Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M3

(of a few elements) with Markus signing key -> looks good. Validated some sha512 signatures -> looks good. Gruß Richard > Am 05.10.2024 um 19:29 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos > : > > Hello, > > +1 > > Thanks > > On Sat, Oct 5, 2024, 14:26 Richard Zowal

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M3

Hi all, This is a VOTE for the third milestone release of TomEE 10 targeting JakartaEE 10. Thanks to everyone who contributed code to make this happen. I would especially like to thank Markus Jung for his work as Release Manager. I am only running this VOTE because it requires a member of the PMC

Re: What do you think about a M3 soon?

t; > > On 02.10.24 11:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: > > > > > I saw geronimo upgrade was pushed recently... any other > > > > > blockers for an  M3 ? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > &g

Re: What do you think about a M3 soon?

;>> +1 for an M3, I have people with me waiting for TomEE 10 GA for a >>> while, so it's no problem to find volunteers to give M3 try ! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alexandre >>> >>> Le lun. 23 sept. 2024 à 09:16, Richard Zowalla a écrit

Re: PR - TOMEE-1380 - Study a better data Importer for DataSources and EntityManagers Export

Hi, thanks for your PR. Really appreciated :) I left some (minor) comments to improve reader / user experience (by being a bit more clear and concise). Feel free to adjust as you like. In addition, I would always try to keep the change set small and on point (for the context of the issue on w

Re: What do you think about a M3 soon?

23 sept. 2024, 09:24, Thomas Andraschko > a écrit : > >> +1 >> >> Richard Zowalla schrieb am Mo., 23. Sept. 2024, 16:16: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Since we made some progress on the concurrency implementation and sxc >>> space, ha

What do you think about a M3 soon?

Hi all, Since we made some progress on the concurrency implementation and sxc space, had some dependency updates and fixed some bugs, it might be a good thing to ship M3 [1]. What do you think? Gruß Richard [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4403?jql=project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20AND%

Re: [PR] [TOMEE-4402] Remove JCache (JSR 107) API and its implementation (tomee)

So do you think upgrading to JCS3 + shading it for Jakarta inside TomEE would be worth? There are no bug reports for TomEE 9.x that it isn't working, so is anyone using it? Gruß Richard Am 16. September 2024 23:17:19 MESZ schrieb Mark Struberg : > There are quite a few specs in the javax na

Re: SXC Rework

enerated. But likely still a lot faster than > just using JAXB RI. > > > [1] > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jaxb-ri/blob/4.0.5-RI/jaxb-ri/runtime/impl/src/main/java/org/glassfish/jaxb/runtime/v2/runtime/reflect/opt/Injector.java > > > On 9. Sep 2024, at 10:21, R

[ANN] Welcome new Apache TomEE Committer Markus Jung

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TomEE has invited Markus to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Markus, when I started contributing and I eventually got invited to become a committer, JL sent a wonderful message[1] quoting David on the well

Re: SXC Rework

http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:30 AM Richard Zowalla wrote: > >> Any other thoughts? >> >>> Am 05.09.2024 um 11:08 schrieb Richard Zowalla : >>> >>> Yes. It is done for startup performance reasons only. At runtime,

Re: Observation - Doubt - TOMEE-1380 - Study a better data importer for datsources and entitymanagers

; > make changes to other classe, referring to the unit test of this >> > class. >> > > > > >> > > > > The changed classes, in addition to ImportSql, were the >> > > > > following:Assembler, EntityManagerFactoryCallable and >> > >

Re: Observation - Doubt - TOMEE-1380 - Study a better data importer for datsources and entitymanagers

ample >> using flyway and liquibase in the TomEE repository. >> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, 19:12 Evaldo Junior wrote: >> >> > Richard, thanks for your feedback. >> > >> > >> > Evaldo Junior >> > >> > Em qui., 5 de set. d

Re: Observation - Doubt - TOMEE-1380 - Study a better data importer for datsources and entitymanagers

reated as the official database >>> import class for the Tomee project ? >>> >>> >>> Evaldo Junior >>> >>> >>> [1] >>> >> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/main/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/

Re: SXC Rework

Yes. It is done for startup performance reasons only. At runtime, there is not a big difference. Regarding your points. (1) I think, that metatype.org has expired / is parked at a domain service, so it might not be possible to release SXC under that umbrella (again). We c

Re: Doubt - TOMEE-1380 - Study a better data importer for datsources and entitymanagers

Hi Evaldo, thanks for your mail. I am wondering, if this feature is still needed in 2024? Since 2014 tools such as liquibase or flyway have emerged and have similar functionality interms of boot strapping a database. You can find an example for the current import feature in TomEE :: Examples :

Re: TomEE 10 & TCK

environment where these tests take place and are > reported and, if so, how can I access them? > > 3) How can I share the log results (~200k/test group) in the list? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > Paulo > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Issue TOMEE-2934

Hi, Thanks for the PR. I left a comment. I think it is present in 1.6.x onwards. Best Richard > Am 25.07.2024 um 17:56 schrieb Giannis Giannoulas > : > > It is there since Support for @Asynchronous was added in with > revision 99e6bcffe2ac56e75e75ed7fa4d5abbc3a23d23c in Sep. 2010. > Maybe it w

Re: TomEE 10 & TCK

ipse.org/jakartaee/cdi/4.0/cdi-tck-4.0.5-dist.zip > >[9] >https://download.eclipse.org/jakartaee/bean-validation/3.0/beanvalidation-tck-dist-3.0.1.zip > >[10] >https://download.eclipse.org/jakartaee/dependency-injection/2.0/jakarta.inject-tck-2.0.2-bin.zip > >[11] >

Re: TomEE 10 & TCK

rsion and SHA of the TCK binary used: > > - > https://glassfish.org/certifications/jakarta-platform/10/TCK-Results-7.0.0-M8 > > Those can be found from this page: > > - https://jakarta.ee/compatibility/certification/10/ > > > -David > >> On Jul 23, 2024, at 12:

Re: TomEE 10 & TCK

ure out these setup issues someone from >> tomitribe could trigger a full run on tck.work so we can get some actual >> numbers. >> >> Thanks >> Markus >> >> [1] https://github.com/jungm/tomee-tck/tree/ee10work >> [2] >> >> https://github.

TomEE 10 & TCK

Hi all, TomEE 10.0.0-M2 is out and it seems, that we have quite a few people already testing it, which is great. Since we resolved most of the open dependency updates related to EE10, we can now start to work on TCK setup / compliance or at least to get some numbers. Aside from the standalone T

[ANN] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M2

The Apache TomEE team is pleased to announce the availability of TomEE 10.0.0-M2 Apache TomEE delivers enterprise application containers and services based on, but not limited to the Enterprise JavaBeans Specification and Java/Jakarta Enterprise Edition Specifications. This release is the second

[RESULT] [VOTE] TomEE 10.0.0-M2

Hi, This vote passes with the following votes: +1 Markus Jung +1 Thomas Andraschko +1 Daniel Dias Dos Santos +1 Martin Wiesner +1 Mark Struberg (binding) +1 Benedict Eisenkrämer +1 Richard Zowalla (binding) +1 Jonathan Gallimore (binding) Thanks for the votes. I will proceed with the steps

Re: [VOTE] TomEE 10.0.0-M2

;>>> >>>>> - CDI >>>>> >>>>> - Faces >>>>> >>>>> - JPA (running hibernate 6.4) >>>>> >>>>> - Security (Both custom HttpAuthenticationMechanism and new >>>>> OpenIdAuthentication

[VOTE] TomEE 10.0.0-M2

Hello everyone, This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M2. This is the second milestone release of TomEE 10 targeting JakartaEE 10. Thanks to everyone who contributed code to make this happen. I would like to emphasise and give a shout out to all our volunteers who have been doin

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 10.0.0-M2

most of the JAX-RS TCK tests, so it should be ok for usage inside of M2. Gruß Richard On 2024/07/08 08:43:30 Richard Zowalla wrote: > Hi all, > > We had quite a few fixes and dependency updates since we released M1 (like > Java 17 baseline, ams, cxc, mp updates), see

Re: Fwd: TomEE Version Upgrade

This information is provided on our download page. Just have a look. Am 10. Juli 2024 17:17:55 MESZ schrieb AD : >Thank you much Richard > >How about Jdk ? Can we stay on JDK 8.0 ? > >On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 9:03 AM Richard Zowalla wrote: > >> You will need https://issue

Re: Fwd: TomEE Version Upgrade

t;Hello Richard > >Thank you very much for your response , much appreciated. >I had sent an email there as well , but did not get a response. > >oh you mean to say . Java also has to be upgraded ? > >We are running now on Jdk 1.8_331 > >Thank you >-AJ > >On Tue,

Re: TomEE Version Upgrade

Hi, this kind of question is better to be asked on the user list: u...@tomee.apache.org You will need to upgrade your fullstack to Jakarta namespace (EE9). Some dependencies might not be available in a plain relocated version or require a Java version of 17+ (Spring 6), so you might be forced

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 10.0.0-M2

;>>> >>>> no strong opinion for (1) from my side, if there are no objections we >>>> should just merge it so we can push another milestone release IMO. +1 to >>>> downgrade Mojarra to 4.0.0 to make tomee-plume usable again until we >>>> figure out

[DISCUSS] TomEE 10.0.0-M2

Hi all, We had quite a few fixes and dependency updates since we released M1 (like Java 17 baseline, ams, cxc, mp updates), see https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE/versions/12354473 Currently, we have two open things, we need to discuss (1) https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1229

Re: AutoConfig undeclared dependencies in Resources?

JNDI name >java:comp/DefaultContextService > > >IMO considering this it makes sense to automatically resolve a ContextService >if a user does not explicitly overwrite it. Also makes moving from TomEE 9 to >TomEE 10 easier. Any more thoughts on this? > > >Thanks > >Markus

Re: AutoConfig undeclared dependencies in Resources?

Hi all, I want to add some additional thoughts here: The question is more or less a question related to the original design of the auto configuration of TomEE, so basically boils down to: Should a default context service be created if implicitly referenced by a user-defined custom managed (or

Re: CXF 4.1.0 Fork Release - Thoughts?

Hi all, managed to deploy my fork to central. Here is the PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1229 (REST) TCK is still fine. Gruß Richard On 2024/07/01 08:49:41 Richard Zowalla wrote: > Copying the whole bunch of code into TomEE doesn’t look like a good idea > (imho). >

Re: CXF 4.1.0 Fork Release - Thoughts?

his setup anymore. > > > IMHO both solutions 1 and 2 are quick and desirable, though 1 would really > need to be discussed. 3 requires at least a couple of people to be involved > to do a formal vote. > > Any other thoughts on this? > > > > T

Re: New Doubt - Ticket TOMEE-3965 - Fix TomEE

Hi, TOMEE-3965 was created for the example „deltaspike-fullstack“ [1]. This example was dropped on „main“ for several reasons (cf. TOMEE-4137) and I wouldn’t spend any time solving it on the 9.x line. However, you are right, that bval-evaluation examples uses an outdated deltaspike version, whi

CXF 4.1.0 Fork Release - Thoughts?

Hi all, I just forked CXF (from the latest green build with 7ab74899002f69055175dacae946b7664413c9ad) on my personal repo and did a search / replace party for the group id from org.apache.cxf to org.apache.tomee.cxf [1] Of course it would need to be moved in a tomee-related repo. The build works

Re: Doubt - Ticket TOMEE-3965 - Fix TomEE

Should be MyFaces 4.x Might be also possible, that some of the examples use deprecated / obsolete features. > Am 26.06.2024 um 22:07 schrieb Evaldo Junior : > > I have a question, with this ticket 3965 - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3965. > The latest stable version of Apache-

Re: I have a doubt about contribute to Apache Tomee Project

ASF mailing lists do not allow attachments. You need to put them on an external service. Am 26. Juni 2024 15:16:50 MESZ schrieb Evaldo Junior : >Daniel, the Gilberto informed that he does not accept attachments, soi am >resending the prints. >I am trying to upload it again, but for some reason, i

Re: Update on TomEE 10

. Juni 2024 um 11:37 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla >: > > > Any other thoughts? > > > > @JL: Do you want the Geronimo mail implant release (ongoing vote) to be > > included in an M2? > > > > @Jon: Think it would be worth to include > > https://gith

Re: Update on TomEE 10

Any other thoughts? @JL: Do you want the Geronimo mail implant release (ongoing vote) to be included in an M2? @Jon: Think it would be worth to include https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1166 ? > Am 12.06.2024 um 20:38 schrieb Richard Zowalla : > > Hi Markus, > > Thanks

Re: Update on TomEE 10

wever, my OIDC code already uses > some language features not available in Java 11. So I think we need to keep > Java 17 as a requirement. > > > Thanks > > Markus > >> On 12. Jun 2024, at 06:17, Richard Zowalla wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >>

Re: Update on TomEE 10

hrough TomEE 10 Milestone 2 > testers. > > That's my 2 cents ! > > Thanks, > Alex > > > Le mer. 12 juin 2024 à 06:17, Richard Zowalla a écrit : > > > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a new update on TomEE 10. > > > > Markus Jung has impl

Update on TomEE 10

Hi all, Here is a new update on TomEE 10. Markus Jung has implemented the missing part of the EE10 security spec: [1] and the TCK for it looks good. Thanks a lot for that contribution! If anybody wants to give it a review, you find it here: [1] We have updated most MicroProfile specs to be com

Missing MicroProfile 6 Module: OpenTelemetry 1.0 vs Open Tracing 3

Hi all, I just did the upgrade of OpenAPI to 3.1 (for MP6) and its TCK is fine. If anyone is motivated to pick up a (well defined) task for TomEE 10, see [1] For MicroProfile 6, we need to switch from OpenTracing 3 to OpenTelemetry 1.0. Basically, it boils down to: - Update the integration code

Re: No tests run for arquillian-tomee-jaxrs-tests module?

Hi, they seem to be run as part of a CI full build: https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-full/org.apache.tomee$arquillian-tomee-jaxrs-tests/1387/console Gruß Richard Am 22. Mai 2024 12:19:36 MESZ schrieb Jonathan Gallimore : >Hi All, > >If I run mvn -Pall-adapters test in

Re: CXF 4.1.x - Status

a look to tell us, if it is on our side (or on their side): [1] So for now, I've marked them as ignored in our setup. Gruß Richard [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-9005 Am Samstag, dem 20.04.2024 um 16:13 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hi all, > > turned out to b

Re: EE10 - Jakarta Security OIDC

/jungm/tomee/tree/openid  > > It's still a huge work in progress right now though > > > > On 13. Apr 2024, at 20:29, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > looks like we need to implement OpenID connect for Jakarta Security > > 3.0 > &g

Re: CXF 4.1.x - Status

(for now) and create related tracking Jiras for it). Gruß Richard [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1063 Am Freitag, dem 19.04.2024 um 10:04 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hi all, > > overall CXF 4.1.x looks good (from a build perspective and the MP > TCKs). This is the

CXF 4.1.x - Status

Hi all, overall CXF 4.1.x looks good (from a build perspective and the MP TCKs). This is the PR [1]. We have one failing JWT test: > org.eclipse.microprofile.jwt.tck.container.jaxrs.EmptyTokenTest#invalid Token It fails because of a recent change in CXF 4.1.x - you can find some details here:

Re: [DISCUSS] Switch "main" (TomEE 10) to Java 17 ?

>> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 9:24 AM Thomas Andraschko >> wrote: >>> +1 for Java17 >>> >>> seems we have no other choice >>> maybe we can try to get certified on Java17 but we still need green TCKs >>> first anyway, which is not reachable wi

[ANN] Apache TomEE 9.1.3

The Apache TomEE team is pleased to announce the availability of TomEE 9.1.3 Apache TomEE delivers enterprise application containers and services based on, but not limited to the Enterprise JavaBeans Specification and Java/Jakarta Enterprise Edition Specifications. This release contains some bug

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 9.1.3

Hi all, this vote passed with the following votes: +1 Frank Jung +1 Martin Wiesner +1 Alex The Rocker +1 Thomas Andraschko +1 Cesar Hernandez (binding) +1 Richard Zowalla (binding) +1 Daniel Dias Dos Santos +1 Mark Struberg (binding) I'll proceed with the steps. Gruß Richard

EE10 - Jakarta Security OIDC

Hi, looks like we need to implement OpenID connect for Jakarta Security 3.0 - https://jakarta.ee/specifications/security/3.0/ If anyone wants to jump in and dive into the spec -> feel free :) Gruß Richard

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 9.1.3

Here is my own +1 Am Montag, dem 08.04.2024 um 11:33 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hello everyone, > > This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.3 > > It contains some version upgrades (cxf, jackson, batchee) and > security > backports for the recent Tomcat CV

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?

+1 Note: TomEE docker images are not officially distributed by the project itself (ASF), so no real decision space from our side, imho. Am Dienstag, dem 09.04.2024 um 09:34 +0200 schrieb Markus Jung: > Hi all, > > > I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now > at > 8

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 9.1.3

Hello everyone, This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.3 It contains some version upgrades (cxf, jackson, batchee) and security backports for the recent Tomcat CVEs. Here are the hard facts: ### Maven Repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetom

[ANN] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1

The Apache TomEE team is pleased to announce the availability of TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Apache TomEE delivers enterprise application containers and services based on, but not limited to the Enterprise JavaBeans Specification and Java/Jakarta Enterprise Edition Specifications. This release is a first mil

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1

Hi all, this vote passes with the following +1 being cast: - Frank Jung - Markus Jung - Thomas Andraschko - Daniel Dias Dos Santos - Benedict Eisenkrämer - Alex The Rocker - Jean-Louis Monteiro (binding) - Martin Wiesner - Richard Zowalla (binding) - Mark Struberg (binding) I'll proceed

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1

Here is my own +1 (binding) Am Dienstag, dem 02.04.2024 um 09:47 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hello everyone, > > This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1. > > It is a first milestone release of TomEE 10 targeting JakartaEE 10. > Thanks to everyone who c

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1

Can we get some more binding votes? :) Gruß Richard Am Dienstag, dem 02.04.2024 um 09:47 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hello everyone, > > This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1. > > It is a first milestone release of TomEE 10 targeting JakartaEE 10. >

[DISCUSS] Switch "main" (TomEE 10) to Java 17 ?

Hello everyone, We should discuss the following to get up to speed on our EE-10 efforts. For EE-10 we need - JMS 3.1 [1] - JAX-RS 3.1 [2] AMQ-6 (which will become JMS 3) has changed it's baseline to Java 17 [3]. CXF 4.1.0-SNAPSHOT (which will target JAX-RS 3.1) has switched it's baseline to Ja

Re: AMQ6 in TomEE 10

ote (I will release it tomorrow), > including a couple of new JMS3 operations. > I estimate that JMS3 full support should come around ActiveMQ 6.3. > > Please let me know if I can help in any way :) > > Regards > JB > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 11:30 AM Richard Zowall

Re: ScriptEngine - Example testing-security-4 - JDK17

I have no preference at all as long as the minimum JDK to build stays with 11 for main (as this is the baseline we need to adhere due to compliance with EE10). Gruß Richard Am Mittwoch, dem 03.04.2024 um 09:19 -0300 schrieb Paulo Araújo: > Thomas, > > > > Just my bean: when faced with this iss

Re: About a TomEE 9.1.3 soon?

o, > > So is it possible to run a TomEE 9.1.3 vote soon, or are we waiting > for more inputs? > > Thanks > Alex > > Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 21:11, Richard Zowalla a > écrit : > > > > FYI: apache-mime4j-core is a shaded dependency of the Jakarta Mail >

Re: TomEE - Examples

Hi, building from a development branch (i.e. main), which depends on SNAPSHOTS is expected to fail, if the related maven repositories (apache snapshots) are not configure locally. The examples itself (and their tests, if they exist) are build and run by CI on a daily basis. Of course this doesn't

[VOTE] Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1

Hello everyone, This is a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 10.0.0-M1. It is a first milestone release of TomEE 10 targeting JakartaEE 10. Thanks to everyone who contributed code to make this happen. I would like to emphasise and give a shout out to all our volunteers who have done the hard wo

Re: TomEE 10 - Current Status

:58 PM Thomas Andraschko < > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Richard Zowalla schrieb am Fr., 29. März 2024, > > 12:50: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > just to give a short additional note here: > > > >

Re: TomEE - Examples

Hi, all examples in /examples are standalone code examples, which are unrelated to the actual TomEE core root pom and should be independently runnable. So don't get the actual issue here? :) Gruß Richard Am Montag, dem 01.04.2024 um 20:10 +0200 schrieb Thomas Frühbeck: > Hi, > I wanted to comp

Geronimo Mail 2.1 in TomEE 10.x ?

Hi all, I was looking in more depth into the mime4j cve reported by grype for 9.1.x and 10.0.x - the spec jar contains a shade of mime4j but doesn't use anything of it. After going down the rabbit hole (just a bit) and chatting with Romain, we noticed, that mail spec 1.5 was created from a ver

Re: AMQ6 in TomEE 10

a 17. > >Thanks, >Alex > > >Le dim. 31 mars 2024 à 11:59, Thomas Andraschko > a écrit : >> >> If we are allowed to set baseline to +17, im ok with it. >> New user can just use 17 and existing users can easily upgrade Java when >> they already migrate their who

AMQ6 in TomEE 10

Hi all, just looked into AMQ (classic) 6.1.0 (JMS 3.1), which seems to be fully Jakarta compatible (currently running a CI build on a related branch). However, it requires Java 17 as a baseline (meh). Since EE10 targets Java 11+ (and not 17+), the question would be, if we can/want to upgrade? Fro

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 9.1.x and it's crippling dependency on EOL Tomcat 10.0.27 - Thoughts?

itag, dem 29.03.2024 um 14:16 +0100 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 12:39 PM Richard Zowalla > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I want to bring to your attention, that we had recently some > > discussion > > around our current strat

Re: Helping in setting up another TCK

Hi, I guess, we need to have a look into how to run the web plattform tck [1]. The other tcks, we were currently using, are all more or less standalone versions of each spec. At a first glance, it looks familiar to the old(er) tcks for ee8 and ee91 but didn't look into the zip deeper. Our old se

Re: [DISCUSS] TomEE 9.1.x and it's crippling dependency on EOL Tomcat 10.0.27 - Thoughts?

10.x and then depending on the state of > > > that release make a new decision on 9.x. > > > > > > As I suspect (2) doesn't help very much since it would add more > > > effort than it saves: instead of backporting CVEs from Tomcat > > > 10.1 to 10.

Re: About a TomEE 9.1.3 soon?

3 then I guess its medium severity > doesn't make it vital to update. > > Should I check other dependencies against non-vulnerabilities related > criteria ? > > Thanks, > Alex > > Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 12:44, Richard Zowalla a > écrit : > > > >

Re: About a TomEE 9.1.3 soon?

not trivial to fix in 9.1.3 then I guess its medium severity >doesn't make it vital to update. > >Should I check other dependencies against non-vulnerabilities related criteria >? > >Thanks, >Alex > >Le ven. 29 mars 2024 à 12:44, Richard Zowalla a écrit : >> >&

Re: TomEE 10 - Current Status

25.03.2024 um 10:44 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Hello everyone, > > Here is an update on the current progress of EE10, as the list has > been > a bit quiet for a few weeks now due to discussions on the lists of > our > dependencies. > > We are currently blocked by th

Re: About a TomEE 9.1.3 soon?

Hi, I have nothing against doing a TomEE 9.1.3, which is merely a time thing. Doing the actual release preperation, starting the vote, etc. takes ~ 30-60min depending on a machine. If we need to do additional library upgrades, it might take some additional time to wait until CI is complete and to

[DISCUSS] TomEE 9.1.x and it's crippling dependency on EOL Tomcat 10.0.27 - Thoughts?

Hi all, I want to bring to your attention, that we had recently some discussion around our current strategy of backporting cve related fixes to TomEE 9.1.x [1]. We are in a situation, in which the Tomcat community has decided to stop Tomcat 10.0.x (Servlet 5) work and only support Tomcat 9, 10.1

[ANN] Welcome new Apache TomEE Committer Thomas Andraschko

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache TomEE has invited Thomas to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. I'm very proud to be writing this announcement on behalf of the Apache TomEE PMC. You have been continuously contributing (over the last decade!) to

TomEE 10 - Current Status

Hello everyone, Here is an update on the current progress of EE10, as the list has been a bit quiet for a few weeks now due to discussions on the lists of our dependencies. We are currently blocked by the SNAPSHOT dependency towards BatchEE. The good thing is that a VOTE for 1.0.4 is currently ru

Re: [DISCUSS] EE-10 Progress

; needs help, and add call to action to contribute. > > Thoughts? > > > -David > > > > On Feb 6, 2024, at 2:43 AM, Richard Zowalla > > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > if you monitored the GitHub repository in the last few weeks, you

Re: [DISCUSS] Challenge against BatchEE TCK: com.ibm.jbatch.tck.tests.jslxml.CDITests#testCDILookup(...)

I have opened a challenge [1]. Hope we can exclude the test soon and move on with our batch impl soon. [1] https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/batch-tck/issues/71 Am Mittwoch, dem 28.02.2024 um 21:02 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > Given this comment [1] by Scott (Batch Spec), it looks like t

Re: [DISCUSS] Challenge against BatchEE TCK: com.ibm.jbatch.tck.tests.jslxml.CDITests#testCDILookup(...)

ons are: >* param injection >* ct injection >* field injection >but no CDI.current().select()... > >Feel free to reference this when creating a TCK challenge. > >txs and LieGrue, >strub > > >> Am 23.02.2024 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Struberg : >> >> Please cr

Re: [DISCUSS] Challenge against BatchEE TCK: com.ibm.jbatch.tck.tests.jslxml.CDITests#testCDILookup(...)

m 23.02.2024 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Struberg : >> >> Please create a TCK Challenge and disable the test for now. >> >> txs and LieGrue, >> strub >> >> >>> Am 22.02.2024 um 20:09 schrieb Richard Zowalla : >>> >>> Hi all, >>

[DISCUSS] Challenge against BatchEE TCK: com.ibm.jbatch.tck.tests.jslxml.CDITests#testCDILookup(...)

Hi all, I want to get consensus on filling a TCK challenge against the Batch TCK. As written in the other thread, I am currently working on getting a Jakarta Batch 2.1 ready version of Batch EE for usage in TomEE 10 [1]. The most significant change is, that CDI support is now required. == Details

Re: [DISCUSS] EE-10 Progress

soon. Gruß Richard Am 6. Februar 2024 09:43:14 MEZ schrieb Richard Zowalla : >Hi all, > >if you monitored the GitHub repository in the last few weeks, you might >have noticed, that we did some work in order to get EE10 rolling. > >As we were mostly silent on the dev@ list (which i

[DISCUSS] EE-10 Progress

Hi all, if you monitored the GitHub repository in the last few weeks, you might have noticed, that we did some work in order to get EE10 rolling. As we were mostly silent on the dev@ list (which is not a good thing and we should definitly going back to use the lest more frequently), I want to gi

Re: JPA impl in TomEE 10?

er. > > 3) Concurency: Can you point me to the sources? I will try to work > > on it > > upcoming week. > > > > Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 11:07 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla < > > rich...@zowalla.com>: > > > > > I have tested a custom TomEE 10 build (wit

Re: JPA impl in TomEE 10?

can try > to > migrate BatchEE to jakarta later but for now the highest prio for me > and my > company to migrate to a EE10 container. > 3) Concurency: Can you point me to the sources? I will try to work on > it > upcoming week. > > Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 11:07 Uhr schrieb R

Re: JPA impl in TomEE 10?

46 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro >> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks Thomas for pointing this out. >> > -- >> > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 20,

Re: Unable to run TomEE 1.7.5 java 21 Could not create the Java Virtual Machine - -Djava.endorsed.dirs

Given that 8.0.16 will also be EOL in a few days, I would recommend to switch to TomEE 9.1.x instead. Gruß Richard Am 29. Dezember 2023 15:02:29 MEZ schrieb Felipe Rafailov : >Thank you, I will be upgrading to 8.0.16 and Java 17. > > > > > > >Em sex., 29 de dez. de 2023 às 10:55, Gilberto >es

Re: Java 21 and Docker images

Java 21 might work (didn't test). xbean 4.23 supports Java 21. Didn't check for other libs like eclipselink. I am totally ok to drop semeru. With TomEE 8 going EOL this year, we might also drop these images... Gruß Richard Am Mittwoch, dem 20.12.2023 um 14:08 -0600 schrieb r...@rodandmichelle

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 9.1.2 (take 2)

all be done. Any issues, please let me know. Thanks to > everyone > for the review and votes. > > Jon > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 2:04 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1s: > > > > Richard Zowalla (binding) &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 9.1.2 (take 2)

is is considered to be a showstopper, concerning > only Java 21: > > Eclipselink needs a dependency update to work with Code compiled with > JDK 21. > Created a ticket for that: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4291 > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache TomEE 9.1.2 (take 2)

Any more votes? Am Dienstag, dem 12.12.2023 um 16:57 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi All, > > I'd like to start a vote for the release of Apache TomEE 9.1.2. TomEE > 9.1.2 > is a maintenance release with dependencies upgrades and bug fixes. It > also > fixes the latest Tomcat vulnerabiliti

Re: TomEE 10 in the pipe or not ?

Hi all, Reminder: Better to not crosspost between lists ;-) And I think, that Jonathan summarized it quite well: OSS lives from the people contributing code. The "main" branch is migrated towards EE10 APIs, but has some issues: (1) We rely on some SNAPSHOT dependencies and need to wait for the

Re: OSGi information in TomEE 9 and 10

So if no one was interested since ~ 2012 (no bug reports, etc.), should n't we just remove it? Am Dienstag, dem 12.12.2023 um 07:05 -0800 schrieb David Blevins: > Those we there for Geronimo's benefit as it became osgi-based in the > last few years it was around.  I suspect they've not consistentl

  1   2   3   4   >