gt; > prefix setters with "set", so I think we could use void reason(final
> > > > > > String reason).
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 1:48 PM Luke Chen wrote:
> > > > > > >
&
gt; > > Hi David,
> > > > > > Thanks for the KIP!
> > > > > > It is good to have the joinGroup/leaveGroup reason sent to brokers
> > for
> > > > > > better troubleshooting.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-b
brokers
> for
> > > > > better troubleshooting.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > Luke
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shap
; > > > Thank you.
> > > > Luke
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for d
on sent to brokers for
> > > better troubleshooting.
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > > Luke
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira >
> > > wrote:
> > >
)
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Luke
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:14 AM Gwen Shapira
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks for driving David. Super useful.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8
useful.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:53 AM David Jacot
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-800: Add reason to LeaveGroupRequest.
> > >
> > > KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/eYyqCw
Hi Mickael,
Yes, I briefly considered it. I was trying to stay inline with the
`enforceRebalance`
method. On second thought, it was likely the wrong way to look at it as we
already have the optional members in `RemoveMembersFromConsumerGroupOptions`
so adding another optional `reason` field there
Hi David,
Thanks for the KIP, it looks like a useful addition.
You propose adding a new method removeMembersFromConsumerGroup(String,
String, RemoveMembersFromConsumerGroupOptions) to Admin.
Have you considered keeping the existing method and instead add the
reason to
Hi David,
Thanks for the update.
Just voted! :)
Thank you.
Luke
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:42 PM David Jacot
wrote:
> Hi Luke,
>
> Good point. I have renamed the KIP.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:28 AM Luke Chen wrote:
> >
> > Hi David,
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> >
4, 2021 at 8:53 AM David Jacot
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-800: Add reason to LeaveGroupRequest.
> >
> > KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/eYyqCw
> >
> > Please let me know what you think.
> >
Hi Luke,
Good point. I have renamed the KIP.
Thanks,
David
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 4:28 AM Luke Chen wrote:
>
> Hi David,
> Sorry for the late reply.
> Thanks for the update. It looks good now.
> I love the idea to add joinGroup request reason, as well as the
> `enforceRebalance` API!
>
> One
Hi David,
Sorry for the late reply.
Thanks for the update. It looks good now.
I love the idea to add joinGroup request reason, as well as the
`enforceRebalance` API!
One minor comment, since we extended the original KIP from leaveGroup to
joinGroup request, Could you please update the KIP title
+1
Thanks for driving David. Super useful.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 8:53 AM David Jacot
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-800: Add reason to LeaveGroupRequest.
>
> KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/eYyqCw
>
> Please let me know what you thi
Hi folks,
I'd like to start a vote on KIP-800: Add reason to LeaveGroupRequest.
KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/eYyqCw
Please let me know what you think.
Best,
David
I have updated the KIP.
Best,
David
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 3:00 PM David Jacot wrote:
>
> Thank you all for your feedback. Let me address all your points below.
>
> Luke,
> 1. I use a tag field so bumping the request version is not necessary. In
> this case, using a tag field does not seem to
Thank you all for your feedback. Let me address all your points below.
Luke,
1. I use a tag field so bumping the request version is not necessary. In
this case, using a tag field does not seem to be the best approach so
I will use a regular one and bump the version.
2. Sounds good. I will fix
This sounds great, thanks David.
One thought: what do you think about doing something similar for the
JoinGroup request?
When you only have broker logs and not client logs, it's somewhere between
challenging and
impossible to determine the reason for a rebalance that was triggered
explicitly by
Thanks David, this is a worthwhile improvement. Quick question, why did we
pick a tagged field here?
Ismael
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, 8:32 AM David Jacot
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'd like to discuss this very small KIP which proposes to add a reason
> field
> to the LeaveGroupRequest in order to let
Hi David,
Thanks for the KIP.
It makes sense to me.
Some comments:
1. Should we bump the `LeaveGroupRequest` protocol version to 5?
2. the description in the new field: "about": "The reason" -> "about": "The
reason why the member left the group"
3. For the `removeMembersFromConsumerGroup` case,
Hi folks,
I'd like to discuss this very small KIP which proposes to add a reason field
to the LeaveGroupRequest in order to let the broker know why a member
left the group. This would be really handy for administrators.
KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/eYyqCw
Cheers,
David
21 matches
Mail list logo
