Currently Linux. I have just bought a ST-Ericsson Snowball card, but
can be a platform for Windows phone as well at most no cost.
The OS that I am assuming to support are : Linux, Windows and Mac.
With pthread you can cover all both for sure: there is a window port.
When it will be available the st
Ok...let take apart the entusiasm. You are right!
2011/10/21 Jean-Sebastien Delfino :
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Giorgio Zoppi
> wrote:
>>
>> tnx Jean Sebastian..in the legalese has been written:
>>
>> YOU MAY reference a prohibited work (e.g. with text or hyperlinks)
>> from an apache
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> JS,
> I was looking for a portable interface..
> Just 1c,
> Giorgio.
>
That's what I thought too.
Looks like std::thread is not ready for prime-time yet with CLang.
Apache APR has a portable thread API, proven and tested on many platforms
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> tnx Jean Sebastian..in the legalese has been written:
>
> YOU MAY reference a prohibited work (e.g. with text or hyperlinks)
> from an apache.org web page or identify the work as a system
> requirement for the proper operation of the Apache
JS,
I was looking for a portable interface..
Just 1c,
Giorgio.
tnx Jean Sebastian..in the legalese has been written:
YOU MAY reference a prohibited work (e.g. with text or hyperlinks)
from an apache.org web page or identify the work as a system
requirement for the proper operation of the Apache product.
So we can use pococapsule as container as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:23 AM, dsh wrote:
> [1] <- That's what you are looking for in terms of CLang and pthread no?
>
> [1]
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2391194/what-is-gs-pthread-equiv-in-clang
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
>
Not sure. My understanding is that -pthread adds -lpthread to link
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> Jean Sebastian,
> when do you use libcloud? That is an interesting point.
>
I've been using it to bootstrap and control virtual machines for automated
testing.
--
Jean-Sebastien
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> PocoCaspule is LGPL. Dunno about third derivate stuff and legalese,
> but we should check. More people we are, more critical mass we have to
> follow and change the runtime to adapt to the cloud.
> Best Regards,
> Giorgio.
>
Some info about
PocoCaspule is LGPL. Dunno about third derivate stuff and legalese,
but we should check. More people we are, more critical mass we have to
follow and change the runtime to adapt to the cloud.
Best Regards,
Giorgio.
compatible.
Best Regards
--Oliver.
Von: Jean-Sebastien Delfino [mailto:jsdelf...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2011 08:13
An: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Cc: tuscany-...@ws.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Cloud enabled devices.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Konradi, Philipp
scany-...@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloud enabled devices.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Konradi, Philipp
mailto:philipp.konr...@siemens.com>> wrote:
That sounds like a great idea and I would be interested to understand better
what you exactly mean by "SCA clouded embedded devices fra
Konstantin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:giorgio.zo...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Oktober 2011 10:43
An: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Cloud enabled devices.
2011/10/12 Sokolov, Konstantin (ext) :
> The use of RTTI in Trentino is limited to only two p
2011/10/12 Sokolov, Konstantin (ext) :
> The use of RTTI in Trentino is limited to only two places where a
> dynamic_cast is used. This is done mostly for esthetic reasons (prefer C++
> style casts over C Style casts) and could be easily avoided. The entire
> logging/log4cxx stuff can be control
Jean Sebastian,
when do you use libcloud? That is an interesting point.
[1] <- That's what you are looking for in terms of CLang and pthread no?
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2391194/what-is-gs-pthread-equiv-in-clang
Cheers
Daniel
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> 2011/10/13 Jean-Sebastien Delfino :
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:58 AM
2011/10/13 Jean-Sebastien Delfino :
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Giorgio Zoppi
> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi there! a few thoughts:
>> > Tuscany-cpp has a hard dependency on HTTPD, used as runtime container
>> > instead or writing my own.
>> > Not sure if HTTPD mods can be easily ported to LightHTTPD.
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Konradi, Philipp <
philipp.konr...@siemens.com> wrote:
> That sounds like a great idea and I would be interested to understand
> better what you exactly mean by "SCA clouded embedded devices framework"?
> Devices which communicate to SCA services hosted in a cloud?
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:58 AM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> > Hi there! a few thoughts:
> > Tuscany-cpp has a hard dependency on HTTPD, used as runtime container
> > instead or writing my own.
> > Not sure if HTTPD mods can be easily ported to LightHTTPD. If it's
> feasible
> > and people want to try,
: Samstag, 8. Oktober 2011 02:22
An: dev@tuscany.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Cloud enabled devices.
I would like something more lighter than trentino, i would like not
use RTTI or c++ exception, in a real time enviromement they behave
really bad.
I would like to stay away from log4cxx, it is surrogate
2011/10/11 dsh :
> Hi Giorgio,
>
> if you say WE, is that WE like in HP the enterprise?
No. I speak only for me. We (me and my friend who is going to work
outside), my manager doesnt know anything about this stuff.
I like separating job from apache stuffz.
Cheers,
Giorgio.
--
Quiero ser el rayo d
Hi Giorgio,
if you say WE, is that WE like in HP the enterprise?
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> Hi all,
> first of all we have to target to a demo product as embedded. This is
> what I am looking for, for going to people...and saying we have done
> with S
> Hi there! a few thoughts:
> Tuscany-cpp has a hard dependency on HTTPD, used as runtime container
> instead or writing my own.
> Not sure if HTTPD mods can be easily ported to LightHTTPD. If it's feasible
> and people want to try, I can help with any questions you have on the
> Tuscany HTTPD mods
2011/10/10 Jean-Sebastien Delfino :
> Hi there! a few thoughts:
> Tuscany-cpp has a hard dependency on HTTPD, used as runtime container
> instead or writing my own.
> Not sure if HTTPD mods can be easily ported to LightHTTPD. If it's feasible
> and people want to try, I can help with any questions
Hi all,
first of all we have to target to a demo product as embedded. This is
what I am looking for, for going to people...and saying we have done
with SCA, it works and works well. Otherwise all this efforts results
in it's cool but not sure that it works. Any ideas on this?
For the runtime, we co
Hi there! a few thoughts:
Tuscany-cpp has a hard dependency on HTTPD, used as runtime container
instead or writing my own.
Not sure if HTTPD mods can be easily ported to LightHTTPD. If it's feasible
and people want to try, I can help with any questions you have on the
Tuscany HTTPD mods.
Some si
On a side note - I was thinking to alternatively use LightHTTPD [1]
instead of Apache HTTPD cause it run's on most of my embedded devices
already.
[1] http://www.lighttpd.net/
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Simon Laws wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Giorgio Zoppi
> w
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> For embedded java and python are too much. .NET performs better, but
> it is tight with Windows. It has a lot of dependencies, programmers
> tends
> to use introspection at runtime in the core. I know, Java is a tool
> like can be C/C++, but
For embedded java and python are too much. .NET performs better, but
it is tight with Windows. It has a lot of dependencies, programmers
tends
to use introspection at runtime in the core. I know, Java is a tool
like can be C/C++, but generally performs bad in runtime/resource
contrains enviroment
Btw,
I would not completely disregard Java as a platform if you think it
doesn't scale on resource constraint devices. For instance SheevaPlug
devices [1] can be ordered with an accompanying J9 VM and a ProSyst
OSGi R4 framework [2] and I suppose both scales pretty well on those
devices.
[1] http
i wanna arrive to a platform and a couple of products. I am interested
in innovation but not in cs research.
I am going to look your pointer.
2011/10/8 dsh :
> That finding illustrates that it is not only about application domains
> but actually the questions we were asking so far do qualify for
>
That finding illustrates that it is not only about application domains
but actually the questions we were asking so far do qualify for
research topics. I am for instance are interested in research
questions such as how could computing cycles be offloaded on embedded
devices from the main CPU to the
I have found this..http://www.smarcos-project.eu
2011/10/8 Giorgio Zoppi :
> It sounds good. Now it is time to find some application domains to
> apply it and then funding.
> Who can need such framework? Which kind of application should be targeted?
> Should be in C or C++?
>
>
> --
> Quiero ser
It sounds good. Now it is time to find some application domains to
apply it and then funding.
Who can need such framework? Which kind of application should be targeted?
Should be in C or C++?
--
Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta
para hacerte respirar y vivir en me.
"Favola -Mod
Hi,
in 2007 I did the Apache Bennu proposal [1]. I think at that time the
proposal did not find plenty of traction but the idea of
componentizing every service found on a router/firewall sounds similar
to what you are describing. At that time the idea as well was to not
use Apache HTTPd on embedde
2011/10/8 dsh :
> Hi,
>
> are you targeting for end user devices such as tablets, cell phones
> etc.? at network devices such as embedded routers, firewalls, a NAS
> etc. or are you thinking of something that's really agnostic and thus
> more pervasive and hence could be run on any of the use case
Hi,
are you targeting for end user devices such as tablets, cell phones
etc.? at network devices such as embedded routers, firewalls, a NAS
etc. or are you thinking of something that's really agnostic and thus
more pervasive and hence could be run on any of the use case scenarios
mentioned?
Cheer
Florian,
I would like to skip Java...As far I know that is java.
2011/10/8 Florian Moga :
> I don't know what the current state is, but seems like we had a couple of
> Tuscany samples running on Android [1]. Luciano can probably give us more
> info on that. Seems to me like it fits your "SCA cloud
I don't know what the current state is, but seems like we had a couple of
Tuscany samples running on Android [1]. Luciano can probably give us more
info on that. Seems to me like it fits your "SCA clouded embedded devices
framework" idea. Eventually, there will be Android on many different devices
I would like something more lighter than trentino, i would like not
use RTTI or c++ exception, in a real time enviromement they behave
really bad.
I would like to stay away from log4cxx, it is surrogate of an optimal
java product, we need something more simple for logging or we dont
need logging in
ded
> devices framework"?
I have not seen the code..but it sounds good. I wanna something simple
to incorporate in tuscany embedded sca.
> Thanks,
> Philipp
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Giorgio Zoppi [mailto:giorgio.zo...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Frid
r 07, 2011 3:32 PM
> To: tuscany-...@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Cloud enabled devices.
>
> Hi all,
> are you tired of legacy code? Do you wanna try something new with SCA
> architecture? If yes, we are brainstorming about using SCA clouded
> embedded devices framework.
> What d
Hi all,
are you tired of legacy code? Do you wanna try something new with SCA
architecture? If yes, we are brainstorming about using SCA clouded
embedded devices framework.
What do u think about it?
Cheers,
Giorgio
--
Quiero ser el rayo de sol que cada día te despierta
para hacerte respirar y viv
43 matches
Mail list logo
