On 22/12/08 04:16, Eddy Nigg wrote:
Not sure if this is a reason to disable a root, but it's certainly
illegal business practice. Hopefully we can settle this with Comodo
directly in appropriate manner.
Seems like the business is in Denmark, and claims Danish law and courts.
Which law are yo
Hi. I'm asking for help :) When I try to build NSS on Windows Vista,
I've go build_coreconf error 1. Is it possible to build NSS on Vista ?
If it is possible, then please tell me how?
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
htt
Unless you're intimate with the NSS build system and know enough to trim things
down...then this set of instructions is the best thing. I've built NSS on
Vista using this wiki page:
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Windows_Build_Prerequisites
-Original Message-
From: dev-tech-crypto-bou
On 12/22/2008 11:11 AM, Ian G:
On 22/12/08 04:16, Eddy Nigg wrote:
Not sure if this is a reason to disable a root, but it's certainly
illegal business practice. Hopefully we can settle this with Comodo
directly in appropriate manner.
Seems like the business is in Denmark, and claims Danish la
Thank you, David Stutzman. I hope this information will help me.
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
Dear all,
does the current version of nss already support delta crls? I can only find
old information about this. Where can I find up to date info about such
information?
thanks
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://
ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 03:33:
> Hi. I'm asking for help :) When I try to build NSS on Windows Vista,
> I've go build_coreconf error 1. Is it possible to build NSS on Vista ?
> If it is possible, then please tell me how?
Sounds like you might have had one or more of these issue
sg4all wrote, On 2008-12-22 06:46:
> Dear all,
>
> does the current version of nss already support delta crls?
No. Presently, No version of NSS supports delta CRLs. There are no
definite plans to do so, at this time. It has been on the wish list
for a long time.
> I can only find old informa
On 22 дек, 19:14, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 03:33:
>
> > Hi. I'm asking for help :) When I try to build NSS on Windows Vista,
> > I've go build_coreconf error 1. Is it possible to build NSS on Vista ?
> > If it is possible, then please tell me how?
>
> S
alex.agra...@gmail.com wrote, On 2008-12-21 08:02:
> I'm working with NSS from JAVA (via JAVA 6 PKCS11 provider on RHEL 5).
> My NSS database is configured for FIPS-140 mode. And I try to wrap/
> unwrap AES key with RSA public/private key pair as follows:
>
> // open NSS keystore
> char[
ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 08:45:
> On 22 дек, 19:14, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>> ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 03:33:
>>
>>> Hi. I'm asking for help :) When I try to build NSS on Windows Vista,
>>> I've go build_coreconf error 1. Is it possible to build NSS on Vista ?
On 22 дек, 20:08, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 08:45:
> Please supply more output from the gmake run, like (say) the last 20
> lines of output
There is building log(but there are only 5 lines of output):
>>gmake nss_build_all
process_begin:CreateProcess((n
hi,
ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote:
On 22 дек, 20:08, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 08:45:
Please supply more output from the gmake run, like (say) the last 20
lines of output
There is building log(but there are only 5 lines of output):
gmake
ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 09:30:
> On 22 дек, 20:08, Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
>> ps_mitrofa...@mail.ru wrote, On 2008-12-22 08:45:
>> Please supply more output from the gmake run, like (say) the last 20
>> lines of output
>
> There is building log(but there are only 5 lines of ou
> Are you sure this is not coming from the cipher.unwrap call?
> If you add a line of code to print info about the unwrapped key,
> does it show that key to be in the NSS token?
Actually, the cipher.unwrap call passes fine, but when I print the
unwrappedKey - it looks like a secretKeySpec rather t
https://blog.startcom.org/?p=145
--
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Jabber: start...@startcom.org
Blog: https://blog.startcom.org
___
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-
Eddy,
That reseller's ability to sell Comodo certificates has been
suspended while we investigate why they are apparently not fulfilling their
contractual obligations to us.
We revoked your certificate for mozilla.com.
Regards
Robin Alden
Comodo
> -Original Message-
> From
On 12/23/2008 03:15 AM, Robin Alden:
Eddy,
That reseller's ability to sell Comodo certificates has been
suspended while we investigate why they are apparently not fulfilling their
contractual obligations to us.
How can you outsource such a critical part as domain control validation
to
Eddy,
As I noted in my prior correspondence, Comodo has undertaken an internal
review of the Certstar reseller account. We have informed CertStar that
their email violates their contractual obligation to refrain from sending
unsolicited emails and that their email could be interpreted as mislead
On 12/23/2008 03:38 AM, Robin Alden:
Eddy,
As I noted in my prior correspondence, Comodo has undertaken an internal
review of the Certstar reseller account. We have informed CertStar that
their email violates their contractual obligation to refrain from sending
unsolicited emails and that their
I believe that this is a symptom of faulty internal control, and that
this is direct evidence of not living up to the Mozilla CA policy.
I advocate at least temporarily removing the trust bits from Comodo
until a new external audit can be completed, with an eye toward
ensuring that Comodo, not the
Kyle Hamilton wrote:
I advocate at least temporarily removing the trust bits from Comodo
until a new external audit can be completed, with an eye toward
ensuring that Comodo, not the reseller, perform the domain
validations.
There are two general reasons for pulling a root, to address a clear a
I agree with all three of these issues -- it's not *just* this
reseller, it's potentially the entire reseller network, and it's
entirely possible that the problem exists across multiples.
(Especially if Comodo delegates full Registration Authority capability
without verification, which seems to be
23 matches
Mail list logo
