strategy for sources anyways, we have
a few
weeks to deal with this. If I've not seen
Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm would like to give few notes on the things I'm
currently working on, so that eventually no duplicate
work is done if someone already have similar things
on his drawing board.
1. Additional by business load balancing method
that will load balance on the actual
Mladen Turk wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
1. Additional by business load balancing method
that will load balance on the actual load of the
beckend servers. The servers that have shorter reply
time will get more load.
+1 on the work, but I question the usefulness of this routing
Tiago Semprebom wrote:
Hello,
I'm working with QoS (quality of service) and I'm using
the Apache web server to implement my QoS policy. For
that, basically I'll need to intercept all incoming
requests in Apache and after that, to classify this
requests in different queues, according with their
Paul Querna wrote:
Saju Pillai wrote:
Greetings,
The event mpm expects the apr_pollset backends to be based on epoll()
/ kqueue() or Solaris 10 event ports. What are the reasons because of
which poll() is not considered to be suitable for the event mpm ?
Is this because of the large
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
I haven't thought this through yet, but presumably we could implement
an API for this. Something like:
struct worker_score {
/* all the stuff that's there now */
void data[]; /* at the end */
};
/* ditto other records */
:)
I did this awhile
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 2/9/06, Maxime Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, I've been working on cleaning up the directory structure of
the module's source code in a 'surgery' branch. Today, this work is
done and the branch's code compiles, installs and works fine here at
home.
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Sorry this is somewhat OT, I'm looking for people who have dealt
with/would like to share experience/discuss Edge Architecture and Edge
Side Includes (www.esi.org). I've done some experimenting with over the
last week and to me the approach appears rational
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
@@ -150,6 +151,9 @@
#define CACHE_IGNORE_HEADERS_SET 1
#define CACHE_IGNORE_HEADERS_UNSET 0
int ignore_headers_set;
+/* Minimum time to keep cached files in msecs */
+apr_time_t minex;
+int minex_set;
} cache_server_conf;
Does this change
Xuekun Hu wrote:
So, same reason. Also in file mod_mem_cache.c around line 786, there
is a malloc(mobj-m_len), and a few lines later, another
malloc(obj-count) is performed.
If the second malloc fails, I think also should add something like
free(mobj-m);
mobj-m = NULL;
reasonable?
No.
Christophe Jaillet wrote:
Comments agains httpd-2.1.8-beta
=
In file mod_mem_cache.c (/modules/cache) around line 558, there is a malloc
(*obj).
A few lines later, another malloc (buf) is performed.
If the second malloc fails, then we have (*obj = NULL) but I
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/02/2005 09:58 PM, Christophe Jaillet wrote:
Comments agains httpd-2.1.8-beta
=
In file mod_mem_cache.c (/modules/cache) around line 558, there is a malloc
(*obj).
A few lines later, another malloc (buf) is performed.
If the second
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/02/2005 10:54 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
[..cut..]
Finding calls to malloc and friends in the code of mod_mem_cache is a
clear documentation
that there is no development care of this code as they should not be
used inside of
httpd code
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/02/2005 11:54 PM, Bill Stoddard wrote:
[..cut..]
Yep, you see it correctly. Mod_mem_cache is most interesting to me
personally as a benchmark toy. It should be possible to extend
mod_mem_cache to cache headers (rather than rebuilding them for each
response sent
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
Hi!We have Apache/Subversion server under Windows Server 2003. And I wascome
into problem with restarting server that process long request(more than 180
seconds). It's usual for bug Subversion repository. Isee messages like this in
error.log:[Thu Oct 13 02:28:01 2005]
Kai Engels wrote:
Hi Bill
Patch 2: Call to arm_destory_application
This is it. Just a call to arm destroy application() as the standard
awaits it
Greetings
Kai
Committed.
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Kai Engels wrote:
Hello,
I write to this address since I have made some changes to the
mod_arm4 module which I hope you will find usefull.
Hello Kai,
Your patch is difficult to review because there are too many
Kai Engels wrote:
Hello,
I write to this address since I have made some changes to the mod_arm4
module which I hope you will find usefull.
Patch it by unzipping the patch, changing into the mod_arm4 directory
and say
patch -p1 mod_arm4_20052009.patch
Then change to the mod_arm4 source
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Phillip Susi wrote:
When I asked about this a month or two ago, someone explained that
Apache uses TransmitFile() to implement sendfile but in a weird way
that makes it really, really slow. Disabling sendfile in the apache
config, and just using the mmap module
My thinking on how to solve this has changed over the past year or so...
there are numerous ways to DoS an httpd server and you can't protect
against the more effective attacks at the httpd layer.
I forgot the punch line here but hopefully it's obvious where I'm heading... apr_sendfile on
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
My thinking on how to solve this has changed over the past year or
so... there are numerous ways to DoS an httpd server and you can't
protect against the more effective attacks at the httpd layer.
I forgot the punch line here but hopefully
Parin Shah wrote:
Cool. Very good start. Leaks memory like a sieve, but good start.
ohh, I thought I was taking care of it. I mean, code frees the memory
when no longer needed except during the shutdown of server. anyway I
will go through the code again to check that. Also feel free to point
Brian Akins wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
I've not looked at your code so I can't make specific recommendations.
Just remember, code allocated with any of the apr_pool functions is
freed only when that pool is reclaimed (end of a request for a request
pool, shutdown of the server for pconf
Rachel Willmer wrote:
I've just been writing an Apache2 module. To help myself with this, I
made a searchable version of the doxygen-generated documentation in
the Apache2 source code.
In case anyone else would find it useful, I've put it up on
http://www.hobthross.com/docs/apache2/srcdoc
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't
exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during
auth check)... since the module is experimental, can I assume CTR ?
+1
IMO, imposing RTC on experimental modules is counter
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:36 PM 8/8/2005, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't
exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during
auth check)... since the module is experimental, can I
Bill Stoddard wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:36 PM 8/8/2005, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't
exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during
auth check)... since the module
Nick Kew wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:01 PM 8/3/2005, Bill Stoddard wrote:
A monitor thread would periodically check for a transmitfile
completion status; if the completion status is too slow in
coming, the monitor thread cancels the io and closes the socket.
We really need
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 10:48 AM 8/3/2005, Phillip Susi wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
In the APR library, yes, we translate 'apr_sendfile' to TransmitFile()
on win32. Some other magic occurs to obtain a file handle which can be passed
to TransmitFile. But there are enough
Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
configure.in makes a big deal about determining AP_SIG_GRACEFUL, which
defaults to SIGUSR1, but uses SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0. But then
mpm_common.c goes ahead and ignores this for actually sending the
signal, SIGUSR1 is hard-coded;
if (!strcmp(dash_k_arg, graceful)) {
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:12 AM 7/17/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ianh
Date: Sat Jul 16 22:12:10 2005
New Revision: 219372
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=219372view=rev
Log:
This patch adds a new hook (request_status) that gets ran in proxy_handler
just before the
Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
Hi,
As I already said, the AJAX browser in mod_mbox relies on a hidden
XmlHttpRequest and on Javascript processing of the replied XML
document to generate the message list.
After setting up a browser stub, I'm not going to concentrate on
compatibility and speed problems
Akins, Brian wrote:
Here's the problem:
If you want to use keepalives, all of you workers (threads/procs/whatever)
can become busy just waiting on another request on a keepalive connection.
Raising MaxClients does not help.
The Event MPM does not seems to really help this situation. It seems
Brian Akins wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
If the event MPM is working properly, then a worker thread should not
be blocking waiting for the next ka
request. You still have the overhead of the tcp connection and some
storage used by httpd to manage connection
events but both of those are small
Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:08:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 6/8/05, Dr. Peter Poeml [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:57:39AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:04:03 +0100, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody to wonder
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:23:21AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/experimental/mod_dbd.h (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/experimental/mod_dbd.h Wed May 18 02:23:20 2005
@@ -1,11 +1,25 @@
-/*Copyright (c) 2004, Nick Kew. All rights
Paul Querna wrote:
Okay, because of the quirky behavior of a 'sometimes' cached page, this
one had me going in circles for a little while.
What this patch does, is add a new command to mod_cache,
'CacheRunAfterOthers_RenameThisCmd'[1]
+1 in concept (patch not reviewed). This was on my todo list
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to modify the Win32 build projects (of mod_jk, and
httpd 1.3/2.0/2.1-dev, along with apr);
The /O2 optimization option is extremely agressive, unfortunately
it produces less than ideal crash traceback information. That
is due to the (implicit) /Oy flag,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 08:46 AM 5/11/2005, Branko ibej wrote:
All in all - comments?
How about moving away from MSVC 6 to (say) VC.Net 2003, while we're at it? It's time, to say the least.
Not for 1.3 or 2.0 httpd - you lose some measure of binary
compatibility. We can jump through hoops
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 04:26 PM 5/8/2005, Ben Hyde wrote:
Thanks for the pain, patience and effort Ben :)
+1
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 4/29/05, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me :)
How appropriate would a 2.0/2.1 patch be as well?
Attached is an updated 1.3 patch which avoids specifying the directive
within limit. Also attached is a 2.1 patch.
+1
Bill
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 02:25 AM 4/12/2005, Sander Striker wrote:
As usual the tarballs are at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please give 2.0.54 a whirl and report any problems (or successes) ;)
Hmmm. How does the current infrastructure state of http://*.apache.org
fit into testing
Rich Bowen wrote:
While the 2.2 config files are somewhat in flux, I thought I'd bring up
the topic of KeepAliveTimeout. The default config files have this set to
15 seconds. As far as I remember, it is set that way due to some
possibly-scientific survey that said that average web users click ever
Paul Querna wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
How is this worthless? IIUC, the unix mpm's announce the
creation of each worker.
Worker, Prefork and Event do not.
Correct. Only Windows logs a debug message for each and every thread created. I added these two debug messages
to winnt_mpm a couple
Rici Lake wrote:
On 30-Mar-05, at 12:52 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
#EnableSendfile off
I'd suggest uncommenting that for a win32 config file.
+1
Bill
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 00:50:45 -0800, Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Tue Mar 29 00:44:53 2005
New Revision: 159356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=159356
Log:
sync with 2.0.54-dev
Modified:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
'Apache' was our program. It became our project. It's become
our entire organization.
In 2.2, I -will- be changing the default location for the Win32
installer from %programsdir%\Apache Group\Apache2\ over to
%programsdir%\Apache Software Foundation\Apache HTTP Server
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Ryan Bloom wrote:
disabling sendfile solved it immediately. Seems to me that until our
sendfile support is better, we should err on the side of always
sending the data correctly instead of absolutely as fast as possible.
I would much rather have APR
Joshua Slive wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
IMHO, all default conf files except for highperformance[-std].conf
should have the EnableSendfile off directive uncommented, under the
theory that people who want the extra performance can take an action
to re-enable sendfile and then pay attention to the
Joshua Slive wrote:
Bill Stoddard wrote:
Guess I've not been paying attention... what type of problems have you
seen with sendfile (TransmitFile) on Win32? We do have a performance
problem (will leave out details unless your interested) but I was not
aware of corruption problems
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
As it turns out, we clone all of the main request's input headers when
we create the subrequest, including C-L. Whacking the subrequest's
C-L header fixes the hang. Since the main request's body could also
have be chunked, we should
Matt Mitchell wrote:
All,
We had a need here for mod_speling's case-correcting functionality but
we have generated filenames with very similar names so we were
constantly running afoul of its willingness to substitute the wrong
file when the correct one did not exist. I made a simple addition
luca regini wrote:
Taking a look at mod_mem_cache source code i have seen that it doesn't
use pools to allocate cache objects but i does so by means of
reference counting and simple calloc/free calls. I have also seen
that this module requires a Threaded apr to work. I am wondering the
reasons of
Greg Ames wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Then realize you need to support boatloads more clients, so you bump
up MaxClients to 5000. Now when load changes very slightly (as a
percentage of MaxClients), which happens continuously, the web server
will create or destroy a child process.
b) tweak
Laszlo wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to set up (in httpd.conf) a content-handler module
to be executed only for a specific extension?
More clear, I have a mod_abc.c. I have to test if the
request_rec *r-filename ends with .abc
or I can set up my module in httpd.conf, by specifying
the
Paul Querna wrote:
Andr Malo wrote:
I personally believe, that there is actually no problem to solve.
While we are free to write the software we like, people are free to
use the software they like. I have no desire to force someone to use
either version.
But that's my very humble opinion ;-)
+1
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Bill,
The httpd-2.1 tree was entirely busted on Win32 by the pcre
reorganization. Hoping that my fixes have already addressed
this for Win32 users, without any nasty side effects for the
Unix/Netware/etc builds.
I'm having problems again with compiling APR with LDAP
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 06:00 PM 2/12/2005, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Bill R correctly identified the reason I'd like to see
the service install occur before post-config. If the last
thing your installer does is install the service, the service
install will fail if there is a problem
Bill,
How's this look?
svn diff
Index: mpm_winnt.c
===
--- mpm_winnt.c (revision 153937)
+++ mpm_winnt.c (working copy)
@@ -1071,7 +1071,8 @@
/* Handle the following SCM aspects in this phase:
*
* -k runservice
Jeff White wrote:
From: Bill Stoddard
It would, but is it worth the extra code to enable switching between
both behaviours? Got some code to review?
Bill
What's the real problem
Bill (Stoddard) wants to over
come or what does he really
want to happen?
That's almost haiku :)
Bill R correctly
If I try apache -k install -n foo, the install for service foo will fail if there are any problems in
httpd.conf (invalid directives, syntax errors, or if the listener port is already active). While I see some
value in failing the install of the service based on httpd.conf, overall I think's its
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
For manually installed services, we -should- keep the behavior.
What good is it to have a user install a reference to an Apache
service which won't work?
For automated installs, e.g. the package installer, I see the
benefit of offering more than one behavior. E.g. the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
For manually installed services, we -should- keep the behavior.
What good is it to have a user install a reference to an Apache
service which won't work?
Installing a service != starting a service. Users will figure out httpd.conf has problems as soon as they
attempt
I just committed a change to core.c in httpd-2.1 (rev 149269). I'm looking here:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd/httpd/
and I can't find my change or rev 149269. If I look here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/server/core.c
I see the change. Is viewcvs screwed up
Jeffrey Burgoyne wrote:
I'm using least connections with an Alteon on a recently installd system.
Least connections, whil eperhaps crude, is one of the most effective
methods for load balancing.
The general reason is that over the long haul, it will be putting
conenctions onto those mahcines which
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: stoddard
Date: Fri Dec 3 04:20:12 2004
New Revision: 109667
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=109667
Log:
Add mod_arm4 to the modules page
Modified:
httpd/site/trunk/docs/modules/index.html
Modified: httpd/site/trunk/docs/modules/index.html
Ok,
Stas Bekman wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:24:29 -0500, Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there some doc explaining the usage of signal handlers under
different
mpms?
No, although I would suggest the following ;)
/* @tip Don't use signals in your own modules. Apache
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
nuke it?
So this is incorrect?
- The MPM does not set a SIGALRM handler, user code may use SIGALRM.
It can use it if it knows what it's doing.
Too much rope Cliff, too much rope. :-)
A mod_perl module that's
expected to work on
Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:11:34 -0500, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ScriptSock directive must be used when there are two instances of
the server with same ServerRoot. If it is omitted, symptoms may
include
. wrong credentials for CGIs
. CGIs stop working for one
Brian Pane wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
A thread per-connection that is currently being processed.
Note that this is not the traditional 'event' model that people write
huge papers about and thttpd raves about, but rather a hybrid that
uses a Worker Thread todo the processing,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 11:03 PM 11/19/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Friday, November 19, 2004 8:01 PM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll offer compelling argument. Allen offered patches, which
Roy vetoed, to fix object sizes on 32/64/64 ILP bit platforms,
and
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 08:23 AM 11/20/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Nov 20, 2004, at 12:03 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
So, my opinion is that we let Allen branch apr off now and let him go at it at a measured pace, but we shouldn't intend to hold httpd 2.2 for that. -- justin
+1. Of
Paul Querna wrote:
So, we are nearing a new stable branch. For the first time in a long
time we will have a no-longer-developed-but-stable-branch in wide use.
(2.0.x)
I would like to have a semi-official policy on how long we will provide
security backports for 2.0 releases.
I suggest a
Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
I have attached a small filter module that strips leading whitespace
from text files. This would typically be used to remove the indenting
whitespace found inside HTML files, resulting in a significant reduction
in network traffic for some sites.
I didn't bother
Nick Kew wrote:
A first step would be to take
each component in there and establish up-to-date records of responsibility
for every component listed there.
-1
This is not corporate development. Folks are here to serve their own needs, scratch their own itches. Folks
will look at what is important
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi all,
Justin and I have been up all night again working on the httpd-*
conversion. We've come to about 10% of loading the final dumpfile
and then we run into some issues.
We think we've sorted that out now and are restarting the load
(in a test repos). Loading takes quite
Paul Querna wrote:
Is there any reason to keep libpcre in the httpd tree?
I believe we should use the PCRE installed on the system. If its not on
the system, the user can install it. There are several bugs from 3rd
party modules that also try to use pcre, and get conflicting symbols
because
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I'm finally taking care of the conversion of httpd-* to SVN.
I'll follow up with instructions on how to pull new workingcopies,
etc etc. I'm looking for volunteers to actually write a page
for developers on where to get SVN and how to check out the
sources from the SVN
Joe Orton wrote:
+/* Now NUL-terminate the string at the end of the line;
+ * if the last-but-one character is a CR, terminate there */
+if (last_char *s last_char[-1] == APR_ASCII_CR) {
last_char[-1]... yack, that's just nasty syntax if you ask me.
Bill
Jeff Trawick wrote:
At best, ap_sock_disable_nagle() is of limited use (just call
apr_socket_option_set and log if it fails), and at worst it hides
information (no retcode) and has no information to know
when/where/what to log. So yank it.
+1
Also:
Change httpd so that a connection-oriented nagle
Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 01:39:20PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
+/* Now NUL-terminate the string at the end of the line;
+ * if the last-but-one character is a CR, terminate there */
+if (last_char *s last_char[-1] == APR_ASCII_CR) {
last_char[-1
Jeff Trawick wrote:
I'm gonna puke if I see another connection-oriented error message with
no client IP.
Am I missing something basic, or is there really no reason NOT to have
ap_log_cerror()? It seems so obvious.
before:
[Fri Oct 29 06:56:16 2004] [info] (32)Broken pipe: core_output_filter:
Graham Leggett wrote:
Roman Gavrilov wrote:
In my opinion it would be more efficient to let one process complete
the request (using maximum line throughput) and return some busy code
to other identical, simultaneous requests until the file is cached
locally.
As anyone run into a similar
Rüdiger Plüm wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:55 AM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[..cut..]
Well the process is not quite so structured by design, but yes, I
plan to
propose we backport these into 2.0 (in time for 2.0.53) and I'll do
commit the
changes to the main branch (aka. Apache 2.1) and Bill Stoddard backports
them to the Apache 2.0 branch.
So the fixes for 21492 and 30278 will be part of 2.0.53 if Bill finds
time to backport them to the
the Apache 2.0 branch before 2.0.53 is released?
Well the process is not quite so
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:17 PM -0400 Bill Stoddard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
This little gem causes a regression. Because cache-handle is left
NULL,
we never cleanup stale entries in the cache (in cache_save_filter).
Once
1 - 100 of 744 matches
Mail list logo
