Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

Adding gtk+ maintainer. Paul, would you mind commenting about this issue? On 11/09/2017 01:07 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> libkprint, kde-print-manager, etc. may have dependencies that make >> the mix impossible. I don't

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On 11/08/2017 09:43 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> AFAIK such projects are gutenprint, cups-filters or hplip... does anyone >> have in mind other projects, which will be unable to use CUPS and reason? >> > libkprint,

Fedora-Modular 27-20171109.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Docker_base docker x86_64 Server dvd arm Failed openQA tests: 23/94 (x86_64), 4/19 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171108.n.2): ID: 167539 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/167539 ID

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2017-11-09 17:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2017-11-09 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2017-11-09 09:00 PST  US/Pacific 2017-11-09

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171109.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171108.n.2 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171109.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 976 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 738 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 320

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 854 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 848 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 738

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

On 2017-11-08 11:08, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > since there has been some discussion in the last time about removing > libcrypt from glibc in some time [1,2,3,4] and splitting it out into a > separate project which can evolve quicker, I'd like to hear your > oppinion about replacing glibc's

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Modular Server 27 Beta Release Go/No-Go - 5th round

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Modular Server 27 Beta Release Go/No-Go - 5th round on 2017-11-09 from 13:00:00 to 15:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Final release Go/No-Go Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Final release Go/No-Go Meeting on 2017-11-09 from 13:00:00 to 15:00:00 US/Eastern The meeting will be about: Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a

[Bug 1511253] perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511253 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.98-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1511253] New: perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511253 Bug ID: 1511253 Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.98 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-LibXML-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1511253] perl-XML-LibXML-Simple-0.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511253 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1349670 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1349670=edit [patch] Update to 0.98 (#1511253) -- You are

[Bug 1511251] perl-User-Identity-0.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511251 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-User-Identity-0.98-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1511252] New: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.446 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511252 Bug ID: 1511252 Summary: perl-Verilog-Perl-3.446 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Verilog-Perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1511251] perl-User-Identity-0.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511251 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1349669 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1349669=edit [patch] Update to 0.98 (#1511251) -- You are

[Bug 1511251] New: perl-User-Identity-0.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511251 Bug ID: 1511251 Summary: perl-User-Identity-0.98 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-User-Identity Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Mail-Message-3.003-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1511244] perl-Mail-Transport-3.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511244 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Mail-Transport-3.001-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1511246] New: perl-PAR-Packer-1.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511246 Bug ID: 1511246 Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.041 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PAR-Packer Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1511244] perl-Mail-Transport-3.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511244 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1349660 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1349660=edit [patch] Update to 3.001 (#1511244) -- You are

[Bug 1511244] New: perl-Mail-Transport-3.001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511244 Bug ID: 1511244 Summary: perl-Mail-Transport-3.001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-Transport Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1349659 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1349659=edit [patch] Update to 3.003 (#1511243) -- You are

[Bug 1511243] New: perl-Mail-Message-3.003 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 Bug ID: 1511243 Summary: perl-Mail-Message-3.003 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-Message Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Finance-Quote-1.45-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1511240] perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1349655 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1349655=edit [patch] Update to 1.45 (#1511240) -- You are

[Bug 1511240] New: perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511240 Bug ID: 1511240 Summary: perl-Finance-Quote-1.45 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Finance-Quote Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:43 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: libkprint, kde-print-manager, etc. may have dependencies that make the mix impossible. I don't know for sure, though. GTK+ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Finance-Quote-1.44-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:27 PM Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:58 +, Christopher wrote: > > Hi, I've been reading a lot lately about Fedora modularity, and I'm > > still a > > bit confused on some points. > > > > Is it necessary for

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171108.n.2 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171108.n.2 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:199 Upgraded packages: 28 Downgraded packages: 31 Size of added packages: 1.08 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 09:16:23PM +0100, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > AFAIK such projects are gutenprint, cups-filters or hplip... does anyone > have in mind other projects, which will be unable to use CUPS and reason? Gutenprint today is okay, as only its CUPS filters/backend link against CUPS and

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:51:00PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On 11/08/2017 07:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > AFAIK such projects are gutenprint, cups-filters or hplip... does anyone > have in mind other projects, which will be unable to use CUPS and reason? > libkprint, kde-print-manager, etc. may have dependencies that make

[Bug 1510220] perl-Finance-Quote-1.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510220 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1509722] perl-Finance-Quote-1.40 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509722 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1510678] perl-Finance-Quote-1.44 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1510678 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

Here is reply from CUPS mailing list: On 11/08/2017 08:58 PM, Michael Sweet wrote: > Zdenek, > >> On Nov 8, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> ... >> would you mind considering dual license - Apache License 2.0 and GPLv2+? >> Because "OS-supplied library" definition

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 11/08/2017 07:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > >> wrote: > >>>

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On 11/08/2017 07:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox >>>

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 8 November 2017 at 13:50, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +,

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171108.n.1 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171106.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171108.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 4 Dropped packages:199 Upgraded packages: 28 Downgraded packages: 31 Size of added packages: 1.08 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On 8 November 2017 at 13:50, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

Re: Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 18:58 +, Christopher wrote: > Hi, I've been reading a lot lately about Fedora modularity, and I'm > still a > bit confused on some points. > > Is it necessary for maintainers to create modules for their RPM > packages?

Modularity questions for "traditional" RPM packaging

Hi, I've been reading a lot lately about Fedora modularity, and I'm still a bit confused on some points. Is it necessary for maintainers to create modules for their RPM packages? Is modularity something that a maintainer for an RPM package must deal with? What kinds of new issues must an RPM

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < >> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:58:13PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171026.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:53 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > But why? _Any_ package can completely

Re: time-1.8 changes license and output

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 05:06:11PM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > I hope Fedora's time-1.8 won't disrupt your scripts so blatantly. Let's land this in F28 (rawhide) and not update in F27. And make sure it gets in the release notes. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader

Re: [RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

I forgot to mention: There's already a COPR [1] for sneak-peak testing of the current pre-release libxcrypt. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/besser82/libxcrypt/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

[RFC] Replace glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt for Fedora 29/30

Hello everyone, since there has been some discussion in the last time about removing libcrypt from glibc in some time [1,2,3,4] and splitting it out into a separate project which can evolve quicker, I'd like to hear your oppinion about replacing glibc's libcrypt with libxcrypt [5] for Fedora 29

time-1.8 changes license and output

After many years a new 1.8 version of "time" tool was released. This version brings some noticable changes: (1) License changed from (GPLv2+) to (GPLv3+ and GFDL). (2) Additional exit codes are used to report meassured command failures and failures to execute the command. (3) A meassured

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-11-10)

Once upon a time, Randy Barlow said: > #topic #1788 Default path for root is inconsistent between su - and sudo > .fesco 1788 > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1788 Since the proposal included "discuss on the mailing list" - I'll throw in my two cents... I think su

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-11-10)

The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-11-10 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues

Re: [HEADS-UP] cryptsetup-2.0.0-rc1 - libcryptsetup soname bump

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:03:37PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote: > Pushed new cryptsetup update in rawhide: cryptsetup-2.0.0-0.3.fc28. > Please rebuild related packages above. > > The new build includes old soname so that systemd and others may > rebuild safely against new library. The old soname

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:23:37PM +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

I'll try to convince Mike to make a dual license. On 11/08/2017 04:34 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:25:22PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> Well that page only refers to OpenSSL and even then it points out that other >> distros have differing opinions. Personally I

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:25:22PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Well that page only refers to OpenSSL and even then it points out that other > distros have differing opinions. Personally I think it is dubious even for > OpenSSL, and if you start broadening it further to claim it applies to

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:17:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08-11-17 16:06, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > > >I don't think static linking against libcups is common enough to be a > > > >serious concern - CUPS

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

Hi, On 08-11-17 16:06, Solomon Peachy wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: I don't think static linking against libcups is common enough to be a serious concern - CUPS is fairly ubiquitous and easily falls under the "OS-supplied library" exception in

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox > > (trademarks), > > and for bootloaders (signing again), and some

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > I have many questions here. > > Isn't this going to require relicensing a humongous number of applications? > We can't plausibly relicense so much. We would have to remove printing > support from GTK+, which is

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On 08.11.2017 15:53, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 08-11-17 15:06, Solomon Peachy wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:54:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> Is there anyone who could raise concerns to Apple about the license >>> change? Maybe convince them to dual-license it or something? >>

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:53:32PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I don't think static linking against libcups is common enough to be a > > serious concern - CUPS is fairly ubiquitous and easily falls under the > > "OS-supplied library" exception in the GPL 2. And existing GPL-2-only > >

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > We have such special protections for the kernel (signing), firefox > (trademarks), > and for bootloaders (signing again), and some packages which don't consider > the fedora repo the canonical location for

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 02:05:12PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > I propose simplifying this and opening

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

I have many questions here. Isn't this going to require relicensing a humongous number of applications? We can't plausibly relicense so much. We would have to remove printing support from GTK+, which is not going to happen. The system library exception might work for Fedora, but it would be

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

Hi, On 08-11-17 15:06, Solomon Peachy wrote: On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:54:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: Is there anyone who could raise concerns to Apple about the license change? Maybe convince them to dual-license it or something? Well, Michael Sweet (mswet AT apple.com) remains the

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:51:22AM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > The gutenprint CUPS filters in my dev tree dynamically pull in 41 shared > libraries, mostly as passthroughs. I'm auditing them now. FWIW, everything that gutenprint links against, and everything they pull in, appears to be

Fedora Rawhide-20171108.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 23/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171106.n.0): ID: 167184 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL:

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >> wrote: >> > I propose simplifying this and

Re: [HEADS UP] Removed legacy provides from coreutils

On 11/07/2017 06:32 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Yesterday we removed following Provides/Obsoletes from coreutils. > - fileutils > - sh-utils > - stat > - textutils > - mktemp > > First four never been separate packages (at least from what I can see > in dist-git), last one disappeared in fc10...

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:54:03AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > Is there anyone who could raise concerns to Apple about the license > change? Maybe convince them to dual-license it or something? Well, Michael Sweet (mswet AT apple.com) remains the primary developer of CUPS, and this has been

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:43 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > I propose simplifying this and opening fedora-release releases to more > > contributors: > > > > 1. Let's drop "upstream" at

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:38:31PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> > OTOH, Gutenprint is GPLv2+, so it could be considered GPLv3 for purposes >> > of linking to ASL2.0 CUPS.. >> >> Just make sure that Gutenprint

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 01:38:31PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > OTOH, Gutenprint is GPLv2+, so it could be considered GPLv3 for purposes > > of linking to ASL2.0 CUPS.. > > Just make sure that Gutenprint doesn't link to any other 3rd party > libs that are GPLv2-only - everything it links

Re: streamlining fedora-release

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi fedora-release maintainers and fellow developers, > > The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora > version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for > systemd

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 08:32:50AM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:45:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple > > exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not > > link to the newer

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 07:45:28AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > It will. Previously, it was licensed under GPLv2 + LGPLv2 with Apple > exceptions. Now it is ASL 2.0 across the board. GPLv2 projects can not > link to the newer version. That will seriously affect Gutenprint if applied strictly.

streamlining fedora-release

Hi fedora-release maintainers and fellow developers, The fedora-release package contains stuff that is tied to each Fedora version and changes slowly, and it also contains the preset files for systemd units, which change fairly often (a few requests per month). Currently fedora-release has a

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Felipe Borges wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> CUPS upstream changed license of project to Apache

[EPEL-devel] Re: ansible1.9 package

On Sat, 2017-11-04 at 10:33 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Breaking updates would be pushed only at these times (unless there > > is a > > *really* good reason). This could involve also writing some release > > notes > > (e.g. the packager could tick a box "breaking update" and submit a > > note

Re: [HEADS-UP] cryptsetup-2.0.0-rc1 - libcryptsetup soname bump

On 11/07/2017 06:59 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote: On 11/07/2017 05:51 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 04:47:51PM +0100, Ondrej Kozina wrote: On 10/30/2017 04:58 PM, Ondrej Kozina wrote: clevis-udisks2-0:6-3.fc27.x86_64 libblockdev-crypto-0:2.13-1.fc28.x86_64

[EPEL-devel] Re: ansible1.9 package

Dne 4.11.2017 v 01:20 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a): > What I normally do in an enterprise setting is get the packages I am > going to install on the boxes and collect them to their own > repository. I then sign those packages with a rpm key that I control > and then have all the client boxes

[EPEL-devel] Re: ansible1.9 package

Dne 3.11.2017 v 05:09 Peter Rex napsal(a): > We originally looked at Ansible and thought, OK, Red Hat, nothing more stable > than that. Ansible, flagship product. It > seemed like a good bet, but turned out not to be, that Red Hat wasn't likely > to deprecate a major version of a software >

Re: Looking for package reviewers / sponsors for Thonny, Python IDE for beginners

Hi! Sorry, I guess I didn't bring the link out clearly enough, but I already created the request in Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1503175 best regards, Aivar On 8.11.2017 12:28, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 11/08/2017 09:58 AM, Aivar Annamaa wrote: Hi! I am computer

Re: CUPS will change license since 2.3 version - now incompatible with GPLv2

On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 7:39 AM, Felipe Borges wrote: > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> CUPS upstream changed license of project to Apache license 2.0, which is >> now incompatible with GPLv2. This change will be in new

  1   2   >