On 11/10/2010 12:22 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just got word from my editor that TDPL has been approved for translation
in Russian.
Andrei
Поздравляю! Надеюсь, что перевод будут делать долго, дорого и о..енно.
#1054;#1090;#1083;#1080;#1095;#1085;#1099;#1077;
#1085;#1086;#1074;#1086;#1089;#1090;#1080;!
#1058;#1077;#1084; #1085;#1077; #1084;#1077;#1085;#1077;#1077;,
#1084;#1085;#1086;#1075;#1080;#1077;
#1089;#1086;#1075;#1083;#1072;#1089;#1103;#1090;#1089;#1103;
#1089;#1086; #1084;#1085;#1086;#1081;
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:34:46 +0300, Eldar Insafutdinov
e.insafutdi...@gmail.com wrote:
#1054;#1090;#1083;#1080;#1095;#1085;#1099;#1077;
#1085;#1086;#1074;#1086;#1089;#1090;#1080;!
#1058;#1077;#1084; #1085;#1077;
#1084;#1077;#1085;#1077;#1077;,
#1084;#1085;#1086;#1075;#1080;#1077;
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
On 28/10/2010 18:51, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Bruno Medeiros wrote:
But isn't the staging area similar, if not identical to SVN? I mean, in
svn you also have to do a command svn add to add new files to the
sandbox. They won't get commit otherwise, right?
(note: im
10.11.2010 1:22, Andrei Alexandrescu пишет:
Just got word from my editor that TDPL has been approved for
translation in Russian.
Andrei
Congratulations!
Though I only can second Max's hopes. I'd hate it if it results in yet
another unreadable do-no-good stuff, as is too often with Russian
10.11.2010 3:22, Walter Bright пишет:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just got word from my editor that TDPL has been approved for
translation in Russian.
Da, Tovarish!
Aw come on! Where did you ever get that stuff?..
10.11.2010 14:34, Eldar Insafutdinov пишет:
Отличные новости! Тем не менее, многие согласятся со мной что при
должном владении английским языком, технические книги лучше читать в
оригинале. Но русский перевод будет отличным выходом для многих
программистов, которые еще не так хорошо знают
Stanislav Blinov bli...@loniir.ru wrote:
P.S. Guys, let's be polite, please! Yes, the news are great, but let's
not cause eyestrain to non-Russian speaking people.
Но Россия это весело!
(But russian is fun!)
--
Simen
Come on, this thread gives us a great excuse!
Eldar Insafutdinov Wrote:
#1054;#1090;#1083;#1080;#1095;#1085;#1099;#1077;
#1085;#1086;#1074;#1086;#1089;#1090;#1080;!
#1058;#1077;#1084; #1085;#1077; #1084;#1077;#1085;#1077;#1077;,
#1084;#1085;#1086;#1075;#1080;#1077;
#1089;#1086;#1075;#1083;#1072;#1089;#1103;#1090;#1089;#1103;
This was in reply to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.announce/5763 .
I
should probably start use a proper client instead of web-interface for replying
to
these news groups.
10.11.2010 18:54, Eldar Insafutdinov пишет:
This was in reply to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.announce/5763 .
I
should probably start use a proper client instead of web-interface for replying
to
these news groups.
It's probably because of me: I post via mailing list, and
Stanislav Blinov wrote:
10.11.2010 3:22, Walter Bright пишет:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just got word from my editor that TDPL has been approved for
translation in Russian.
Da, Tovarish!
Aw come on! Where did you ever get that stuff?..
The movies, naturally!
On 10.11.2010 1:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just got word from my editor that TDPL has been approved for
translation in Russian.
Andrei
Awesome!
P.S. God, if you hear me, please, send us some _adequate_ Russian
translators/reviewers.
--
Dmitry Olshansky
On 11/10/2010 08:25 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
On 10.11.2010 1:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just got word from my editor that TDPL has been approved for
translation in Russian.
Andrei
Awesome!
P.S. God, if you hear me, please, send us some _adequate_ Russian
translators/reviewers.
It
Walter Bright wrote:
Stanislav Blinov wrote:
10.11.2010 3:22, Walter Bright пишет:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just got word from my editor that TDPL has been approved for
translation in Russian.
Da, Tovarish!
Aw come on! Where did you ever get that stuff?..
The movies, naturally!
I
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Stanislav Blinov bli...@loniir.ru wrote:
P.S. Guys, let's be polite, please! Yes, the news are great, but let's
not cause eyestrain to non-Russian speaking people.
Но Россия это весело!
(But russian is fun!)
Oh, it certainly is. Sadly, the language nowadays suffers
Stanislav Blinov stanislav.bli...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ibf3dm$29e...@digitalmars.com...
Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Stanislav Blinov bli...@loniir.ru wrote:
P.S. Guys, let's be polite, please! Yes, the news are great, but let's
not cause eyestrain to non-Russian speaking people.
??
so wrote:
Sean took all the code he had written. The other minor contributors
did not yet give permission for their code to be used, so of course it
could not be included.
This is the single big thing on this tango vs phobos issue i never
understand.
What are the reasons/motives behind this
I see your point. You argue that the behavior is consistent. My point is
that this consistency can lead to bugs. I may forget the ref. But I'll
keep in mind to never forget the ref if it is needed.
Jens
Well, in the case of classes, I don't think it would be very common.
For
On 11/10/10 12:00 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
[…] Producing another incompatible split with D2 will not be of an
advantage to anyone, and will just give people reasons not to use D
at all.
I probably wouldn't get the problem anyway, and I have been using both
D1/Tango and, recently, D2/Phobos,
On 2010-11-09 23:04, Don wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-09 17:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if Tango chose to turn away from compatibility
for the second time (be it theoretical compatibility for now since there
is no Tango for D2). The technical reasons are
On 2010-11-09 22:45, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/9/10 12:33 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-09 17:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/9/10 1:42 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-08 20:55, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
It is my perception (though I might be wrong) that the
On 2010-11-10 01:25, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Eric Poggeldnewsgro...@yage3d.net wrote in message
news:ibcn72$2u3...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People
On 2010-11-10 03:28, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I could probably live with that as long as the PHP template stayed
view-only and didn't grow too much logic.
Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity
and static typing of C#, and
On 2010-11-10 00:00, Walter Bright wrote:
Tobias Pfaff wrote:
1. Bitter fighting about a possible non-nullable type for D3(!).
Discussion style: Noone will take away my right to write unsafe code
! vs. Down with the reckless cowboy coders. Are we discussing guns
or coding here?
That, and
On 2010-11-10 00:57, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/9/2010 12:17 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:ibaepi$vf...@digitalmars.com...
People at Facebook told me that the adoption of D inside the company
might
be helped if they could
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:51:19 +0100
Jacob == Jacob Carlborg wrote:
Jacob Of course that would be the preferred way, there should have
Jacob been some kind of agreement for this (maybe there was but never
Jacob fulfilled?) But you also have to look at it from Tangos point of
Jacob view. Why would
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:56:18 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-10 00:00, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree. The reasons for the Tango split long ago, whatever the merit
of those reasons was, have long since passed. Producing another
incompatible split with D2 will not be of an advantage to
On 11/09/2010 06:57 PM, Eric Poggel wrote:
I've always felt the opposite way. It's been a while since I've worked
with Asp.net controls, but I remember something like this:
ul id=List/ul
.
// Later, in C#
for (int i=0; i10; i++)
List.innerHtml += li + sanitize(someArray[i]) + /li
While php
On 11/10/10 1:38 PM, klickverbot wrote:
I probably wouldn't get the problem anyway, and[…]
Whoops, s/and/as/ there…
== Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article
Eric Poggel dnewsgro...@yage3d.net wrote in message
news:ibd00s$dl...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/9/2010 7:25 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I could probably live with that as long as the PHP template stayed
view-only and didn't grow too much
Eric Poggel wrote:
Are there any web-friendly languages that are mature, offer the sanity and
static typing of C#, and the immediate mode of php?
We could do it in D, somewhat easily. Here's an implementation with only mild
bugginess:
===
import std.file;
import std.string;
import std.stdio;
On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
A potential mod_d Apache module would go a long way to promote D language to
the web application world.
But it seems that implementing a mod_d Apache module may require that C
instantiates a D language interpreter (similar to Py_NewInterpreter() for
Python), or
Hi,
according to TDPL p. 294 the following call to fun should not be
allowed. But it compiles and I see not why that shouldn't be allowed. I think
it's a bug in TDPL but I'm unsure.
class A {
int a;
int[] b;
this() immutable {
a = 5;
b = [ 1, 2, 3 ];
fun();
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
(but I've done worse - I once tried to build HTML
buy manually adding nodes to an XML DOM...it seemed like a good idea
until I actually started doing it).
This is actually one of the methods I've been using in my D web apps throughout
the year. It's not that bad if you
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:13:55 -0500, Pillsy pillsb...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 08:14:40 -0500, Pillsy pillsb...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Ah! This is a lot of what was confusing me about arrays; I still
thought
they had this behavior. The fact that
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:48:30 -0500, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Yao G.:
Ugh. The datetime.d file is 1.5 MB? 0_o
So it will be very well tested :) Look, the huge benefit of unit tests
are that they are inline with the code. Either you want that or you want
small files,
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:37:49 -0500, Yao G. yao.go...@spam.gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:28:09 -0600, Andrew Wiley debio...@gmail.com
wrote:
Please do not feed the trolls.
But he's the same troll :/ Using a bunch of socket puppets.
Are those IPV4 or V6 socket puppets?
-Steve
His post seem reactionary rather that driving. Perhaps bearophile,
who seems to have quite some verve for D, should take the reigns?
What I'd like to see is Walter's and Bearophile's views on the
direction of D... the language, the process.. everything.
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 05:51:19 -0500, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Of course that would be the preferred way, there should have been some
kind of agreement for this (maybe there was but never fulfilled?) But
you also have to look at it from Tangos point of view. Why would Tango
drop
On 2010-11-10 12:43, retard wrote:
Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:56:18 +0100, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-10 00:00, Walter Bright wrote:
I agree. The reasons for the Tango split long ago, whatever the merit
of those reasons was, have long since passed. Producing another
incompatible split with D2
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
I don't want to increase any separation in the D community and would
hope peoeple could agree more. I have no problems what so ever
contributing both to Tango and Phobos/druntime. And I'm happy to license
any of my code to whatever license would be need for a give D
retard wrote:
A dual licensing scheme for all code might help a bit (since both parties
refuse to switch licensing). There are also
Releasing under the Boost license will make it compatible with both. Such is
kinda the point with the Boost license, and why we chose it.
It's not
a big
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:13:31 -0600, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
But he's the same troll :/ Using a bunch of socket puppets.
Are those IPV4 or V6 socket puppets?
-Steve
He he he. s/socket/sock
On a serious note, I think that they are IPV6 sockets.
--
Yao G.
Steven Schveighoffer:
Well, I'm not certain that this is the reason, but calendars are riddled
with corner cases. I would expect a well-tested date/time library to test
all those corner cases.
I have never suggested to remove unit tests. But in several languages and
projects there is
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:27:16 -0600, casualobserver c...@bigcorp.com wrote:
His post seem reactionary rather that driving. Perhaps bearophile,
who seems to have quite some verve for D, should take the reigns?
What I'd like to see is Walter's and Bearophile's views on the
direction of D... the
As a long time lurker I witnessed the last, rather infamous event when this
topic
was brought up.
The way I see it the situation has only deteriorated further since then.
There are still resources spent on managing the political situation, to avoid
license infringement, supporting two libraries,
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 06:14:07 Jens Mueller wrote:
Hi,
according to TDPL p. 294 the following call to fun should not be
allowed. But it compiles and I see not why that shouldn't be allowed. I
think it's a bug in TDPL but I'm unsure.
class A {
int a;
int[] b;
lurker #5 schrieb:
As a long time lurker I witnessed the last, rather infamous event when this
topic
was brought up.
The way I see it the situation has only deteriorated further since then.
There are still resources spent on managing the political situation, to avoid
license infringement,
thank you oldtimer Wrote:
oldtimer Wrote:
Is it a coincidence that all the complaints seem to come from a single
person? Let's take a look at my killfile:
ankh, anonymous troll, another lurker, anton smith, arnoldsschwartz, bjarne
yesterday, blaise pascal, cal, chmod+x, crap, darth
On 10.11.2010 4:52, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 17:34:15 Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Tuesday, November 09, 2010 16:23:56 Yao G. wrote:
On Tue, 09 Nov 2010 18:11:59 -0600, Jonathan M Davis
jmdavisp...@gmx.com
wrote:
I think that the real question here is how good the
In the Apache mod_d thread I saw:
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libhello.so.0 -o libhello.so.0.0 libhello.a
Has anyone tried this with libphobos2.a?
Has anyone got something that would be a nucleus for this?
Steve Teale schrieb:
Has anyone got something that would be a nucleus for this?
I've used http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcrypt with D1 (just simple HMAC-SHA1
signing, so I can't tell how well the other stuff works).
== Quote from so (s...@so.do)'s article
But a question comes to mind. For library development (or just everything
if that matters) is the top down OOP approach ideal/right way?
It is just an idiom that might have elegant solutions for certain tasks.
Frankly, for a library, I hate it in most
Radu r...@foo.bar wrote in message news:ibe95h$gl...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
A potential mod_d Apache module would go a long way to promote D
language to
the web application world.
But it seems that implementing a mod_d Apache module may require that C
Make the syntax ugly? - so you cant avoid seeing it?
On 29 October 2010 19:40, Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
wrote:
On 10/29/10 12:18 CDT, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Andrei Alexandrescu (seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org)'s
article
To recap:
1. Arbitrary cost copy
On 2010-11-10 20:12, Steve Teale wrote:
In the Apache mod_d thread I saw:
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libhello.so.0 -o libhello.so.0.0 libhello.a
Has anyone tried this with libphobos2.a?
Phobos cannot currently be used as a dynamic library. DMD cannot produce
correct PIC for building dynamic
dsimcha wrote:
Libraries need to make the
simple use cases sufficiently simple that people aren't tempted to roll their
own.
Hear hear. For example, one of the goals with D strings was to make them so good
that people wouldn't invent their own string classes.
On 2010-11-10 21:42, Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/10/2010 3:16 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Don't make it a class if it can be a free
function.
I agree with most of the others except for this one.
I can type Math. and instantly see my choices. It also helps namespace
conflicts without having to do
On 11/10/2010 3:16 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Don't make it a class if it can be a free
function.
I agree with most of the others except for this one.
I can type Math. and instantly see my choices. It also helps
namespace conflicts without having to do selective imports or use the
slightly longer
Nick Sabalausky a...@a.a wrote in message
news:ibev09$1vf...@digitalmars.com...
Radu r...@foo.bar wrote in message news:ibe95h$gl...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
A potential mod_d Apache module would go a long way to promote D
language to
the web application world.
I agree with most of the others except for this one.
I can type Math. and instantly see my choices. It also helps
namespace conflicts without having to do selective imports or use the
slightly longer std.math.log
You can get the same thing with a namespace/module named math, after all
Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 06:14:07 Jens Mueller wrote:
Hi,
according to TDPL p. 294 the following call to fun should not be
allowed. But it compiles and I see not why that shouldn't be allowed. I
think it's a bug in TDPL but I'm unsure.
class A {
Jacob Carlborg Wrote:
On 2010-11-09 23:04, Don wrote:
Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-11-09 17:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if Tango chose to turn away from compatibility
for the second time (be it theoretical compatibility for now since there
is no Tango for
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 13:01:55 Jens Mueller wrote:
You mean alter A's state. It could change something outside of A, couldn't
it?
I suppose that it could. I forgot about that. It's certainly not something that
I'd ever think of doing. It would be bizarre to alter global state from a
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
I'm having trouble thinking of something that would go in this module
that wouldn't be a better fit somewhere else. What do you envision?
I thought of it for a bit, but couldn't come up with anything :o). I
think you're right!
Yeah, I think std.all would be
Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
foreach (line; File.byLine(args[1 .. $]) {
...
}
}
I hypothetically made byLine a static method inside File to avoid
confusing beginners (one might think on first read that byLine goes line
by line through an array of strings).
The
On 11/10/2010 10:47 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Nick Sabalauskya...@a.a wrote in message
news:ibev09$1vf...@digitalmars.com...
Radur...@foo.bar wrote in message news:ibe95h$gl...@digitalmars.com...
On 11/8/2010 11:45 PM, JFD wrote:
A potential mod_d Apache module would go a long way to
Eric Poggel:
On 11/10/2010 3:16 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Don't make it a class if it can be a free
function.
I agree with most of the others except for this one.
Object oriented programming is a way to think about code, so it may come more
natural to you, or less natural, according to the way
sybrandy sybra...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ibbkh3$fv...@digitalmars.com...
Ahh, I see that's written by the ANTLR/StringTemplate guy. I never read
that
paper, but the docs for his StringTemplate were a big part of what
convinced
me that template engines shouldn't try to be
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:00 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.comwrote:
Eric Poggel:
On 11/10/2010 3:16 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Don't make it a class if it can be a free
function.
I agree with most of the others except for this one.
Object oriented programming is a way to think
On 11/10/10 1:45 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
I'm having trouble thinking of something that would go in this module
that wouldn't be a better fit somewhere else. What do you envision?
I thought of it for a bit, but couldn't come up with anything :o). I
think you're
Walter Bright Wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
Libraries need to make the
simple use cases sufficiently simple that people aren't tempted to roll
their own.
Hear hear. For example, one of the goals with D strings was to make them so
good
that people wouldn't invent their own string classes.
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
Latest: http://is.gd/gSwDv
My 2 cents:
Units of time are represented more naturally by an integer enum (could be
anonymous) than a string.
A problem recurring in many methods:
/+ref+/ Date opOpAssign(string op, D)(in D duration) nothrow
if((op == + ||
Andrew Wiley schrieb:
One thought here:
If Tango is still useful in the D world but there isn't too much
enthusiasm about porting it to D2, why not break its functionality (that
isn't already in Phobos 2) down into a set of supplemental libraries
that can be included as needed?
Or just
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.comwrote:
Andrew Wiley schrieb:
One thought here:
If Tango is still useful in the D world but there isn't too much
enthusiasm about porting it to D2, why not break its functionality (that
isn't already in Phobos 2) down into
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.comwrote:
Andrew Wiley schrieb:
One thought here:
If Tango is still useful in the D world but there isn't too much
enthusiasm about porting it to D2, why not break its functionality (that
isn't already in Phobos 2) down into
Andrew Wiley schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.com
mailto:metalcae...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew Wiley schrieb:
One thought here:
If Tango is still useful in the D world but there isn't too much
enthusiasm about porting it
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
Speaking of getopt, when writing the 'grep' snippet I missed anonymous
options a lot:
bool h, i; string expr; string[] files;
getopt(args, h,h, i,i,expr,files);
They can be implemented with relatively little effort.
Not getting the example. How would
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
On 2010-11-10 20:12, Steve Teale wrote:
In the Apache mod_d thread I saw:
gcc -shared -Wl,-soname,libhello.so.0 -o libhello.so.0.0 libhello.a
Has anyone tried this with libphobos2.a?
Phobos cannot currently be used as a dynamic
On 11/10/10 3:58 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
Speaking of getopt, when writing the 'grep' snippet I missed anonymous
options a lot:
bool h, i; string expr; string[] files;
getopt(args, h,h, i,i,expr,files);
They can be implemented with relatively little effort.
== Quote from Jacob Carlborg (d...@me.com)'s article
On 2010-11-09 01:37, JFD wrote:
Yes, you're right. One should implement Apache module in D.
One thing is that Apache module entry point expects a C function. I've
figure
that that one could just add extern(C) in front of D function
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 14:52:10 Jesse Phillips wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
Libraries need to make the
simple use cases sufficiently simple that people aren't tempted to roll
their own.
Hear hear. For example, one of the goals with D strings was to make them
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.comwrote:
Andrew Wiley schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.commailto:
metalcae...@gmail.com wrote:
Andrew Wiley schrieb:
One thought here:
If Tango is still useful
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 17:53:08 Andrew Wiley wrote:
Well, my assumption was that Phobos 2 was pretty much complete. If more
functionality is planned, then that's definitely a higher priority because
long term, that's a much better solution than any supplemental library.
Goodness, no.
Any thoughts on parallel programming. I was looking at something about Chapel
and X10 languages etc. for parallelism, and it looks interesting. I know that
it is still an area of active research, and it is not yet (far from?) done,
but anyone have thoughts on this as future direction? Thank
Do you seen anything wrong in this code? It compiles with no errors:
enum string[5] data = [green, magenta, blue red, yellow];
static assert(data[4] == yellow);
void main() {}
Yet that code asserts. it's an excellent example of why a sloppy
compiler/language sooner or later comes back to bite
jfd:
Any thoughts on parallel programming. I was looking at something about Chapel
and X10 languages etc. for parallelism, and it looks interesting. I know that
it is still an area of active research, and it is not yet (far from?) done,
but anyone have thoughts on this as future direction?
Nagging is one way to accomplish change, but it's sure annoying. If you feel
the feature is import, you know where to get the source. Give it a shot.
Contribution of code is oh so much more valuable than a constant stream of you
should change...
Repeatedly claiming that Walter ignores 'X' is
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:34:07 -0600, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
Do you seen anything wrong in this code? It compiles with no errors:
enum string[5] data = [green, magenta, blue red, yellow];
static assert(data[4] == yellow);
void main() {}
Yet that code asserts. it's an
== Quote from jfd (j...@nospam.com)'s article
Any thoughts on parallel programming. I was looking at something about Chapel
and X10 languages etc. for parallelism, and it looks interesting. I know that
it is still an area of active research, and it is not yet (far from?) done,
but anyone
On Wednesday 10 November 2010 18:56:02 Brad Roberts wrote:
Nagging is one way to accomplish change, but it's sure annoying. If you
feel the feature is import, you know where to get the source. Give it a
shot. Contribution of code is oh so much more valuable than a constant
stream of you
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 04:34:07 +0200, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com
wrote:
So please kill automatic joining of adjacent strings in D with fire.
Yes please. I didn't even know this feature existed in D, but I was
recently bitten by a bug in a C++ program - also due to a missing comma
blue red
I guess it exists because of a few use cases other than this one.
For this particular example, you are right i couldn't see it and i checked
two times!
--
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
Brad Roberts:
Nagging is one way to accomplish change, but it's sure annoying.
Right. I was a little too much nervous, sometimes I need to control myself a
little more :-)
If you feel the feature is import, you know where to get the source. Give it
a shot.
There is already a partial
Yao G.:
Stop blaming the compiler for your own carelessness.
If a simple common human error is avoidable at compile-time then it's the duty
of the compiler to avoid it. Blaming the programmer is just silly (and it's
against one of the main philosophical differences between C and D). I suggest
so wrote:
blue red
I guess it exists because of a few use cases other than this one.
It's sometimes nice to be able to break up really long string literals, but it
looks like it's mostly a C holdover. In C it helps with some preprocessor
macros, but D doesn't have preprocessor macros, so
so:
For 3 lines yes but how about a long file? Not everyone using vim!
There is very little D2 code around... and I don't think very large amounts of
concatenated strings in the source code are a good programming practice.
What about this one?
red blue = error
red
blue = pass
That's
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
