d...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/49b8a024/attachment.pgp>
--
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/28b23b40/attachment.pgp>
ar more of an
authority on what freenet is or isn't than me ;).
- jj
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/41c4d29d/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, 27. January 2003 03:33, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Just had an idea for a "Network Health" infolet that would contain data
> which would give an indication of how "healthy" the network is as a
> whole.
What I really would like to see is an estima
> What QOS does the internet have in general? We need simply to have
> enough local bandwidth, enough of a buffer, enough parallel requests and
> enough redundancy.
Assuming this isn't a rhetorical question - the only guarantee that the
Internet makes at the IP layer is that your packet will prob
> What QOS does the internet have in general? We need simply to have
> enough local bandwidth, enough of a buffer, enough parallel requests and
> enough redundancy.
Assuming this isn't a rhetorical question - the only guarantee that the
Internet makes at the IP layer is that your packet will prob
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:59:23PM +1100, fish wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:46AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > On Friday 24 January 2003 22:11, you wrote:
> > > What is the situation with the streaming servlet?
> > >
> > > Ian.
> >
> > 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have e
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:55:22PM +1100, fish wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:46AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
>
> > 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
> > undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
>
> [exaggeration]
> You could say the sam
Just had an idea for a "Network Health" infolet that would contain data
which would give an indication of how "healthy" the network is as a
whole.
Firstly, we could have a table - indicating the average response times
for the various messages (DataRequest/DataReply etc) against the HTL of
the
Just had an idea for a "Network Health" infolet that would contain data
which would give an indication of how "healthy" the network is as a
whole.
Firstly, we could have a table - indicating the average response times
for the various messages (DataRequest/DataReply etc) against the HTL of
the
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 01:00:01PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:49, you wrote:
> > > length 7.4M
> > > elapsed time: 37 minutes
> > > end to end transfer rate: 7.4M * (1024K/M) / (37 min * (60sec/min) ) ~=
> > >3.4k/sec
> > >
> > > It took one minute to find
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:57:28PM +1100, fish wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > Why not encourage people to do things which have a reason
> > > Personally I am optimistic, with
> > > Splitfiles I have been seeing overall download rates of around 30k/
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:16:36PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote:
> > > > You don't want fred to have to compete with code that is running
> > > > continuous FEC decoding in the same JVM. Perhaps your machine is so
> > > > powerful that you haven't noticed, but we can't get fred to run with
> > > > rea
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 04:03:01PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Sunday 26 January 2003 13:51, you wrote:
>
> > > > > Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM
> > > > by default.
> > >
> > > When you next talk to the press and mention Freenet as a replacement fo
> > > You don't want fred to have to compete with code that is running
> > > continuous FEC decoding in the same JVM. Perhaps your machine is so
> > > powerful that you haven't noticed, but we can't get fred to run with
> > > reasonable CPU usage *all by itself*.
> If you really care so passionat
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/df5fd1e2/attachment.pgp>
> Works for me!
>
> While you've got the code editor open... :-)
> The current and previous versions of freenet.exe don't create any file
> when I choose the "Export Refs" option. Somehow the shortcut to the file
> gets created in my Win2000 recent Documents folder, but the file never
> gets create
On Sunday 26 January 2003 13:51, you wrote:
> > > > Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM
> > > by default.
> >
> > When you next talk to the press and mention Freenet as a replacement for
> > internet radio (which it is not), everyone will turn it on and try to ru
> > > But what does it mean?
> >
> > It's the effect of a bug in the IBM JDK 1.3.
>
> I'm using blackdown 1.3.1.
I thought that was the last best explanation.
Dunno. Maybe Blackdown has the same problem. Search the devl mailing list
archives for more info.
--gj
___
I could really use some help testing the new SplitFile insertion and
retrieval code. The best way to do this at the moment is to use
the command line clients.
The current default FEC encoder segments files greater than 128Mb.
I am most interested in files from 1Mb to 128Mb for now. You can in
What's up?
___
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:36 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > I can't reprod
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this.
> >
> > > Size: 64911360
> >
> > Are you sure that this is the exact file size?
>
> That's the size reported
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:47, you wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > > 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
> > > > undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
> > >
> > > I agree - that is what plugin archi
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:49, you wrote:
> > length 7.4M
> > elapsed time: 37 minutes
> > end to end transfer rate: 7.4M * (1024K/M) / (37 min * (60sec/min) ) ~=
> >3.4k/sec
> >
> > It took one minute to find the SplitFile metadata and somewhat less than
> > 2 minutes to decode.
> >
> > D
On Sunday 26 January 2003 13:51, you wrote:
> > > > Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM
> > > by default.
> >
> > When you next talk to the press and mention Freenet as a replacement for
> > internet radio (which it is not), everyone will turn it on and try to ru
Hi,
Looking at environment
ARK sequence number is 22
Last ARK sequence number inserted is 24
clicking on the 24 gets DNF, change the 18 to 17 gets DNF
and 16 finds the correct ARK...
What happened? This is with build 656.
Ed Tomlinson
___
devl mail
> > > But what does it mean?
> >
> > It's the effect of a bug in the IBM JDK 1.3.
>
> I'm using blackdown 1.3.1.
I thought that was the last best explanation.
Dunno. Maybe Blackdown has the same problem. Search the devl mailing list
archives for more info.
--gj
___
> > Well, I thought you were worried about something running in Fred's JVM
> > by default.
> When you next talk to the press and mention Freenet as a replacement for
> internet radio (which it is not), everyone will turn it on and try to run it
> for a while until the network collapses.
More gr
I could really use some help testing the new SplitFile insertion and
retrieval code. The best way to do this at the moment is to use
the command line clients.
The current default FEC encoder segments files greater than 128Mb.
I am most interested in files from 1Mb to 128Mb for now. You can in
scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/19f61952/attachment.pgp>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 26 January 2003 01:36 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > I can't reprod
What's up?
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Hi,
At this end of the line 656 seems to be working well. I have been running a
naked node (no name or ip_address supplied in freenet.conf) and my node is
quickly found (1 to 2 hours depend on how long freenet is down here) after
an ip address change and maintains the same specialization. I hav
On Saturday 25 January 2003 21:55, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Saturday 25 January 2003 10:46 pm, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > I can't reproduce this.
> >
> > > Size: 64911360
> >
> > Are you sure that this is the exact file size?
>
> That's the size reported
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:47, you wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > > > 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
> > > > undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
> > >
> > > I agree - that is what plugin archi
On Saturday 25 January 2003 22:49, you wrote:
> > length 7.4M
> > elapsed time: 37 minutes
> > end to end transfer rate: 7.4M * (1024K/M) / (37 min * (60sec/min) ) ~=
> >3.4k/sec
> >
> > It took one minute to find the SplitFile metadata and somewhat less than
> > 2 minutes to decode.
> >
> > D
Hi,
Looking at environment
ARK sequence number is 22
Last ARK sequence number inserted is 24
clicking on the 24 gets DNF, change the 18 to 17 gets DNF
and 16 finds the correct ARK...
What happened? This is with build 656.
Ed Tomlinson
___
devl mail
Hi,
At this end of the line 656 seems to be working well. I have been running a
naked node (no name or ip_address supplied in freenet.conf) and my node is
quickly found (1 to 2 hours depend on how long freenet is down here) after
an ip address change and maintains the same specialization. I hav
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:05:50PM +0100, Michael Schierl wrote:
> Thanks, "nomail" was on. But I did not switch that on.
The same thing happened to me a while back, I suspect mailman is being
a bit too quick to turn on nomail for temporarily undeliverable mail
(due to timed out connections and suc
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:46AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Friday 24 January 2003 22:11, you wrote:
> > What is the situation with the streaming servlet?
> >
> > Ian.
>
> 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
> undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:15:26PM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> > Why not encourage people to do things which have a reason
> > Personally I am optimistic, with
> > Splitfiles I have been seeing overall download rates of around 30k/sec,
> > which is more than enough for a FM quality ogg stream
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:49:46AM -0500, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> 1) This doesn't belong in Fred's JVM. We have enough problems
> undertanding/bounding fred's resource consumption as it is.
[exaggeration]
You could say the same about fec generally, and I'm sure you could make a
similar argume
part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/f77e6649/attachment.pgp>
new AutoRequester
> SplitFile insertion code yet.
>
> --gj
>
> >
> > Ian.
--
Matthew Toseland
toad at amphibian.dyndns.org/amphibian at users.sourceforge.net
Full time freenet hacker.
http://freenetproject.org/
Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at
http://amphibian.dyndns.org:8889/dbS0eicAn1o/
ICTHUS.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030126/81122488/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 22:05, Michael Schierl wrote:
> bdonlan schrieb:
> > On Saturday 25 January 2003 04:15 pm, Michael Schierl wrote:
>
> > > i did not get any mails since 2003-01-13 on this list.
>
> > Send a message to devl-request at freenetproject.org with 'helpme' in the
> > subject, and c
Apologies. Everything works just fine. Thanks for getting this fixed so
quickly.
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 21:58, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Fixed. Thanks for the bug report.
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 01:06:32AM -, Simon Porter wrote:
> > 25-Jan-2003 01:04:50 (freenet.node.Main, main): loading data
Hmm. I'm still getting the same problem on a freshly downloaded version.
Have you updated freenet-latest.jar? I am running Linux btw.
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 21:58, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Fixed. Thanks for the bug report.
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 01:06:32AM -, Simon Porter wrote:
> > 25-Jan-
48 matches
Mail list logo
