On 2011-08-20 23:29, dsimcha wrote:
On 8/20/2011 4:24 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
2. What are the prospects for submitting this for inclusion in Phobos?
Serialization is something basic and universally needed enough that it
should not require a third-party library.
From my part:
* Remove all
On 20.08.2011 19:45, dsimcha wrote:
On 8/20/2011 12:50 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Masahiro Nakagawa seems to be working on msgpack:
https://bitbucket.org/repeatedly/msgpack4d/
Yeah, this does look quite useful. I tried it a few weeks ago and ran
into a couple showstopper bugs. I filed them
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 02:45:20 +0900, dsimcha dsim...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 8/20/2011 12:50 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Masahiro Nakagawa seems to be working on msgpack:
https://bitbucket.org/repeatedly/msgpack4d/
Yeah, this does look quite useful. I tried it a few weeks ago and ran
into a
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 05:28:33 +0900, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2011-08-20 19:45, dsimcha wrote:
On 8/20/2011 12:50 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Masahiro Nakagawa seems to be working on msgpack:
https://bitbucket.org/repeatedly/msgpack4d/
Yeah, this does look quite useful. I tried it
Am 20.08.2011 17:40, schrieb Walter Bright:
http://llvm.org/pubs/2006-05-24-SAFECode-BoundsCheck.pdf
What it does is rewrites the program to install runtime checks on
pointers to ensure no array bounds overflows.
It indicates to me the effort being poured into C to try to make it
memory
Walter:
Very little code in a D program needs to be @system, so I see little need for
this.
I'd like to know what percentage of code of a high-performance indie video game
is @system :-)
Bye,
bearophile
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote:
kenji hara wrote:
Issue in bugzilla:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=6207http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6207
Test implementation:
A not too much serious post fit for a slow Sunday :-)
Time ago I have half-seriously suggested the static static, to be used to
define a static variable that is static (shared) for all instantiations of one
function template. With it you avoid a global variable, and you have the
advantages of
What are the chances of D getting proper runtime reflection? Something
like this:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o = foo;
o.setInstanceVariable(a, 3);
assert(foo.a == 3);
This would be useful as well:
On 20/08/2011 16:40, Walter Bright wrote:
http://llvm.org/pubs/2006-05-24-SAFECode-BoundsCheck.pdf
What it does is rewrites the program to install runtime checks on
pointers to ensure no array bounds overflows.
It indicates to me the effort being poured into C to try to make it
memory safe,
Jacob Carlborg:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o = foo;
o.setInstanceVariable(a, 3);
assert(foo.a == 3);
Is this related to the Delphi feature I've recently shown?
On 21/08/2011 11:55, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What are the chances of D getting proper runtime reflection? Something
like this:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o = foo;
o.setInstanceVariable(a, 3);
assert(foo.a == 3);
This would be
On 21-08-2011 02:35, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 00:27:03 Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 16:57:38 +0200, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Hi,
I recently set up a Jenkins server which is running DMD builds and tests
at: http://emoba.net:/jenkins/view/D/ It's
On 2011-08-21 13:41, bearophile wrote:
Jacob Carlborg:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o = foo;
o.setInstanceVariable(a, 3);
assert(foo.a == 3);
Is this related to the Delphi feature I've recently
On 2011-08-21 13:42, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 21/08/2011 11:55, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What are the chances of D getting proper runtime reflection? Something
like this:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o = foo;
On 08/21/2011 12:55 PM, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 20/08/2011 16:40, Walter Bright wrote:
http://llvm.org/pubs/2006-05-24-SAFECode-BoundsCheck.pdf
What it does is rewrites the program to install runtime checks on
pointers to ensure no array bounds overflows.
It indicates to me the effort being
Am 21.08.2011, 14:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com:
BTW, you're already paying for the class info.
That could be a necessity of D's OOP implementation to fulfill the
specification and while it is there that data was exported. Delphi used to
have a compiler switch to include
Am 21.08.2011, 12:55 Uhr, schrieb Robert Clipsham
rob...@octarineparrot.com:
On 20/08/2011 16:40, Walter Bright wrote:
http://llvm.org/pubs/2006-05-24-SAFECode-BoundsCheck.pdf
What it does is rewrites the program to install runtime checks on
pointers to ensure no array bounds overflows.
It
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:16:11 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Yes, I know. But the point is to be able to do it without the use of
mixins. It needs to work with third party types, otherwise there no use.
It also needs to work when the static type is Object.
You're already paying
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:55:52 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
What are the chances of D getting proper runtime reflection? Something
like this:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o = foo;
On 21-08-2011 15:13, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:16:11 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Yes, I know. But the point is to be able to do it without the use of
mixins. It needs to work with third party types, otherwise there no
use. It also needs to work when the
Hi,
Currently, the Phobos posix.mak assumes that druntime is checked out in
../druntime, and altering the variable on the make command line for some
reason seems to do nothing.
Is there any way to specify this path without modifying the makefile?
Regards,
Alex
On 8/21/11 3:34 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Currently, the Phobos posix.mak assumes that druntime is checked out in
../druntime, and altering the variable on the make command line for some
reason seems to do nothing.
Is there any way to specify this path without modifying the makefile?
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:31:14 +0300, Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
I really don't think this is a valid cause of concern in this day and
age.
Perhaps not for you.
Look at Java and .NET. They're doing just fine even with all metadata
being available.
And that's why
On 2011-08-21 14:55, Marco Leise wrote:
Am 21.08.2011, 14:11 Uhr, schrieb Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com:
BTW, you're already paying for the class info.
That could be a necessity of D's OOP implementation to fulfill the
specification and while it is there that data was exported. Delphi used
to
Hi,
dman seems to require some sort of browser (std.net.browser) component.
Where does this sit? Are any other dependencies required in order to
build it?
Regards,
Alex
On 21-08-2011 15:36, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 8/21/11 3:34 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen wrote:
Currently, the Phobos posix.mak assumes that druntime is checked out in
../druntime, and altering the variable on the make command line for some
reason seems to do nothing.
Is there any way to specify
On 2011-08-21 15:13, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:16:11 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Yes, I know. But the point is to be able to do it without the use of
mixins. It needs to work with third party types, otherwise there no
use. It also needs to work when the
On 2011-08-21 15:20, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:55:52 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
What are the chances of D getting proper runtime reflection? Something
like this:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o =
On 21/08/2011 16:05, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is for a serialization library where third party types need to be
serializable. I don't like the idea of annotate everything that should
be serializable.
You don't need to annotate it:
void serialize(T)(T something);
You have access to all the
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:05:20 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
This is for a serialization library where third party types need to be
serializable. I don't like the idea of annotate everything that should
be serializable.
I think you misunderstood what I meant. I did not imply that
On 21/08/2011 14:13, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:16:11 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Yes, I know. But the point is to be able to do it without the use of
mixins. It needs to work with third party types, otherwise there no
use. It also needs to work when the
On 2011/08/21 22:13, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:16:11 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Yes, I know. But the point is to be able to do it without the use of
mixins. It needs to work with third party types, otherwise there no
use. It also needs to work when the
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:j2luh6$23bb$1...@digitalmars.com...
One thing I'd subjectively like is to require braces on both branches of
if/else if at least one has braces.
Yuck! I'd really hate that.
Nick Sabalausky:
Yuck! I'd really hate that.
Recently I have converted this Python code:
def foo(sol):
global best
if is_solution(sol[-1]):
if best or len(sol) len(best):
best = list(sol)
else:
for next in alternatives(sol[-1]):
if next not
On 2011-08-21 17:30, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 21/08/2011 16:05, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is for a serialization library where third party types need to be
serializable. I don't like the idea of annotate everything that should
be serializable.
You don't need to annotate it:
void
On 2011-08-21 17:30, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:05:20 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
This is for a serialization library where third party types need to be
serializable. I don't like the idea of annotate everything that should
be serializable.
I think you
On 2011-08-21 18:18, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On 2011/08/21 22:13, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 15:16:11 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Yes, I know. But the point is to be able to do it without the use of
mixins. It needs to work with third party types, otherwise there no
On 2011-08-21 20:02, bearophile wrote:
Nick Sabalausky:
Yuck! I'd really hate that.
Recently I have converted this Python code:
def foo(sol):
global best
if is_solution(sol[-1]):
if best or len(sol) len(best):
best = list(sol)
else:
for next
On 8/21/2011 3:55 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
What are the chances of D getting proper runtime reflection? Something
like this:
class Foo
{
private int a;
private void bar (int i)
{
a = i;
}
}
auto foo = new Foo;
Object o = foo;
o.setInstanceVariable(a, 3);
assert(foo.a
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:07:17PM -0700, Mehrdad wrote:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7102648/using-dynamic-typing-in-d-a-statically-typed-language
There's an easy fix for that question:
blah opDispatch(string name)(blah) if ( name != popFront ) { }
Sean Kelly wrote:
On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Bernard Helyer b.hel...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:j2ithq$12kd$1...@digitalmars.com...
I asked the Ars forums ( http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?
f=20t=1153378p=21965411 ) and I ask the same of you: should
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 21:21:05 +0300, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Would that be possible to do for third party types available in a
pre-compiled library?
If said types are in the .di files, sure, why not?
Otherwise, the answer is obvious... but as someone else mentioned in this
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:03:46 +0300, Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
dman seems to require some sort of browser (std.net.browser) component.
Where does this sit? Are any other dependencies required in order to
build it?
std.net.browser is a module that Walter just
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 12:47:22 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote in message
news:j2luh6$23bb$1...@digitalmars.com...
One thing I'd subjectively like is to require braces on both branches of
if/else if at least one has braces.
Yuck! I'd
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:j2rh7g$2tfq$1...@digitalmars.com...
To this innocent-looking D code, do you see the problem?
void foo(Pair[] sol) {
if (isSolution(sol[$-1]))
if (!best.length || sol.length best.length)
best = sol.dup;
else
On 8/21/11 4:02 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
bearophilebearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:j2rh7g$2tfq$1...@digitalmars.com...
To this innocent-looking D code, do you see the problem?
void foo(Pair[] sol) {
if (isSolution(sol[$-1]))
if (!best.length || sol.length
On 08/21/2011 11:02 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
bearophilebearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:j2rh7g$2tfq$1...@digitalmars.com...
To this innocent-looking D code, do you see the problem?
void foo(Pair[] sol) {
if (isSolution(sol[$-1]))
if (!best.length || sol.length
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:57:54 +, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:12:20 +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
At this point, I would like to invite everyone to spend some time
testing the module and reading its documentation and code. It is
essential for a working open source code
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 21:44:33 Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:57:54 +, Jesse Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:12:20 +0200, David Nadlinger wrote:
At this point, I would like to invite everyone to spend some time
testing the module and reading its documentation
On 8/21/11 1:19 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-08-21 17:30, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 21/08/2011 16:05, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is for a serialization library where third party types need to be
serializable. I don't like the idea of annotate everything that should
be serializable.
You
On 8/21/2011 6:35 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 8/21/11 1:19 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2011-08-21 17:30, Robert Clipsham wrote:
On 21/08/2011 16:05, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
This is for a serialization library where third party types need to be
serializable. I don't like the idea of
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Yah, it's pretty neat, and very much in the spirit of D. I'd missed it.
Thank you Andrei. This problem is know as Dangling else problem. When a bug
receives a name, you know it's common enough.
This is one of the about one dozen of tiny/small breaking changes I'd like for
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:20:14 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2011-08-21 15:20, Robert Jacques wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 06:55:52 -0400, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
What are the chances of D getting proper runtime reflection? Something
like this:
class Foo
{
private int a;
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 20:36:55 bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Yah, it's pretty neat, and very much in the spirit of D. I'd missed it.
Thank you Andrei. This problem is know as Dangling else problem. When a
bug receives a name, you know it's common enough.
This is one of the
Jonathan M Davis:
Except that it's not a bug. It's an issue that crops up in grammars for
programming languages.
Right, I have just seen I was wrong :-)
There is classic solution to the problem which D
follows. So, there is no ambiguity, and there is no bug. It's very much by
design.
On 21-08-2011 21:48, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 18:03:46 +0300, Alex Rønne Petersen
xtzgzo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
dman seems to require some sort of browser (std.net.browser)
component. Where does this sit? Are any other dependencies required in
order to build it?
On 2011-08-21 02:26, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2011 18:18:25 Sean Eskapp wrote:
bearophile:
As far as I know they have decided to make memory overflow errors, so
they are
not exceptions, you can't catch them. Other people will confirm this or not.
In this case, how
as with most tools mentioned on the digitalmars homepage I am unable to find
ddoc.
I know it exists, judging by the whole page dedicated to it but the tool
itself is never mentioned in any download page.
Not to offend anyone but the digitalmars homepage really could use some
rethinking. It was one
On 21.08.2011 13:32, maarten van damme wrote:
as with most tools mentioned on the digitalmars homepage I am unable to
find ddoc.
I know it exists, judging by the whole page dedicated to it but the tool
itself is never mentioned in any download page.
Not to offend anyone but the digitalmars
On 8/21/2011 8:32 PM, maarten van damme wrote:
It would be great to also have a link to the full phobos documentation
generated with candydoc on the digitalmars d page instead of
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/phobos/ , candydoc generates something
more readable and structured.
The new
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6136
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3661
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibuc...@ubuntu.com
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6136
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3661
Iain Buclaw ibuc...@ubuntu.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bearophile_h...@eml.cc
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6518
--- Comment #3 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2011-08-21 07:00:55 PDT ---
More simple test case.
enum Foo : uint { A }
void main() {
Foo foo;
switch (foo) {
enum op = A;
case Foo.A: break;
default:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6542
Summary: Add IFTI (Implicit Function Template Instantiation) to
glossary
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6543
Summary: RDMD -I character limitation
Product: D
Version: D2
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: DMD
68 matches
Mail list logo
