Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-14 Thread Werner Punz
+1 Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/

Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-14 Thread Grant Smith
+1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.com wrote: +1 Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:

Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-14 Thread Leonardo Uribe
+1 2011/1/14 Grant Smith work.gr...@gmail.com +1 On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Werner Punz werner.p...@gmail.comwrote: +1 Am 13.01.11 19:21, schrieb Michael Freedman: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Michael Freedman
Looks like I don't have a LICENSE/NOTICE file in the TCK svn project. As this distributable is just a zip of the svn project, it explains why you aren't seeing the files. Turns out this is a holdover from Bridge 1.0 TCK which has already been released and lacks the LICENSE/NOTICE files. Let

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
there is a reason . the bits are no maven artifacts, so there is no need to deploy them to central (and we never did that). Michale, using your private URL is fine; Once the release is done, we will continue the regular process. where the bits 'just' got deployed to the MyFaces (Portal TCK) site

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a JIRA which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can include it. I'm not sure how feasible this is, given that the TCK needs to run against a native portal environment, but I certainly wouldn't be

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Would be a nice improvement -M On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Scott O'Bryan darkar...@gmail.com wrote: Matthias and I spoke offline a bit and I think it merits writing up a JIRA which would allow us to have stuff in the repo so that projects can include it.  I'm not sure how feasible this

[RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Michael Freedman
Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/ http://people.apache.org/%7Emfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip has been verified to

Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/. The zip

Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Michael Freedman
+1 On 1/13/2011 10:21 AM, Michael Freedman wrote: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on: http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge-tck/jsr329-1.0.0/

Re: [RE-VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-13 Thread Scott O'Bryan
+1 Good work Mike On 01/13/2011 11:31 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: +1 On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Appropriate NOTICE/LICENSE files have now been added to the TCK project and a distributable has been built and is hosted on:

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-12 Thread Leonardo Uribe
Hi Checking the distributables, I have seen that there is no LICENSE / NOTICE on the parent folder or in META-INF folder. Is that correct? In comparison, the files for portlet bridge 2.0 (portlet-bridge-2.0.0-src-all.zip) does have it. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2011/1/12 Matthias Wessendorf

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-12 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Leonardo and Matthias, Can Nexus host distributables only? There should be no repository entries associated with this project. It's run from maven directly so this distributable should simply be a zip of the svn source tree (without the svn directories). Scott On 01/12/2011 03:00 PM,

[VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-11 Thread Michael Freedman
Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK. This is the final version of the JSR 329 TCK and corresponds to Portlet 2.0 Bridge for JavaServer Faces 1.2 specification which was finalized/approved by the JCP last month. Note: The TCK is designed to be built and

Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK

2011-01-11 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
was there any reason why you didn't use Nexus for the release procedure? MyFaces (sub)projects agreed to use this.. On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Michael Freedman michael.freed...@oracle.com wrote: Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0 TCK.  This is the final