Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

+1 - the signature was verified - the checksums match - contents of source zip matches https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans-jackpot30/tree/master/cmdline tag: netbeans-jackpot-11.0-vc1 - source code compiles and results in a usable package - basic tests were also done with the

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 1:24 PM Matthias Bläsing < > mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > wrote: > > > Hi Jan, > > > > Am Sonntag, den 07.04.2019, 11:30 +0200 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > > I'd like to release the standalone Java Hints tool ("j

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans Standalone Java Hints Tool 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 1]

Hi Jan, Am Sonntag, den 07.04.2019, 11:30 +0200 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > I'd like to release the standalone Java Hints tool ("jackpot") based on > Apache NetBeans 11.0. could you please give a sample how to use it. I now managed to build it after some fiddeling, but I don't see how to use it.

Re: plugins.netbeans.org / netbeans.org

Hi, Am Samstag, den 06.04.2019, 16:22 +0200 schrieb Christian Lenz: > Oracle hosted them by there own with there own little webapp to have > a list page and a detail page, why not making it by our own? For > example with OracleJET frontend? If that is more work, of course it > is more work, why

Re: ? about development

Hi Brad, Am Freitag, den 29.03.2019, 13:43 -0600 schrieb Brad Walker: > I'm interested in helping w/ development. So I was thinking that I could > fix some of the "low-hanging" issues that would be easy for me to complete. > This would also help me with learning the process. > > There are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 11.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

Vote: +1 Source: - checked signature - verified sha512 - compared with the referenced git tag, differences are in unreleased modules/expected - build runs cleanly and results in a runnable IDE Binary - checked signature - verified sha512 Thank you Matthias Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2019, 00:41

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache NetBeans 11.1 Development

Hi, Am Montag, den 25.03.2019, 18:23 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > I have been thinking differently about this ‘capacity’ item. In summary, I > think it will be easier to release 4 times per year than 2 times per year, > precisely because of the capacity item. Dealing with smaller

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache NetBeans 11.1 Development

Hi Laszlo, Am Sonntag, den 24.03.2019, 14:29 -0700 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > While we are doing the voting round, I think we need to think about > NetBeans 11.1. > > Are we planning continue do cherry-picking into the release branch for > 11.1 or do something more sophisticated? I mean

Re: [PLUGINS] http://plugins.netbeans.org down

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 24.03.2019, 15:29 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Sure, but you don’t need that in order to try out vc4. Just go ahead > without it for the moment. > > Gj just a suggestion: the netbeans javac plugin could be published to maven central. While central is also not perfect,

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project

+1 Am Montag, den 11.03.2019, 11:47 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Hi all, > > After a discussion amongst the Apache NetBeans community on the dev > mailing > list[1], voting on a PMC chair[2], checking the podling status > page[3], and > working through the maturity model[4], I would like

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans 11.0 Release Blockers

Hi, Am Samstag, den 09.03.2019, 13:59 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > Hi, > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:50 AM Matthias Bläsing > wrote: > [snip] > > > > > NETBEANS-1819 Incorrect License Headers in Test Sources > > > > (https://i

Re: Status of Apache NetBeans 11.0 Release Blockers

Hi, Am Samstag, den 09.03.2019, 08:44 +0100 schrieb Jan Lahoda: > > NETBEANS-2126 Ant Web Application project - missing reference > > javaee-endorsed-api-7.0 > > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2126) > > > > I do not know how much this counts as a blocker, I hope there is an easy

Re: Revert Fragments for libs.javafx with JavaFX 11 implementation #917 (was: Re: Apache NetBeans 11.0 has been Branched!)

ílatel Jaroslav Tulach < > jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> > napsal: > > > -1 (e.g. veto) to the revert proposal. > > > > Dne středa 20. února 2019 1:03:36 CET, Matthias Bläsing > napsal(a): > > > Hello all, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] PMC chair for Apache NetBeans

+1 Am Freitag, den 01.03.2019, 08:28 -0600 schrieb Glenn Holmer: > This voting thread is to confirm Geertjan Wielenga as the first PMC > chair of NetBeans as we leave incubation and begin our journey as a > top-level Apache project. As an Oracle employee, Geertjan has been in > a > unique

Re: [PLATFORM] nbm-maven-plugin:4.1:manifest failed. IllegalArgumentException

Hi Patrik, I think I saw a similar problem with recent JAXB versions. If I remember correctly, the problem happend when the plugin scanned the jar for classes. I assume, that it failed to parse class files build for JDK >= 9 (Placed in the META-INF directory). Maybe that helps Matthias Am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans (incubating) parent pom 1

Hi Eric, thank you for your work. For the pom.xml, I vote: +1 reasoning: * LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER file is present and correct * contents of the pom.xml looks reasonable: * the parent pom of apache is referenced * groupId is in the apache namespace * description looks good * url is

Revert Fragments for libs.javafx with JavaFX 11 implementation #917 (was: Re: Apache NetBeans 11.0 has been Branched!)

Hello all, Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2019, 20:01 +0100 schrieb Matthias Bläsing: > Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2019, 10:44 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > BTW, as we are not really going to release this build and that would be > > true for the next one. > > Shall we play the rel

Re: Bug and solution with Maven Dependency Check Out

Hey Mark, Am Montag, den 18.02.2019, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Mark Herkrath: > at least under Windows 10 and Maven 3.5.4, the handy Check Out... feature > at [Maven project] > Dependencies > [artifact] > View Artifact Details > > Project > Source Control Management > Check Out... is broken. After

Re: Apache NetBeans 11.0 has been Branched!

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2019, 10:44 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > BTW, as we are not really going to release this build and that would be > true for the next one. > Shall we play the release dance and upload everything to the staging > area and create vote threads? we can skip this. We

Re: Source Code Pro as the default font for the Editor?

Hi Laszlo, Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2019, 22:31 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > > What do you think about using a standard font like Source Code Pro > as the default font for Editor? > I think that fonts are a highly subjective matter, that depends on OS, screen and preferences). I for

Re: What to do with features for EARs and EJBs?

Hi, Am Montag, den 28.01.2019, 21:06 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > OK, OK, let's assume everyone continues to say 'keep it', the question is > how do we call those categories, one is right now 'Java Web' and the other > 'Java EE', does that still make sense? In the referenced blog entry, I >

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 2019.03

Vode: 0 Am Freitag, den 25.01.2019, 19:51 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > Dear all, > > Well, it is time to finalize out version scheme for a while. There > will > be three voting threads created on this topic with subjects: > > * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11 > * [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11

Vote: 0 Am Freitag, den 25.01.2019, 19:50 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > Dear all, > > Well, it is time to finalize out version scheme for a while. There > will > be three voting threads created on this topic with subjects: > > * [VOTE] Apache NetBeans Version Number: 11 > * [VOTE]

Re: Javadoc for 9 and 10

Hi Antonio, Am Sonntag, den 20.01.2019, 12:33 +0100 schrieb Antonio: > Let's encrypt certificates are now set up. > > These are "chain certificates" for both netbeans-vm.apache.org and > bits.netbeans.org. Firefox doesn't like it, but Chrome doesn't mind. > thank you for your work! Its great

Re: took about three minutes of use to break netbeans-10-0

Hi Kent, Am Mittwoch, den 16.01.2019, 11:25 -0500 schrieb Kent Dorfman: > I have been very hesitant to upgrade from the Oracle netbeans to the > apache version but decided to try it today (10.0). Took me all of > three minutes of use to crash it. opened the plugins list and > switched to

Re: Where is `Oracle JS Parser Implementation` built from?

Hi Emilian, Am Freitag, den 11.01.2019, 22:35 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > We suggest the plugin in NetBeans, but I don't know where the source > for it is. > > The plugin we point to is > http://plugins.netbeans.org/plugin/74901/oracle-js-parser-implementation > > I suspect it used to be part

[CVE-2018-17191] Apache NetBeans 9.0 Proxy Auto-Configuration (PAC) interpretation is vulnerable for remote command execution (RCE)

CVE-ID -- CVE-2018-17191 Summary --- NetBeans Proxy Auto-Configuration (PAC) interpretation is vulnerable for remote command execution (RCE) Versions Affected: -- - Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 - NetBeans releases before the Apache transition started may be also

Re: [GROOVY] Activation of unit tests on Travis / Jenkins

Hi Sven, Am Freitag, den 05.10.2018, 00:42 +0200 schrieb Sven Reimers: > All unit tests in groovy.editor should pass. > > Is there already a best practice way to enable such tests on Travis > / Jenkins? > > Would really like to have them running as part of the normal > workflow. at some point

Re: Gradle Support for Apache NetBeans

Hi, Am Samstag, den 29.12.2018, 21:36 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > Probably we shall switch to jcenter as default to turn to. we should discuss downloading dependencies again. But switching to JCenter won't help: https://jcenter.bintray.com/org/gradle/gradle-tooling-api/ does not list

Re: Cannot build NetBeans from source

Hi Peter, Am Samstag, den 29.12.2018, 20:20 +0100 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: > Thank You for Your answers! My problem is slightly more complex: NB > has > been able to compile its own sources most of the time, and IMHO it > should be able to do that. The necessity of working around a buggy >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

Hi Emilian, Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2018, 09:49 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > I was just grep-ing for GPL and found > ./platform/o.n.core/licenses/LICENSE.txt which mentions that > > > The Common Development and Distribution License > > (CDDL), Version 1.0 governs your use of: > > NetBeans

Re: Installer for NetBeans bundled with the JDK

Hey Geertjan, Am Sonntag, den 23.12.2018, 13:17 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > > Just like the NetBeans binaries, an installer (bundled or not), is a > convenience binary. > The installer might be bundled (if build from donated code). A JDK (that was Emilians question) is a different

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

Hey Neil, Am Dienstag, den 18.12.2018, 17:59 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > Minor niggle - one failure in RAT report, but *not* a license issue > (webcommon/javascript2.jquery/external/jquery-api.xml) please ensure, that you run the rat report on a clean source tree. The file you are refering to

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

Hi Emilian, Am Mittwoch, den 19.12.2018, 09:49 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > The DEPENDENCIES, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files look fine but I am > mildly annoyed that the NOTICE file mentions 'IntelliJ IDEA Community > Edition' for a single file (SmoothScrollPaneUI.java) which is under > Apache 2.0.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 5]

The following is from memory (will not be back to notebook till tomorrow night). Point 1: The .java file is ALv2, but not donated to the Apache foundation (adapted from Idea if I recall correctly). We need the licenseinfo.xml for the notice file, but could suppress ALv2 output in license

Re: OSGi support for maven-based plugins

Hi again, Am Samstag, den 15.12.2018, 23:24 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > I believe Peter was asking for an open-source project related to > NetBeans (Platform) that uses successfully OSGi dependencies. ok, maybe this is nearer to the question: https://github.com/redminenb/redminenb that is

Re: OSGi support for maven-based plugins

Hi, Am Samstag, den 15.12.2018, 22:04 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > I have not heard of any open-source projects with OSGi modules... > JDeveloper uses this but I believe it's proprietary. Glassfish/Payara are JavaEE/JakartaEE servers using OSGI. if I'm not mistaken Eclipse is also using OSGI

Re: How to easily switch branches with all the schemas in enterprise/ ?

Hi Emilian, Am Dienstag, den 11.12.2018, 15:51 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > > I see a lot of DTDs and such in the enterprise cluster. > > This makes it hard to switch to another branch since git complains > that: > > > error: The following untracked working tree files would be > > overwritten

Re: Subscription Request

Hello Jeff, Am Freitag, den 07.12.2018, 17:23 + schrieb Jeff Lanham: > subscribe please follow the advise here: http://netbeans.apache.org/community/mailing-lists.html The correct address to subscribe to dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org is dev-subscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org

Re: Rhino in NetBeans Platform?

Hi Geertjan, I'm mobile right now and won't get back to my main maschine till thursday, so I'll make it brief. The discussion happened in the private@ mailinglist. Please see the discussion around the PAC interpretation there. Thank you Matthias Am 4. Dezember 2018 10:18:08 MEZ schrieb

Re: [PPMC] We need volunteers for NetBeans lists moderation (+ [MENTORS] , want to step down?)

Hello Bertrand, Am Montag, den 26.11.2018, 13:56 +0100 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz: > As per https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/netbeans it looks like > it's only Geertjan and mentors who are moderating the NetBeans > mailing lists for now. > > In view of the project's graduation I'd like to

Re: netbeans warning..

Hi, Am Montag, den 26.11.2018, 19:51 +0200 schrieb Emilian Bold: > * at least one warning seems interesting and a potential bug: > > > WARNING [nativeexecution.support.logger]: [931 ms.] > > UnixHostInfoProvider: > > sed: -e expression #1, char 6: unterminated `s' command Agreed, that would be:

Re: 10-vc5

Hi, Am Samstag, den 24.11.2018, 10:35 -0800 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > Hi all PR-973 broke HTML5, PHP. Going to revert the patch from > release100 please wait and give Svatopluk some time to react - else I see the next one voting -1 because the old Javascript parser is bundled (with GPLv2- CPE

Re: How to work on Apache NetBeans sources

Hey Lars, the NetBeans top-level directory layout was incompatibility changed. Before the change all modules were at the top-level directory, after the change, the modules were moved into a per-cluster directory. You need NetBeans 9 to open the modules. HTH Matthias Am Samstag, den

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Netbeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 4]

Hi, Am Freitag, den 23.11.2018, 18:12 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 at 17:57, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > Recommendations for next release — (1) include nb-javac > > installation as > > part of the NetCAT test specs, to catch related problems early, > > Well, only one of

Re: WildFly plugin

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 21.11.2018, 10:41 +0100 schrieb ehsavoie: > > It seems that the plugin is relying on LGPL 'code' (the XML schema from > JBoss) and as such the code produced by parsing them is considered LGL :( > My understanding is that this makes the plugin LGPL and as such it can't be >

Re: Amazon Corretto

Hi Zoran, Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2018, 11:59 +0100 schrieb Zoran Sevarac: > Would it be possible to provide Net Beans binary distribution together as > Corretto, as it was before with Oracle JDK? > With Gosling there , he is probably using NetBeans and he may be willing to > support that. at

Accessing/Uploading to netbeans.osuosl.org (was: Re: External Libraries)

Hi, Am Freitag, den 02.11.2018, 19:54 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Right, we should be using OSUOSL now. (How does one say that out loud, by > the way.) And we need to document that. > > > On Friday, November 2, 2018, Antonio wrote: > > > > > AFAIK we're not using hg.netbeans.org for

Re: JavaDB?

Hi John, Am Dienstag, den 23.10.2018, 22:20 +0200 schrieb John Kostaras: > No JavaDB support anymore? *Services (tab) -> Databases -> JavaDB *you > cannot start any server any more, while expanding the *Drivers* node there > no driver for JavaDB. I 'd expect that installing *Java EE Base* plugin

Re: Per-cluster repo layout loose ends

Hi Eric, Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2018, 17:25 +0200 schrieb Eric Barboni: > New layout make git repo clearer, great job. > I just have an issue on "ant clean" (failing at a time build > is cleaning platform/openide.util.lookup module) is this target > supposed to work ? it normally does.

Re: Build binaries hosting (was Re: Jenkins Builds)

Hi, Am Montag, den 24.09.2018, 21:02 +0200 schrieb Antonio: > Let me ask about some -ilities of the solution... :-) > > - Security > I undrestand we are checksumming all binaries, so if any OSUOSL > student > decides to tamper with the binaries we'll know. Agreed. And based on my experience

Re: Jenkins Builds

Hi Geertjan, Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2018, 21:13 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Antonio wrote: > > > It seems this is an SSL related problem [1]. Maybe this is due to > > domain > > donation? > > > > > Will try to find out. it would be great if you could

Re: downloaded binaries questions

Hi Glenn, Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2018, 13:12 -0500 schrieb Glenn Holmer: > 1) Where is the format of the external/*-license.txt file documented > (e.g. ide/db.drivers/external/postgresql-9.4.1209-license.txt)? There is no formal documentation I'm aware of. If you are interested in the code, that

Re: Public vs. Friend API Reloaded (Summary)

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 23.09.2018, 19:23 +0200 schrieb Peter Nabbefeld: > > I think that having a reasonable documentation was traditionally > > one of the > > requirements for a public API modules. (I doubt csl.api went > > through the > > API review process.) > > > > (next sentence is meant to

Re: build error

Hi, Am Samstag, den 22.09.2018, 10:39 -0500 schrieb Glenn Holmer: > I'm trying to build the current NetBeans sources from scratch, but > get > this error: > > Could not download > D6330851B59C33A3A8D98C86FF438F23DD3B4267-ant-misc-1.10.4.zip from > http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries/ ... Connection

Re: [VOTE] Accept donation Mojohaus NetBeans Maven Utilities

Hi, some might get a bit grumpy after I write this, but for me this is currently a: -1 The reasoning: Oracle is in a pretty good situation regarding the donation of the netbeans source base to the ASF. At least since I'm aware of netbeans, Sun and Oracle both required major contributions to be

Re: Run on JDK8, compile on JDK11

Hi Eric, Am Montag, den 03.09.2018, 16:35 +0200 schrieb Eric Barboni: > This is nice. Derby module as the same utility usage of Holder. also covered here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/833 Greetings Matthias

Re: JDK requirements for building NB

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 21.08.2018, 12:41 -0700 schrieb Chuck Davis: > Quite right and eloquently put, Scott. > > If people don't want the feature-set of JDK9 continue using NB8.2. For > those of us who want the feature-set (in particular HTTPClient) of JDK11 we > need NB11 sooner rather than

Re: css.lib Css3Parser antlr grammar

Hi Jack, Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2018, 10:55 -0600 schrieb Jack Woehr: > Matthias, thanks ... > > I was looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-747-7 > 47 ... So > I should wait until this file appears in the tree to attend to that > issue. > > Is this correct? sorry - I'm

Re: Existing license headers of template files

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 14.08.2018, 11:21 +0900 schrieb Junichi Yamamoto: > If an existing template file has the license header, how should we > handle it? (see [1]) > Just change it? or Remove it from the template, then exclude from > rat? > > AFAIR, almost all template files don't have the

Re: css.lib Css3Parser antlr grammar

Hi Jack, Am Mittwoch, den 08.08.2018, 10:40 -0600 schrieb Jack Woehr: > Bedankt, Geertjan ... So we are now waiting for Oracle to donate > before > that file can appear in the tree? yes, the file needs to be officially donated, then the version, that is in the repository needs to be bootstrapped

Re: Error updating version in pom.xml

Hi, Am Freitag, den 27.07.2018, 19:55 + schrieb Kenneth Fogel: > I have just added this to jira but I'm curious if anyone else noticed > this in 9.0 vc3. > > When editing the pom.xml file: > 1.5 in any place in a pom.xml. > Type a period in front of the existing period and I get a list of >

Re: Error updating version in pom.xml

Am Freitag, den 27.07.2018, 23:41 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Or maybe, thanks to the changes in that PR, the current issue > reported by Please don't jump to conclusions. The issues are not identical and the changeset is not the cause of the new bug. Before the referenced changeset an

Re: Error updating version in pom.xml

Hi Gj, Am Freitag, den 27.07.2018, 23:30 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Absolutely, I'm not disagreeing with you at all, in fact it's 24.00 here > and I am trying to identify where the problem is coming from. a similar problem (corruption of XML structure)

Re: Contrib repo & Community Plugin Repo

Hi Tim, Am Mittwoch, den 25.07.2018, 12:06 -0400 schrieb Tim Boudreau: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:34 AM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > PS: Just for the record, Oracle doesn't relicense anything at all > > to > > Apache. Instead, Oracle donates code to Apache, and we together, > > here in > >

Re: Undo squashed commits

Hey, in theory you could rewrite history and force push an update, but that will break all commits on top of that. I would create a revert patch, that restores the branch to its previuos state. History looks a bit more complicated after that, but that should not break others work. In general

Re: Next release can be put together, volunteer for next release manager needed.

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 19.06.2018, 13:53 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > We're coming very close IMHO to the final release of Apache NetBeans 9.0, > i.e., the Java SE IDE (without the 2nd donation code, which is now very > close to being here but we shouldn't wait for that, i.e., JEE,

Re: [Mentors] Re: What is nbbuild/licenses/ for? Too many files there.

Hi Emilian, Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2018, 15:24 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > 1. The files in external/*-license.txt have everything we need. They > also have the 'License:' header. I don't know why the files from > nbbuild/licenses are used for the summary when we could use the files > from

[Mentors] Re: What is nbbuild/licenses/ for? Too many files there.

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 17.06.2018, 14:57 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > But the 'License:' header already represents a 'family'. That's why > MIT-validator should not exist in nbbuild/licenses: it's just the > plain MIT license with a particular author. beware! The file from licenses is used for the

Re: What is nbbuild/licenses/ for? Too many files there.

Hi Emilian, Am Samstag, den 16.06.2018, 02:38 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > I think we are starting to have too many files in nbbuild/licenses/ > > The way I understand it, inside $module/external/$somelib-license.txt > we have the actual license of the external dependency and we add a > header

Re: Questions about contributing code and developing on top of Platform 9.0

Hi Dmitry, Am Freitag, den 15.06.2018, 11:02 -0700 schrieb Dmitry Avtonomov: > Just wanted to point out that: > 1) The Netbeans project is potentially loosing lots of people who would > have liked to contribute, but can't find a way how. the insight is good, so you obvisually went through this

Re: NetBeans Build and the binaries-list hash

Hi Josh, Am Freitag, den 15.06.2018, 10:41 -0500 schrieb Josh Juneau: > Thanks for the responses. Yes, after I clone, I simply run ant. I > just performed a new clone to test the issue again, and here is > example of the hash update: > > Download of B9BBF5BF22E1B8603F312F6E02ABC6267996B38A- >

reviews.apache.org - git integration?

Hello, I just looked at review board and the first thing I'm asking myself: How do I start a review based on a git branch? "New review request" requires me to upload a diff, that is not what I want. This leads me to the question: As a committer I could push a branch into the netbeans apache

Re: Microsoft buys GitHub

Hello all, Am Mittwoch, den 06.06.2018, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Chuck Davis: > If Git is the tool of choice I say let Apache set up it's own Git > repositories for Apache projects. it would be great if the noise on this list could get down. You obviously did not read the Email from Bertrand

Re: AW: Postgres JDBC driver

Hi, Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2018, 08:59 -0500 schrieb Glenn Holmer: > On 05/30/2018 06:18 AM, Josh Juneau wrote: > > +1 to including a "Driver" plugin update center. > > Couldn't we just get them from Maven Central (with the appropriate > license confirmation dialog)? Do we already have code that

Re: Postgres JDBC driver

Hi Glenn, Am Dienstag, den 29.05.2018, 08:16 -0500 schrieb Glenn Holmer: > > I'd like to work on this. I'll have lots of questions, but I want to > learn the NetBeans internals. I'm studying "NetBeans Platform for > Beginners" and the API docs on netbeans.org. > > I had a look at NETBEANS-170

[Mentors] Assembling NOTICE for ASF dependencies

Hello all, I was looking into: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-827 My first impression was: Everything is correct. The NOTICE file for commons-net reads: -- Apache Commons Net Copyright 2001-2017 The Apache Software

Re: Postgres JDBC driver

Hey Glenn, Am Montag, den 23.04.2018, 06:22 -0500 schrieb Glenn Holmer: > The Postgres driver shipped with NetBeans is several years old. Any > chance that could be updated for 9.0? I'm not sure when I'll have time to look at this. I doubt, that it will make it into Netbeans 9.0. I opened

Handling of "non-modifiable, but redistributable" third party artifacts

Hey all, we have artifacts we will need to distribute, but (potentially) can't hold in the repository. Apache has a statement on this: https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#no-modification I consider this bad practise, as it means the project will depend on potentially fragile third party

Developers on MacOS, please have a look at: [NETBEANS-438] Cannot Sign Platform app due to symlink (#440)]

95ceb0063 73b10630d9cfe423b16b2b92cf0001171a22bc92a169ce11fe11e1@reply.github .com> An: apache/incubator-netbeans <incubator-netbe...@noreply.github.com> Kopie: Matthias Bläsing <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu>, Mention <mention@n oreply.github.com> Betreff: Re: [apache/incubator-netbeans] [NETBEANS-438] Cannot Si

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

[Resend incuding gene...@incubator.apache.org] Hi Ate, Am Montag, den 21.05.2018, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Ate Douma: > a) nbbuild/licenses folder still has the GPL license file, which I > thought/expected no longer should be needed with the fix from > NETBEANS-305 [1]? > Is there still a GPL usage

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Hi Ate, Am Montag, den 21.05.2018, 14:54 +0200 schrieb Ate Douma: > a) nbbuild/licenses folder still has the GPL license file, which I > thought/expected no longer should be needed with the fix from > NETBEANS-305 [1]? > Is there still a GPL usage left? If so this then could be a blocker > IMO.

Re: [Hibernate] - Issue Netbeans-171

Hi, Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:56 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Here's the current state relating to Hibernate in Apache NetBeans > (incubating): > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3a616160163bd55fa036c409281cac34 > c0fbc317b534b47f6699d96a@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E some more

Re: NETBEANS-312: how to fix patches removing license headers?

Hi, I added my evaluation to the bug and created a related PR. Greetings Matthias Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2018, 10:15 +0200 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga: > Hi all, > > I'd like to get ahead of a discussion we'll inevitable end up in if > we > don't deal with this before we try to do the

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2018, 09:25 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > Not sure why you have to be so adamant about this. Because you try to force your use-case down my throat. Yes I choose my hardware to get my work done and this worked good with netbeans. All I heard till now torpedes this. This is

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2018, 18:59 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > > That would be nice--but how would one dock the TopComponent again > > if there is no tab to right-click or drag? > > Closing the frame would dock the contained TopComponent "back". This breaks current behaviour where closing the

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

Hi, Am Freitag, den 04.05.2018, 21:42 + schrieb Eirik Bakke: > That would be nice--but how would one dock the TopComponent again if > there is no tab to right-click or drag? at this time I'm pretty happy with the way netbeans handles docking. There are already customizations possible for

Re: AW: (Git) Diff Window horizontal space rescue

Hi, Am Freitag, den 04.05.2018, 14:42 + schrieb Eirik Bakke: > On the other hand, I think the Diff panel should remain a regular > TopComponent--those can be undocked, full-screened, moved to different > monitors, and so on. Making it into a Dialog is a step backwards, in my > opinion. But

Re: Tracking Issues, Versions

Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 26.04.2018, 11:18 -0700 schrieb Laszlo Kishalmi: > I'm walking through the open issues with PR-s now. I'm going to mark > their Fix Version to 9.0 if I think that shall be part of that > release. Issues need people working on them if that does not happen, marking them for

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Hi Neil, Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2018, 12:10 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, 09:35 Matthias Bläsing, <mblaes...@doppel-helix.eu> > wrote: > This sounds like something I would be interested in - is there > > indication, that Oracle wants to swit

Re: Snap Packaging of NetBeans

Hi Neil, Am Sonntag, den 22.04.2018, 08:27 + schrieb Neil C Smith: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2018, 07:05 Laszlo Kishalmi, > wrote: > > > Once we can provide our official signed versions the '--dangerous' > > flag > > would not be required. > > > > I've been reading this

Re: Anonymous issue reporting

Hi, Am Dienstag, den 03.04.2018, 20:21 +0200 schrieb Antonio: > > Well, I thought NetBeans did already this this with some exceptions, > sending them to some server that was responsible for classifying them > automatically. Some other IDEs do the same as well. That would be a nice > feature

Re: Anonymous issue reporting

Hey, Am Dienstag, den 03.04.2018, 14:36 +0200 schrieb Antonio: > > I was looking at https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/471 > and thought if it would be possible/desirable to have some anonymous > issue reporting at JIRA, or if we could set up some sort of "generic" > user for

Re: [Oracle] Missing Css3.g file from donation -- suggestion for solution

cess, i.e., that diff > that > you create will be audited and then included in one of the next > donations. > > Gj > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Matthias Bläsing <mblaesing@doppel-h > elix.eu > > wrote: > > Hello Geertjan, > > > >

Re: The Red Sea

Hey Chuck, Am Sonntag, den 01.04.2018, 09:16 -0700 schrieb Chuck Davis: > articipate/submit-pr.html except that > I used NB8.2 to do the Git things. When NB asked if I wanted to open a > project I selected them all and clicked "Yes". After cranking several > minutes nearly all the projects

[Oracle] Missing Css3.g file from donation -- suggestion for solution

Hello Geertjan, I wanted to look into a CSS parser error I saw while working with NB9 and noticed, that one of the most important files is missing: css.lib/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/lib/Css3.g that file holds an antlr3 grammer for CSS 3. That file was not donated and I think the reason is,

Re: Help wanted with fixing NetBeans 9.0 blockers

Hey, Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2018, 13:14 -0400 schrieb cowwoc: > The number of resolved issues over the past 300 days is 0 :) > > In general, the pace of non-infrastructure bugs getting fixed is > still > very very slow (maybe 1 a week). this kind of talk it total unhelpful. Matthias

[Oracle][Infrastructure] hg.netbeans.org rejects connections (was: Re: build error using ant)

Hey Oracle people, if I'm not mistaken hg.netbeans.org is still hosted by oracle. Could you please contact your infrastructure people to see why hg.netbeans.org rejects connections? For example this download should succeed:

Re: AssertionError at org.netbeans.api.visual.widget.Widget.addChild

Hi Efrem, Am Mittwoch, den 21.03.2018, 13:21 -0400 schrieb Efrem Mc: > Hi, yes I can look at. I downloaded the source code at > http://www-eu.apache.org/dist/incubator/netbeans/incubating-netbeans- > java/incubating-9.0-beta/incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-beta-source.zip > > I am not sure if this

Re: try-with-resources and AutoCloseable in our codebase

Hey Emilian, Am Samstag, den 17.03.2018, 07:45 -0400 schrieb Emilian Bold: > I really like how each try-with-resources removes at least 2 lines > (the finally block). Agreed. > And I was just using ProgressHandle the other day which is a perfect > fit for an AutoCloseable resource, so I've

  1   2   >