RE: AW: slf4j and myfaces

2009-06-09 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Start voting? ;-) From: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 11:45 AM To: MyFaces Development Subject: Re: AW: slf4j and myfaces yes the -1 vote would be a veto in view of slf4j - no agreement - we would vote about jul. or as mario suggested -

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Werner Punz
Michael Concini schrieb: All, I thought it might be a good time to raise the issue of solidifying a plan for the MyFaces 2.0 alpha release now that we've had a little time to work with the release candidate draft of the spec. What are the thoughts in the community with respect to what

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Werner Punz
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hey mike, I agree that we should try to get an *alpha* out of the door. Full ack, I personally think the biggest priority for now is to get a working release so that we can start to test and fix the entire thing. As for now we have a load of parts, many of them

Re: Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread jankeesvanandel
Hi, The end of my extremely busy project is near, so I should have more time to work on MyFaces. My last work was on the annotation processing stuff, but AFAIK, Leonardo has continued this work. @Leonardo: What's the current state? Something else, some weeks ago, there was a discussion

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Concini
Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done as part of the Google Summer of Code? I seem to recall some discussion around this awhile back (don't have time to dig through the mailing list archives right now to check). Does anybody remember what the plan was with

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Curtiss Howard
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Werner Punzwerner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: Hey mike, I agree that we should try to get an *alpha* out of the door. Full ack, I personally think the biggest priority for now is to get a working release so that we can start to test

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Werner Punz
Michael Concini schrieb: Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done as part of the Google Summer of Code? I seem to recall some discussion around this awhile back (don't have time to dig through the mailing list archives right now to check). Does anybody

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Michael Concinimconc...@gmail.com wrote: Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done as part of the Google Summer of Code?  I seem to recall some discussion around this awhile back (don't have time to dig through the mailing list

[Trinidad]Share static data between web-projects

2009-06-09 Thread Ricardo Rog
Hello, I‘m using two web-projects with trinidad. I want both projects to have the same style, but with only on file for .css and for each image. What I don’t want is to duplicate the files and copy them around the different projects. I tried to extract the files that should be shared

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
regarding tree visitor, this may help: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368 -Matthias On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Werner Punzwerner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Michael Concini schrieb: Wasn't there a plan to have some of the partial tree traversal work done as part of the

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Werner Punz
Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: regarding tree visitor, this may help: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-1368 Thanks for the link, I will get it and compare it to what I have... I assume there wont be too much which I still can integrated in the PartialVisitContext since I am

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Simon Lessard
Hi, On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part within 2 weeks, fater than that is impossible for me atm. Regards, ~ Simon On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias Wessendorf schrieb: regarding tree visitor, this may help:

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Ganesh
Hi, Facelets are apache 2.0 licensed, why do we reinvent them? Best regards, Ganesh Simon Lessard schrieb: Hi, On my side I'll try to work and finish Facelets part within 2 weeks, fater than that is impossible for me atm. Regards, ~ Simon On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Werner Punz

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Ganeshgan...@j4fry.org wrote: Hi, Facelets are apache 2.0 licensed, correct why do we reinvent them? they added stuff for JSF 2.0 e.g. composite:interface etc (but didn't put it into the Apache licensed version) Best regards, Ganesh Simon Lessard

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Simon Lessard
We use the Facelets codebase, we just have to rename the package (already done), use the HandlerDelegate ... thing ... and implement the Facelets VDL. Those are not part of standard Facelets with existing ASL 2.0 code. ~ Simon On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf

Re: [MyFaces 2.0] discussion on alpha plans

2009-06-09 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Good to hear that facelets part will be committed soon. I hope to start working on javax.faces.behavior api and continue contribute on other parts of myfaces core 2.0 (for example implement partial state saving) as soon as tomahawk be released (planned on next week). regards Leonardo Uribe

[jira] Commented: (TOMAHAWK-1108) MultipartRequestWrapper doesn't handle request parameters correctly in JSF 1.2/JSP 2.1

2009-06-09 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12717773#action_12717773 ] Leonardo Uribe commented on TOMAHAWK-1108: -- Thanks a lot to Ben Smith for

[jira] Resolved: (TOMAHAWK-1108) MultipartRequestWrapper doesn't handle request parameters correctly in JSF 1.2/JSP 2.1

2009-06-09 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leonardo Uribe resolved TOMAHAWK-1108. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.9-SNAPSHOT Assignee: Leonardo

Re: [VOTE] Release Tobago 1.0.21

2009-06-09 Thread Volker Weber
Hi, +1 regards, Volker 2009/6/8 Udo Schnurpfeil u...@schnurpfeil.de: Hi, here is my +1 Regards Udo Bernd Bohmann schrieb: Hello, I would like to release Tobago 1.0.21 For a detail list please consult the release notes:

[VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are currently using commons-logging. so e.g. trinidad isn't affected. details are available at [1] if there won't

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+0.75 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Gerhard Petracekgerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are currently using

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Michael Concini
+1 Gerhard Petracek wrote: hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are currently using commons-logging. so e.g. trinidad isn't affected. details are

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Curtiss Howard
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Gerhard Petracekgerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are currently using

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Mike Kienenberger
+1 On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Curtiss Howardcurtiss.how...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Gerhard Petracekgerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a

Re: AW: slf4j and myfaces

2009-06-09 Thread Gerhard Petracek
here [1] you go! :) regards, gerhard [1] http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--jul-instead-of-commons-logging-td23948865.html 2009/6/9 Mario Ivankovits ma...@ops.co.at Start voting? ;-) *From:* Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Saturday, June 06, 2009 11:45 AM

AW: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Mario Ivankovits
+1 Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:gerhard.petra...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 09. Juni 2009 20:33 An: MyFaces Development Betreff: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Cagatay Civici
-0.5, I like slf4j :) Regards, Cagatay On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are currently

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Hazem Saleh
+1 for JUL. On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Cagatay Civici cagatay.civ...@gmail.comwrote: -0.5, I like slf4j :) Regards, Cagatay On Jun 9, 2009, at 7:32 PM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Manfred Geiler
+0.5 I like SLF4J as well, but I won't get in the way of JUL. Never used JUL myself, so I don't know for sure if there might be any hidden quirks. ;-) --Manfred On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 20:32, Gerhard Petracekgerhard.petra...@gmail.com wrote: hi, short description: this first vote is about

Re: Problems compiling a modified version Tomahawk for JSF 1.2

2009-06-09 Thread Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes
Ganesh, I downgraded my maven to version 2.0.9 but I still can't have my changes compiled. I'm trying to change the org.apache.myfaces.shared_tomahawk.renderkit.html.HtmlRendererUtils class and package it with maven. This class is located in my

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-1318) Add itemLabelEscaped, itemDisabled attributes to t:selectItems

2009-06-09 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-1318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leonardo Uribe updated TOMAHAWK-1318: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.9-SNAPSHOT Assignee: Leonardo

Re: Problems compiling a modified version Tomahawk for JSF 1.2

2009-06-09 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi This file is on shared project: svn repo: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/shared/ link to find site : http://myfaces.apache.org/otherProjects.html Tomahawk unpack shared code and add it, so if you want change this file, you have to follow this steps: 1. Checkout, make the update and

[jira] Updated: (TOMAHAWK-596) Duplicate id exception for HtmlDataScrollerRenderer

2009-06-09 Thread Leonardo Uribe (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMAHAWK-596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Leonardo Uribe updated TOMAHAWK-596: Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.9-SNAPSHOT Assignee: Leonardo Uribe

Re: Problems compiling a modified version Tomahawk for JSF 1.2

2009-06-09 Thread Ramiro Pereira de Magalhaes
Guys, thanks for helping. It worked just fine. Is this written somewhere? I can write about it if you point me where the appropriate place is. RPM Leonardo Uribe wrote: Hi This file is on shared project: svn repo: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/shared/ link to find site :

Re: [VOTE] jul instead of commons-logging

2009-06-09 Thread Werner Punz
+1 Gerhard Petracek schrieb: hi, short description: this first vote is about the switch from commons-logging (cl) to java.util.logging (jul). it's a binding vote for the next releases of all myfaces libs which are currently using commons-logging. so e.g. trinidad isn't affected. details