On Wednesday 26 November 2003 09:34 pm, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can you do further development without an up-to-date base ? Or are
you planning to use some other base of some nature ?
Although I can understand your curiosity about Mitel's plans,
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice that Mitel is saying it WILL comply with GPL, so my questions are
appropriate at this time or in the near future.
So I ask again, what are your (Mitel's) plans about this Charlie ?
Your question has already been answered, as you state
In Other Words...
They will comply with GPL and source will therefore be made available.
What kernel or dist that source is compiled against... Or any other
unknown, will be known when it is released... Right? I think I got it
a week or so ago, actually :-)
Fear of the unknown can, buif we let
Craig,
They will comply with GPL and source will therefore be made available.
Yep... we have always complied with the GPL (and have been very strong
in that position, going perhaps a bit farther than we needed to) and
always will.
What kernel or dist that source is compiled against... Or any
On Monday 01 December 2003 09:21 am, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I notice that Mitel is saying it WILL comply with GPL, so my questions
are appropriate at this time or in the near future.
So I ask again, what are your (Mitel's) plans about this Charlie
On Monday 01 December 2003 10:01 am, Craig Jensen wrote:
In Other Words...
They will comply with GPL and source will therefore be made available.
What kernel or dist that source is compiled against... Or any other
unknown, will be known when it is released... Right? I think I got it
a week
I think Mitel have answered most of the questions, if some in a sort of
round-about way. This is my take:
1. Their MAS 6000 server (our 6.0 unsupported) has 99% or more of the
performance and features they need to continue selling that product at a margin
they find acceptable. They do not need
BTW; thanxs for being so polite. That often (sadly) is not the case on this
list.
Bob, I can't recall the last time you contributed anything of substance
to this list. In fact, before responding to your email, I did a search
on mail archives for your email address. The first three pages of
Devlyn,
I think Mitel have answered most of the questions, if some in a sort of
round-about way. This is my take:
Your comments are essentially on target with just a couple of notes:
1. Their MAS 6000 server (our 6.0 unsupported)
Please be careful on this statement as there *is* a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has 99% or more of the
performance and features they need to continue selling that product
at a margin they find acceptable. They do not need to continue adding
too many more features besides security updates and tweaks.
Yep... it
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 09:42 pm, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
On 26/11/03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] did say:
Confusing as to how you are planning to implement this - ...we will be
continuing to develop applications on top of our commercial release and
as we make changes to GPL components we
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 17:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Devinfo list members,
As has been hinted on this list, we are following Red Hat's lead with
Fedora and turning the SME Server developer release over to the community.
I don't think
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 05:58 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Devinfo list members,
As has been hinted on this list, we are following Red Hat's lead with
Fedora and turning the SME Server developer release over to the community.
I don't
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can you do further development without an up-to-date base ? Or are you
planning to use some other base of some nature ?
Although I can understand your curiosity about Mitel's plans, I see no
reason why your questions should be answered here.
On 26/11/03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] did say:
Confusing as to how you are planning to implement this - ...we will be
continuing to develop applications on top of our commercial release and as we
make changes to GPL components we will release them to the community just as
any other developer
15 matches
Mail list logo
