OT:
c) It tries to convert news posts to HTML, so the paragraphs
wrap to the browser, links work, quotes are put into the proper
tags for indentation, and it tries to auto-detect D code and
put it in a pre block - which my javascript can make inline
editable and runnable. Example:
Adam Ruppe Wrote:
In the other newsgroup, I've been talking about a little
web news program I've been writing as a spinoff of the
potential new homepage idea.
It's to the point where it is usuable, but still kinda buggy:
http://arsdnet.net/d-web-site/nntp/thread-index?
foobar f...@bar.com wrote in message
news:ii62n0$1r3i$1...@digitalmars.com...
1. common human markup such as: _foo_ (underline), *foo* (bold) etc,
I've never been much of a fan of that. Actually that's one of the things I
didn't like about Thunderbird when I tried it: it kept replacing *'s
Am 31.01.2011 13:19, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
foobarf...@bar.com wrote in message
news:ii62n0$1r3i$1...@digitalmars.com...
1. common human markup such as: _foo_ (underline), *foo* (bold) etc,
I've never been much of a fan of that. Actually that's one of the things I
didn't like about
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
It's amazing how often people seem to forget [a:visited] exists.
Yeah, it boggles my mind - I personally find it incredibly useful.
But every design I get for clients invariably has visited colors
purposefully indistinguishable from regular links.
Other things that break
Trass3r wrote:
So it showed me some Get Message form with
mailman.1085.1296409409.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
in the message id field.
That, by the way, is one of the background features of web.d. If
there's insufficient parameters to call a function ( newsgroup
!= newsgroup so it
foobar wrote:
1. common human markup such as: _foo_ (underline), *foo* (bold) etc,
Yeah, that's a pretty good idea. I agree with the others that it
should keep the text symbols (especially since I've seen these
algorithms wrongly flag things *a lot*) but a basic implementation
is ok.
2. parse
But I'm curious how you do web programming with D. Do you use CGI?
Yes, for most my apps (some have a homegrown HTTP server they use
instead, if persistence is necessary).
The module is here:
http://arsdnet.net/dcode/cgi.d
That same module works with standard CGI and with the embedded
http
Strange thing is, most functions are properly demangled but 2
aren't.
Is this a (known) bug?
Yes, core.demangle can't do some symbols because DMD applies
a one-way hash to them once they reach a certain length because
such long symbols tend to break linkers.
Ah I see, but what about
Stephan Soller wrote:
Cache invalidation
How do you handle this right now?
I don't. My program assumes that once it has a message, it never
needs to look to the server for it again.
(This is probably because of my own experience with mailing lists -
I use the mailing list interface to the
Ah I see, but what about the short one:
Might be a bug in core.demangle (passing it to the function
directly didn't work either).
I'm not sure though.
Adam Ruppe Wrote:
foobar wrote:
1. common human markup such as: _foo_ (underline), *foo* (bold) etc,
Yeah, that's a pretty good idea. I agree with the others that it
should keep the text symbols (especially since I've seen these
algorithms wrongly flag things *a lot*) but a basic
Very interesting stuff.
May D kick php out of business ;)
Word wrapping, please!
Looks cool so far.
8. Search functionality
digitalmars uses google for searching the NG archive, but I've no idea
how to do custom searches. I.e. I'd like to search for a keyword in
the topic title only, how would I do that?
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:28:37 -0800
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
7. runs on 64 bit FreeBSD (what the Digital Mars server runs on),
yes, I know that means I have to get 64 bit dmd on FreeBSD working!
You've made my day. :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia |
Did you try the Open Watcom Linker?
It support OMF, COFF, AR, ELF, but no x64.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:43:22 +0100, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
Tried to see if I could find this in the issue tracker; sorry if I
missed it. (Maybe it manifests with something other than a bus error on
other platforms?)
Anyway, when I run the following program in OS X (using dmd 2.051), it
g g g...@g.com wrote in message news:ii5mtb$12qv$1...@digitalmars.com...
IDK where to put this.
first thing:
Could it be a way to collapse Variants in std.variant?, like
Variant x = Variant(1)
Variant y = Variant([x,x,x,x])
//y could be simplified to Variant(int[]) instead of
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 01/30/2011 06:13 AM, Jens Mueller wrote:
Masahiro Nakagawa wrote:
I vote Andrei's suggestion, std.exception is better than new std.unittests.
I think testing module should provide more features(e.g. Mock, Stub...).
Your helpers help assert writing style but not
Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic napisał:
If you really want to set up a column limit that *everyone* has to abide to,
then make a poll to see what everyone can agree on.
Actually that's a splendid idea. Let's take it easy. Regardless of that silly
beef I'm really curious what
Hi,
I just realized something: If the delete keyword is being removed because it's
dangerous, and if the scope storage class is being removed because of the same
dangling reference problem, how come
int[] global_var;
void foo(int[] args...) { global_var = args; }
isn't considered to be
On 01/30/2011 07:17 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
The unittest topic is about to get derailed so I want to continue this silly
discussion here.
Wheres Nick? I want to see the CRT vs LCD discussion heated up again with
Andrei claiming that LCDs are so Godlike but yet claims 80 columns is enough
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:36:44 +0100, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 30.01.2011 13:29, schrieb Michel Fortin:
On 2011-01-30 03:05:59 -0500, Gary Whatmore n...@spam.sp said:
D's main focus currently is 32-bit x86 servers and desktop
applications. This is where the big market has traditionally been. Not
On 2011-01-31 10:18:49 +0100, Lars T. Kyllingstad said:
It works fine on Linux, which means the bug is likely OSX specific. I
only know of one mysterious OSX segfault bug currently in Bugzilla, but
I'm not sure if it's related:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4854
Thanks for
While workstations for developers have bigger and completely different
requirements, in general the most demanding applications for ordinary
sixpack-joe are hd-video transcoding (which actually isn't memory
intensive), image manipulation (this year's basic $100 models already
sport a sensor of 14
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:04:11 +0100, dennis luehring wrote:
While workstations for developers have bigger and completely different
requirements, in general the most demanding applications for ordinary
sixpack-joe are hd-video transcoding (which actually isn't memory
intensive), image manipulation
Am 31.01.2011 00:17, schrieb Stewart Gordon:
On 30/01/2011 17:17, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
snip
80 colums is an artifact of the old age. Just like the
preprocessor is an artifact of the C language. And many other old
things are artifacts. There's no reason to keep these artifacts
around anymore.
Am 31.01.2011 11:52, schrieb retard:
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:36:44 +0100, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 30.01.2011 13:29, schrieb Michel Fortin:
On 2011-01-30 03:05:59 -0500, Gary Whatmoren...@spam.sp said:
D's main focus currently is 32-bit x86 servers and desktop
applications. This is where the
Am 31.01.2011 12:04, schrieb dennis luehring:
While workstations for developers have bigger and completely different
requirements, in general the most demanding applications for ordinary
sixpack-joe are hd-video transcoding (which actually isn't memory
intensive), image manipulation (this year's
Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ii67i0$1vf2$2...@digitalmars.com...
Am 31.01.2011 00:17, schrieb Stewart Gordon:
For all I know, people probably still do run the D compiler in the
terminal app on Unix-like systems.
1. The D-Compiler doesn't care if the code fits
On 2011-01-31 02:18:26 -0500, foobar f...@bar.com said:
Phobos is a very good product that I for one will never use. Just
looking at the one huge page for algorithms is enough to discourage
many people.
But is Phobos the problem or is the one-page-per-module documentation
the problem?
--
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 06:13:54 +0200, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
Compiling the source from the .zip still yields a broken dmd.exe. My
version and the one from the .zip seem to differ in many small ways.
The first difference is that in main(),
On 2011-01-30 18:53, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 30.01.2011 09:30, schrieb Gary Whatmore:
Jonathan M Davis Wrote:
On Sunday 30 January 2011 00:05:59 Gary Whatmore wrote:
jim_g Wrote:
What I tried to say is, in my opinion, a language with only a half
or a
quarter of D's improvements over C++
On 2011-01-31 12:04, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
On 2011-01-31 10:18:49 +0100, Lars T. Kyllingstad said:
It works fine on Linux, which means the bug is likely OSX specific. I
only know of one mysterious OSX segfault bug currently in Bugzilla, but
I'm not sure if it's related:
On 2011-01-31 10:18, Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:43:22 +0100, Magnus Lie Hetland wrote:
Tried to see if I could find this in the issue tracker; sorry if I
missed it. (Maybe it manifests with something other than a bus error on
other platforms?)
Anyway, when I run the
Am 31.01.2011 12:15, schrieb retard:
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:04:11 +0100, dennis luehring wrote:
While workstations for developers have bigger and completely different
requirements, in general the most demanding applications for ordinary
sixpack-joe are hd-video transcoding (which actually
On 1/30/11 5:03 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I've had some style updates from David Gileadi rotting in a zip file in
my inbox for a good while. It took me the better part of today to
manually merge his stale files with the ones in the repository, which
have in the meantime undergone many
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:16:54 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can't buy enterprise support,
Of course you can!
No really, I can't afford it ;)
But seriously, I find it hard to believe that you can buy enterprise
support for D if it
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 16:25:49 -0500, retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote:
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:14:04 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think as D matures
and hopefully gets more enterprise support, these problems will be
history.
This is the classic chicken or the egg problem. I'm not trying
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 02:04:11 -0500, g g g...@g.com wrote:
IDK where to put this.
first thing:
Could it be a way to collapse Variants in std.variant?, like
Variant x = Variant(1)
Variant y = Variant([x,x,x,x])
//y could be simplified to Variant(int[]) instead of
Variant(Variant(int)[])
//now
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 18:32:28 -0500, Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com wrote:
On 2011-01-28 17:09:08 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
On 1/28/11 3:05 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
Not my preferred choices (especially #1), but having containers in
Phobos will
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 12:09:00 -0500, Simon Buerger k...@gmx.net wrote:
On 28.01.2011 19:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
1. Containers will be classes.
2. Most of the methods in existing containers will be final. It's up
to the container to make a method final or not.
3. Containers and their
2011/1/30 Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
People who use screen readers often crank up the playback rate to 2x. The
software adjusts the pitch so it doesn't sound like the Chipmunks.
I've often wondered why DVRs don't do this (I've sent the suggestion to
Tivo, they ignored me). I'd
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.comwrote:
Am 31.01.2011 11:52, schrieb retard:
Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:36:44 +0100, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 30.01.2011 13:29, schrieb Michel Fortin:
On 2011-01-30 03:05:59 -0500, Gary Whatmoren...@spam.sp said:
D's main
On 01/31/2011 01:18 AM, foobar wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
foobar wrote:
ATM, Phobos ranks extremely poorly in this regard. Far worse than C++ which
is by far one of worst ever. both Java and C# are surprisingly high on
On 01/31/2011 01:48 AM, foobar wrote:
Stewart Gordon Wrote:
Therein lies the problem - in this day and age, everyone's screen is
different, and everyone's needs are different. Even if we can get
people to agree on a limit of 100 in this day and age, it might not suit
the programmers of the
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:16:54 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can't buy enterprise support,
Of course you can!
No really, I can't afford it ;)
But seriously, I find it hard to believe
On 31.01.2011 17:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections
-Steve
Well, seems not bad on a quick look. But source is updated 2 years
ago, so I doubt it would compile with current dmd. Anyway, the topic
here is the std-behaviour of the std-lib. But sure,
FWIW: Here's my two cents; (Non-Phobos participant, so feel free to
click delete now)
I'm not sure whether text-books and program-code are really comparable
in this respect. When reading books I hardly put much attention to
each particular word, while in computer-code, each token is very
Michel Fortin Wrote:
On 2011-01-31 02:18:26 -0500, foobar f...@bar.com said:
Phobos is a very good product that I for one will never use. Just
looking at the one huge page for algorithms is enough to discourage
many people.
But is Phobos the problem or is the one-page-per-module
On 1/31/11 6:48 PM, Simon Buerger wrote:
Well, seems not bad on a quick look. But source is updated 2 years ago,…
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections/browser/branches/d2 – four
months are not quite as long as two years. Oh, and Steve is the very
author of dcollections. ;)
David
On 1/31/11 11:54 AM, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
FWIW: Here's my two cents; (Non-Phobos participant, so feel free to
click delete now)
I'm not sure whether text-books and program-code are really comparable
in this respect. When reading books I hardly put much attention to
each particular word,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:48:06 -0500, Simon Buerger k...@gmx.net wrote:
On 31.01.2011 17:53, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections
-Steve
Well, seems not bad on a quick look. But source is updated 2 years ago,
so I doubt it would compile with current dmd.
2011/1/28 retard r...@tard.com.invalid:
I've heard this before. I've also heard the 64-bit port and many other
things are done in a year/month or two. The fact is, you're overly
optimistic and these are all bullshit. When I come back here in a year or
two, I have full justification to laugh at
90 as a rule of thumb with some exceptions.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 11:55:28 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Steve is in New York City.
If you mean me, I'm in the Boston area (not exactly in Boston), and I
bring a thousand curses on you for suggesting I'm from NYC ;)
Unfortunately, all of us must turn
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
On 01/31/2011 01:18 AM, foobar wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshou...@digitalmars.com)'s article
foobar wrote:
ATM, Phobos ranks extremely poorly in this regard. Far worse than C++
which
is by far one of worst ever.
Okay, my fault. Didnt realize you were the author, and the project is
still active. The 2 years came from here:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections/browser/trunk/dcollections.
I thought, that trunk was the most recent version. Added a bookmark,
and will definitely take a closer look
Andrei:
Seems reasonable. Since both Jonathan and Don prefer longer lines, I'm
now more inclined to increase and/or soften the recommended limit for
Phobos.
I think 110 columns are a little too many. I have suggested 90-95 chars max
(but less than 80 on average) after seeing both the
Ary Manzana
The only think I don't like is the background image. I mean, I like
the background, it just doesn't have to be an image. Each time I go to
another page it shows me a white page and then loads everything.
That's not the image's fault. The image is cached and background
loaded, so
Functional languages often have built-in partial function application:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currying#Contrast_with_partial_function_application
D doesn't have this feature built-in despite it can't break C compatibility,
maybe because it's a lot of work to implement, maybe because it is
2011/1/31 Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org:
On 1/31/11 11:54 AM, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
I'm not sure whether text-books and program-code are really comparable
in this respect. When reading books I hardly put much attention to
each particular word, while in computer-code, each
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:03:08 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I've had some style updates from David Gileadi rotting in a zip file in
my inbox for a good while. It took me the better part of today to
manually merge his stale files with the ones in the
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 17:54:20 -0500, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:ii3nsc$kob$1...@digitalmars.com...
Andrei:
Yes, once you go beyond 80 columns.
I suggest to relax that limit a little, I think 90-95 columns are
acceptable still. Too
Walter Bright Wrote:
foobar wrote:
Java (the language itself) is mediocre at best but the Java standard
libraries are excellent with comprehensive usable documentation to boot.
Phobes is half a notch above c++ stdlib which is the worst ever from a
usability and readability
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote:
If (as usual) you don't want to implement this as a new D feature, I
presume something like a
PartialTemplate/StaticCurry/StaticPartialApplication is writeable in the
standard library:
import std.typecons, std.functional, std.array;
auto
I've chosen to only work with D1/Tango from start, and I simply don't
recognize the frustration many are feeling. I'm only concerned over
that there ARE quite a few developers that seems to have been turned
off by instability, and the Phobos/Tango-problem.
Well, if nobody acted as a guinea pig,
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 14:47:26 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Tomek Sowiński wrote:
What is your preferred *maximum* length for a line of D code? (please
reply with a number only)
6.022e+23
It's amazing that D does so much, and to top it off, it's only ONE LINE OF
On 1/31/11 11:50 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
BTW, in perusing the site, I noticed the language reference does not
contain a navigation menu. I can only get to the lexical page, not any
other pages of the language reference.
Andrei e-mailed me about this. It's due to some Ddoc macros that
Isn't it possible to unify functions which work on compile-time and
run-time arguments?
What I mean is, if curry detects that you're currying a compile-time
argument against a template, then it should do what your
PartialTemplate/StaticCurry would do.
It seems odd having to create 'static'
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 13:55:53 -0500, Tomek Sowiński j...@ask.me wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic napisał:
If you really want to set up a column limit that *everyone* has to
abide to, then make a poll to see what everyone can agree on.
Actually that's a splendid idea. Let's take it easy. Regardless of
On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 13:41 -0500, bearophile wrote:
[ . . . ]
I think 110 columns are a little too many. I have suggested 90-95
chars max (but less than 80 on average) after seeing both the problems
caused by too much short lines (to keep lines below 70-80 chars I have
seen programmers use 2
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:09:01 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 01/31/2011 01:18 AM, foobar wrote:
You completely miss the most important principle - it doesn't matter
how good and efficient your product is if no one's using it. Phobos
is a very good product
On 1/31/11 12:50 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:03:08 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
I've had some style updates from David Gileadi rotting in a zip file
in my inbox for a good while. It took me the better part of today to
manually merge
On 1/31/11 1:07 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:09:01 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
On 01/31/2011 01:18 AM, foobar wrote:
You completely miss the most important principle - it doesn't matter
how good and efficient your product is if
On 01/31/2011 11:10 AM, %u wrote:
Hi,
I just realized something: If the delete keyword is being removed because it's
dangerous, and if the scope storage class is being removed because of the same
dangling reference problem, how come
int[] global_var;
void foo(int[] args...) {
On 01/30/2011 01:13 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
I do not like putting it in std.exception. Maybe the name std.unittest
is also not good. I would propose std.assert if assert wasn't a keyword.
[...]
I would_not_ expect helpers for writing
assertions (Assert_Error_) in a module named
On 01/30/2011 02:13 PM, Jens Mueller wrote:
The only argument against putting in its own module is it's size. That
seems to be your main point. I think putting something in new module
should mainly be concerned with separating stuff logically. Later on it
should be easy to add a new module that
foobar wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
foobar wrote:
Java (the language itself) is mediocre at best but the Java standard
libraries are excellent with comprehensive usable documentation to boot.
Phobes is half a notch above c++ stdlib which is the worst ever from a
usability and readability
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We'd eliminate the unstructured jump to section and we create the
grouping by hand (sigh).
Maybe we can get the best of both worlds: how about a Group: or
Tags: section in the ddoc that a program could automatically
pull out to make the listing?
I think we can do
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 12:26:56 -0500, Simen kjaeraas
simen.kja...@gmail.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:16:54 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can't buy enterprise support,
Of course
Trass3r Wrote:
I've chosen to only work with D1/Tango from start, and I simply don't
recognize the frustration many are feeling. I'm only concerned over
that there ARE quite a few developers that seems to have been turned
off by instability, and the Phobos/Tango-problem.
Well, if
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 13:36:57 -0500, Simon Buerger k...@gmx.net wrote:
Okay, my fault. Didnt realize you were the author, and the project is
still active. The 2 years came from here:
http://www.dsource.org/projects/dcollections/browser/trunk/dcollections.
I thought, that trunk was the most
Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote in
news:ii4an2$1npj$1...@digitalmars.com:
80 columns came from how many characters would fit on a standard size
8.5*11 sheet of paper. Even punch cards followed this precedent.
This suggests (without exactly stating) one of my personal reasons
Tomek Sowiński napisał:
Actually that's a splendid idea. Let's take it easy. Regardless of that silly
beef I'm really curious what distribution will emerge.
What is your preferred *maximum* length for a line of D code? (please reply
with a number only)
Alright, I'm wrapping up this toy
Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
2011/1/30 Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
People who use screen readers often crank up the playback rate to 2x. The
software adjusts the pitch so it doesn't sound like the Chipmunks.
I've often wondered why DVRs don't do this (I've sent the suggestion to
Tivo,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:15:18 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/31/2011 11:10 AM, %u wrote:
Hi,
I just realized something: If the delete keyword is being removed
because it's
dangerous, and if the scope storage class is being removed because of
the same
dangling reference
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:17:50 -0500, Adam Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I think the main problem is with ddoc. This, from std.algorithm is a
f**king mess IMO:
Note that that is generated through some short javascript in the
html header.
I remember
On 1/31/11 1:22 PM, Adam Ruppe wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
We'd eliminate the unstructured jump to section and we create the
grouping by hand (sigh).
Maybe we can get the best of both worlds: how about a Group: or
Tags: section in the ddoc that a program could automatically
pull out to
On 2011-01-31 14:13:40 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org said:
Let's fix it! I'm thinking along the lines of finding some broad groups, e.g.
Searching
find until mismatch startsWith ...
Sorting
sort partialSort partition ...
Set operations
setUnion setDifference
2011/1/31 Jesse Phillips jessekphillip...@gmail.com:
I do not think there is an issue with using D2 in a new project, but if you
have to ask you probably should go with D1. I say this because someone who is
aware of the issues present in the language is able to decide if their
desired
Java is an excellent example of many very usable APIs, meaning that it
very easy to both read Java code and understand what the functions do
and write code that's just as readable *without* RTFM.
This one i don't understand. (seems i fail to understand many things
nowadays!).
I have read
Tomek Sowiński napisał:
Alright, I'm wrapping up this toy study. Two things before the numbers come:
- A few respondents gave 2 numbers, one reasonable, the other if I really
have to. I took the latter (larger) number as I was after maximum length,
something usable as a setting for a
2011/1/31 Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com:
I think the reason I.E. YouTube and Tivo don't do it is that AFAIU, it
is fairly CPU-consuming (FFT back and forth?) In the TiVo-case, my
guess is nobody paid for the hardware, and in the YouTube-case I doubt
neither Flash nor JavaScript will
Mon, 31 Jan 2011 11:43:37 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 20:16:54 -0500, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I can't buy enterprise support,
Of course you can!
No really, I can't afford it ;)
But seriously, I find it
On Monday, January 31, 2011 11:31:29 Jesse Phillips wrote:
Trass3r Wrote:
I've chosen to only work with D1/Tango from start, and I simply don't
recognize the frustration many are feeling. I'm only concerned over
that there ARE quite a few developers that seems to have been turned
off
On 01/30/2011 07:27 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
80 columns
wasn't determined by some scientific method to be a good size for code, it's
a product of limitations of the older generation hardware.
80 columns came from how many characters would fit on a standard size 8.5*11
Russel Winder:
What say we cut the agist crap.
There are also armies of programmers with myopia :-)
Bye,
bearophile
Tomek Sowiński wrote:
1 respondent answered 1 mole which I also excluded as a 22-order-of-magnitude
outlier.
What kind of a jerk is that respondent?
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
