On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 22:42:28 UTC, Namespace wrote:
On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 22:14:24 UTC, Organic Farmer
wrote:
Would be great to have template constraints back in the docs
(see e.g. std.algorithm.all). Indispensable info on templates
in and of themselves.
Gut gemacht!
It's the new year, and time is running short on submitting your proposal!
http://dconf.org/2014/index.html
On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 03:45:22 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
Why have you posted this ungrounded Rust advertisement anyway?
To spark discussion?
05-Jan-2014 09:22, Jason White пишет:
On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 13:32:15 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
IMHO C run-time I/O has no use in D. The amount of work spent on
special-casing the non-locking primitives of each C run-time,
repeating legacy mistakes (like text mode, codepages and
On 2014-01-05 03:38, Manu wrote:
On 5 January 2014 12:30, Manu turkey...@gmail.com
mailto:turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, so I jigged it so it's able to find mspdb100.dll, but now
link.exe complains: The application was unable to start correctly
(0xc07b).
That's weird.
On 5 Jan 2014 02:35, Walter Bright newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 1/3/2014 6:26 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Here's the patch against GDB for anyone who wants to review.
https://github.com/ibuclaw/gdb/commit/6c187f7250c21a1b3ba2a09942b52ad238397d43
If no one sees anything that seems wrong,
On 1/5/14, Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 22:08:59 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Here you go:
Genius!
I'm pretty happy with that, and it can be used for all kinds of
range checks following the same pattern.
Yeah. I've actually posted about this
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 09:33:46 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
As an advice I'd suggest to drop the 'Data' part in
writeData/readData. It's obvious and adds no extra value.
You're right, but it avoids a name clash if it's composed with
text writing. write would be used for text and
On 5 January 2014 19:50, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
On 2014-01-05 03:38, Manu wrote:
On 5 January 2014 12:30, Manu turkey...@gmail.com
mailto:turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, so I jigged it so it's able to find mspdb100.dll, but now
link.exe complains: The application was
On 05.01.2014 03:38, Manu wrote:
On 5 January 2014 12:30, Manu turkey...@gmail.com
mailto:turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, so I jigged it so it's able to find mspdb100.dll, but now
link.exe complains: The application was unable to start correctly
(0xc07b).
That's weird.
On 5 January 2014 21:23, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05.01.2014 03:38, Manu wrote:
On 5 January 2014 12:30, Manu turkey...@gmail.com
mailto:turkey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, so I jigged it so it's able to find mspdb100.dll, but now
link.exe complains: The
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 00:49:43 UTC, Organic Farmer wrote:
Are there any developers left who can afford to choose their
programming language for its expressive power and not for the
amount of safety nets it provides. That is why D became my #1
language.
Well it depends. On my case, the
05-Jan-2014 15:08, Jason White пишет:
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 09:33:46 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
As an advice I'd suggest to drop the 'Data' part in
writeData/readData. It's obvious and adds no extra value.
You're right, but it avoids a name clash if it's composed with text
writing.
On 05.01.2014 12:51, Manu wrote:
On 5 January 2014 21:23, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de
mailto:r.sagita...@gmx.de wrote:
I guess you are using the latest beta of Visual D, don't you?
Actually, I'm using the latest release. What's new in the beta?
See here for beta releases with a
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 07:51:31AM +, digitalmars-d-boun...@puremagic.com
wrote:
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 00:05:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/4/2014 3:04 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Because it is an instant crash,
Would things going on and a random thing happening randomly later
be
On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 23:04:12 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
The list is endless. Why is null special?
Because it is an instant crash, because it is not possible to
make it safe without runtime check, because it is known to fool
optimizer and cause really nasty bugs (typically, a pointer is
On 2014-01-05 13:58, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Well it depends. On my case, the technology stack is always choosen from
the customers.
Our freedom to choose is quite limited.
One could think that the technology stack is chosen based on the task it
should solve.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tuesday, 3 December 2013 at 02:43:34 UTC, Mike wrote:
I agree. Submitted an enhancement here:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11666
What new platform are you porting druntime to? I'm guessing
linux/ARM Cortex-M based on your previous posts. Hopefully, I
can reuse some
On 6 January 2014 00:35, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05.01.2014 12:51, Manu wrote:
On 5 January 2014 21:23, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de
mailto:r.sagita...@gmx.de wrote:
I guess you are using the latest beta of Visual D, don't you?
Actually, I'm using the
On 05.01.2014 18:10, Manu wrote:
On 6 January 2014 00:35, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de
mailto:r.sagita...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05.01.2014 12:51, Manu wrote:
On 5 January 2014 21:23, Rainer Schuetze r.sagita...@gmx.de
mailto:r.sagita...@gmx.de
Just to let you know that Kenton Varda an ex-Googler working on
Protocol buffer released CapNProto.
http://kentonv.github.io/capnproto
There are some really nice features like 'Time-traveling RPC'
(aka RPC with continuations) that allows several calls server
side without paying for the round
Is it possible for the deimos[1] repositories to be added to the
dub registry[2] please?
I'm working on a project that uses the deimos x11 bindings and it
would be nice to handle building the project using dub. Also, i
won't have to distribute the x11 bindings with my project.
[1]:
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 20:48:00 UTC, Gary Willoughby wrote:
Is it possible for the deimos[1] repositories to be added to
the dub registry[2] please?
I'm working on a project that uses the deimos x11 bindings and
it would be nice to handle building the project using dub.
Also, i won't
It is also worth noting that specifying git repository URLs
rather than being locked into the registry should be added to DUB
eventually[1]. Until then, you can always fork it, add a DUB
package configuration, and install the package locally or use the
complex variant[2] of DUB version
On 1/4/2014 6:38 PM, Manu wrote:
Walter: Is it possible to completely override sc.ini? What needs to be done to
get there?
dmd will look for the initialization file sc.ini in the following sequence of
directories:
1.current working directory
2.directory specified by the HOME environment
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 00:05:46 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
Because it is an instant crash,
Would things going on and a random thing happening randomly
later be better?
Compile time error is preferable.
because it is not possible to make it safe
without runtime check,
Wrapper
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 00:49:43 UTC, Organic Farmer wrote:
Are there any developers left who can afford to choose their
programming language for its expressive power and not for the
amount of safety nets it provides. That is why D became my #1
language.
Safety nets can be provided
On 1/5/2014 3:59 PM, deadalnix wrote:
because it is known to fool optimizer and cause really
nasty bugs (typically, a pointer is dereferenced, so the optimizer assume it
isn't null and remove null check after the dereference, and then the dereference
is removed as it is dead.
I'd like to see a
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 00:13:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/5/2014 3:59 PM, deadalnix wrote:
because it is known to fool optimizer and cause really
nasty bugs (typically, a pointer is dereferenced, so the
optimizer assume it
isn't null and remove null check after the dereference, and
On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 22:44:31 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 1 January 2014 at 10:27:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
Why doesn't D support some kind of partial evaluation instead?
With llvm you get to JIT for free, seems to be an overall
simpler solution than having an
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 00:20:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
void foo(int* ptr) {
*ptr;
if (ptr is null) {
// do stuff
}
// do stuff.
}
The code look stupid, but this is quite common after a first
pass of optimization/inlining, do end up with something like
that when a
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 00:43:22 UTC, Thiez wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 00:20:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
void foo(int* ptr) {
*ptr;
if (ptr is null) {
// do stuff
}
// do stuff.
}
The code look stupid, but this is quite common after a first
pass of
On 12/20/2013 09:43 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Couldn't static imports be made lazy without breaking any code?
The above example would read.
static import std.range.
void foo(R)(R range) if (std.range.isForwardRange!R)
{
}
Furthermore selective import can always be made lazily without changing
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 17:07:10 UTC, Joakim wrote:
What new platform are you porting druntime to? I'm guessing
linux/ARM Cortex-M based on your previous posts. Hopefully, I
can reuse some of your work when I try ARM out.
I'm porting to an STM32F4
On 1/5/2014 4:20 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 00:13:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd still like to see an example, even a contrived one.
void foo(int* ptr) {
*ptr;
if (ptr is null) {
// do stuff
}
// do stuff.
}
The code look stupid, but
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 15:19:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Isn't that usually handled by running the webserver itself as a
separate
process, so that when the child segfaults the parent returns
HTTP 501?
You can do that. The hard part is how to deal with the other 99
non-offending
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 06:03:04PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/5/2014 4:20 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 00:13:19 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I'd still like to see an example, even a contrived one.
void foo(int* ptr) {
*ptr;
if (ptr is null) {
//
Hello Fellow D Heads,
Recently, I've been working to evaluate the feasibility and reasonability
of building out a binding to Cinder in D. And while it is certainly
feasible to wrap Cinder, that a binding would be necessarily complex and
feel very unnatural in D.
So after talking it over
On 1/5/2014 7:25 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On that note, some time last year I fixed a bug in std.bigint where a
division by zero was deliberately triggered with the assumption that it
will cause an exception / trap. But it didn't, so the code caused a
malfunction further on, since control passed on
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 02:24:09AM +, digitalmars-d-boun...@puremagic.com
wrote:
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 15:19:15 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Isn't that usually handled by running the webserver itself as a
separate process, so that when the child segfaults the parent returns
HTTP 501?
On 1/5/2014 8:10 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Recently, I've been working to evaluate the feasibility and reasonability of
building out a binding to Cinder in D.
For reference, here's what Cinder is:
http://libcinder.org/
It's been well received by the C++ community.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 08:43:25PM +, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
I've been thinking about this too. It shouldn't be too hard to add
this to std.conv (I'd call it fromString, though, by analogy with
toString -- parseImpl looks a bit ugly).
Is fromString good in case of InputRange?
Good
On 1/5/14 5:22 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 12/20/2013 09:43 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Couldn't static imports be made lazy without breaking any code?
The above example would read.
static import std.range.
void foo(R)(R range) if (std.range.isForwardRange!R)
{
}
Furthermore selective import
On 1/5/14 5:22 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 12/20/2013 09:43 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Couldn't static imports be made lazy without breaking any code?
The above example would read.
static import std.range.
void foo(R)(R range) if (std.range.isForwardRange!R)
{
}
Furthermore selective import
2014/1/6 Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
On 1/5/14 5:22 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 12/20/2013 09:43 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
Couldn't static imports be made lazy without breaking any code?
The above example would read.
static import std.range.
void foo(R)(R range) if
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 04:11:07 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello Fellow D Heads,
Recently, I've been working to evaluate the feasibility and
reasonability of building out a binding to Cinder in D. And
while it is certainly feasible to wrap Cinder, that a binding
would be necessarily
On 1/5/14 8:44 PM, Kenji Hara wrote:
Honestly, lazy import (== defer loading module file and running
semantic analysis for symbol search) would improve compilation speed for
selective imports and static imports, but it would have no merit for
basic imports.
So precisely, all imports lazy would
My first post. :)
I come from a perl background but currently I am looking into
transitioning into a compiled language. I am a fan of open
software and know of the affinity Gnu has towards the C language,
but would like to learn something that is a bit more like what I
am used to. I have
I'm sure you'll receive no shortage of opinions with such an open
invitation, so here's mine:
* Please don't make a graphics library that is useful only on PCs.
* Please consider more than mouse and keypboard as input devices
(e.g. multitouch)
* Today is the first I've heard of Cinder, but
The birth and evolution of d language is to provide a modern and
better alternative to C++! If I look at C++ then C++ is a systems
programming language. The use cases of C++ is OS and embedded
systems writing. Why? C++ claims to extract last drop out of HW.
If I
look correctly rarely C++ is
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 13:30:59 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
I my view text implies something like:
void write(const(char)[]);
size_t read(char[]);
And binary would be:
void write(const(ubyte)[]);
size_t read(ubyte[]);
Should not clash.
Those would do the same thing for either text
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 20:58:11 -0800, Nick B nick.barbal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 04:11:07 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Hello Fellow D Heads,
Recently, I've been working to evaluate the feasibility and
reasonability of building out a binding to Cinder in D. And while it
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 09:22:09PM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/5/14 8:44 PM, Kenji Hara wrote:
Honestly, lazy import (== defer loading module file and running
semantic analysis for symbol search) would improve compilation speed
for selective imports and static imports, but it would
2014/1/6 Andrei Alexandrescu seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org
On 1/5/14 8:44 PM, Kenji Hara wrote:
Honestly, lazy import (== defer loading module file and running
semantic analysis for symbol search) would improve compilation speed for
selective imports and static imports, but it would have no
On 1/5/2014 9:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/5/14 8:44 PM, Kenji Hara wrote:
Honestly, lazy import (== defer loading module file and running
semantic analysis for symbol search) would improve compilation speed for
selective imports and static imports, but it would have no merit for
On 1/5/14 10:31 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/5/2014 9:22 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/5/14 8:44 PM, Kenji Hara wrote:
Honestly, lazy import (== defer loading module file and running
semantic analysis for symbol search) would improve compilation speed for
selective imports and static
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 21:32:54 -0800, Mike n...@none.com wrote:
I'm sure you'll receive no shortage of opinions with such an open
invitation, so here's mine:
* Please don't make a graphics library that is useful only on PCs.
That's the plan. However at this point D only works on x86 so it's
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 20:17:22 -0800, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.com wrote:
On 1/5/2014 8:10 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Recently, I've been working to evaluate the feasibility and
reasonability of
building out a binding to Cinder in D.
For reference, here's what Cinder is:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 01:32:09 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 17:07:10 UTC, Joakim wrote:
What new platform are you porting druntime to? I'm guessing
linux/ARM Cortex-M based on your previous posts. Hopefully, I
can reuse some of your work when I try ARM out.
I'm
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 04:11:07 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
- Aurora is not a GUI library. Aurora is intended as a creative
graphics programming library in the same concept as Cinder.
This means that it will be much closer to game's graphics
engine, in terms of design and capability, than a
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 04:17:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/5/2014 8:10 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Recently, I've been working to evaluate the feasibility and
reasonability of
building out a binding to Cinder in D.
For reference, here's what Cinder is:
http://libcinder.org/
It's been
On Saturday, 4 January 2014 at 22:08:59 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 1/4/14, Adam D. Ruppe destructiona...@gmail.com wrote:
The big thing people have asked for before is
Object foo;
if(auto obj = checkNull(foo)) {
obj == NotNull!Object
} else {
// foo is null
}
and i haven't figured
* correct: whether obj converts to true or false
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 23:25:38 -0800, ilya-stromberg
ilya-stromberg-2...@yandex.ru wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 04:11:07 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
- Aurora is not a GUI library. Aurora is intended as a creative
graphics programming library in the same concept as Cinder. This means
that
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 23:30:24 -0800, Joakim joa...@airpost.net wrote:
On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 04:17:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/5/2014 8:10 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
Recently, I've been working to evaluate the feasibility and
reasonability of
building out a binding to Cinder in D.
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 06:31:38 UTC, Jake Thomas wrote:
And got 86,421 lines of assembly!! I expected a load
instruction to load whatever was at loadMe's location into r0
(the return register) and not much else. Maybe 10 lines - tops
- due to compiler fluffiness. I got about 8,641 times
On 2014-01-05 01:17, Jeroen Bollen wrote:
Also a somewhat unrelated question, variables in D get initialized by
default, do they also when you define them right after? Something like:
int[] iryy = new int[](50); // Will the array elements be initialized to 0?
Yes, have a look at:
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:08 PM, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
Of course, these are arguably clever hacks than true, properly-motivated
examples, but still, they exemplify what Andrei meant when he said that
the power of opDispatch is largely still unexplored territory.
As Adam
Andrej Mitrovic:
However the [k, aa[k]] expression will allocate an array for
each key you iterate over regardless if you use join or joiner.
I posted a solution with only, hope that works. :)
Perhaps the s suffix (to define fixed-sized arrays) could avoid
that problem:
string[] r =
Another simple example that have helped me tremendously when
debugging OpenGL calls. A simple dispatcher that checks
glGetError after every call.
struct GL
{
auto opDispatch(string name, Args...)(Args args)
{
enum glName = gl ~ name;
mixin(format(
static
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Ali Çehreli acehr...@yahoo.com wrote:
3) The member rangeFront is needed because Tuple does not have opIndex for
dynamic indexes. I can do range.front[0] but I cannot do
range.front[currentIndex].
Is there any plan to add indexing on runtime indices to Tuple?
On 01/05/2014 03:55 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Is there any plan to add indexing on runtime indices to Tuple? It can
be done, by generating a specific runtime opIndex for Tuple, if the
types held in the tuple have a common type.
It would override the current index operator.
Replying to myself:
In my case at lease, I don't think it's a bug...
I have just used the build tool binary that comes with the
DWinProgramming samples, added a new folder with my source in the
Samples directory, and the tool managed to build it properly...
I will now look at the souces of
On 01/05/14 15:36, TheFlyingFiddle wrote:
Another simple example that have helped me tremendously when debugging OpenGL
calls. A simple dispatcher that checks glGetError after every call.
struct GL
{
auto opDispatch(string name, Args...)(Args args)
{
enum glName = gl ~
I keep getting mixed results searching for this. :\
Just as the title says, is it safe to extern (C) variables?
Something like this:
extern (C) auto foo = 800;
And then call that from another program?
Also, just because this has been bugging me for a while.. Is
export broken, or it it not
It works if you recompile phobos64.lib
So it seems the standard DMD 2.064.2 download comes with an
outdated version of phobos64.lib which is out of sync with the
included source code.
@Palmic the DWinProgramming samples use the overload
Runtime.initialize(ExceptionHandler)
Which gives a warning that it is deprecated and you should use
this overload instead:
Runtime.initialize()
But this is not compiled in phobos64.lib, while it is included in
the source code. So the
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 18:22:54 UTC, Mineko wrote:
I keep getting mixed results searching for this. :\
Just as the title says, is it safe to extern (C) variables?
Something like this:
extern (C) auto foo = 800;
And then call that from another program?
Also, just because this has been
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 19:05:58 UTC, Erik van Velzen wrote:
@Palmic the DWinProgramming samples use the overload
Runtime.initialize(ExceptionHandler)
Which gives a warning that it is deprecated and you should use
this overload instead:
Runtime.initialize()
But this is not compiled in
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 19:08:44 UTC, Jeremy DeHaan wrote:
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 18:22:54 UTC, Mineko wrote:
I keep getting mixed results searching for this. :\
Just as the title says, is it safe to extern (C) variables?
Something like this:
extern (C) auto foo = 800;
And then
Filed under installer
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11871
You could add the linux thing as a comment if you're sure it's
the same issue.
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 18:22:54 UTC, Mineko wrote:
I keep getting mixed results searching for this. :\
Just as the title says, is it safe to extern (C) variables?
Something like this:
extern (C) auto foo = 800;
And then call that from another program?
Also, just because this has been
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 19:47:46 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
Some code snippets of what you try to do would help.
Maybe this example explain you something:
//mod.d
extern(C) int foo = 42;
void changeFoo(int val)
{
foo = val;
}
//main.d
import std.stdio;
import mod;
int main()
{
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 19:30:46 UTC, Erik van Velzen wrote:
Filed under installer
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11871
You could add the linux thing as a comment if you're sure it's
the same issue.
Well, I'm not sure this is same. I explored something new to me
and
import core.runtime;
int main()
{
Runtime.loadLibrary(does not care);
Runtime.unloadLibrary(null);
return 0;
}
When I try to compile this code with 'dmd main.d', I get errors
main.o: In function
`_D4core7runtime7Runtime17__T11loadLibraryZ11loadLibraryFxAaZPv':
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 19:55:50 UTC, Mineko wrote:
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 19:47:46 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
Some code snippets of what you try to do would help.
Maybe this example explain you something:
//mod.d
extern(C) int foo = 42;
void changeFoo(int val)
{
foo = val;
}
I a using dirEntries to list recursively build a list of all
files in all subdirectories but dirEntries is throwing an
exception when it encounters a broken link.
I want just report the exception, then ignore the broken link and
then continue processing the rest of the dir's and files.
Do I
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 19:55:50 UTC, Mineko wrote:
Ahh I appreciate it, but I already have that part down and
good. :)
I was wondering about how to use export correctly, I apologize
for not being clear.
Also I'll keep in mind the __gshared, never even knew about it.
Export is
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 17:17:27 UTC, Artur Skawina wrote:
While 'void' is not a first class type in D, there /is/ a
special
case for returning 'void' from functions - so all of the above
can
simply be written as:
struct gl {
static auto ref opDispatch(string name, Args...)(Args
You must not cast base class to derived class, when you don't
know actual type (and even if you know exact type it's still bad
practice to cast instance of more generic type to more specific
one). Use multiple catch statements instead:
catch(FileException o)
{
//handle FileException
}
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Jacob Carlborg d...@me.com wrote:
Just for the record. In Rails, that's the old, now discourage, Rails 2
syntax.
I didn't know that, thanks. I read it during the holidays in Martin
Fowler's book on DSL, but indeed that book is from 2005, IIRC.
In Rails 3 and
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Timon Gehr timon.g...@gmx.ch wrote:
On 01/05/2014 03:55 PM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
Is there any plan to add indexing on runtime indices to Tuple? It can
be done, by generating a specific runtime opIndex for Tuple, if the
types held in the tuple have a common
The following doesn`t work:
immutable(string[]) strArr = new string[](10);
But I feel that it probably should work. I know we have
assumeUnique, but I remember awhile ago that some work was done
toward making the result of unique expressions (like those using
new) implicitly convertible to
On 01/05/2014 05:19 PM, Meta wrote: The following doesn`t work:
immutable(string[]) strArr = new string[](10);
A pure function is a workaround. The return value of a pure function is
implicitly convertible to immutable:
pure string[] foo()
{
return new string[](10);
}
void main()
{
On Sunday, 5 January 2014 at 21:33:56 UTC, FreeSlave wrote:
You must not cast base class to derived class, when you don't
know actual type (and even if you know exact type it's still
bad practice to cast instance of more generic type to more
specific one). Use multiple catch statements
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11849
--- Comment #6 from github-bugzi...@puremagic.com 2014-01-05 00:11:27 PST ---
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11863
--- Comment #3 from monarchdo...@gmail.com 2014-01-05 00:10:54 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hmm, with -allinst switch, OP code runs successfully in Windows (Both -m32
and -m64).
I *thought* I had tried that, but I must have gotten it
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7683
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1566
Denis Shelomovskij verylonglogin@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11863
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara k.hara...@gmail.com 2014-01-05 00:29:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Hmm, with -allinst switch, OP code runs successfully in Windows (Both -m32
and -m64).
Instead of -allinst, -release also suppresses the
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
