OK, it's done: 29334 are relicensed to ASF.
Gj
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> We've been discussing this a while now. I'm going to take the tool and run
> it, relicensing around 29,000, as documented here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.
We've been discussing this a while now. I'm going to take the tool and run
it, relicensing around 29,000, as documented here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetBeans+Transition+Process
I'll then do the push of those changed headers. I'm also on the Infra chat
just in case so
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Neil C Smith
wrote:
> ...Take
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/blob/master/apisupport.wizards/src/org/netbeans/modules/apisupport/project/ui/wizard/wizard/instantiatingIterator.javx
Ok - IIUC that's a template that NetBeans uses at runtime to
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:26 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Neil C Smith
> wrote:
> > ...I assume we wouldn't want the output of
> > them to be under any kind of license?...
>
> As a podling, NetBeans releases are approved by the Incubator PMC, and
> I doubt t
If in NetBeans IDE the user does New/Java Class, then (I think) this
template will be instantiated:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-netbeans.git;a=blob;f=java.project.ui/src/org/netbeans/modules/java/project/ui/resources/Class.java.template;h=e9890cf1ebbfa872259a65b4259e10fd0505
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Neil C Smith
wrote:
> ...I assume we wouldn't want the output of
> them to be under any kind of license?...
As a podling, NetBeans releases are approved by the Incubator PMC, and
I doubt they would approve a release containing files with no license.
See "Source
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:58 AM Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Emilian Bold
> wrote:
> > ...But it's a bit silly no? Any new project based on an Apache sample
> would have to post a notice about the Apache
> > license and include a copy of the license
>
>
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> Pe 21 sept. 2017, la 09:51, Bertrand Delacretaz a
> scris:
>> ...Code produced by the ASF must use the Apache License, so that's not an
>> option here...
> ...But it's a bit silly no? Any new project based on an Apache sample would
> have
But it's a bit silly no? Any new project based on an Apache sample would have
to post a notice about the Apache license and include a copy of the license.
--emi
Pe 21 sept. 2017, la 09:51, Bertrand Delacretaz a
scris:
> Hi,
>
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Emilian Bold
>> wrote:
>> .
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> ...My concern was that sample code should not trigger any licensing
> thoughts. In that light Apache or BSD doesn't matter.
> Since it's designed to be used as a starting point it should be Public
> Domain...
Code produced by the ASF m
Thanks, it was a small fun clean up task.
Gj
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Emilian Bold
wrote:
> Well, that was very effective!
>
> My concern was that sample code should not trigger any licensing
> thoughts. In that light Apache or BSD doesn't matter.
>
> Since it's designed to be used as a
Well, that was very effective!
My concern was that sample code should not trigger any licensing
thoughts. In that light Apache or BSD doesn't matter.
Since it's designed to be used as a starting point it should be Public Domain.
Of course, everybody treats sample code as Public Domain, but that'
OK, done, including references in various supporting files, and did a build
and run to check everything still works and resolved the issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-62
Gj
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Those
Excellent, thanks!
Jan, can you check the license converter into that new repo when it's there?
Gj
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
> wrote:
> > Can someone create a repo for tools for Apache NetBeans, i.e.,
> > i
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> Can someone create a repo for tools for Apache NetBeans, i.e.,
> incubator-netbeans-tools? ...
Should be ready soon, reporeq says: this will create
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-netbeans-tools.git,
notifications will
Can someone create a repo for tools for Apache NetBeans, i.e.,
incubator-netbeans-tools?
Also, can someone verify that the license header pattern is good? We want
to minimize as much as possible the situation where later on someone tells
us we did something wrong and need to do things all over aga
Those specific files, i.e., the samples relating to the NetBeans Platform
(FeedReader, PaintApp, OSGIDemo and maybe another one or two) should simply
be deleted, they're old and out of date and it would simplify things simply
not having them.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-62
I'm
Hi Bertrand,
The tool is currently a zip attached to the wiki - but the zip contains a
git repository, so no history is lost. I just tried to create a new
repository (incubator-netbeans-tools) using:
https://reporeq.apache.org/
but it seems I cannot create such a repository.
Aside for this, any
Could it be a subfolder in this incubator-netbeans? Or a new repo since the
tool will be useful for other NetBeans repos too: incubator-netbeans-tools.
There may be more scripts and things we'll be needing.
Gj
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 15:08, Jaroslav Tulach
wrote:
> On úterý 19. září 2017 15:24:5
On úterý 19. září 2017 15:24:53 CEST Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> > ...I've uploaded an updated version of the tool...
>
> You mean the tool is not in Git? I think it should, maybe using a
> specific "tools" repository.
We don't have
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
>> ...some files in the repository (typically samples) are using 3-clause (if I
>> get that correctly) BSD license...
If those files have been donated to Apache they can be relicensed, and
IMO they should, in order to simplify things.
-B
Good idea.
Can you do this, Jan?
Gj
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 14:25, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> > ...I've uploaded an updated version of the tool...
>
> You mean the tool is not in Git? I think it should, maybe using a
> specific "to
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> ...I've uploaded an updated version of the tool...
You mean the tool is not in Git? I think it should, maybe using a
specific "tools" repository.
-Bertrand
On úterý 19. září 2017 11:33:03 CEST Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> PS: re the samples, I propse we remove the NetBeans Platform samples, e.g.,
> FeedReader. These samples are old and include code and approaches that one
> wouldn't use anymore, e.g., TopComponents manually registered in layer
> instead
PS: re the samples, I propse we remove the NetBeans Platform samples, e.g.,
FeedReader. These samples are old and include code and approaches that one
wouldn't use anymore, e.g., TopComponents manually registered in layer
instead of via annotations. We can recreate some samples easily from
scratch,
Sounds like a plan -- I'll use the tool to convert the licenses to Apache,
push that to Git, and then we'll use Rat to narrow down the remainder.
How does that sound to everyone?
Gj
On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 at 08:50, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> I can try to categorize the files a little, but I was hoping
> As a side note, some files in the repository (typically samples) are using
> 3-clause (if I get that correctly) BSD license
Last time this was a talking point you couldn't tweak the installer
without changing the source code that was under the standard CDDL +
GPL w/ CPE license. So each custom
I can try to categorize the files a little, but I was hoping we could
switch to using Rat to do the checks (after the bulk of the changes are
done). So if e.g. the META-INF files would be OK to not have a header, we
could simply exclude them in the Rat configuration, and they would be
ignored (but
Does the above make sense, i.e., I'm suggesting a few ways to finetune the
results a bit further -- and are there other ideas for finetuning, i.e.,
trying to somehow incorporate those 14,651 files, so we can minimize the
manual checking we'll need to do?
Thanks,
Gj
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:53
Great, I've tried it, works well.
In the report, there's a list of 14,651 files under the heading "Files
without CDDL (14651)".
Could a distinction be made between those that have a license (i.e., some
license other than CDDL) and those that do not have a license at all?
I also think that it wou
Hi,
I've uploaded an updated version of the tool - fixing a bug in rewriting
headers of bundle files (where it was deleting one line after the header,
reported by Geertjan offline), making it a little bit more strict
(currently rewrites 29474 files), adding support for bat files, and adding
abilit
Ah, found this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12886241/categorized-1.zip
I.e., quite some analysis done by you already and found here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-54
Gj
On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> w
I've used the tool, it's really great, not only analyzes but also actually
changes the licenses, 29,496 of 44,324:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetBeans+Transition+Process
Could the tool be tuned to list all the files that are not in the 29,496?
I have updated the table i
Agree completely.
Gj
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think we also need to fill out the "Relicensing of incubator-netbeans"
> > table on the page
> > https://cwiki.apache
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think we also need to fill out the "Relicensing of incubator-netbeans"
> table on the page
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/
> NetBeans+Transition+Process,
> i.e., with the vario
I think we also need to fill out the "Relicensing of incubator-netbeans"
table on the page
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetBeans+Transition+Process,
i.e., with the various file types in a column, related numbers, and in each
case what the problems are/could be, so that we ca
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Wonderful news and big next step indeed!
>
> Now, while I understand everyone being 'trigger happy' to start committing
> improvements, fixes, etc. (and currently I already see 2 addition commits)
> the next step should be to adjust the license
In sorting through the files and doing the relicensing, since it's going to
be a very large set of changes, we'd like to do one big merge from a fork.
I.e., we propose doing a fork of incubator-netbeans to, for example,
github.com/geertjanwielenga, and then doing all the license changes there,
afte
On 2017-09-11 22:42, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hi Ate,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
Wonderful news and big next step indeed!
Now, while I understand everyone being 'trigger happy' to start committing
improvements, fixes, etc. (and currently I already see 2 addition commits)
Hi Ate,
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Ate Douma wrote:
> Wonderful news and big next step indeed!
>
> Now, while I understand everyone being 'trigger happy' to start committing
> improvements, fixes, etc. (and currently I already see 2 addition commits)
>
As Geertjan mentions - one of the c
Thanks a lot for the support and advice throughout this process, Ate. The
two addition commits you see are specifically to enable the build to
succeed, there were two small problems in that area. And in general for
right now, and of course we need to discuss this as a community, we
probably should
Wonderful news and big next step indeed!
Now, while I understand everyone being 'trigger happy' to start committing
improvements, fixes, etc. (and currently I already see 2 addition commits)
the next step should be to adjust the license headers!
Which this should be done by a Oracle representing
The sooner the better. :-)
Gj
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Simon IJskes wrote:
> When can we start contributing patches?
>
> G. Simon
>
>
> On 11-09-17 17:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
>
>> Yes, README and much more must be added.
>>
>> -- Build it: ant build -Dcluster.config=java in the roo
When can we start contributing patches?
G. Simon
On 11-09-17 17:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Yes, README and much more must be added.
-- Build it: ant build -Dcluster.config=java in the root of the sources
-- Try it: ant tryme in the root of the sources
Gj
Thx 😊
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: Geertjan Wielenga
Gesendet: Montag, 11. September 2017 17:25
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: NetBeans has landed in Apache Git
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Christian Lenz wrote:
If the 2nd and (if there is one) the 3rd Code
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Christian Lenz wrote:
If the 2nd and (if there is one) the 3rd Code donation is transfered, does
> that mean, that we will have separated github repos for the Code? Or will
> the other stuff landed in the incubation-netbeans (later hopefully
> netbeans) repo too?
>
Yes, README and much more must be added.
-- Build it: ant build -Dcluster.config=java in the root of the sources
-- Try it: ant tryme in the root of the sources
Gj
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Simon IJskes wrote:
> Also:
>
> should these be mentioned as 'externals' in the README?
>
> [down
Also:
should these be mentioned as 'externals' in the README?
[downloadbinaries] Downloading:
http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries/CA70822C47A67FC3A11670270567C2D01566DAE1-jhall-2.0_05.jar
[downloadbinaries] Downloading:
http://hg.netbeans.org/binaries/2973D150C0DC1FEFE998F834810D68F278EA58EC-junit
Great accomplishment. Congrats to all.
David
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Simon IJskes wrote:
> Also:
>
> running 'ant' produces a lot of messages and in the end:
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /home/xxx/apache/incubator-netbeans/nbbuild/build.xml:180: Some modules
> according your cluster config 'ful
Also:
running 'ant' produces a lot of messages and in the end:
BUILD FAILED
/home/xxx/apache/incubator-netbeans/nbbuild/build.xml:180: Some modules
according your cluster config 'full' are missing from checkout, see
messages above.
On 11-09-17 17:12, Simon IJskes wrote:
I'm missing a READM
. September 2017 17:12
An: dev@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
Betreff: Re: NetBeans has landed in Apache Git
I'm missing a README or something with the build instructions.
G. Simon
On 11-09-17 17:07, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Would be great to do some sanity checks, e.g., does it build, if
I'm missing a README or something with the build instructions.
G. Simon
On 11-09-17 17:07, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
Would be great to do some sanity checks, e.g., does it build, if not why
not, and somebody should try to check it out and do a quick recursive diff
with the unzipped donation ZIP
Would be great to do some sanity checks, e.g., does it build, if not why
not, and somebody should try to check it out and do a quick recursive diff
with the unzipped donation ZIP file to make sure all files are there.
Gj
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@goog
Hi all,
Big milestone --
git://git.apache.org/incubator-netbeans.git
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans
The main repo from the 1st code donation has landed in Apache Git, mirrored
at Apache GitHub.
Thanks all, especially Petr Gebauer, for doing the push, and thanks also
for the great
54 matches
Mail list logo
