Re: [dev] SRC680_m246 build breaks in

2008-02-11 Thread Jim Watson
Giuseppe Castagno wrote: mm, it seems I have no scext module, I checked out the source in full, but no scext module present and no error signalled. I'll do it again. that is issue 85986. I think there was a warning message just when the build begins... jim

Re: [dev] Issue 33851

2008-01-22 Thread Jim Watson
Kirill Palagin wrote: Kohei Yoshida пишет: It would be much quicker to just implement the way Excel does, put it in to the release, then decide which part of it we want to implement differently after the fact, not before. Given the circumstance that seems like a much more sensible approach.

Re: [dev] AMD64 Java

2007-05-01 Thread Jim Watson
Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote: Travis Athougies, 01-05-2007 20:58: So can i just install gcj? Like no gnu classpath and stuff? Is there a tutorial or howto or some other document on how to do this. Thanks for your help Caio. Oh... you also should assure that the gcj headers will be visible to

Re: [dev] no suitable windowing system found, exiting.

2007-04-26 Thread Jim Watson
Jan Holesovsky wrote: To see what exactly is wrong, do ldd libvclplug_* in the non-working environment and see what library is missing/wrong. These files exist in my build, which uses default configurations Should there be a plug_kde too? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/o208/program$ ls -la

Re: [dev] no suitable windowing system found, exiting.

2007-04-26 Thread Jim Watson
Jim Watson wrote: Should there be a plug_kde too? half answering my own question... gtk is enabled by default kde is disabled by default So I see it is necessary to configure with --enable-kde to get a complete build But I wonder why...? jim

Re: [dev] no suitable windowing system found, exiting.

2007-04-26 Thread Jim Watson
Philipp Lohmann - Sun Germany wrote: Hi, you can delete libvclplug_dummy680ls.so; this is not installed by the install set and used only during the build. I guess you copied that one directly. yes. The only point here was to show that kde was absent. However that is unlikely to solve your

Re: [dev] no suitable windowing system found, exiting.

2007-04-23 Thread Jim Watson
KAMI911 KAMI911 wrote: Hello! I have build an sightly moded vanilla OpenOffice.org 2.2 patched with some ooo-build's patches and some other smaller patches. I build on Ubuntu Linux latest (7.0.4) and the compiled binary works well on it. But other system has a problem with it. I tried it on

[dev] xorg locked with OOo

2007-04-08 Thread Jim Watson
In some cases the xorg appears to be locked up after clicking on OOo File menu. This has been reported now by debian, opensuse and fedora users. It appears to affect both upstream and ooo-build. Please have a look at this IZ issue and the linked debian issue.

Re: [dev] build error

2007-03-26 Thread Jim Watson
On 26/03/2007, at 4:44 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote: Jim Watson wrote: On 24/03/2007, at 4:50 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: a reference to it ;) http://sw.openoffice.org/source/browse/sw/writerfilter/source/ dmapper/ DomainMapperTableHandler.hxx?rev=1.1view=markup initial check in snip #include

Re: [dev] build error

2007-03-23 Thread Jim Watson
On 24/03/2007, at 4:50 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: nandan k wrote: Hi All, Where can I find the corresponding .idl for the header file XTextAppendAndConvert.hpp? 16:33 it's not under com/sun/star/text directory in solver also solver 680 while trying to build writer filter in windows am

Re: [dev] build error

2007-03-23 Thread Jim Watson
On 24/03/2007, at 8:33 AM, Jim Watson wrote: On 24/03/2007, at 4:50 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: nandan k wrote: Hi All, Where can I find the corresponding .idl for the header file XTextAppendAndConvert.hpp? 16:33 it's not under com/sun/star/text directory in solver also solver 680 while

Re: [dev] compile error on SwBoxSelection

2007-03-04 Thread Jim Watson
On 04/03/2007, at 11:36 PM, Johannes Walther wrote: Hi, I'm about to compile yesterdays CVS checkout. dmake failed with /home/jrg/coding/OOo/sw/source/core/table/swnewtable.cxx:84: error: extra qualification 'SwBoxSelection::' on member 'SwBoxSelection' I wonder why nobody else ran into

Re: [dev] gcj 4.1.2 and java component registration time

2007-02-26 Thread Jim Watson
On 23/02/2007, at 10:03 PM, Caolan McNamara wrote: For some reason I'm seeing a failure at registration of java components during the install. Similar failure here for GNU/Linux SPARC in m203 using gcc4.3 experimental gcj/ecj And for some other bizarre reason I have a workaround,

Re: [dev] How to build openoffice.org-debian-menus?

2007-02-08 Thread Jim Watson
On 08/02/2007, at 11:04 PM, Matthias B. wrote: When I build OOo I get the debs for OOo itself, but openoffice.org-debian-menus is not built. How do I get this to be built? Calling dmake in sysui/desktop/debian doesn't work. I can guess - the debian menus are needed only by the debian

Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Jim Watson
Rony G. Flatscher wrote: See, I would like to learn what is needed for an out-of-the-box Ubuntu OOo installation to be employed to run Java apps from the command line. (Here SDK/NetBeans/Eclipse setups can come into ones way as it is then not always clear which environment is in effect under

Re: [dev] Next .... (Re: [dev] Little update (Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-05 Thread Jim Watson
Rony G. Flatscher wrote: However, *where* would one find the com.sun.star.lib.loader. package? Look in the SDK/classes directory... Get the SDK at api.openoffice.org jim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [dev] Seeking help on Ubuntu 6.10 OOo v. 2.0.4 for starting OOo via Java

2007-02-03 Thread Jim Watson
On 04/02/2007, at 9:45 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: would allow a Java program to start to run, but getting immediately to a problem in the Bootstrap class which is not able to find the OOo binary: com.sun.star.comp.helper.BootstrapException: no office executable found! at

Re: [dev] unowinreg.dll on solaris?

2007-01-09 Thread Jim Watson
On 10/01/2007, at 9:30 AM, Joe Reid wrote: Can someone point me in an appropiate direction to understanding this: -- http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49718 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: [dev] Operating Clarification or Design Modification

2007-01-02 Thread Jim Watson
On 30/12/2006, at 10:30 AM, Sam Domenico wrote: Present operation: When a block of text containing a URL is pasted into a text document, the application attempts to make a connection to the URL target. If my firewall blocks this traffic, the application blocks. I teach computer science

Re: [dev] Problems building scripting on M169

2006-12-28 Thread Jim Watson
On 26/12/2006, at 2:30 PM, James Mckenzie wrote: bad class file: /Users/Shared/OOoQA/M169/solver/680/unxmacxi.pro/ bin/ridl.jar(com/sun/star/uno/UnoRuntime.class) class file has wrong version 49.0, should be 48.0 I saw an error like this a while ago, in a different module. It was caused

Re: [dev] Configure problem with my Linux Debian Sid system (OOE680)

2006-12-28 Thread Jim Watson
On 26/12/2006, at 7:13 PM, KAMI wrote: Hello! I wanted to build OOo 2.1 on my Linux box (Debian Sid) I got this error during configure: checking whether to build Mozilla... yes checking for mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.gz... found checking for mozilla-source-1.7.5.tar.bz2... found checking for

[dev] Re: [Spam?][dev] oo_OOD680_m5 build error

2006-12-06 Thread Jim Watson
On 06/12/2006, at 9:50 PM, Pema Geyleg wrote: /srv/projects/openoffice/ooo_OOD680_m5_src/svx/source/access ibility/AccessibleControlShape.cxx ../../inc/svdobj.hxx:326: error: invalid pure specifier (only `= 0' is allowed) before ‘;’ token Hi Pema, that looks like issue 70684

Re: [dev] Another error oo_OOD680_m5 build error

2006-12-06 Thread Jim Watson
On 07/12/2006, at 4:22 PM, Pema Geyleg wrote: Dear all, Thanks for the help with the earlier build error. I could proceed further than that and now I am getting another error while building the oo_OOD680_m5 ocumen5.cxx:43: warning: ignoring #pragma optimize

Re: [dev] Open Office build doesn't create the package !!

2006-11-08 Thread Jim Watson
On 09/11/2006, at 8:32 AM, Kevin Williams wrote: I cleaned up the source tree and recompiled by specifying --disable- epm and compiled it with in tree mozilla. It compiled successfully. Now, when I want to installit, I see that there's no directory named OpenOffice under

Re: [dev] Open Office build doesn't create the package !!

2006-11-08 Thread Jim Watson
On 09/11/2006, at 2:40 PM, Kevin Williams wrote: The directory install contains three directories namely: en-US, en-US_download and log. The directory en-US/linux-2.6-intel contains a tar.gz file and other readme files along with install and remove scripts. the tar.gz should be 100mb?

Re: [dev] Built and now what ?

2006-11-07 Thread Jim Watson
On 07/11/2006, at 10:30 AM, Jim Watson wrote: Enno, I think the best thing would be to download the released installation that matches your solver version and use that one to drop in your changes. Enno, i dont any other ideas. I am now downloading the 2.0.4 solver for linux/intel

Re: [dev] Integration of the OpenOffice.org page into the Firefox browser

2006-11-07 Thread Jim Watson
On 07/11/2006, at 8:40 PM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: Hi Kay, I have created an extension for the Firefox browser. It adds a new main menu with a list of OpenOffice.org related URLs and it adds a search context menu to the IssuesZilla and OO.o search engine. It is an easy way to access the

Re: [dev] Built and now what ?

2006-11-06 Thread Jim Watson
Enno, the original question (I may have mis-read) I thought was after building, how can it be run? Now i see it is more about solver, about which I have no experience. I will make some very brief comments below, and reply more fully later today. maybe someone else will comment? I think

Re: [dev] Built and now what ?

2006-11-05 Thread Jim Watson
On 06/11/2006, at 4:03 AM, Enno Fennema wrote: I didn't find some 'setup' or whatever script. Anyway, I don't want to install over my ordinary 'operational' OO nor delete/overwrite its settings etc. How can I run the solver version completely separate from the operational one? I

Re: [dev] Extra build options

2006-11-02 Thread Jim Watson
On 03/11/2006, at 12:36 AM, Enno Fennema wrote: I run on a x86_64 system and to build 32-bit objects the compiler needs a -m32 option. I am trying to rebuild the sal module (initially to get debugging symbols). The first thing that build seems to do is create and execute a .cmd file to

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-30 Thread Jim Watson
On 31/10/2006, at 9:57 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: nobody asks for specs for bug fixes. Please give examples where a bug fix was not integrated because a spec was missing. at last...;) http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2977 In this case something different was specified and

Re: [dev] OpenOffice Build Error

2006-10-30 Thread Jim Watson
On 31/10/2006, at 3:22 PM, Indraveni wrote: Hi, I am building OpenOffice version 2.0.4 i.e OOD680_m5. After I performed the dmake step I got the following error. I pasted the error in the pastebin. you can see the error in the following link http://pastebin.ca/230189 I think the

Re: [dev] Specification Process Possibilities ...

2006-10-30 Thread Jim Watson
On 31/10/2006, at 5:29 PM, Mathias Bauer wrote: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=33851 And this one was even a feature. I was talking about bugs (=defects), sorry for being unclear. Please do not be sorry, you have been perfectly clear. You have highlighted exactly the

Re: [dev] Where to find source code for X,,,

2006-10-27 Thread Jim Watson
On 27/10/2006, at 11:03 PM, Enno Fennema wrote: I have two problems. Firstly, I can save a spreadsheet on a USB stick when using a new name so permissions appear to be ok. I can also later load that sheet from the USB stick but when I try to save it I get error message Cannot create

Re: [dev] new build requirement on !Windows - mingw32

2006-08-17 Thread Jim Watson
On 17/08/2006, at 7:06 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: The whole issue came from some extreme views and i like the comment from Volker the extreme view can be correct. Sun takes an extreme position on JCA, and it is also correct that any open source project should be built from sources.

Re: [dev] Re: Coverity

2006-07-26 Thread Jim Watson
On 26/07/2006, at 7:59 PM, Martin Hollmichel wrote: configure: error: unrecognized option: --disbale-cairo snip Does that look correct? Or have some things changed? Thanks. -ben --enable-spelchek ? jim - To

Re: [dev] CHANGING ON calendar_hijri.cxx

2006-02-08 Thread Jim Watson
Quoting Eike Rathke [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Emre, On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 23:28:51 -0800, Emre S�zduyar wrote: How can I use that links files ??? http://l10n.openoffice.org/source/browse/l10n/i18npool/source/calendar/calendar_hijri.cxx What do you mean with how you can use it? Use the

RE: [dev] Koders - code search for OOo

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Watson
Quoting Jorn K Teutloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thank you for your note, Pavel. Yes, the code-search feature will be free of charge to OpenOffice.org, and there are no plans to charge for this service in the future. Could you elaborate a little about what you mean when you say that usage

RE: [dev] Koders - code search for OOo

2005-12-09 Thread Jim Watson
Quoting Jorn K Teutloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks Jim - great input. We never meant to limit the use of code found on Koders.com, but I see how the verbiage might be interpreted as such. We will get this reworded asap. Jorn, I did not see any problem about use of code found on the site, as