Re: Potentially having some part of documentation in the main repo

arent we already using asciidoc? ( https://github.com/apache/tomee-site-generator/tree/master/src/main/jbake/content ) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: Potentially having some part of documentation in the main repo

+0 to have it all and sync somehow in the site build process - i like having it with the code since it enables some more stuff to happen but it increases contribution cost -0 to have it partially to ensure we dont loose contributors Side note: if you import it, ensure to update all the

Re: want to use load balancer while doing lookup , so that request can go to multiple instances for EJB

Hi You can use failover:url1,url2 or failover:roundrobin:url1,url2 for instance to pass multiple instance. If you want a custom strategy just do N lookups and implement a proxy with the custom strategy - like circuit breaker for instance. Le 16 sept. 2017 04:35, "VikasRathee"

Re: tomee git commit: Fix licence issues

Hey Andy Livereload is under MIT license as written in the notice file, not asf one, we should probably strip the header from it to keep the original file. If better we can dowload the file during the build to make it more obvious it is not ours. Le 14 sept. 2017 21:39,

Re: lookup failed in tomee

Hi Vikas You dont use the remote context factory, is it intended? If so the provider url is ignored Le 8 sept. 2017 17:49, "VikasRathee" a écrit : I have one webservice project and one EJB 3.0 project deployed in Tomee plume in same EAR. From webservice class i'm

Re: 7.0.4 release plans

) but nothing really blocking compared to 7.0.3 AFAIK. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.

Re: @Provider scan not working

Hi if you put it in tomee/lib then it is not scanned by default for backward compatibility reasons you can try to set -Dopenejb.scan.webapp.container=true Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Ol

Re: TomEE documenation

Hi Mark Doesnt the xa part cover it? Le 1 sept. 2017 22:47, "Márk" a écrit : > Hi, > > I had a problem with tomee: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45964924/tomee-ora- > 01017-server-tries-to-authenticate-with-os-user/45965073 > >

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

If you use tomee.xml or resources.xml yes, if you don't use the built-in factory then you need to handle it yourself Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

tomee instantiate sessions https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/core/MailSessionFactory.java (which is not the case if you use context.xml) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

Hi Dignesh, Can you try to set mail.smtp.auth before creating the session? Also maybe debug in your authenticator to check it is well used. Le 1 sept. 2017 06:22, "Dignesh" a écrit : Loading javamail.default.providers from

Re: JSTL

+1 side note: we should pby link this to the user thread, can try to find it back later this week if needed Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: JSTL

Hi Jon there is another thread on it (probably on user@) I think we should just make xalan optional in the lib and upgrade. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

just add in properties mail.debug=true BTW, why not using tomee.xml to define this resource? We have some code using this decriptor to handle the authentication a default resource wouldn't have. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2: sending email fails

Hi what is your mail server? can you activate the debug traces? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: TOMEE-2106: Tomee does not encode '%' in war filename

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

dreams, I just > want to be clear where my heart is at. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Aug 11, 2017, at 11:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Does it mean we

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Interesting reasoning. What about tackling new specs - like mvc - which dont have yet a home at asf and would more inline with tomee and require more activity than "done" projects? Le 10 août 2017 22:44, "David Blevins" a écrit : > On Aug 10, 2017, at 1:12 AM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Code donations: Sheldon and Chatterbox

Same thought, for asf it sounds like a G subproject and not sure tomee fits but not strongly against neither. Side note: we had a ssh module already which never got attraction - not a need i guess - so not sure it would get better welcoming this time. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: The road to TomEE 8

comes "possible" if you get what I mean ;) > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 09.08.2017 um 07:09 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > > Well we can go with 8.0.x when finished since for users - and versioning > - > > it doesnt change much. > >

Re: The road to TomEE 8

es sense? Well we can go with 8.0.x when finished since for users - and versioning - it doesnt change much. Anyway it can move to master directly if you branch 7.x before LieGrue, strub > Am 08.08.2017 um 23:09 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > +1 and no

Re: The road to TomEE 8

+1 and no need of 8.0/8.1 branch for now IMHO. Le 8 août 2017 22:21, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" a écrit : > Hi Mark, > > That sounds good. > +1 > > Jean-Louis > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Tue, Aug 8, 2017

Re: Default resources for Java EE 7.

Hi Daniel The side note here is: having them by default was intended cause it breaks tomee deeply in term of resource matching and user existing config. Idea was to set the flag if you want ee7 behavior to stay backward compat (and this solution is fine for a EE container). Le 6 août 2017

Re: Outdated/Junk PR

+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2100 - @Priority

.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yep - that's what I had in my mind. Makes sense if a comparator is > > specified, we should use that instead of the @Priority ordering. > > > > Jon > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >

Re: Probleme with johnzon

2017-07-26 11:19 GMT+02:00 olivier_1 : > Hi > Thank you for your reactivity > > i have already make it . > Not really. This specifies the endpoint types but jackson is still */*: @Provider @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)

Re: Probleme with johnzon

Hi this is an old jackson bug now, story short jackson is defined as a fallback provider (*/*) whereas johnzon is a json one. Just wrap jackson override produces/consumes type to application/json in your app. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

Re: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2100 - @Priority

+1 What's do we want to do? Looks like a EE 8 feature we can eagerly support as a default comparator (if the comparator is set we must bypass it to respect the comparator IMHO) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.c

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TOMEE-2102) IvmContext bind/unbind creates duplicate contexts

looks like the class is not packaged in an arquillian war so it is not instantiable. is that an option? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: Work assignment protocol?

Hi Jon, was writing the same kind of thing - for the same reason pby. Saw you were assigned only in the "fixed" popup :s. Since list is first for now (vs jira), what about fwding the jira saying "i'm on it"? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rman

Re: [PR] TOMEE-2087 IvmContext.list() does not correctly list the context content

looks good to apply to me Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rm

Re: @PostConstruct and @PreDestrory

in the AppContext (resources list?) to avoid to mess up wrappings/unwrapping like we do today and have a straight implmentation. Then the JNDI interaction is a plain unbind but the app resource lifecycle management is not relying on jndi by itself (like EJBs). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: old openejb site is still top ranked in google!

art of the "don't remove the old site" but is outdated. We have a pending task to add a banner on all old pages to show it is no more maintained. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

logic is key for maintenance and ensure it is done in the right order (which is something to ensure we test - override priorities) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpres

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

org.apache.openejb.jee.oejb3.EjbDeployment#getContainerId should give you the container Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

Hi Otavio, I have 2 notes on this: 1. the getProperties() is useless I think (IDE generated?) 2. it would probably better fit ActivationConfigPropertyOverride to have a right ordering of overrides, no? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

just push it, regressions were fixed (thanks again Ivan) so risks are now low enough IMHO Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

readable). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibuc

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

We can also "just" add a video to the website to have it permanent in case part of the world misses the webinar ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordp

Re: [PR] TOMEE-2087 IvmContext.list() does not correctly list the context content

17-07-11 10:10 GMT+03:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > side note: embedded (not tomcat based) testing is needed to ensure we > don't > > break but doesn't fully test the ivmcontext code because the federation > is > > different so guess start

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

ng > for. > >> > >> When you get it figured out any new docs would be amazing. > >> > >> On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 9:57 AM Elder Moraes <elder.mor...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Ok, will try them. > >> > > >> > T

Re: When building locally TomEE has tons of broken tests.

2017-07-10 8:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > IF we want to increase the community activity, then we first need to have > a stable local build. > One has to checkout, run mvn clean install and get a green build. > Currently that's just not the case. It seems that the

Re: Miss the contributing section on the new web site

enhancement is to add 1 line with a link to github, kind of "quick link", in souce part and probably the dev list in support part. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: Miss the contributing section on the new web site

Hi Mark 2017-07-10 7:51 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi folks! > A bit of feedback for the new site.It looks really great but there are a > few minor glitches still: > * The most important information is missing: How to obtain the source > code!This information used to

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

can we proceed from here? Can we get this change merged? > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Not a big fan of "list sites" cause basically you dont find anything (or > it > > is faster to find

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

@Andy: discussion is not if the process is easy or not but if it would be beneficial to the project. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

Not sure there will be a consensus so how do we close that thread? >From what happent last weeks seems project is back on track so I'm tempted to say we should keep it like that for now. Alternative is to do an ASF vote to see if we go with RTC. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <

Re: Example+request

Hi did you have a look to https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/examples/rest-example? Except the client part it matches it. Not sure what you mean by "client using EJBContainer" since EJBContainer is a server technology so orthogonal to the client needs. Romain Manni-Bucau @r

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

good catch for the typo, -0 to backport it (really read it as "this flag shouldnt have existed anyway" more than "don't backport it") Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog &

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

sounds good this way for container activation props Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn &

Re: Adds an option to ignore mdb.activation fields

2017-07-06 23:01 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore : > I'm +1 for back porting that patch, thanks Otavio. > > One thing I'd be interested in as an extra, is seeing if we can set > activation properties on a per-container basis too. > Mean like adding one new key in

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

outch, no more, didnt resetup a cluster since 2 years. But if you push a tomee-maven-plugin sample it would be quick to help. Side note: Tomcat list can also be more relevant since they fully own that part. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

) and switch it to send messages Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.c

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

> > If you are using docker-compose, check the depends_on option. It will > > guarantee you have your name available. It does not guarantee you have > the > > service fully up and running though. If you need that too, you will need > > the script to wait for the service behind t

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

what he is > >> looking > >> > > for is. The content inside is not perfect, but we are getting > better. > >> > > > >> > > The links for the changes made are below, please give feedback on > >> them. > >> > &g

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

..@apache.org> a écrit : > for 404, could be this a solution: > > > Just an idea. :) > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Ivan pushed a way to solve the 404, we just nees to extend it instead o

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

Ok, saw Andy did a similar comment on github so probably let's reverse the question. Anyone feeling like me it is a passthrough? (if not under 1 day think we can "close it" and just push it in prod) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Bl

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

interesting, would be great to have debug log of that clustering part (something like org.apache.catalina.tribes.level = FINE), think the static members are actually excluded of the cluster reading this error Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

Hmm, why not the tcpfailuredetector as a root (/>) instead of wrapping the static membership one? Also did you manage to get debug log of tomcat cluster? it helps a lot in general Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

input box on the home page instread of the "writing text" to find a particular page. Can merge both worlds and solve the navigation issue making it "legacy" :) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rm

Re: Site and "documentation" usage

very close http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/ivan/ can be used (think Ivan did some minor adjustments after but overall idea is here if I'm not mistaken) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Ol

Site and "documentation" usage

Hi guys With Ivan's work I d like to get your feeling on "Documentation" as an entry menu. Personally I feel it weird since almost all is supposed to be doc (like having "Website") but wonder if it is a language/habit thing or if you share it too. Any thoughts?

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

maybe I can figure it out. > > Is that code that I've sent here correct? No issue? > > Did I put the StaticMembershipInterceptor at right place? > > > Twitter: @elderjava <https://twitter.com/elderjava> > Blog: http://eldermoraes.com > > > > 2017-07-05 16:21

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

he cluster still works as a dynamic one. > > > Twitter: @elderjava <https://twitter.com/elderjava> > Blog: http://eldermoraes.com > > > 2017-07-05 16:08 GMT-03:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Think you ask to find node with this servic

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

rmoraes.com 2017-07-05 15:38 GMT-03:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > (disclaimer: read quickly on phone so can be wrong) > > seems you use membership discovery, can't it be simply that? > > 2017-07-05 20:07 GMT+02:00 Elder Moraes <elder.mor...@gmail

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

otifyLifecycleListenerOnFailure: false > objectName: Catalina:type=Cluster > > Name: Catalina:type=Cluster,component=Deployer > modelerType: org.apache.catalina.mbeans.ClassNameMBean > watchDir: /tmp/war-listen/ > processDeployFrequency: 2 > tempDir: /tmp/war-temp/ > maxValidTime: 300

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

Hmm, can you have a look into JMX on some tomee instances to check the tomcat cluster config please? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github &

Re: Building a Static Discovery Cluster

Hi Elder, are all the binding address (host)/ports opened between your containers? (can you telnet between them) do you use docker-compose to create the cluster (it helps a bit)? did you activate the debug log of tomcat clustering? it generally helps Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

. To rephrase it to maybe make it even more explicit: it is not about making our - as committers - work easier but making contributions easier. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: TOMEE-1974 - lost commits

ng on IIRC. Once enhancement which was made related to that feature was to strip the value from the url when doing the request > > Many thanks > > Jon > > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > >

Re: TOMEE-1974 - lost commits

Hi Jon, did you consider making it working without any code change? it does AFAIK. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rm

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

.Gurkan- > > > > > > On Wednesday, July 5, 2017, 10:13:22 AM GMT+3, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > @Gurkan: concretely nothing changed factually since we discussed it and > concluded we can't pay the overhead at the moment so why pu

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

therefore tolerate more latency. And side note (probably some wording issue but just to make it obvious if not): if it is to go back to the normal process anyway after then we can gain these 3 months and already work as we and we'll do ;). Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.co

Re: Site NG on github

e, I > think all you'd have to do is specify the new repo + branch name. > > John > > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:20 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Ok submitted > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-tomee-site-generat

Re: Site NG on github

should have all the needed content now, mvn compile to generate the site mvn pre-site to publish it on staging Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: Site NG on github

*typo: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee-site-generator.git is the right one Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://g

Re: Site NG on github

imported the generator in https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-tomee-site-generator.git, will push a warning in the svn project for now and we can delete it later Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.c

Re: Site NG on github

I can add it to our generator with a java svn or git client, shouldnt take the night ;) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com

Re: Site NG on github

Ok, let say if there is no -1 tonight I'll update the ticket to ask it - it doesnt hurt worse case so dont think we need to wait much more, in particular if we want to work on the website now. Let me know if it is a concern at any level. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Site NG on github

-ng.git (or equivalent) and have a github proxy. In term of deployment it would still be the same, ie we copy the output to content/ of the cms subversion repo or we wire pubsub maven plugin. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rh

Re: MDB JMX Control

will open a new thread about the github integration of the site "Site NG on github" Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://git

Re: AutoConfig - IllegalArgumentException: Comparison method violates its general contract!

+1, the indexOf was supposed to be done on getResourceIds(appResources, type, required) not the copy (which is sorted) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: Building Github PR with Buildbot

yes, mentionned in another thread that PR usage need to probably move to jenkins of travis to have that. In any case (if we want to maintain buildbot too) we need to ask infra since they are the ones owning that part until we use travis. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.

Re: 7.0.4 release plans

> > 2017-07-03 15:11 GMT+03:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi Svetlin, > > > > as soon as this cglib issue is fixed/merged and we reviewed the > dependency > > stack (no other "leak") we can release IMO. Build was fixed last w

Re: 7.0.4 release plans

Hi Svetlin, as soon as this cglib issue is fixed/merged and we reviewed the dependency stack (no other "leak") we can release IMO. Build was fixed last week so we are all good. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau

Re: Removing ANT from the packaged tomee distributions

/org/apache/openejb/server/ejbd/BasicClusterableRequestHandlerTest.java - i don't see what mocks brings except potentially a false positive test Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Ol

Re: Removing ANT from the packaged tomee distributions

Hi Svetlin, would need to check the dependency tree but cglib can miss a test. We shouldnt have cglib at runtime at all Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: [Discuss] Review-than-commit 3 month trial

I'm +1 to enhance our github support, it is really a favorable contribution solution but for the process itself I don't see what changed so I'm still -1 for the reasons mentionned when we discussed it. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: Learning from this week

4 (revert) > > > >Jun 27, 22:56 > >[dev@ list] (Re: TomEE Documentation) > >RM> PS - cause it appeared unobvious on jira: we should try to > >keep current bookmarks as much as possible cause users already > >complained we changed them an

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.x EOL

ranch in svn will move from /tomcat/tc8.0.x to /tomcat/archive/tc8.0.x - the links to the 8.0.x documentation will be removed from tomcat.apache.org " We are already on 8.5 so not directly impacted for 7.x but think we can take it as a good example for 1.x. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibu

Re: Backport of TOMEE-1908

unsafe is fine (and you don't really have the choice actually) Wonder if we should add a flag support in the resource adapter definition/properties to force the use of java proxies (= prevent subclassing) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <htt

Re: Backport of TOMEE-1908

+1, think hazelcast was doing it too at some point (never got why it was often done with a spec making interfaces the first citizen ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 19:46 GMT+02:00 exabrial12 : > As one of the people that had a commit reverted, then history hard pushed, > I > think it should be a policy that NO git push --hard should ever occur. > There > was/is absolutely no justification for such childish behavior. > To be

Re: MDB JMX Control

on github+list the comments?". Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linke

Re: MDB JMX Control

@Jon: commented 2 small things on the PR. More than the fixes itself which shouldnt be too hard I'm interested to learn the flow we have when commenting on github. Know jira should have a comment so a mail too but on the "submitter" point of view how does it look like? Romain M

Re: Suffocating development environment

b plugin is not automatically wired to the generator. If we agree to use the personal html area we solve that part - and probably need to create a committer page on the website btw. About target I guess Mark is our expert and can fix it very quick? > > Andy. > > On 28 June 2017 at

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 13:19 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> : > On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > 2017-06-28 11:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 11:39 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore : > Wow. > > Well, thanks for writing the email, and starting the discussion. From where > I'm sitting, it looks like there are a few issues. I'll work in reverse-ish > order (in terms of your post). > > -- Reverting

Re: Suffocating development environment

2017-06-28 2:14 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht : > I'm writing this on the public dev list as there seems to be inaction on > the private list regarding the preservation and nurturing of contributions > to the TomEE project. I hope this serves as an entry into a public >

Re: TomEE Documentation

PS - cause it appeared unobvious on jira: we should try to keep current bookmarks as much as possible cause users already complained we changed them and it is now "done" (= we dont get complains anymore or very rarely) so i don't feel comfortable breaking it again Romain Manni-Bucau @r

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >