On 11/28/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/29/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
It might be worthwhile looking at the serializablity contracts in
[resources]. I don't know if there is interest.
Maybe, depends what you come up with :-)
snap/
OK, unless
I believe Jakarta Commons (especially the sandbox) is one of the
wonderful playgrounds we have under the Apache umbrella. Having
started a sandbox project recently, I continue to be amazed by the
Commons community and its responsiveness in day-to-day operations.
I'm also seeing a trend that is a
Recently, while looking at a codebase that uses Commons Chain, I was
drawn to the top commit message for ContextBase [1].
I'm interested in knowing what the developer (and user too) opinions
are on this topic. Has anybody made any progress on this?
Does anyone have a preference among -
* Keep
On 11/30/05, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oddly enough, I have spent the last week point five
working on a similar setup at $work. My syntax is
slightly different (extended I would say). If this
proposal is accepted in principle, I could query my
boss whether we could make any
On 11/30/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/30/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently, while looking at a codebase that uses Commons Chain, I was
drawn to the top commit message for ContextBase [1].
I'm interested in knowing what the developer (and user too
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sheesh, the release process has gotten much hairier since I last did it!
5 hours and I'm still not all the way there. And this was supposed to
be a simple release.
Phooey.
I decided that that easiest way to do this simple release fixing ONLY
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory Winston wrote:
statcvs and svn dont work together (yet)...
http://www.researchkitchen.co.uk/blog/archives/13
I just turned off the statcvs report last time.
where do you do that? Project.xml?
snip/
Yup, for this project.xml
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
okay, made it down to step 12 now.
* Update Jakarta News Page Add a standard news item announcing
the release to the current Jakarta news page. Look for the page whose
name covers today's date in the site/xdocs/site/news directory. For
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pls disregard. I figured it out.
snip/
Yup, noticed that as I clicked send to the earlier email. I think
you've a typo, the id for the net 1.4.1 news item should be 20051203.1
(instead of 2005203.1)
-Rahul
Steve Cohen wrote:
okay, made it
On 12/3/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know what is actually meant by 'not default' here ?
snip/
I was wondering about that myself, I read the The Problem part of
the wiki page but [collections] seems to fit The Plan.
Maybe those non default comments on the wiki page
On 12/1/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some thoughts on the site.
snip/
B] Clicking on sandbox.
1) There are many projects which have become dormant. How should we be
changing the site?
2) Corresponding Wiki page needs changing [my fault :) ]
snap/
I tinkered with one of
, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The current sandbox page [2] (and therefore Commons home page as well)
list them together, would there be any interest in separating the
dormant components so the website actually matches
On 12/3/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/3/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
okay, made it down to step 12 now.
snip/
However, there is no such file since 2nd quarter of 2005, and the
index.xml mentions that this has now been retired, and the apache site
now
On 12/4/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My attempt to help the next person in line avoid the same confusion
(by updating step 12) is available as 37779 [1].
-Rahul
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37779
Applied. You know, you can do this yourself ;-)
Please see three responses consolidated in one email below -
On 12/4/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
I've posted a version of the Commons website in my ~
snip/
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/
snap/
The Jakarta Commons project is composed
On 12/5/05, Barnett, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've developed a version of SCXML that matches the spec's semantics more
closely (no superstep, single event queue, internal and external events
treated identically, etc.)
snip/
This is great, thanks.
I am not going to check it in right
On 12/5/05, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Logging on via ssh -1 works.
Does apache accept protocol 2 ssh keys?
snap/
Atleast the RSA one, AFAICT.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
I've refreshed the Commons website according to recent discussions.
TODOs:
1) Dormant components revival (website says [1] we need a VOTE
according to the sandbox pruning proposal [2]). Any objections?
2) There are 6 links under View Source Code Repository, a bit of a
clutter. Hen was to check
On 12/5/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've refreshed the Commons website according to recent discussions.
snip/
Oh, and therefore, yell at me if you notice any regressions ;-)
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Please allow me to suggest taking these questions to legal-discuss@
Though there may be many subscribed to this list who are quite well
informed about licensing, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is probably not a good forum
for these discussions.
Marked OT.
-Rahul
On 12/6/05, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL
On 12/6/05, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, that list isn't open to non-committers except by invitation...
could a committer possible repost there my query for me, and of course by
extension any resulting answer? Unless anyone wants to extend an
invitation ;)
snip/
On 12/6/05, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
I probably wouldn't choose a component in the sandbox to start off with.
If I were you, I'd start with one of the more popular commons components
from the proper. You might try Collections, Lang, BeanUtils, or Digester.
Those are the
On 12/6/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will be giving a 15 minute speech on Commons at Javapolis, I titled it
'new and upcoming at commons'
Now there is very little I can really cover in 15 minutes, but does
anyone have any comments?
snip/
Thanks for asking.
At present
-0
RandomDataTest#testConfig() assumes SUN will be available as a
provider for the SHA-1 PRNG. Depending on your JDK, this may cause
test (and therefore, build) failures (as it did on one of my
machines). I understand this is *not* a [math] issue, but IMO, it will
be good if the test case can
On 12/9/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll try and get to the latter ones by then.
snip/
Exec has been published [1] (as you must be well aware, no doubt), it
just needs a blurb (I recently added it to the menu bar on the
left, so notice the sandbox entity in the About Us menu has
On 12/9/05, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Exec has been published [1] (as you must be well aware, no doubt), it
just needs a blurb (I recently added it to the menu bar on the
left, so notice the sandbox entity in the About Us menu has Exec
listed
On 12/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: psteitz
Date: Sat Dec 10 13:22:28 2005
New Revision: 355783
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=355783view=rev
Log:
Removed test dependency on SUN security provider.
Reported (and patched) by Rahul Akolkar.
Bz #37862
snip
+1
I would, however, like to see the deprecations issued in IO 1.1
removed from the fileupload 1.1 sources. A (minor) patch to that
effect is available for consideration in bugzilla, item 37865 [1].
-Rahul
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37865
On 12/11/05, Martin Cooper
On 12/10/05, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Just talked with Leo. We can drop the direct links and just use viewcvs.
The big problems are:
a) cvsgrab tool, which is effectively a viewcvs scraper
b) using viewcvs for the site. ie) not publishing the site and just
hooking the
+1
-Rahul
On 12/12/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problems reported with math 1.1 RC4 have been fixed. I would like
to call for another release vote, based on the release candidate
available here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-math/1-1-rc5
Release notes are
On 12/14/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what the official process is, but I propose it should be
possible for anyone to move it from dormant to sandbox (and back to
proper in accordance with the sandbox rules).
snip/
As listed in the sandbox pruning proposal [1] and
On 12/17/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We seem to be converging on a standard (mentioned in
/releases/release.html as an ASF standard, but I can't find it
documented anywhere) for md5 checksum files that takes the form
hash *name
I am curious as to where the extra stuff comes
On 12/18/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is automatically generated, so if you are in a project.xml somewhere in
commons-proper you should already end up there..
snip/
Thanks, I know you discussed this, I somehow didn't keep up with that
thread. I'm not listed in any
On 12/19/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Checked again, and it works now! So I am +1 for the release.
No one else?
snip/
FWIW, I will express my non-binding opinion by the end of the week, if
this vote is still open.
Should I delay the release until all the discussion
On 12/19/05, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I tried to open the PowerPoint version in PowerPoint 2003 SP2, it
immediately had an error.
snip/
I know. Distilled to PDF below:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/StephenColebourne_JakartaCommonsJP05.pdf
Stephen - Can you host
On 12/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a proposed release date for v1.0 for the scxml stuff?
snip/
Thanks for the nudge :-) An hour or so ago, I added a brief roadmap to
a Commons SCXML 1.0.0 release on the Apache wiki. That is here:
On 12/19/05, 中西 俊光 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Sir.
I noticed, commons-feedparser is hidden by
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/index.html.
but, http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser/ is available.
snip/
That just means no one cared to submit a feedparser description for
the
I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
in SVN, but it will be nice to have that :-) These are not in the
externals for trunks-proper either.
* combo/
Was this concept ever put in motion? (committer list shows Craig and Hen)
* docs/
Much of the stuff under docs/
On 12/20/05, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/20/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I lack the background for a couple of directories under commons proper
in SVN, but it will be nice to have that :-) These are not in the
externals for trunks-proper either
On 12/21/05, Andrea Alberto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am willing to start contributing to some project at the
jakarta-commons and this could be a good possibility.
I have java experience but no experience as a developer on RSS (but I
think this is not a big problem).
snip/
Thanks a lot
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I also said on the PMC list, I am not particularly interested in
development on feedparser, though I am willing to apply patches (if they are
complete with testcases).
snip/
Thanks for stepping forward Martin, I have no background
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Yeah I know... Was just assuming dormant mode already for my offer,
snap/
OK, I did miss that critical point earlier :-)
On 12/21/05, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not about finding a release manager, but
As Robert has indicated before [1], it seems appropriate that sandbox
graduation proposals surface on the dev list before any formal VOTE
thread.
I'd like to propose moving SCXML to Commons Proper. Various data
points that motivate me -- in no particular order -- are:
* Commons SCXML is being
On 12/21/05, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many active developers are there for SCXML?
snip/
I believe you mean Commons committers?
I have done most of the development since Commons SCXML was created.
Other Commons committers who have expressed interest in participating
(in the
On 12/19/05, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one else?
snip/
Hi Mario -
Three source files in [vfs] depend on [compress], which is a sandbox component.
I am not sure what Commons policy is about releasing components with
dependencies on unreleased components. Is this OK?
-Rahul
On 12/23/05, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/21/05, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
* Martin Cooper (see Project team page, played a key role in the
creation of the SCXML component)
Well, I suggested that it might make a good Commons component - and I still
think
On 12/23/05, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a look around SCXML 1 or 2 months ago and liked the idea of it,
although I don't currently have a use for it. It is/was my intention to get
more familiar with the code in the new year and help out where I can -
having said that I'm
+1
On 12/27/05, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like we do not have sufficient committer support to move
[feedparser] to a release at this time. We should therefore move this
component to sandbox/dormant.
Votes, please. The vote will close in 72 hours.
Here is my +1
trunks-sandbox [1] now looks a bit odd to me.
Hen - Did you mean to put csv under trunks-sandbox?
Brett - Did you mean to put the m2 (site) stuff under trunks-sandbox?
Neither follows the branches, tags, trunk directory organization
(commons-build does that as well).
Thanks for getting both of
On 12/29/05, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Brett - Did you mean to put the m2 (site) stuff under trunks-sandbox?
yes, at least for now. It's a little more expedient for getting things
up and going and its not in anyone's way - but we can move it later. My
On 12/30/05, Mark Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been trying to get around the wiki to fix a typo and am unable to
get my password info mailed to me (it just shows blank). Could someone
direct me to who to consult for this info?
snip/
Mark -
FWIW, I had my info emailed to me without a
Based on a recent discussion [1], the contents of the combo directory
[2] -- combo probably doesn't qualify as a component -- belong in
dormant, rather than proper.
Lets move combo to dormant. This vote will remain open for atleast 72 hours.
I'd insert step 2.5 below ...
On 1/1/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate it if some more svn-knowledgable folks could verify
the following sequence of steps to move a component - in this case
[feedparser] to dormant. I want to do this with minimal noise, but
obviously
On 1/2/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go for it, Rahuland THANKS!
snip/
Bah, no problem, will wait to see if there is consensus on combo first.
Doc-ing process somewhere - probably Wiki at first would be great.
snap/
Yup, will do. We have this page already for one specific
+1
-Rahul
On 1/2/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on a recent discussion [1], the contents of the combo directory
[2] -- combo probably doesn't qualify as a component -- belong in
dormant, rather than proper.
Lets move combo to dormant. This vote will remain open for atleast
This vote has passed.
8 +1 (PMC: martinc, craigmcc, psteitz, mvdb, brett, bayard;
Committers: joehni, rahul)
No other votes.
I'll move [1] combo (as well as feedparser) to dormant by the end of my day.
-Rahul
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MovingComponents
On 1/2/06, Rahul
JEXL developers -
Any objections to me adding myself to the JEXL component?
I will be starting small -- fixing typos and broken/obsolete links and
republishing the website etc. Over time, I'm looking at adding to the
JexlContexts and JexlExprResolvers. For example, some ideas include:
* A
On 1/9/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good to me!
+1
snip/
Cool. I'll give this thread the rest of the week before moving forward.
-Rahul
On 1/10/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JEXL developers -
Any objections to me adding myself to the JEXL component
It is time for a promotion vote for Commons SCXML [1], whose initial
project proposal is archived here [2].
A proposal for the promotion of this component that contained a
release plan [3], was posted about 3 weeks ago, and that thread is
archived here (amongst other places):
On 1/12/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
- Jörg
BTW: How do you search the archives for [id]? All engines drop the square
brackets and the hit list gets worthless ...
snap/
Seems to vary per mail archives site, this one seems OK:
] email when I'm
back.
-Rahul
Mvgr,
Martin
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
It is time for a promotion vote for Commons SCXML [1], whose initial
project proposal is archived here [2].
A proposal for the promotion of this component that contained a
release plan [3], was posted about 3 weeks ago
+1
(for the record)
-Rahul
On 1/12/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is time for a promotion vote for Commons SCXML [1], whose initial
project proposal is archived here [2].
A proposal for the promotion of this component that contained a
release plan [3], was posted about 3
There was a veto against this vote, and hence, this vote has failed.
-1 mvdb (PMC, hence veto -- primary reason: lack of support from
other Commons' developers)
+1 rahul (Commons committer)
No other votes.
-Rahul
On 1/12/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is time for a promotion
Based on Martin's (mvdb) veto against the recent promotion vote for
Commons SCXML, it is obvious that lack of Commons' developers'
interest (other than mine) for this component bothered some of us. In
that light, Tim's interest towards an SCXML release indicated in his
recent posts (pending his
On 1/13/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the mean time, if you have browsed through Commons SCXML and have
suggestions for improvement, let me know. Careful, that might risk
making you a believer though ;-)
I'll see if I can free up some time to dig into it, but
On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF
to join the W3C, but
we're currently not a Member organization.
snap/
FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
an example where we're
On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
1. SCXMLSerializer
Right now the code to serialize an SCXML object is a Visitor pattern that
constructs XML using a
series of StringBuffers. The code to read this XML document alrady uses a
straightforward set of
Digester rules and
On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
2. Decouple Execution Context from the SCXML Model
Right now, the Context passed into the class that parses the XML and creates
the SCXML object is
the global execution context. You pass in a JexlContext when you are parsing
the SCXML
On 1/17/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add mine to the mix just for the record
+0 at this time, I don't anticipate this not making it out of sandbox, but
I'd like to help solve
the only one committer issue before we promote.
snip/
Cool, feel free to add yourself to the project POM
The email exceeded the maximum length I myself am comfortable with
when it comes to list emails, so I've spawned new threads for the two
technical topics to keep message size manageable. But a couple of
things are discussed here as well.
On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm
Thanks for sharing your views below with us Joe, hard to beat real
applications for driving home a point or two.
-Rahul
On 1/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A real application...
We're very keen to build a solution for a trade workflow and documentation
system which does
On 1/17/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tip : make some noise about your component, to get more attention and users
Eg write in javalobby or
an article on developerworks or something ?
snip/
Its all pure signal, no noise ;-) An article is a decent idea, though
what is needed
On 1/17/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rahul,
Rahul Akolkar wrote on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:03 AM:
Based on Martin's (mvdb) veto against the recent promotion vote for
Commons SCXML, it is obvious that lack of Commons' developers'
interest (other than mine
, though the members only sections interest me, and may possibly
be of interest to others as well. I'll ask.
-Rahul
paul
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the
ASF to join the W3C
On 1/18/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul, my emails are a tad long, eh? Apologies in advance.
snip/
Nah, that was a comment about the length after *I* replied to your
email, and subsequently found it better to fragment it out into bite
size chunks in separate threads.
3. Is
On 1/18/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
2. Decouple Execution Context from the SCXML Model
snip/
Most of your observations are correct. We need effective cloneability
On 1/18/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remembered there was a discussion about membership of the w3c. A quick search
gave me only this
though :
http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2001/board_minutes_2001_10_17.txt
snip/
Cool, looks like this isn't the first
On 1/18/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
* We need to reading in arbitrary document fragments (digester has a
NodeCreateRule)
* Reading and splicing in external documents refered to via src
attributes (you've already answered
On 1/18/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/18/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Cool, looks like this isn't the first time someone thought about this
(as I was fully expecting). Need to find the right people at either
end to see if we can make any further
On 1/19/06, Peter Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to the list
snip/
Welcome!
and would like to get involved in
this project.
snap/
We're always looking for help :-)
I was wondering if you could tell me
where to get more information SCXML other than the
website. Are there any
On 1/19/06, Tim OBrien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Even if a state is associated with a context it doesn't necessary mean that
there needs to be a
relationship with an actual context item.
I guess this is a case of wellwouldn't it be helpful to be able to
participate in that
On 1/14/06, Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by TimObrien:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/SCXML/SCXMLFaq
snip/
Tim -
On 1/21/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the site generated by maven could do with some improvements before the
release. here's a brief list (but could do with a general review):
1 junit report - this should be replaced by a note explaining that maven
cannot run the JCL unit
On 1/21/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
2 javadocs warnings and errors - these need to be eliminated
These are already gone.
snap/
I see 3 warnings, so does this page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/javadoc.html
I get a clean slate after the related patch
On 1/21/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
I see 3 warnings, so does this page:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/javadoc.html
I get a clean slate after the related patch here:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38344
Can
On 1/22/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to run maven site to build the logging website but cannot
get this to work.
Using maven 1.0.2, I get failures in the xdoc plugin:
output
xdoc:jelly-transform:
[echo]
Generating
On 1/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rdonkin
Date: Sun Jan 22 15:26:41 2006
New Revision: 371420
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371420view=rev
Log:
Upgraded version number in preparation for cutting first candidate
Modified:
Steve -
While there are multiple people on this list who are probably
well-informed enough to answer the questions below definitively, I'd
also ping legal-discuss@ which might have a better demographic for
these kind of posts.
-Rahul
On 1/22/06, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josejuan
Re-org'ed a bit of the Commons SCXML repository over the weekend based
on some discussion on this list. The result is here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/scxml/apidocs/
Any comments about further improvements to the source code layout or
better class names etc. are welcome. I plan to
On 1/22/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commons validator serves two functions:
1) To provide validation routines
2) To provide a mini validation framework
I'd like to more clearly separate out these two aspects, so as a first step
in this process I have created a new routines
On 1/22/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've uploaded RC1 to http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging/.
please check and test the release candidate and report any mistakes or
problems.
you'll probably notice that the jars are numbered 1.1 (not 1.1RC1 as is
more
I ;-) But 1.4 may be too high for validator, which is why I
asked the question.
-Rahul
David
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
The next stage would be to move other validators (i.e. credit card,
ISBN,
Email
On 1/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Folks -
Sincere apologies if this seems to be in the way of anyone doing the
real work. There are jars out there marked 1.1, and I'm not
comfortable with this. I'm aware of the httpd/struts/tomcat process,
but we need
On 1/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: bayard
Date: Mon Jan 23 08:12:55 2006
New Revision: 371566
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=371566view=rev
Log:
Adding doap files for each component for the projects.apache.org site
snip/
Lets do the sandbox projects
On 1/23/06, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory Winston wrote:
Ive come across the com.sun.* issue before. They are part of the JVM, just
not officially documented for public use. Usually, they are convenience
classes written by Sun programmes who develop the JDK. AFAIK, Sun says
On 1/24/06, Martin van den Bemt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On general @ jakarta Henri mentioned that the BCEL version was generated from
the project.xml. I
assume he did that with these doap files.
I hope that Henri didn't mean generated by hand from the project.xml.
It should be pretty easy
On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
which version of Maven and the xdoc-plugin is necessary to build the site of
a component? Building for commons-id, I just get:
== % ===
xdoc:jelly-transform:
[echo]
Generating
I'm proposing to move some content around on the Commons wiki.
Motivating factors are:
* Discourage amorphous growth on one or two pages
* Distribute content over already existing pages (some of which are
mostly abandoned)
* Reduce the number of orphaned pages, aim for better wiki navigation
On 1/24/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 20:42 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 1/24/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
xdoc-plugin is 1.8
snap/
Try 1.9.2. Some folks have begun adding a specific version dependency
to the POM (marked site
On 1/28/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
The nightly source code build distributions for Proxy include its
dependencies. I am not sure, but I don't think we're supposed to do that,
are we?
snip/
While I'm unaware of the specifics of [proxy] (is there any particular
reason for
101 - 200 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
