ication/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/49b8a024/attachment.pgp>
ext attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/28b23b40/attachment.pgp>
jj
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/41c4d29d/attachment.pgp>
> What QOS does the internet have in general? We need simply to have
> enough local bandwidth, enough of a buffer, enough parallel requests and
> enough redundancy.
Assuming this isn't a rhetorical question - the only guarantee that the
Internet makes at the IP layer is that your packet will
Just had an idea for a "Network Health" infolet that would contain data
which would give an indication of how "healthy" the network is as a
whole.
Firstly, we could have a table - indicating the average response times
for the various messages (DataRequest/DataReply etc) against the HTL of
the
non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/df5fd1e2/attachment.pgp>
On Sunday 26 January 2003 13:51, you wrote:
> > > > Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM
> > > by default.
> >
> > When you next talk to the press and mention Freenet as a replacement for
> > internet radio (which it is not), everyone will turn it on and try to
> > > But what does it mean?
> >
> > It's the effect of a bug in the IBM JDK 1.3.
>
> I'm using blackdown 1.3.1.
I thought that was the last best explanation.
Dunno. Maybe Blackdown has the same problem. Search the devl mailing list
archives for more info.
--gj
I could really use some help testing the new SplitFile insertion and
retrieval code. The best way to do this at the moment is to use
the command line clients.
The current default FEC encoder segments files greater than 128Mb.
I am most interested in files from 1Mb to 128Mb for now. You can
What's up?
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:36 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > I can't
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this.
> >
> > > Size: 64911360
> >
> > Are you sure that this is the exact file size?
>
> That's the size reported
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:47, you wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > > 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
> > > > undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
> > >
> > > I agree - that is what plugin
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:49, you wrote:
> > length 7.4M
> > elapsed time: 37 minutes
> > end to end transfer rate: 7.4M * (1024K/M) / (37 min * (60sec/min) ) ~=
> >3.4k/sec
> >
> > It took one minute to find the SplitFile metadata and somewhat less than
> > 2 minutes to decode.
> >
> >
Hi,
Looking at environment
ARK sequence number is 22
Last ARK sequence number inserted is 24
clicking on the 24 gets DNF, change the 18 to 17 gets DNF
and 16 finds the correct ARK...
What happened? This is with build 656.
Ed Tomlinson
___
devl
tion/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/19f61952/attachment.pgp>
Hi,
At this end of the line 656 seems to be working well. I have been running a
naked node (no name or ip_address supplied in freenet.conf) and my node is
quickly found (1 to 2 hours depend on how long freenet is down here) after
an ip address change and maintains the same specialization. I
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:05:50PM +0100, Michael Schierl wrote:
> Thanks, "nomail" was on. But I did not switch that on.
The same thing happened to me a while back, I suspect mailman is being
a bit too quick to turn on nomail for temporarily undeliverable mail
(due to timed out connections and
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/f77e6649/attachment.pgp>
>
> >
> > Ian.
--
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org/amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Full time freenet hacker.
http://freenetproject.org/
Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at
http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/dbS0eicAn1o/
ICTHUS.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/81122488/attachment.pgp>
Apologies. Everything works just fine. Thanks for getting this fixed so
quickly.
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 21:58, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Fixed. Thanks for the bug report.
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 01:06:32AM -, Simon Porter wrote:
> > 25-Jan-2003 01:04:50 (freenet.node.Main, main): loading
Hmm. I'm still getting the same problem on a freshly downloaded version.
Have you updated freenet-latest.jar? I am running Linux btw.
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 21:58, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Fixed. Thanks for the bug report.
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 01:06:32AM -, Simon Porter wrote:
> >
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:46AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
[exaggeration]
You could say the same about fec generally, and I'm sure you could make a
similar
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
Why not encourage people to do things which have a reason
Personally I am optimistic, with
Splitfiles I have been seeing overall download rates of around 30k/sec,
which is more than enough for a FM quality ogg stream.
Hi,
At this end of the line 656 seems to be working well. I have been running a
naked node (no name or ip_address supplied in freenet.conf) and my node is
quickly found (1 to 2 hours depend on how long freenet is down here) after
an ip address change and maintains the same specialization. I
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:47, you wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
I agree - that is what plugin architectures are
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
I can't reproduce this.
Size: 64911360
Are you sure that this is the exact file size?
That's the size reported by ls -l
What's up?
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:36 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
I can't reproduce this.
I could really use some help testing the new SplitFile insertion and
retrieval code. The best way to do this at the moment is to use
the command line clients.
The current default FEC encoder segments files greater than 128Mb.
I am most interested in files from 1Mb to 128Mb for now. You can
Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM
by default.
When you next talk to the press and mention Freenet as a replacement for
internet radio (which it is not), everyone will turn it on and try to run it
for a while until the network collapses.
More
But what does it mean?
It's the effect of a bug in the IBM JDK 1.3.
I'm using blackdown 1.3.1.
I thought that was the last best explanation.
Dunno. Maybe Blackdown has the same problem. Search the devl mailing list
archives for more info.
--gj
Works for me!
While you've got the code editor open... :-)
The current and previous versions of freenet.exe don't create any file
when I choose the Export Refs option. Somehow the shortcut to the file
gets created in my Win2000 recent Documents folder, but the file never
gets created
You don't want fred to have to compete with code that is running
continuous FEC decoding in the same JVM. Perhaps your machine is so
powerful that you haven't noticed, but we can't get fred to run with
reasonable CPU usage *all by itself*.
If you really care so passionately about
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 04:03:01PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
On Sunday 26 January 2003 13:51, you wrote:
Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM
by default.
When you next talk to the press and mention Freenet as a replacement for
internet
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:16:36PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
You don't want fred to have to compete with code that is running
continuous FEC decoding in the same JVM. Perhaps your machine is so
powerful that you haven't noticed, but we can't get fred to run with
reasonable CPU
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:00:01PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:49, you wrote:
length 7.4M
elapsed time: 37 minutes
end to end transfer rate: 7.4M * (1024K/M) / (37 min * (60sec/min) ) ~=
3.4k/sec
It took one minute to find the SplitFile
Just had an idea for a Network Health infolet that would contain data
which would give an indication of how healthy the network is as a
whole.
Firstly, we could have a table - indicating the average response times
for the various messages (DataRequest/DataReply etc) against the HTL of
the
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:55:22PM +1100, fish wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:46AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
[exaggeration]
You could say the same about
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:59:23PM +1100, fish wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:46AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
On Friday 24 January 2003 22:11, you wrote:
What is the situation with the streaming servlet?
Ian.
1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
What QOS does the internet have in general? We need simply to have
enough local bandwidth, enough of a buffer, enough parallel requests and
enough redundancy.
Assuming this isn't a rhetorical question - the only guarantee that the
Internet makes at the IP layer is that your packet will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 27. January 2003 03:33, Ian Clarke wrote:
Just had an idea for a Network Health infolet that would contain data
which would give an indication of how healthy the network is as a
whole.
What I really would like to see is an estimate of
42 matches
Mail list logo
