happened in you build
Regards
Eric
De : Christian Lenz
Envoyé : dimanche 7 avril 2019 11:17
À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Objet : AW: [MENTORS] Apache NetBeans maven artifacts groupId and process
Hey Arsi,
did you tried it with NetBeans 11? Just asking.
Cheers
maven artifacts groupId and process
Ate wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> Thanks a ton for the detailed reply, which makes a lot of sense to me.
>
> Given that, I see no strong argument or reason to further hold up the
(re)quest to keep using org.netbeans for Maven GroupId.
> Assuming of course al
Hey Arsi,
did you tried it with NetBeans 11? Just asking.
Cheers
Chris
Von: arsi
Gesendet: Sonntag, 7. April 2019 09:24
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [MENTORS] Apache NetBeans maven artifacts groupId and process
Hi,
I tried to compile NBANDRIOD-V2 for NB10
are identical to the current ANBxx distribution.
Thanks..
Arsi
*From:* Jaroslav Tulach
*Sent:* Sunday, April 07, 2019 4:06AM
*To:* Dev
*Subject:* Re: [MENTORS] Apache NetBeans maven artifacts groupId and process
Great! I have
;
> I removed the former repository with org.apache.netbeans groupid
>
> Regards
> Eric
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jaroslav Tulach
> Envoyé : vendredi 29 mars 2019 10:26
> À : Apache NetBeans
> Objet : Re: [MENTORS] Apache NetBeans maven artifacts groupId and process
&g
maven artifacts groupId and process
Ate wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> Thanks a ton for the detailed reply, which makes a lot of sense to me.
>
> Given that, I see no strong argument or reason to further hold up the
(re)quest to keep using org.netbeans for Maven GroupId.
> Assuming of course al
Ate wrote:
> Hi Mark,
> Thanks a ton for the detailed reply, which makes a lot of sense to me.
>
> Given that, I see no strong argument or reason to further hold up the
(re)quest to keep using org.netbeans for Maven GroupId.
> Assuming of course all the technical and administrative hurdles with
the both groupid)
-Message d'origine-
De : Ate Douma
Envoyé : lundi 25 mars 2019 22:28
À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Objet : Re: [MENTORS] Apache NetBeans maven artifacts groupId and process
Hi Mark,
Thanks a ton for the detailed reply, which makes a lot of sense to me.
Given
Hi Mark,
Thanks a ton for the detailed reply, which makes a lot of sense to me.
Given that, I see no strong argument or reason to further hold up the
(re)quest to keep using org.netbeans for Maven GroupId.
Assuming of course all the technical and administrative hurdles with
Nexus and Sonatype
Uff, quite a few questions. And really good ones! I try to play devils
advocate.
1) If the ASF owns the NetBeans mark and the netbeans.org domain it doesn't
make any legal difference if we call the groupId org.apache.netbeans or just
org.netbeans. Or even foo.netbeans.
2.) The referenced page
On 25/03/2019 12.59, Mark Struberg wrote:
We did have this discussion over a year ago with Greg Stein.
Back then the blocker was indeed the missing trademarks for 'NetBeans'.
With this resolved there is no legal problem anymore afaict.
Yes, the ASF by default prefers to use the org.apache.*
that are code donation from
codehaus we do a few month ago.
Regards
Eric
-Message d'origine-
De : Mark Struberg
Envoyé : lundi 25 mars 2019 13:00
À : dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Objet : Re: [MENTORS] Apache NetBeans maven artifacts groupId and process
We did have this discussion over a year
We did have this discussion over a year ago with Greg Stein.
Back then the blocker was indeed the missing trademarks for 'NetBeans'.
With this resolved there is no legal problem anymore afaict.
Yes, the ASF by default prefers to use the org.apache.* groupIds. Mostly
because there is no
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:48 AM Ate Douma wrote:
> ...Unless one of the other mentors has a different view or is aware of more
> explicit guidelines in this, I suggest raising these questions at
> tradema...@apache.org instead
+1 and I suggest backing that discussion with a
On 25/03/2019 05.55, Jaroslav Tulach wrote:
Thanks Ate. It is great to hear that using org.netbeans.* groupId is
legally OK and that it is not against any Apache policy.
I didn't draw that conclusion, please don't make it sound as if I did...
Instead, I wrote this:
Legally, I think it
+1000 to this mail.
We've been struggling to make transition as smooth as possible for users
for some years now. Let's continue doing so.
Thanks,
Antonio
El 25/3/19 a las 5:55, Jaroslav Tulach escribió:
Thanks Ate. It is great to hear that using org.netbeans.* groupId is
legally OK and that
Thanks Ate. It is great to hear that using org.netbeans.* groupId is
legally OK and that it is not against any Apache policy.
[APIs are like stars](http://wiki.apidesign.org/wiki/Star) - they are with
us "forever" (or at least until their users/observers are alive). It is the
goal of the
On 19/03/2019 18.34, Eric Barboni wrote:
Hi,
Prior to any process for voting/releasing the Apache Netbeans maven
artefacts would be sure on one point. We may use groupId
org.apache.netbeans or org.netbeans as we have the grant to do so.
It would be easier and more backward compatible
Hi,
Prior to any process for voting/releasing the Apache Netbeans maven
artefacts would be sure on one point. We may use groupId
org.apache.netbeans or org.netbeans as we have the grant to do so.
It would be easier and more backward compatible to use org.netbeans as
groupId for Apache
19 matches
Mail list logo
