On 02/27/2014 12:51 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 23 February 2014 at 22:07:39 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
The cat's out of the bag..
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ypg91/getting_started_with_d_and_vibed/
We didn't want to announce the site before we had more videos, but it
has
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 08:15:26 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
On 02/27/2014 12:51 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Sunday, 23 February 2014 at 22:07:39 UTC, simendsjo wrote:
The cat's out of the bag..
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1ypg91/getting_started_with_d_and_vibed/
We didn't
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 02:34:53 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Unfortunately we won't participate in GSoC this year. The
decision was not surprising - our application has been rejected.
Sadly there are lots of things we could have done better. Our
application has been a
On 2/27/14, 10:10 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 02:34:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Unfortunately we won't participate in GSoC this year. The decision was
not surprising - our application has been rejected.
Sadly there are lots of things we could have done
On 2014-02-26 21:23, simendsjo wrote:
The video quality is good, isn't it? Or did you mean the content quality
(which is pretty poor)?
No, not the content, I'm referring to the video quality. Hmm, for some
reason Youtube only displays it in 360p. If I download the video it's
better. It's ok
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 20:25:50 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2014-02-26 21:23, simendsjo wrote:
The video quality is good, isn't it? Or did you mean the
content quality
(which is pretty poor)?
No, not the content, I'm referring to the video quality. Hmm,
for some reason Youtube
On 02/27/2014 09:25 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-02-26 21:23, simendsjo wrote:
The video quality is good, isn't it? Or did you mean the content quality
(which is pretty poor)?
No, not the content, I'm referring to the video quality. Hmm, for some
reason Youtube only displays it in 360p.
On 2/27/14, 11:11 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
One more question. Do you feel this is a job that someone who isn't
necessarily well versed in the various technologies could take on (in a
sort of manager role), or would you need someone who has the expertise
to evaluate various proposals.
Any
On 2/27/14, 1:42 PM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:37:03 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/27/14, 11:11 AM, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:
One more question. Do you feel this is a job that someone who isn't
necessarily well versed in the various technologies could
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:25:27 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
We can still do #2 without #1. And we don't need google to
make it happen. How about trying a practice run despite not
having google tossing in the funding?
If someone would want to contribute, what would be the right
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:47:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
For better or worse Walter and I are the bottlenecks on a lot
of D-related stuff.
I would really like to help with this, and (I think) others would
too.
The ideas for GSoC 2015 could start now. I took the liberty of
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 23:21:29 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
https://community.kde.org/Getinvolved/development
(at the bottom)
Experienced D developers, who feel they could use
on a specific project, or who would be otherwise interested in
taking on an 'apprentice' could list projects
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 01:02:11 UTC, Mike wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:47:37 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
For better or worse Walter and I are the bottlenecks on a lot
of D-related stuff.
I would really like to help with this, and (I think) others
would too.
The
On 2/27/14, 3:22 PM, Mathias LANG wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 22:25:27 UTC, Brad Roberts wrote:
We can still do #2 without #1. And we don't need google to make it
happen. How about trying a practice run despite not having google
tossing in the funding?
If someone would want to
On 2014-02-26 05:50, Brad Roberts wrote:
Later,
Brad
Now I've received your email but it seems I can't reply :)
Instead, I'm receiving mail delivery error:
The mail system
bra...@puremagic.com: host mail2.puremagic.com[99.179.5.161] said: 451
4.7.1
Please try again later (TEMPFAIL) (in
Dear list,
I stumbled over odd behavior which took quite some time of debugging.
Sharing my results may help find a solution or just make others aware
and reduce their debugging time.
To illustrate consider the code:
auto array1 = [ [1, 2], [3, 4] ];
auto array2 = array1.dup;
array2[0] =
A1)
Google's Dart (https://www.dartlang.org) looks like a very promising
replacement for javascript. It can compile to javascript to ensure
portability (but chromium runs it natively) but the language itself reminds
more of D to a surprising extent. Dart language has features such as:
static
What needed to create language that can be run everywhere? I mean
would it be hard to add support of running D code in web-browser?
it's better to write all logic at one language, that on 2 or 3.
Timothee Cour:
* better way to define default constructors:
class Point {
num x;
num y;
num z;
// Syntactic sugar for setting z and x before the constructor
body runs.
Point(this.z, this.x){...}
}
This is more explicit and flexible than D's way for default
struct
constructors,
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 10:12:46 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
As you may conclude from this post I find this behavior odd. I
expect a
hash implementation to follow indirections by calling the
hashing
functions recursively.
How shall it work with cycles in object graphs?
I don't like any of the syntax changes mentioned. I do like the
suggestions for better IDEs and similar tools. We can always do
more to improve these.
C#'s IObservable/IObserver made me think how would a dual
[1][2] of a range concept look in D. Since D has no equivalent
IEnumerable (as it is no needed thanks to templates) it is only
about IEnumerator / IObserver part which relates to a D range.
Ranges/enumerators are models of 'pull' style
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 12:41:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
C#'s IObservable/IObserver made me think how would a dual
Topic should of course be: Duals OF ranges and reactive D
Having precise GC in D eventually would be cool. Not having to
worry about false pointers is always good.
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:44:10 -0500, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
wrote:
First of all, the way ByLine works is kinda tricky, even in the previous
releases. The underlying cause is that at least on Posix, the underlying
C feof() call doesn't actually tell you whether you're really at EOF
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 16:40:59 UTC, NA wrote:
This is an updated document and is quite interesting.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3888.pdf
NA
Don't we already have it? Called gtkD.
Steve
thedeemon wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 10:12:46 UTC, Jens Mueller wrote:
As you may conclude from this post I find this behavior odd. I
expect a
hash implementation to follow indirections by calling the hashing
functions recursively.
How shall it work with cycles in object
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
What do you think how well would this work in D2 ?
Eric Niebler did a very interesting discussion targeting Range
proposals for C++17.
I think it would be great inspiration for future improvements on
D ranges:
The shortcomings of classical C++ (begin, end) ranges:
http://ericniebler.com/2014/02/16/delimited-ranges/
The shortcomings of
Would be so nice if we finally fix issue 12256
(https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12256).
I hate it...
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
What do you think how well would this work in D2 ?
I was
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 07:55:59AM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:44:10 -0500, H. S. Teoh
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
First of all, the way ByLine works is kinda tricky, even in the
previous releases. The underlying cause is that at least on Posix,
the
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 10:27:41 UTC, Timothee Cour
wrote:
A1)
Google's Dart (https://www.dartlang.org) looks like a very
promising
replacement for javascript. It can compile to javascript to
ensure
portability (but chromium runs it natively) but the language
itself reminds
more of D
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
What do you think how well would this work in D2 ?
I like
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
What do you think how well would this work in D2 ?
Wish I
On 24/02/2014 22:26, Brad Anderson wrote:
I threw this together from an old post by Jonathan.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Differences_With_TDPL
People are always asking about what has changed since TDPL was released
and I think it'd be good to have a single resource we can point people
at. The items
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
What do you think how well would this work in D2 ?
D doesn't
Are the peek routines standard? I'm on my phone so I can't
easily check right now. Barring that, there's an ioctl call that
can tell whether data is available, though I'm not sure offhand
what the result would be for a file if you haven't read anything
yet.
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 15:00:13 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 04:43:30 UTC, Mike wrote:
Please review this (http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/2377217c7870)
instead.
throw new Exception(Out of memory);
I don't think it is a good thing to do. Of course GC is likely
to
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:04:47 -0500, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 07:55:59AM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:44:10 -0500, H. S. Teoh
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
First of all, the way ByLine works is kinda tricky, even in the
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 16:08:26 UTC, Robert Clipsham
wrote:
D doesn't need this, you can implement monadic null checking in
the library:
By that argument, I can implement anything that D can do in
assembler, hence I don't need D.
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:22:45 -0500, Sean Kelly s...@invisibleduck.org
wrote:
Are the peek routines standard? I'm on my phone so I can't easily check
right now. Barring that, there's an ioctl call that can tell whether
data is available, though I'm not sure offhand what the result would be
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 15:56:48 UTC, Nick Treleaven
wrote:
On 24/02/2014 22:26, Brad Anderson wrote:
I threw this together from an old post by Jonathan.
http://wiki.dlang.org/Differences_With_TDPL
People are always asking about what has changed since TDPL was
released
and I think
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 14:46:25 UTC, Alessandro
Stamatto wrote:
Eric Niebler did a very interesting discussion targeting Range
proposals for C++17.
I think it would be great inspiration for future improvements
on D ranges:
The shortcomings of classical C++ (begin, end) ranges:
On 2/27/14, 7:19 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
And then some design decisions which wouldn't work for D: everything is
an object, no struct (just class), VM, etc.
In a programming language you can make everything look like an object
but implement it as a primitive type. So that could work in D
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 16:32:18 UTC, Chris Williams
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 16:08:26 UTC, Robert Clipsham
wrote:
D doesn't need this, you can implement monadic null checking
in the library:
By that argument, I can implement anything that D can do in
assembler, hence
Am 27.02.2014 17:48, schrieb Ary Borenszweig:
On 2/27/14, 7:19 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
And then some design decisions which wouldn't work for D: everything is
an object, no struct (just class), VM, etc.
In a programming language you can make everything look like an object
but implement it as
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 10:27:41 UTC, Timothee Cour
wrote:
A1)
Google's Dart (https://www.dartlang.org) looks like a very
promising
replacement for javascript. It can compile to javascript to
ensure
portability (but chromium runs it natively)
No, neither Chromium nor even Chrome
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 17:02:02 UTC, Robert Clipsham
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 16:32:18 UTC, Chris Williams
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 16:08:26 UTC, Robert Clipsham
wrote:
D doesn't need this, you can implement monadic null checking
in the library:
By
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:26:42AM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 10:04:47 -0500, H. S. Teoh
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 07:55:59AM -0500, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:44:10 -0500, H. S. Teoh
hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 17:25:22 UTC, Chris Williams
wrote:
just(myObject).method1().method2().method3()
You can't do that. You're reducing your example code - which
was several dozen lines and only applied to objects for which
you had added the special handler code - to the end
Am 27.02.2014 18:29, schrieb thedeemon:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 10:27:41 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote:
A1)
Google's Dart (https://www.dartlang.org) looks like a very promising
replacement for javascript. It can compile to javascript to ensure
portability (but chromium runs it natively)
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:20:20 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
clip
Like it or not, JavaScript is good enough.
Really? I've been stuck for the past week or so trying to put
together a browser based UI using JavaScript + HTML for a work
related project. It has been a painful experience.
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 12:32:44 -0500, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
wrote:
Actually, now that I think about it, can't we just make ByLine lazily
constructed? It's already a wrapper around ByLineImpl anyway (since it's
being refcounted), so why not just make the wrapper create ByLineImpl
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:37:51 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:20:20 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
clip
Like it or not, JavaScript is good enough.
Really? I've been stuck for the past week or so trying to put
together a browser based UI using
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 19:54:04 UTC, w0rp wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:37:51 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:20:20 UTC, Paulo Pinto
wrote:
clip
Like it or not, JavaScript is good enough.
Really? I've been stuck for the past week or
On 27.2.2014 20:54, w0rp wrote:
I developed 99% of the JavaScript part of an application for a year, and
I have extensive JavaScript knowledge. After all that, I wrote this.
https://w0rp.com/blog/post/javascript-sucks/
I think it was someone on Slashdot who posted this wonderful comment:
Am 27.02.2014 19:37, schrieb Craig Dillabaugh:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 18:20:20 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
clip
Like it or not, JavaScript is good enough.
Really? I've been stuck for the past week or so trying to put together a
browser based UI using JavaScript + HTML for a work
On 2/27/2014 2:19 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
* optional named parameters arguments (with simplest possible syntax)
This comes up now and then. The problem with it is it makes function overloading
a near impossibility to untangle.
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
What do you think how well would this work in D2 ?
Chaining
On 2/27/2014 2:19 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
* import all except specified symbols:
import 'package:lib2/lib2.dart' hide foo; // Import all names EXCEPT foo.
As a general rule, negation features are frequently misunderstood, our brains
tend to just not see the negation. One should positively
after the success of '-vcolumns', I suggest introducing a flag for
colorized error messages, see enhancement proposal:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12273
On 2014-02-27 14:27, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
What do you think how well would this work in D2 ?
I like it.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2/27/2014 2:19 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
* cascade operations: they perform a series of operations on the members of a
single object:
foo.bar(1)..baz(3)
equivalent to:
foo.bar(1)
foo.baz(3)
D has ranges and algorithms to conveniently chain operations.
* better way to define default
Projects such as Pegged and our CTFE regex engine often serve as
poster-children of what is possible in D and many agree they are
among the more important projects.
I was thinking, after std.lexer is accepted, we have a stable
interface, but no matter how great the code is and even if it
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 20:49:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
On 2014-02-26 16:05:19 +, Steve Teale said:
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 13:30:15 UTC, Leandro Motta Barros wrote:
Hello,
I'm coming late to the discussion, but I believe that you can use the
following idiom to achieve the same results in a different way:
Yes we went through that,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:20:47 -0500, Peter Alexander
peter.alexander...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 20:49:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:45:11 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
ifnull(parent).child.child.child
brain fart...
ifvalid(parent).child.child.child
-Steve
On 2014-02-27 10:11:53 +, Jens Mueller said:
Dear list,
I stumbled over odd behavior which took quite some time of debugging.
Sharing my results may help find a solution or just make others aware
and reduce their debugging time.
To illustrate consider the code:
auto array1 = [ [1, 2],
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 20:49:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:49:20 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:45:11 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
ifnull(parent).child.child.child
brain fart...
ifvalid(parent).child.child.child
-Steve
What you want is a maybe monad, and we
Shammah Chancellor wrote:
On 2014-02-27 10:11:53 +, Jens Mueller said:
Dear list,
I stumbled over odd behavior which took quite some time of debugging.
Sharing my results may help find a solution or just make others aware
and reduce their debugging time.
To illustrate consider the
Walter Bright:
* optional named parameters arguments (with simplest possible
syntax)
This comes up now and then. The problem with it is it makes
function overloading a near impossibility to untangle.
Do you have an example of the problem?
* better way to define default constructors:
class
Well, it sounds like one of two issues:
1) you're mail client is sending directly to the mx hosts for
puremagic.com mails (ie, mail1 or mail2) and never retrying to send.
Neither is a good idea.
or
2) your mail transport agent is never retrying.
I suspect the former more than the latter,
On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 20:09:29 UTC, Stanislav Blinov
wrote:
There's a lot more to these singletons than meets the eye.
- It would seem that such usage of raw MemoryOrder in
AtomicSingleton would be wrong (e.g. return to acq/rel is in
order, which should not pose any performance issues
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Walter Bright
newshou...@digitalmars.comwrote:
On 2/27/2014 2:19 AM, Timothee Cour wrote:
* cascade operations: they perform a series of operations on the members
of a
single object:
foo.bar(1)..baz(3)
equivalent to:
foo.bar(1)
foo.baz(3)
D has ranges
* better syntax for optional positional arguments:
void fun(int x, [int y, int z=3]){...}
Thinking of which, this would actually solve a long standing problem in
D, that
of specifying optional parameters AFTER a variadic template:
void fun(T...)(T args, [string file=__FILE__,int
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 2:40 PM, bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.comwrote:
Walter Bright:
* optional named parameters arguments (with simplest possible syntax)
This comes up now and then. The problem with it is it makes function
overloading a near impossibility to untangle.
Do you have
Brad Anderson:
Reddit discussions on these are interesting too. Eric talks
about why he doesn't like D's ranges a bit.
What are the downsides of D ranges he sees?
Bye,
bearophile
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 00:43:57 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Brad Anderson:
Reddit discussions on these are interesting too. Eric talks
about why he doesn't like D's ranges a bit.
What are the downsides of D ranges he sees?
Here's what he wrote:
We could kinda do named parameters today like this:
ParameterTypeTuple!foo args;
args.named_param = 3;
foo(args);
It would be nice if we could declare a variable inside a
with(auto x = foo) like we can in if() too.
* better way to define default constructors:
class Point {
num x;
num y;
num z;
// Syntactic sugar for setting z and x before the constructor body
runs.
Point(this.z, this.x){...}
}
This is more explicit and flexible than D's way for default struct
constructors,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Brad Anderson e...@gnuk.net wrote:
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 00:43:57 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Brad Anderson:
Reddit discussions on these are interesting too. Eric talks about why he
doesn't like D's ranges a bit.
What are the downsides of D ranges he
On 2/27/2014 4:55 PM, Brad Anderson wrote:
On Friday, 28 February 2014 at 00:43:57 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Brad Anderson:
Reddit discussions on these are interesting too. Eric talks about why he
doesn't like D's ranges a bit.
What are the downsides of D ranges he sees?
Here's what he
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 at 17:10:01 UTC, Russel Winder
wrote:
On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:40 +, NA wrote:
This is an updated document and is quite interesting.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3888.pdf
https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!
I was in a discussion here recently about 64 bit and how much
memory people had in their machines these days.
A somewhat unrelated topic is that Microsoft are in the process
of dumping XP.
Now all those old desktop boxes with only 500k of memory will
increasingly migrate in containers to
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 21:44:20 UTC, Shammah Chancellor
wrote:
On 2014-02-26 16:05:19 +, Steve Teale said:
Actually, D has the ability to walk the object hierarchy at
compile time, and generate a function call containing all the
super classes's handleCommands. You could also
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 20:49 +, deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 13:27:14 UTC, Remo wrote:
Apparently C# will get it in the next version.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jerrynixon/archive/2014/02/26/at-last-c-is-getting-sometimes-called-the-safe-navigation-operator.aspx
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 19:20 +0100, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
From what I understood on Dart talks last Google IO, work was planned
to have V8 and Dart VM play together inside Chrome.
Dartium is a build of Chromium with both, so this is very much the
direction that is possible.
Personally, I
Hi,
I am evaluating D for future projects and coming from C++ I find
it really hard to understand semantics of destruction of
GC-managed code.
After many application-shutdown crashes caused by invalid order
of class destructor calls I really think I need to change the way
I am thinking
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 09:49:08 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
My crashes (still have them and can't track all as debugging D
sucks) are caused by the fact that d-tor of parent object can
be called before child d-tors. Adding destroy() calls in parent
d-tors helped with some of crashes
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 09:55:14 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 09:49:08 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
My crashes (still have them and can't track all as debugging D
sucks) are caused by the fact that d-tor of parent object can
be called before child d-tors.
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 09:57:51 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 09:55:14 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 09:49:08 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
My crashes (still have them and can't track all as debugging
D sucks) are caused by
Though this post may seem long, my questions are indeed asked. I
just kinda started typing and didn't stop; I guess this is both a
question post and a vent post. Please bear with me.
Hello, I'm a hobbyist programmer, and I'm tired of the way things
are going. I'm looking for a change.
I must
Szymon Gatner wrote:
Parent-child in the sense of object graph. I did read the spec
when I started to notice crashes. I must say that it really
terrified me to my very bones. I always though that
higher-level memory management environments would give more and
not less guarantees.
Anyway,
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 10:40:15 UTC, Tobias Pankrath
wrote:
Szymon Gatner wrote:
Parent-child in the sense of object graph. I did read the spec
when I started to notice crashes. I must say that it really
terrified me to my very bones. I always though that
higher-level memory
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 10:23:40 UTC, DS6 wrote:
Okay, down to the questions I have about D:
- Why should I use D over another language? What general
benefits does it provide me, in relation to the points I made
about it above? Is it a solid base to build off of, but still
simple in
Szymon Gatner:
I just want them to do their cleanup first as they should.
Why? Perhaps if you explain what's behind your needs better,
people can help better.
Bye,
bearophile
On Thursday, 27 February 2014 at 11:13:17 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Szymon Gatner:
I just want them to do their cleanup first as they should.
Why? Perhaps if you explain what's behind your needs better,
people can help better.
Bye,
bearophile
In my specific example I am creating OpenGL
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
