On 11.01.21 20:58, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
On 1/11/2021 1:04 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
Hi Keith,
If documentation is being moved to Gitbox/GitHub then we should use a new
repository. OpenOffice-Docs or something else?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
OpenOffice-Docs sounds good to me. The
On 1/11/2021 1:04 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> If documentation is being moved to Gitbox/GitHub then we should use a new
> repository. OpenOffice-Docs or something else?
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
OpenOffice-Docs sounds good to me. The only question is how we
Hi Keith,
If documentation is being moved to Gitbox/GitHub then we should use a new
repository. OpenOffice-Docs or something else?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 10, 2021, at 2:12 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
> Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Keith N. McKenna wrote:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#GPL
I was a bit confused myself when I first read it, but why post it on an
ASF FAQ site if it doesn't grant reciprocity?
Because, if I recall correctly, back at the time the two Foundations
worked together in order
;> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Keith N. McKenna
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 14:58
>>>> To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generat
munity Forum,
>>> <https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/>.
>>>
>>> - Dennis
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Keith N. McKenna
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 14:58
>>>
mber 8, 2020 14:58
To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort
[orcmid] [ ... ]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apac
ce.org/en/forum/>.
> >
> > - Dennis
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Keith N. McKenna
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 14:58
> > To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
> > Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [proposal} Trying
t; Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 14:58
> To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort
>
> [orcmid] [ ... ]
>
>
> -
> To
Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort
[orcmid] [ ... ]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
-
From: "Keith N. McKenna"
To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 1:12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort
On 6/13/2020 4:52 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
Greetings all;
As the subject s
t
to replace LO on that device! ;-)
Regards,
Matthias
>
> -marcia
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Keith N. McKenna"
> To: d...@openoffice.apache.org
> Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 1:12:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [proposal} Try
16, 2020 1:12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort
On 6/13/2020 4:52 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> Greetings all;
>
> As the subject states I am proposing a new methodology to try to
> reinvigorate the stalled documentation effort for AOO
Greetings Detlaf;
See comments in-line
On 7/10/2020 7:00 AM, Detlef Nannen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> so far I only have experience with documentation written in AOO itself.
> I've been experimenting with Markdown and Pandoc from time to time, and
> wasn't always happy with the results and the
Hi,
so far I only have experience with documentation written in AOO itself.
I've been experimenting with Markdown and Pandoc from time to time, and
wasn't always happy with the results and the possibilities. An amount of
time that I was not willing to give. And even now I don't have the time
Hi Carl see comments in-line
On 7/4/2020 5:32 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On 7/2/20 11:18 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>> I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
>>> time trying to revive the documentation
Hi Keith,
On 7/2/20 11:18 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
drawbacks is that most people that have started to help
Am 02.07.20 um 17:18 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
drawbacks is that most people that have started to help have
On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
> time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
> drawbacks is that most people that have started to help have left as
> there has been very limited
See inline
On 6/14/2020 4:41 AM, Peter wrote:
> I want to remind you on the talk I posted earlier, which refers to a
> toolchain on docbook, and which talks on Issues and chances there are
> (the editor has been mentioned as use what you want.)
>
> I also would like to suggest to check if an
Hi Peter, all,
Am 14.06.20 um 10:41 schrieb Peter:
> see inline
>
> Am 13.06.20 um 22:08 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>> Francis; replies in-line
>> On 6/13/2020 1:46 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
>>
>>> I have two questions at the moment. The second one is really for
>>> anyone.
>>> 1. I do not see
see inline
Am 13.06.20 um 22:08 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Francis; replies in-line
On 6/13/2020 1:46 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
I have two questions at the moment. The second one is really for anyone.
1. I do not see a way to publish to MediaWiki from DocBook. I thought you
mentioned
Francis; replies in-line
On 6/13/2020 1:46 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> Hi Keith,
> I have been playing with DocBook and it certainly takes a while to learn. I
> suspect that once it was figured out, it would be a workable way to produce
> documents in various formats. I say that based on the
Hi Francis,
Am 13.06.20 um 19:46 schrieb F Campos Costero:
> Hi Keith,
> I have been playing with DocBook and it certainly takes a while to learn. I
> suspect that once it was figured out, it would be a workable way to produce
> documents in various formats. I say that based on the progress I
Hi Keith,
I have been playing with DocBook and it certainly takes a while to learn. I
suspect that once it was figured out, it would be a workable way to produce
documents in various formats. I say that based on the progress I made in
about a week starting from zero knowledge. I am, however, still
On 6/13/2020 5:05 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> Thank you for your effort!
>
> I found some typos:
>
> "Apace" should be "Apache"
>
> "Anaysis" should be "Analysis" (in file properties)
>
> Regards,
>
> Matthias
Thanks Matthias;
Thought I had got all those in the source.
Hi Keith,
Thank you for your effort!
I found some typos:
"Apace" should be "Apache"
"Anaysis" should be "Analysis" (in file properties)
Regards,
Matthias
Am 13.06.20 um 01:42 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
> On 6/3/2020 9:11 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N.
On 6/3/2020 9:11 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
>> time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
>> drawbacks is that most people that have started to help
Keith,
The PDF you sent looks somewhat different than the odt version of the
document that I have. Could you send the odt to my personal email? Also,
the odt I have uses an external link to get the Apache OpenOffice graphic,
i.e. the graphic is not embedded. I can just stick something else in that
Keith,
The only changes I made to the xml to make the second
pdf, Proposaltoreinvigerate_fjcc_myStyles2.pdf, were to change from a
hierarchical section structure to a nonhierarchical, changing sect1, sect2,
sect3 tags to just section, and putting tags around the title,
which moved it above the
On 6/11/2020 2:48 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> Keith,
> I understand you may be busy with other things. Did you get the documents I
> sent? I would be interested to hear your thoughts on how to proceed.
> Francis
>
Francis;
Sorry for not replying sooner. I did get them. The second one that you
Keith,
I understand you may be busy with other things. Did you get the documents I
sent? I would be interested to hear your thoughts on how to proceed.
Francis
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 1:34 PM Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> On 6/8/2020 3:17 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> > Keith,
> > I made an HTML and
On 6/8/2020 3:17 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> Keith,
> I made an HTML and a PDF. Should I email them to your personal account? I
> believe attachments are stripped out on this list.
> Francis
>
Francis;
You can e-mail them to my private account. Thank you very much for your
help.
Keith
> On
Keith,
I made an HTML and a PDF. Should I email them to your personal account? I
believe attachments are stripped out on this list.
Francis
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 11:55 AM Keith N. McKenna
wrote:
> Francis;
> If you have some time try the XML file from this location
>
Francis;
If you have some time try the XML file from this location
https://1drv.ms/f/s!AsMYmStvrJNJinVnnJWlYCHrxzmc just right click on the
XML file and chose download on the fly out menu. It is a draft of my
analysis document. Thanks for the work you are putting in on this.
Regards
Keith
On
Looking at my first post, I should not have said "[not] even remotely close
to high quality material". Let me amend that to "definitely needs work".
Francis
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 9:03 AM F Campos Costero
wrote:
> Keith,
> I would not say it was a disappointing result at all. I am a complete
>
Keith,
I would not say it was a disappointing result at all. I am a complete
novice with DocBook and I have used XSL exactly one time before this. I may
have committed any number of rookie mistakes. I was just playing with the
tools to see what worked right away and what would need tweaking.
I
On 6/7/2020 11:28 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> Keith,
> I have played with generating DocBook files from odt files and then
> producing HTML or PDF from the DocBook. None of the output is even remotely
> close to high quality material but I was pleased to get something readable.
> Rather than
Keith,
I have played with generating DocBook files from odt files and then
producing HTML or PDF from the DocBook. None of the output is even remotely
close to high quality material but I was pleased to get something readable.
Rather than spending more time on what may be a dead end, I will wait
Am 03.06.20 um 14:50 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 6/3/2020 2:32 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the talk I mentioned earlier. It explains how SuSE is Publishing
Documentation (Which is in general), and what Tools they use.
On 5/30/2020 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
> time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
> drawbacks is that most people that have started to help have left as
> there has been very limited
On 6/3/2020 2:32 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Here is the talk I mentioned earlier. It explains how SuSE is Publishing
> Documentation (Which is in general), and what Tools they use.
>
> https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/writing_open_source_documentation/
>
>
> Hope it
Hi all,
Here is the talk I mentioned earlier. It explains how SuSE is Publishing
Documentation (Which is in general), and what Tools they use.
https://archive.fosdem.org/2017/schedule/event/writing_open_source_documentation/
Hope it is inspiring on creating a new documentation process.
I
On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 14:14:28 -0600
F Campos Costero wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I will start to look at how to make
> actual documents from the DocBook output of Writer and I will see what I
> can figure out about the documentation process. I am certainly experiencing
> the
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I will start to look at how to make
actual documents from the DocBook output of Writer and I will see what I
can figure out about the documentation process. I am certainly experiencing
the feeling of being lost on a new project. I did subscribe to the doc mail
On 6/1/2020 10:51 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> Peter - I regret that my suggestion came across as wanting to "boss people
> around". I was responding really to this comment earlier in the thread
>> Because all people who expressed interest expected they are told what
>> needs to be done where.
On 6/1/2020 6:23 PM, F Campos Costero wrote:
> I am not sure that this part of the process has to remain as it is.
>> Unfortunately that is not going to change a whole lot. Just as the
>> development effort is self directed so is the Documentation effort and
>> all volunteers are advised of that.
Hi Peter, all
> On June 2, 2020 3:51 AM F Campos Costero wrote:
> All I meant was that a solution could be to provide such people with
> concrete suggestions of what to do first. Of course that can take into
> account their interests, skill level and available time. I am sure lists of
>
Peter - I regret that my suggestion came across as wanting to "boss people
around". I was responding really to this comment earlier in the thread
> Because all people who expressed interest expected they are told what
> needs to be done where. They did not felt
>
> comfortable to figure that out
Hi all,
Am 02.06.20 um 00:23 schrieb F Campos Costero:
I am not sure that this part of the process has to remain as it is.
Unfortunately that is not going to change a whole lot. Just as the
development effort is self directed so is the Documentation effort and
all volunteers are advised of
Am 01.06.20 um 17:57 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
On 5/31/2020 10:41 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
Also socializing seems to be important. The volunteers do not want to
work "alone". They want to be part of something.
How it is done, did not seem so important to me on first spot.
I just want to
On 5/31/2020 10:41 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>
> Am 31.05.20 um 02:41 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
>
>> Another would be to use Docbook, though this is not as appealing as I
>> have no familiarity with it and it appears that there is a steep
>> learning curve to its use and that would be a
On 5/30/2020 8:46 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Keith,
>
> I pledge to support you however I can.
>
> I’ve been thinking about www.openoffice.org
>
> What do you think about using markdown?
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
I appreciate the pledge of support Dave. I am leery of using
Am 31.05.20 um 02:41 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:
Another would be to use Docbook, though this is not as appealing as I
have no familiarity with it and it appears that there is a steep
learning curve to its use and that would be a disadvantage to attracting
new people.
The SUSE documenters
On 5/31/2020 7:38 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On 5/30/20 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
>> time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
>> drawbacks is that most people that have started to
Hi Carl,
Am 31.05.20 um 13:38 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Keith,
>
> On 5/30/20 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>> I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
>> time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
>> drawbacks is that most people that have
Hi Keith,
On 5/30/20 8:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
drawbacks is that most people that have started to help have left as
there has been very limited
Am 31.05.20 um 02:46 schrieb Dave Fisher:
I’ve been thinking about www.openoffice.org
What do you think about using markdown?
we are using on some webpages quite intensive Javascript. Is markdown
able to handle this?
In general, I don't see the need to use markdown more widely in the
Keith,
I pledge to support you however I can.
I’ve been thinking about www.openoffice.org
What do you think about using markdown?
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 30, 2020, at 5:42 PM, Keith N. McKenna
> wrote:
>
> I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of
I should probably have my head examined but I am thinking of one more
time trying to revive the documentation effort for AOO. One of the
drawbacks is that most people that have started to help have left as
there has been very limited availability of mentoring. I do not see this
changing but I am
60 matches
Mail list logo
