Hey Sharan,
> how hard would it be to create a release?
For Kibble-1, cutting out a release in terms of ASF should be pretty easy
(create release tag in Github, prepare sources, verify and vote). For the
old version we should probably also release kibble-scanners. Tricky part
can be if we would l
As far as I know Apache Kibble was never released. I would propose
using Github milestones to track future releases of new Kibble:
https://github.com/apache/kibble/milestone/1
Tomek
On Sun, 23 May 2021 at 16:00, Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> Thanks to all who helped review our Board report.
at 7:10 PM Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> > Hi All
> >
> > Does anyone have any feedback on the work Tomek has done around this so
> > far? Are people happy with the suggestions or do you have anything else in
> > mind?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
>
implementation of some their metrics...)
>
> My understanding is that first three each have different repos so perhaps we
> could think about managing the roadmap at that level..
>
> I will have a bit more time later this week - so let me see if I can refine
> or iterate on this
gt; Community changes, past quarter:
> - Michał Słowikowski was added to the PMC on 2021-05-03
> - Tomasz Urbaszek was added to the PMC on 2021-05-03
> - Kaxil Naik was added as committer on 2021-02-21
>
> ## Project Activity:
> Since the last report we have welcomed a new commit
Congrats Michał! 🚀
On Mon, 3 May 2021 at 16:23, Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Congratulations Michael 👏
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021, 15:11 Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone
> >
> > I'd like to announce that the PMC has invited Michal to become a member
> of
> > the PMC and once again I am happy to confirm
+1 for using Github issues and projects for managing/tracking - it
works pretty well in Apache Airflow.
Also I'm definitely in favour of defining a roadmap. I think top level
points on such a roadmap should correspond to some big milestones we
would like to achieve as a community but they also sho
Big kudos for that Sharan! Talking about community state is super
important and may bring some new Kibble contributors.
Tomek
On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 18:51, Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> Here is what I submitted.. and feedback is always welcome :-)
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> -
Congratulations Sharan!
On Sat, 1 May 2021 at 22:39, Fourat ZOUARI wrote:
> Congrats Sharan 👍💞, looking forward for a lot of news from this project.
>
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 3:42 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Sharan 👏
> >
> > On Sat, May 1, 2021, 15:22 Sharan Foga wrote:
> >
>
It's possible. In multiple places we use 365 instead of a precise
number. Even the metric is only an estimation not a precise number due
to using 30.45 as month length (the only explanation for it I can
think of).
https://github.com/apache/kibble-1/blob/debb80d400f03af69b65cb43ce00978b1177217b/api/
>From my side there is this discussion about new architecture:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6e948e670495aaa4a7d1e27850edf1d0868a33de03c6e3f6f41dd80b%40%3Cdev.kibble.apache.org%3E
I believe that consensus for how we want to structure the API is
crucial to move things forward. Once we have
Sharan, it would be awesome if you could upload the thesis to ciwiki.
I would love to read it!
Thanks a lot,
Tomek
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 18:13, Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> At Apachecon@Home last year Myrle Krantz did a talk on Vendor Neutrality with
> some suggestions on how it could be
Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone had time to review those documents?
Maybe we should start developing new Kibble and do the decision making
as we go to avoid overhead of excessive planning?
Cheers,
Tomek
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 at 18:43, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
>
> After thinking a bit
ke it
harder to grow the community and develop the app. But I'm not sure if this
should block us from using GQL.
T.
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 at 17:07, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I prepared a draft of Open API specification that we may use to build new
> Kibble API:
> https:
22:07:36, Fourat ZOUARI wrote:
> > > Hi Tomek, Sharan, Added some suggests to the doc
> > >
> > > Thx, Fourat
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:53 PM Tomasz Urbaszek
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Sharan!
&g
Congratulations Kaxil!
T.
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 at 10:53, Sharan Foga wrote:
>
> Hi All
>
> The Kibble PMC has invited Kaxil Naik to become a committer on the project
> and we are happy to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Kaxil on his new role.
>
> Thanks
> Shar
; Hi Tomek, Sharan, Added some suggests to the doc
> >
> > Thx, Fourat
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 1:53 PM Tomasz Urbaszek
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Sharan!
> > >
> > > I already prepared the project structure together with
t;
> I am still waiting on feedback from infra regarding the repo rename so will
> follow up on that again today as it would be good to get started with the
> new version.
>
> And yes - interesting to see popularity increasing :-)
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 2021/02/20
Hi all,
I drafted some proposal of Kibble 2.0 design decisions:
https://s.apache.org/kibble-2-0
This is a google docs - I found those much easier to work with than
confluence. But once we have something that we accept I will move it
to cwiki.
Please feel free to add all your ideas and concerns!
st in the
> >>>> previous discussion. So has anything happened regarding this?
> >>>>
> >>>> I took a quick look and I don't have access to the repo settings to do
> >>>> the rename so maybe it is something we need to ask infra t
Hi folks,
I created a 2.0 branch in apache/kibble (just for sanity sake if we would
like to reuse some code) and I restored the main branch to some commit
before breaking the refactor.
Can someone of you rename apache/kibble -> apache/kibble-old and then
create apache/kibble repo (as discussed ea
Thanks Kaxil for the notes!
Should we create a new repo called something like apache/kibble-2 or should
we rename existing one to apache/kibble-old and then create a new, fresh
apache/kibble?
Best,
Tomek
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:55 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Please ignore the last bullet around "
Great! FYI the calendar link seems to not work :<
Tomek
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 6:34 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
> Let's do it then :) -- Looks like Thursday - Jan 7, 2021 at 2-3 PM GMT is
> suitable for all those who replied on Doodle.
>
> Call Link: https://meet.apache.org/BetterHalvesSenseAround
>
I think this is a good idea. Thanks Kaxil!
Tomek
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:56 PM Kaxil Naik wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was talking to Daniel and Tomek on Slack that it would be awesome to have
> a DEV call to discuss the future of Apache Kibble.
>
> I am one of the committer, PMC Member and Rel
Congrats Michał!
Tomek
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 4:39 PM Sharan Foga wrote:
> Hi All
>
> The Kibble PMC has invited Michał Słowikowski as new committer to the
> project and are happy to announce that he has accepted.
>
> Welcome and congratulations Michał!
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
+1 to use 3.9 as base python. Python community hints that they will drop
support for old version faster than now, so the 3.6py is going to be the
"old" one soon.
Tomek
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:02 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 21/10/2020 10.42, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
> >
native type hints from python 3 for data
validation as well as generating OpenAPI spec.
Tomek
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 9:02 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
>
> Thanks for the replies!
>
> > I'm not too concerned about breaking API, we _could_ make the next one a
> > version
a Pony Factor but dont think it is complete. Anyway
> lots of ideas to keep us going!
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
> On 2020/10/18 14:28:33, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I would like to propose a few things that I think are worth considering:
>
Hello all,
I would like to propose a few things that I think are worth considering:
1. Merge all three repositories (kibble, kibble-scanners,
kibble-docker) into one. In this way I think we may simplify
development, dependency management, and distribution. Our project is
rather small and increasi
Hello,
Quite recently Github introduced a new repository access level called
"triage role":
https://infra.apache.org/github-roles.html
As described on that page:
> It is a good role for people who are interested in supporting and
> contributing to the project, but who are not ready to be Committ
me to move it on as a next step I would like to
introduce auto-adding of ASF licenses to avoid files without them.
Cheers,
Tomek
On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 4:16 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
>
> As an addition to that, we would like to introduce Github Actions as CI for
> Apache Kibble project. T
As an addition to that, we would like to introduce Github Actions as CI for
Apache Kibble project. The PR is ready:
https://github.com/apache/kibble/pull/47
However, it will require asking infra team to turn on the Github Actions
for our project. Can I ask a committer to open the issue?
Bests,
To
Hello all,
It seems that I have some problems with local installation of Apache
Kibble, please see the issue:
https://github.com/apache/kibble/issues/38
I also opened Pr with a small improvement to README:
https://github.com/apache/kibble/pull/35
Bests,
Tomek
I think this could be a very good way to get things started so would be
> willing to support this. What do others think?
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
--
Tomasz Urbaszek
Polidea | Software Engineer
M: +48 505 628 493
E: tomasz.urbas...@polidea.com
Unique Tech
Check out our projects!
34 matches
Mail list logo
