On Sunday, 17. May 2009 00:59:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Not much point hiding it if you're broadcasting the existence of nodes via
MDNSDiscovery!
...you're right for OpenNet... should have seen that before.
I assume only a full steganographic announcement framework could help there
(have
Hi,
It would be nice, if I could tell freenet to use standard ports for
communication - especially for connections inside a LAN (where the possibility
that an admin is watching all used ports might be a bit higher than on the
internet).
I'd think it would be useful to just test a list of
On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote:
> Wouldn't it take much load off the "internet", i.e. small bandwidth
> connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for
> routing requests if possible?
I assume that it would also help privacy, because then timing analysis and
On Monday, 11. May 2009 21:20:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> The only problem I still have is that keeping the uris in the central
> config file didn't work (all paths in the config file were lowercase while
> the real paths aren't - maybe that's connected to the issue).
This prob
On Monday, 11. May 2009 21:20:49 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
The only problem I still have is that keeping the uris in the central
config file didn't work (all paths in the config file were lowercase while
the real paths aren't - maybe that's connected to the issue).
This problem seems fixed
On Friday, 15. May 2009 22:07:34 xor wrote:
Wouldn't it take much load off the internet, i.e. small bandwidth
connections, if any nodes which are connected via LAN used the LAN for
routing requests if possible?
I assume that it would also help privacy, because then timing analysis and
similar
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 16:33:29 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Voting not on users but on messages (objects):
Short additional info: You never rate users directly but only check how much
their votes correspond with yours.
If they correspond positively (they vote up what you vote up)
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 16:33:29 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
Voting not on users but on messages (objects):
Short additional info: You never rate users directly but only check how much
their votes correspond with yours.
If they correspond positively (they vote up what you vote up) you use
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
> background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
> kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 18:12:52 Robert Hailey wrote:
> On May 12, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> >> be out in a few days), and hopefully Bloom filter sharing, a new
> >> feature
>
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 15:03:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> Perhaps some form of feedback/ultimatum system? Users who are affected by
> spam from an identity can send proof that the identity is a spammer to the
> users they trust who trust that identity. If the proof is valid, those who
> trust
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 10:24:52 Daniel Cheng wrote:
> In fms, you can always adjust the MinLocalMessageTrust to get whatever
> message you please to read. -- ya, you may call it censorship..
> but it is the one every reader can opt-out with 2 clicks. --- Even
> if majority abuse the
On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> We are currently working on Freenet 0.8, which will be released later this
> year, and will include additional performance improvements, usability work,
> and security improvements, as well as the usual debugging. Features are not
> yet
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 10:24:52 Daniel Cheng wrote:
In fms, you can always adjust the MinLocalMessageTrust to get whatever
message you please to read. -- ya, you may call it censorship..
but it is the one every reader can opt-out with 2 clicks. --- Even
if majority abuse the
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 15:03:13 Matthew Toseland wrote:
Perhaps some form of feedback/ultimatum system? Users who are affected by
spam from an identity can send proof that the identity is a spammer to the
users they trust who trust that identity. If the proof is valid, those who
trust the
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 18:12:52 Robert Hailey wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
be out in a few days), and hopefully Bloom filter sharing, a new
feature
enabling nodes to know what
On Wednesday, 13. May 2009 19:00:54 Matthew Toseland wrote:
We could pause most of the node relatively easily, there will still be some
background activity, and therefore some garbage collection, but it can be
kept minimal...
That would be great.
As long as it doesn't access its memory very
On Monday, 11. May 2009 22:24:48 Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > The mirror of freenet staging worked, too.
> >
> > The initial pull took about an hour, and it succeeded, though I got the
> > log output "GetFailed".
> > Most recent revision was 13919
> > user:Daniel Cheng (???)
> > date:
On Tuesday, 12. May 2009 21:36:30 Matthew Toseland wrote:
We are currently working on Freenet 0.8, which will be released later this
year, and will include additional performance improvements, usability work,
and security improvements, as well as the usual debugging. Features are not
yet
Hi,
I just want to provide some feedback on Infocalypse - I hope this is the right
place, since it's an application on freenet.
I tried it a bit and I really like it.
I didn't yet try inserting a big repo, but it works pretty well for the
smaller repositories I tested (which are also
Hi,
I just want to provide some feedback on Infocalypse - I hope this is the right
place, since it's an application on freenet.
I tried it a bit and I really like it.
I didn't yet try inserting a big repo, but it works pretty well for the
smaller repositories I tested (which are also
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
> that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to
Am Mittwoch 06 Mai 2009 00:23:54 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Isn't using a reasonably low scheduling priority enough? And we already do
that!
Not really, since I can't disable it (when I want full speed), and it sadly
doesn't work really well for memory consumption.
I'd like an option to have
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
> >
> > Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> > games?
>
> O
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 19:59:15 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
>
> I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
> nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> 3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
>
> Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
> games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
3. Add a 'pause' feature. (131 votes)
Remarkably high ranking, I wonder what proportion of our users use online
games?
Or with other filesharing services (short lived torrents, downloading in
Gnutella) or with graphics editing or video
Am Montag 04 Mai 2009 17:33:30 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
5. Use port 80,443,53,1863 for communication. (74 votes)
I have no idea how this got into the top 5! Any ideas? People trying to run
nodes at work perhaps?
Maybe not wanting the provider to be able to just shut down nonstandard ports
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 16:37:25 schrieb bbackde at googlemail.com:
> If you like the command line, ok. But if I can't work with git using
> my prefered IDE,
> then I have a problem. I don't want to change anything just because you
> decided to switch to some SCM that is mostly used by command
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 16:37:25 schrieb bbac...@googlemail.com:
If you like the command line, ok. But if I can't work with git using
my prefered IDE,
then I have a problem. I don't want to change anything just because you
decided to switch to some SCM that is mostly used by command line
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 12:38:15 schrieb xor:
> We're in 2009 and graphical IDEs ought to be able to do the revision
> control, if that does not work then the wrong revision control system or
> IDE is being used. It is really not like revision control is something
> new, it has to be possible
Am Mittwoch 29 April 2009 12:38:15 schrieb xor:
We're in 2009 and graphical IDEs ought to be able to do the revision
control, if that does not work then the wrong revision control system or
IDE is being used. It is really not like revision control is something
new, it has to be possible with
Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> > A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> > whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
> whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
> committers.
Could someone comment on this?
It's quite security related, so I re
Am Montag 27 April 2009 17:11:54 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
Am Dienstag 14 April 2009 12:22:12 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
A workflow where the repository gets updated only from repositories
whose heads got signed by at least a certain percentage of trusted
committers.
Could
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 22:05:18 schrieb Robert Hailey:
> > "The Freenet software running on your computer" is probably what I
> > would use to describe what "node" means to non-techy users.
> > Couldn't it just use "Your computer is downloading this page from
> > Freenet", that's what people
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 22:05:18 schrieb Robert Hailey:
The Freenet software running on your computer is probably what I
would use to describe what node means to non-techy users.
Couldn't it just use Your computer is downloading this page from
Freenet, that's what people want to know,
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
> Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> > all these people?
>
> I think all people I know privat
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 15:16:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Arguably nobody ever types CHKs even now, and copy and paste allows for
> fairly long keys. Thoughts?
You know what I think.
The length of the key doesn't matter to me, because freesites already hide
them in links, and otherwise
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 09:25:15 schrieb xor:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org
> > [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
> > Babenhauserheide
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
>
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> block [16:39:31] duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
> very easily [16:39:40] but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
> [16:39:43] is that a problem?
> [16:40:04] how much longer?
> [16:40:10] CHK@,, -> CHK@ key
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:26:05 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
block [16:39:31] toad_ duplicating the top block can be done with SSKs
very easily [16:39:40] toad_ but with CHKs it requires much longer URIs
[16:39:43] toad_ is that a problem?
[16:40:04] p0s how much longer?
[16:40:10] toad_
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 09:25:15 schrieb xor:
-Original Message-
From: devl-boun...@freenetproject.org
[mailto:devl-boun...@freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Arne
Babenhauserheide
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:14 AM
To: devl@freenetproject.org
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev
Am Donnerstag 23 April 2009 15:16:40 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Arguably nobody ever types CHKs even now, and copy and paste allows for
fairly long keys. Thoughts?
You know what I think.
The length of the key doesn't matter to me, because freesites already hide
them in links, and otherwise I
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:53:45 schrieb Arne Babenhauserheide:
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
all these people?
I think all people I know privately, including school and university
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
> to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
> sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
> > Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
> >
> > Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
>
> It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
> are doing with it. And whom you
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
>
> which
>
> > increases the maintenance cost for toad.
>
> Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
> > their closest contacts?
>
> I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
> all these people?
I think all people I know
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
> VolodyA! V Anarhist wrote:
> > Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
> > average 20 people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes
> > from, but if it's some
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:38:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
other member of the group as freenet friends, or should they only have
their closest contacts?
I don't know. IMHO 150 is probably too much, have you spoken privately to
all these people?
I think all people I know privately,
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 14:57:06 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
But both have the drawback of drawing people away from the webinterface,
which
increases the maintenance cost for toad.
Not sure I follow.
They'd be another interface and someone would have to keep it up to date and
working
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:15:07 schrieb VolodyA! V Anarhist:
Wouldn't IRC/Jabber break anonymity ?
Or, maybe you're speaking of IRC/Jabber over Freenet and i'm wrong ...
It would only let people know that you are running Freenet, not what you
are doing with it. And whom you are
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 15:53:39 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I don't understand why you want to run a jabber server. Surely announcing
to your jabber contacts that you are interested in ref exchange would be
sufficient, and would be client level?
I don't mean announcing to your jabber contacts
Am Dienstag 21 April 2009 17:41:59 schrieb Theodore Hong:
VolodyA! V Anarhist volo...@whengendarmesleeps.org wrote:
Matthew Toseland wrote:
If you watch the 'Human body' documentary it says that humans have on
average 20 people they call friends. I am unsure where that number comes
from,
Am Dienstag 07 April 2009 10:28:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> >> > > git tag -s -m
> > Can you also sign a revision without tagging it?
>
> No.
> In DVCS model, signing single revision does not make sense
> -- since you will merge / rebase that revision as soon as it is merged.
I think it does
Am Freitag 10 April 2009 18:30:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> > I think it would be nice to do this as repository which can be updated
> > only if at least 60% of a specific group of people agree.
>
> Why is that beneficial relative to a fully distributed model of people
> pulling if they like a
Am Dienstag 07 April 2009 10:28:30 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
git tag -s name commit -m message
Can you also sign a revision without tagging it?
No.
In DVCS model, signing single revision does not make sense
-- since you will merge / rebase that revision as soon as it is merged.
I think it
Am Freitag 10 April 2009 18:30:29 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
I think it would be nice to do this as repository which can be updated
only if at least 60% of a specific group of people agree.
Why is that beneficial relative to a fully distributed model of people
pulling if they like a patch?
Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
> Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any
code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the
would-be litigant with the identity of the committer, we don't have
this problem.
Sure.
That's why
Am Samstag 04 April 2009 03:29:57 schrieb David ‘Bombe’ Roden:
On Friday 03 April 2009 18:29:04 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
$ hg sign [REVISION]
git tag -s name commit -m message
Is that a GnuPG signed tag?
Yes. Check [1] for an example.
Thanks!
(also to Daniel Cheng who
Am Samstag 04 April 2009 22:50:11 schrieb Matthew Toseland:
Agreed, however we need to be careful as we can be sued for any
code which is copyrighted by somebody else; if we can provide the
would-be litigant with the identity of the committer, we don't have
this problem.
Sure.
That's why
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ?Bombe? Roden:
> On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > $ hg sign [REVISION]
>
> git tag -s -m
Is that a GnuPG signed tag?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
-- Ein W?rfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saube
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 12:18:11 schrieb Florent Daigni?re:
> Sure we can do that... but how integrated are the PGP/GPG modules with
> git/hg? What about the GUI versions?
At least for hg you can just activate the gpg extension (distributed with hg)
and can then sign changesets with
$ hg sign
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
> DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution.
>
> However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us.
Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly establish a workflow
where people contribute pseudonymously, because
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke:
> If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks:
>
> http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks
>
> I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is
> currently, with developers pushing to a single
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 02:22:05 schrieb Daniel Cheng:
DVCS does _NOT_ means accepting anonymous contribution.
However, if we want to, there is nothing stopping us.
Personally I think it important for freenet to slowly establish a workflow
where people contribute pseudonymously, because that
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 12:18:11 schrieb Florent Daignière:
Sure we can do that... but how integrated are the PGP/GPG modules with
git/hg? What about the GUI versions?
At least for hg you can just activate the gpg extension (distributed with hg)
and can then sign changesets with
$ hg sign
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 17:19:13 schrieb David ‘Bombe’ Roden:
On Friday 03 April 2009 14:14:41 Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
$ hg sign [REVISION]
git tag -s name commit -m message
Is that a GnuPG signed tag?
Best wishes,
Arne
--
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere
Am Freitag 03 April 2009 00:44:37 schrieb Ian Clarke:
If we go with git and github they do support post-receive hooks:
http://github.com/guides/post-receive-hooks
I think the workflow can and should be very similar to what it is
currently, with developers pushing to a single authoritative
java.io.FileNotFoundException: store/temp/t1d0a3bb5 (Too many open files)
java.io.FileNotFoundException: store/temp/t1d0a3bb5 (Too many open files)
at java.io.FileOutputStream.open(Native Method)
at java.io.FileOutputStream. (FileOutputStream.java:97)
at
701 - 772 of 772 matches
Mail list logo
