Re: [freenet-dev] What blocks Freenet adoption?

On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 02:26 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > I asked myself that question. These are my answers. Please add yours! I'll add to this. As some may have noted from the previous "project status" thread, I went through a process of trying to understand what issues there were with

Re: [freenet-dev] Fundamental problems in Freenet was Re: Links for Bob Ham

On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 22:33 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 05/11/15 22:21, Bob Ham wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 21:19 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> On 04/11/15 22:57, Bob Ham wrote: > >>> That's all helpful, thanks. However, I'm

Re: [freenet-dev] Fundamental problems in Freenet was Re: Links for Bob Ham

On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 21:19 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 04/11/15 22:57, Bob Ham wrote: > > That's all helpful, thanks. However, I'm still not entirely sure which > > are the "fundamental" problems Toad spoke of > Okay, I will give some here, since peopl

Re: [freenet-dev] Links for Bob Ham

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 07:49 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 11/04/2015 07:41 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > ... > > Did you see https://wiki.freenetproject.org/Research_challenges or the > > section titled "Do we understand Freenet?" on toad's blog? No I missed those. > Also this thread: >

Re: [freenet-dev] Request for comments: Change list+IRC policy to avoid full rewrite flamewars

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 12:02 +0100, Ximin Luo wrote: > On 04/11/15 11:55, Bob Ham wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:40 +0100, xor wrote: > >> we also haven't encountered any unsolvable > >> technical goals with how it is. > > > > Toad says ther

Re: [freenet-dev] Request for comments: Change list+IRC policy to avoid full rewrite flamewars

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 08:40 +0100, xor wrote: > we also haven't encountered any unsolvable > technical goals with how it is. Toad says there are fundamental problems with Freenet. Is that not the case? ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 22:47 +, Bob Ham wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 18:18 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > The key point is to solve the numerous fundamental problems which still > > exist in Freenet > > What are these problems? Are they described anywhere? Is

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 11:02 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:55 -0600, Ian wrote: > > > Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship - Robert C. > > Martin > &

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 11:30 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 11:02 -0600, Ian wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:55 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:43 -0600, Ian wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 18:18 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > the numerous fundamental problems which still > exist in Freenet Could you please describe those problems? ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:47 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:32 -0600, Ian wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > > &

Re: [freenet-dev] High Speed Links

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 21:14 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Montag, 2. November 2015, 22:53:13 schrieb Bob Ham: > > In which case it's even more critical to be clear about what you're > > trying to achieve and how the things you spend your time on help to > > achieve

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 21:17 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Now you show the Hurd as an example and tell us that you want us to > spec our protocol instead of making Freenet more useful to its users My argument is that what is most useful to the world is an ecosystem of implementations of

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 21:16 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Am Dienstag, 3. November 2015, 18:32:39 schrieb Bob Ham: > > On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 18:18 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > > > the numerous fundamental problems which still > > > exist in

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 08:57 -0600, Ian wrote: > The GNU Hurd is a cautionary tale, not a model for software > development. If GNU Hurd is a cautionary tale, what is Freenet? > As for your belief that documentation will solve everything I have no such belief. > You may also be unaware that in

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:10 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Ximin Luo > wrote: > > > > You're applying a generalisation inappropriately here. Linux did not win > > because they spent time writing code instead of documentation. They did > > both.

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:14 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 08:57 -0600, Ian wrote: > > > You may also be unaware that in the ideal case, well-written code is > > > self-document

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:35 -0600, Ian wrote: > Anyone educated on modern software development practices knows that > well-written code is self-documenting I disagree. ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:32 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > > > I'm not claiming that Linux won just because they spent more time writing > > > code than documentation > > > > What are you cl

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:43 -0600, Ian wrote: > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Bob Ham <r...@settrans.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 10:35 -0600, Ian wrote: > > > > > Anyone educated on modern software development practices knows that > >

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 06:28 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: > On 11/02/2015 06:26 AM, Steve Dougherty wrote: > > On 11/02/2015 06:21 AM, Bob Ham wrote: > >> On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 05:54 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: > >>> one > >>> may observe that we

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 08:15 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: > I feel like you're belitting what work we do because we have not > performed it in accordance with an overarching strategy. I'm not trying to belittle anyone, I'm simply pointing out that there is a problem in how the project is going

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 22:16 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Aren't all volunteer projects necessarily coalitions of people with > differing goals? No, many volunteer projects are coalitions of people with the same goals. > I mean, how much front-most leadership and strategy is > actually

Re: [freenet-dev] Multiple implementations considered harmful was Re: Project Status

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 18:18 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 02/11/15 13:02, Bob Ham wrote: > > It seems that nobody here believes that in five years' time Freenet > > developers will be publishing an RFC. Instead, people seem to be > > focussed on updating the website

Re: [freenet-dev] High Speed Links

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 22:14 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > The Internet is being developed by full-time paid staff at large > companies and by researchers at major universities. > > In these environments, RFC style development makes sense. > > In contrast, Freenet is developed by a

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On Mon, 2015-11-02 at 05:54 -0500, Steve Dougherty wrote: > one > may observe that we have not written up protocol documentation, making > that our current strategy. I'm not sure what you mean; what are you referring to with the word "that"? What is your current strategy?

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status (was: Re: High Speed Links)

On Sun, 2015-11-01 at 12:07 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > On Saturday, 31. October 2015 16:27:42 Bob Ham wrote: > > 15:47 < pintu> there is no clear strategy on how to get from here to a > > robust, published protocol enabling censorship resistant publishing >

Re: [freenet-dev] High Speed Links

On Sat, 2015-10-31 at 22:18 +0100, Bert Massop wrote: > Nor did I learn how documenting a protocol, > what you seem to be advocating endlessly, would help just the slightest > bit in getting there. I was assuming the audience was aware of how protocols are usually developed on the Internet.

Re: [freenet-dev] Project Status

On Sat, 2015-10-14 at 20:22 +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > I think it's time for us all to take a step back and have a serious > conversation about where we are, and where we are going. I (as pintu) asked this question on IRC a little while back, I think it's worth sharing that log. Here is an

Re: [freenet-dev] High Speed Links

On Sat, 2015-10-14 at 20:22 +0100, Ian Clarke wrote: > I think it's time for us all to take a step back and have a serious > conversation about where we are, and where we are going. I (as pintu) asked this question on IRC a little while back, I think it's worth sharing that log. Here is an

[freenet-dev] Cache and Store

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 19:08 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > Take it to -tech please. > > > > That's pretty ridiculous. > > Is it rel

[freenet-dev] Cache and Store

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > Take it to -tech please. That's pretty ridiculous. Bob -- Bob Ham

[freenet-dev] Cache and Store

by the Cache. I want to assign different limits to each set of keys. Is there a reason this can't happen? Regards, Bob -- Bob Ham

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:31:53AM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:46 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > 1031 should fix this bug. Please try it. > > > > What was the problem? >

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:46 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > 1031 should fix this bug. Please try it. What was the problem? Bob -- Bob Ham -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes D

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:46 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: 1031 should fix this bug. Please try it. What was the problem? Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Devl mailing list

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 11:22 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:31:53AM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 00:46 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: 1031 should fix this bug. Please try it. What was the problem? A bug in the request queue code that only

[freenet-dev] Cache and Store

by the Cache. I want to assign different limits to each set of keys. Is there a reason this can't happen? Regards, Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Cache and Store

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: Take it to -tech please. That's pretty ridiculous. Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Cache and Store

On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 19:08 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Bob Ham wrote: On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 15:51 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: Take it to -tech please. That's pretty ridiculous. Is it relevant to the development of the next few builds

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:12 +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * Bob Ham [2007-05-02 14:33:13]: > > > On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 19:02 +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > > > * bbackde at googlemail.com [2007-05-01 > > > 18:50:31]: > > >

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:35 +0200, Florent Daigni?re (NextGen$) wrote: > * Bob Ham [2007-05-02 14:33:13]: > > > > > We need to catch the bug; implementing a hack ... would only be a > > > workaround. > > > > Perhaps implement something to help catch t

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

bug; implementing a hack ... would only be a workaround. Perhaps implement something to help catch the bug? Bob -- Bob Ham

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

... would only be a workaround. Perhaps implement something to help catch the bug? Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:12 +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: * Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-02 14:33:13]: On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 19:02 +0200, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-05-01 18:50:31]: So now we know

[freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:19 +0200, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > I've noticed this as well on downloads. If I change the priority, > either lower or higher, the download will start retrieving blocks > again. I can confirm this behaviour. -- Bob Ham --

Re: [freenet-dev] Persistent downloads never internally restarted?

On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 18:19 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've noticed this as well on downloads. If I change the priority, either lower or higher, the download will start retrieving blocks again. I can confirm this behaviour. -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description

[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 17:33 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:29:54AM +0000, Bob Ham wrote: > > Yes, but the limits are still being wholly ignored. Which JVM would you > > suggest running fred with that will respect configured memory limits?

Re: [freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 17:33 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 01:29:54AM +, Bob Ham wrote: Yes, but the limits are still being wholly ignored. Which JVM would you suggest running fred with that will respect configured memory limits? What was the limit set

[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:39:05PM +, Bob Ham wrote: > > Even disregarding the > > database, fred's memory footprint is massive. > Negative. I was running it with a maximum memory setting of 100MB, and > 54MB+ of that was used by the database. If the database had

[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

xactly, requires all this memory? Bob -- Bob Ham -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/piperma

[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:44 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:39:05PM +0000, Bob Ham wrote: > > It's clear to see that the configured limits are wholly ignored, and by > > significant percentages. This is a major problem. > > On the contrary this

Re: [freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

: On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:39:05PM +, Bob Ham wrote: Even disregarding the database, fred's memory footprint is massive. Negative. I was running it with a maximum memory setting of 100MB, and 54MB+ of that was used by the database. If the database had respected the configured setting

Re: [freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:44 +, Matthew Toseland wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:39:05PM +, Bob Ham wrote: It's clear to see that the configured limits are wholly ignored, and by significant percentages. This is a major problem. On the contrary this is utterly irrelevant

Re: [freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

this memory? Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

rding the database, fred's memory footprint is massive. For the functionality that it provides, it seems to me to be excessive. I can't understand why fred would need anything in excess of a few 10s of megabytes. Where is this memory going? Bob -- Bob Ham -- next part -- A

Re: [freenet-dev] BDB uses far more memory than it's supposed to; ideas?

is massive. For the functionality that it provides, it seems to me to be excessive. I can't understand why fred would need anything in excess of a few 10s of megabytes. Where is this memory going? Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[freenet-dev] emu

f for a week Jan 20 01:26:03 cya then -- Bob Ham -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/piperma

[freenet-dev] emu

On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: > I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. I'd note it's still not up this morning, which is about three days it's been down. Who's responsible for emu? Are they on this list? Cheers, Bob -- Bob Ham -- n

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:18 -0600, David Sowder (Zothar) wrote: I've got a commit waiting for it to come back. I'd note it's still not up this morning, which is about three days it's been down. Who's responsible for emu? Are they on this list? Cheers, Bob -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [freenet-dev] emu

20 01:26:03 nextgens cya then -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] emu

What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn access. -- Bob Ham -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <ht

[freenet-dev] emu

What's up with emu? It seems to have its port 443 closed; no svn access. -- Bob Ham [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi

[freenet-dev] 0.7 java installer currently broken on windows

till uses the testing one, but nobody should need to use that now anyway. Bob ___ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com

Re: [freenet-dev] 0.7 java installer currently broken on windows

the testing one, but nobody should need to use that now anyway. Bob ___ To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com

[freenet-dev] Unbundled 0.7 install wrapper

is still there. Testing appreciated. Bob

[freenet-dev] Re: 0.7 java installer currently broken on windows

Fixed now, thanks NextGen$. Bob

[freenet-dev] 0.7 java installer currently broken on windows

Easy to fix though, this happens simply because it's been renamed to wrapper-windows-x86-32.exe. So it needs renaming back or else the path in run.cmd should be changed. Which is best? We don't need a win64 native version of the service too do we? Either way someone needs to fix this soon, if nobody does I will .. Bob

[freenet-dev] 0.7 java installer currently broken on windows

, this happens simply because it's been renamed to wrapper-windows-x86-32.exe. So it needs renaming back or else the path in run.cmd should be changed. Which is best? We don't need a win64 native version of the service too do we? Either way someone needs to fix this soon, if nobody does I will .. Bob

[freenet-dev] Re: 0.7 java installer currently broken on windows

Fixed now, thanks NextGen$. Bob ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Unbundled 0.7 install wrapper

is still there. Testing appreciated. Bob ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Re: [Tech] Coral Cache Must Die

or any alternate distribution method. It's something I've been meaning to look into / fix but I've been extremely busy for the last few weeks (and lazy / forgetful before that). Bob

[freenet-dev] Re: [Tech] Coral Cache Must Die

something I've been meaning to look into / fix but I've been extremely busy for the last few weeks SMALL(and lazy / forgetful before that)/SMALL. Bob ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Re: Please report the following

h will handle the datastore differently amongst numerous other big changes, so hopefully that will fix this. Bob

[freenet-dev] Re: Please report the following

the datastore differently amongst numerous other big changes, so hopefully that will fix this. Bob ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

[freenet-dev] Re: SVN Repository organization

hs in install scripts etc. Obviously it would be a good idea to coordinate the release of a new installer with the change though. Bob

[freenet-dev] Re: Java vulnerabilities, recommendations on download page

NextGen$ writes: > > * Bob [2005-12-15 13:06:31]: --snip-- > > Oh I know all about 1.5's memory hoarding, believe me :) I've been --snip-- > > > Such a hack aren't a long-term solution :) They're mostly rational low-memory optimisations, but I wasn't expecting to h

[freenet-dev] Re: Java vulnerabilities, recommendations on download page

NextGen$ writes: > * Bob [2005-12-15 11:14:37]: --snip-- > > there were recently 3 new applet privellege escalation vulnerabilities > > publicised affecting everything less than 1.5.0 update 3. > > Link multilined for stupid gmane filter : > > http://se

[freenet-dev] Java vulnerabilities, recommendations on download page

) provided the user OK's it, therefore recommending a recent version should save us from future issues like this. The version currently bundled with the java-webinstaller is 1.5.0_06 and therefore safe by the way. Bob

[freenet-dev] Java vulnerabilities, recommendations on download page

the user OK's it, therefore recommending a recent version should save us from future issues like this. The version currently bundled with the java-webinstaller is 1.5.0_06 and therefore safe by the way. Bob ___ Devl mailing list Devl@freenetproject.org http

[freenet-dev] Re: Java vulnerabilities, recommendations on download page

NextGen$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-15 11:14:37]: --snip-- there were recently 3 new applet privellege escalation vulnerabilities publicised affecting everything less than 1.5.0 update 3. Link multilined for stupid gmane filter : http

[freenet-dev] Re: Java vulnerabilities, recommendations on download page

NextGen$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: * Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-15 13:06:31]: --snip-- Oh I know all about 1.5's memory hoarding, believe me :) I've been --snip-- Such a hack aren't a long-term solution :) They're mostly rational low-memory optimisations, but I wasn't expecting

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

--snip-- > * Bob [2005-12-02 16:34:11]: > > >I was thinking more along the lines of i)Turn off the > > redirection for the time being and ii)Ask the CoralCDN people WTF is going > > on > > and get it working again. --snip-- OK, this is definetely a widespr

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

NextGen$ writes: > > Bob ...> writes: > > > > > > > > > Is Coral Cache in general, and our Coral-ified download archive in > > > > particular > > > >(click "downloads" on the front page and try and get one of the > &

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

Bob writes: > > > Is Coral Cache in general, and our Coral-ified download archive in > > particular > >(click "downloads" on the front page and try and get one of the > > installers) working for anyone? For me it's *insanely* slow and high > >

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

nyud.net|66.150.161.133|:8090... at this point I gave up, there's a long pause between each one of those attempts .. note that 25 mins have passed when it requeries in the above example :( Bob ___ Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/

[freenet-dev] Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

igh browser timeouts for freenet.) Initially I couldn't even resolve it from my home connection, perhaps there's been some sort of weird DNS update that's broken the network? There's no mention of such a thing on any of coralcdn's list archives though. Bob

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is Coral Cache in general, and our Coral-ified download archive in particular (click downloads on the front page and try and get one of the installers) working for anyone? For me it's *insanely* slow and high latency right now --snip-- Still happening

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

NextGen$ [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Bob bob_j_hayes at ... writes: Is Coral Cache in general, and our Coral-ified download archive in particular (click downloads on the front page and try and get one of the installers) working for anyone? For me it's *insanely* slow

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

--snip-- * Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-12-02 16:34:11]: I was thinking more along the lines of i)Turn off the redirection for the time being and ii)Ask the CoralCDN people WTF is going on and get it working again. --snip-- OK, this is definetely a widespread Coral problem, DNS

[freenet-dev] Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

.) Initially I couldn't even resolve it from my home connection, perhaps there's been some sort of weird DNS update that's broken the network? There's no mention of such a thing on any of coralcdn's list archives though. Bob ___ Devl mailing list Devl

[freenet-dev] Re: Coral Cache unusably slow/high latency??

each one of those attempts .. note that 25 mins have passed when it requeries in the above example :( Bob ___ Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars - http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search

[freenet-dev] Re: Wininstaller updates for new emu/coralcache file locations

Ian Clarke writes: > > Great stuff. Can you let Matthew or Nextgens know what your > username/password should be for subversion so that you can get write > access? Also, can we give Bob access to emu so that he can upload > updates to the Windows installer? Sure, I'll do that.

[freenet-dev] Re: Wininstaller updates for new emu/coralcache file locations

Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Great stuff. Can you let Matthew or Nextgens know what your username/password should be for subversion so that you can get write access? Also, can we give Bob access to emu so that he can upload updates to the Windows installer? Sure, I'll do that. I

[freenet-dev] Wininstaller updates for new emu/coralcache file locations

current *unofficial* builds for anyone who wants to test them here : http://bob.sdf-eu.org/freenet.html Like the page says, these aren't endorsed by the project in any way. Bob ___ Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars

[freenet-dev] Re: downloads.freenetproject.org inconsistencies

Matthew Toseland writes: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:37:03PM +0000, Bob wrote: --snip-- > > - seednodes.ref.zip on SF has seednodes.ref in the > > root where it should be, on emu it's in > > var/www/downloads/seednodes. There's presumably no > > good reason for th

[freenet-dev] Re: downloads.freenetproject.org inconsistencies

nextgens writes: > > Bob a ?crit : > > >I'm fixing the wininstallers to match the new file > >setup on emu, but there are a couple of minor issues. > > > >- freenet.exe isn't on emu yet, it's still on the SF > >snapshots and is pretty small but ideally

[freenet-dev] Re: downloads.freenetproject.org inconsistencies

Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 11:37:03PM +, Bob wrote: --snip-- - seednodes.ref.zip on SF has seednodes.ref in the root where it should be, on emu it's in var/www/downloads/seednodes. There's presumably no good reason for this and it's breaking

[freenet-dev] Wininstaller updates for new emu/coralcache file locations

current *unofficial* builds for anyone who wants to test them here : http://bob.sdf-eu.org/freenet.html Like the page says, these aren't endorsed by the project in any way. Bob ___ Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next

  1   2   >