Zoom in. Footpaths are perhaps visible too soon.
Ed
From: Nick Whitelegg [mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk]
Sent: 06 January 2014 11:17
To: dev@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-dev] Renderer issue: highway=service and service=driveway?
Hi,
Have noticed an issue with the main mapnik
I might be wrong but looks like Key pages contents disappeared in 2008
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:KeyDescriptiondiff=87767oldid=80400
___
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
(Let's see if my bounce issues are resolved)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Loach [mailto:e...@loach.me.uk]
Sent: 20 December 2012 08:46
To: 'Toby Murray'; 'dev List'
Subject: RE: [OSM-dev] Screenshots from OpenStreetMap-Carto spot
checking
Toby wrote:
I was doing some poking around
I was using P2 and Opera 12 fine on Windows 7 yesterday. I think C
to close the changeset is the one I use most, and that was working.
I'm not sure whether I used any others in yesterday's session, but
I've just tried clicking Edit, selecting a way and pressing T and
learned a new shortcut key (it
A way CAN be a member of a(n ordered) relation more than once, so is this a
defect, or by design?
-Original Message-
From: OpenStreetMap [mailto:t...@openstreetmap.org]
Sent: 25 May 2012 14:34
To: potlatch-...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Potlatch-dev] [OpenStreetMap] #4422: Shift-R
Cobra wrote:
Is there any other way than this one?
- click the map style button, select edit
- click add, name=Power,
URL=http://dl.dropbox.com/u/31535737/Power.mapcss
- close the style popup
After that, I click the map style button again and select Power.
This
is how potlatch looks after
Steve wrote:
See http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2501.
This was reported 18 months ago and still appears to be 'new'.
Presumably the first step is normally that a developer would
'accept'
it? This appears never to have happened.
Is anyone still trying to fix Potlatch 1 bug reports?
PS: I was wrong, creating single node ways in P2 did still work as
per the trac ticket steps.
___
Potlatch-dev mailing list
Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Steve wrote:
Is this working? I just noticed that, for Meopham in Kent, I can
view
the 1:25k OS map as a background in Potlatch 1, but nothing
displays
in
Potlatch 2.
It looks like Potlatch 1 is loading .jpg and Potlatch 2 is failing
to load .png, if that helps.
Ed
I created this way yesterday by mistake:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/103531496/history
Is this a known issue, or should I report it in trac?
I can't exactly remember how I did it - I had intended to select a
way to add a maxspeed tag, but selected a node by mistake. Or maybe
double
-
From: Ed Loach [mailto:e...@loach.me.uk]
Sent: 05 March 2011 16:44
To: t...@openstreetmap.org; potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Potlatch-dev] [OpenStreetMap] #3360: Switching
backgrounds doesn't respect Dim setting
I don't use Yahoo imagery. Will see if I can find steps to reproduce
In my view, the source key is crucial to every object.
I don't add the source key to anything which I've done based on GPS
traces/waypoints. I try and add it on objects I add from other
sources though (NPE, OS Opendata, Bing for example), but as someone
else has says, this won't always go in
Mark wrote:
Looking at the first missing node 24490963:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/24490963
referenced by way 4187296:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4187296
The node is clearly in the database.
That first link suggests the node was deleted in July 2008.
My 'problem' is that this looks graphically overloaded - think
even
about footways in several floors!
Q1. What about a new tag indoor=yes in addition to
highway=footway?
Q2. Renderer (like Mapnik / Osmarender) then chould suppress
these footways?
Alternative: new tag highway=corridor,
Indeed. Leave it in the ways, remove it from the nodes.
Is this a low (database) level delete? Or will we gain a new history
entry for every node showing the node as it was before the delete
and as it was after? If the latter then won't the database end up
bigger rather than smaller?
Ed
Jeff:
OK, that makes sense. But then what is the error:
Detail: Key (node_id)=(395051992) is not present in
table current_nodes.
from? That's what crashed my import. I'm trying to find where
Osmosis
requests a node_id from current_nodes; or am I misreading the
error?
The foreign
But does current_way_nodes have a node_id column? It looks to me
like the foreign key constraint is making sure that the nodes in the
current_way_nodes table actually exist in current_nodes
Ed
From: dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:dev-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Jeffrey
Can somebody please explain what
has happened?
Picking your first example, in 0.5 API various timeouts could occur
which could lead to this happening. Pick one of the nodes for
example that is in the way history but not showing for the way
so again the problem. how does a user who downloaded my
application
know what version of the file he is using?
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the issue, but couldn't you just update
# $Revision$ by $Author$, $Date$
manually each time you upload a revision?
Ed
RichardF:
I suspect a lot of the Potlatch load is caused by people trying
to
edit large areas at z13.
We pretty much have to keep offering z13 because for most of
the
world, it's the only level at which Yahoo imagery is available.
Is there anywhere though that z13 Yahoo imagery is of any
Well, depending on how you downloaded the data in the first
place. It is not
said that the data came from a download in JOSM.
But if it is, and JOSM can recreate the download and then
only query the
missing items, that's even more efficient.
As it was me started this thread (and repeating
no, Ed's edits are lost, unless JOSM saved them to a tmp file
somewhere.
Hopefully only those from the first time I did it... The village of
Pattingham was looking so beautiful this morning after I repeated
the edits I lost.
I think this boils down to a bug in JOSM. If it had warned me there
Not sure, whether this is a bug in JOSM. Currently it's
classified as
enhancement.
What you describe (making it clear that nothing was saved) sounds
like an enhancement. Letting me actually exit without warning that
there were unsaved changes I feel is more serious.
Ed
I think, and I can't be certain, that I've lost a whole evening's editing, just
because one way I deleted in JOSM had already been deleted by other means
before I came to upload. Surely that shouldn't be a problem that loses all the
other changes which were unrelated?
I say I can't be certain,
Karl wrote:
I today tried to acces the dev and test APIs on
apis.dev.openstreetmap.org
but they seem to be down. Are there any dev or test API
instances availabe
after the API switch to 0.6?
If you're trying at the moment, there are network issues that might
be affecting access:
I asked the following on talk on Saturday. I thought perhaps I
should mention it here as it seems to be a problem with the data in
the database as both Potlatch and JOSM give errors when I try and
add ways to the relation. Perhaps someone on this list can work out
what that might be? I did just
it might. i'm sure i can think up a semi-plausible situation
involving
scientists at CERN being so frustrated with the broken
relations they
don't notice that LHC is creating a massive black-hole. ;-)
They won't have restarted it since the repairs within the next two
weeks. From
I've been noticing recently how things seem to be heading.
Before I was involved with the project there were nodes, segments
and ways. Whether there were also relations at that time I don't
know. Perhaps the same key could be used more than once on a way -
again I don't know.
Currently we seem
Alex wrote:
So (at least my) screen stays empty.
If it helps, I'm using IE8RC1 and that also has a blank screen using
the URL in this message's subject, but I see a map if I open the
attachment Alex originally sent (with the styles containing width
and height percentages for html and body as
On 5th March I wrote:
I notice it includes something called Accelerators with a map
category.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc289775(VS.85).aspx
I don't know how complicated it would be to provide an OSM
Accelerator? If I get time I'll read the above page in more
detail.
I've
does anyone know a good algorithm to extract
the house-number from a string containing
street-name and house-number?
I'm not entirely sure what you're planning. I'm guessing storing
house numbers as numeric fields would save storage space, but not
all addresses even have numbers (some are just
I notice it includes something called Accelerators with a map category.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc289775(VS.85).aspx
I don't know how complicated it would be to provide an OSM Accelerator? If I
get time I'll read the above page in more detail.
Ed
Practically everything we have been doing with OSM tags until
now has
assumed that keys are unique. Nearly all the software I have
seen (like
editors, renderers, etc.) treat keys as if they are unique.
I wondered the other day when I was adding the tag for the
(maritime) museum to the
Ivo wrote:
minor-roads
minor-roads-casing
5 000
1 000
☡
([highway] = 'secondary' or [highway] =
'secondary_link') and not ([tunnel]='yes' or [tunnel]='true')
CSS:
stroke: #a37b48
Richard wrote:
It has been explained many times in the
past, not just
by me, that database freakiness _will_ happen because we don't
have
transactions, our server is often under high load, and there
may be memory
leaks or blocking processes in some of the software we use.
Do I understand
I've just noticed if you have a bridge going over a trunk dual carriageway the
oneway arrows render above the bridge,
e.g.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.872301lon=0.316664zoom=18
And if you zoom out a bit the arrow on the opposite carriageway overlays the
bridge rather than the one
Is this the correct place for JOSM queries, or do they have their own list?
Anyway - is it me or are nodes tagged with amenity=telephone invisible in the
editor? I'm losing track of which I've tagged and which I haven't at the moment.
Thanks
Ed
Shaun wrote:
Isn't the default background colour black?
Thanks to you both for your answers. I had just this moment realised
the problem as I tagged the first phone box in a car park that I've
ever tagged. Yes the phone symbol is black on transparent and yes
the default background is black.
Patrick wrote:
Patch looks good to me and is applied.
Thanks for that.
Related to this, in osmarender, the name= tag for the landuse areas
currently only renders for z17. I guess this is because some landuse
areas might be quite small, so labelling them at lower zoom levels
would be a bit
I've done a search for answers unsuccessfully, and while I'm a bit reluctant to
ask while people are suggesting each other smell, I'm hoping for some
non-personal advice.
I recently added an area to the map tagged as landuse=construction. This
doesn't render in Osmarender, so I looked into
40 matches
Mail list logo
