On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 22:11:09 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 30 November 2015 at 21:50:09 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/30/15 4:41 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
What about when element i is matched, swap it with the
(i/2)'th element?
Randomization is essential -
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 20:44:56 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 16:22:25 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 8 October 2013 at 15:43:46 UTC, ponce wrote:
Is there a plan to have a standard counter-attack to that
kind of overblown problems?
It could be just a solid blog p
On Friday, 14 June 2013 at 08:17:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/14/2013 1:11 AM, Denis Koroskin wrote:
Does it look like it's slower? To me it looks like it's
actually FASTER with a
flush, although I don't know why.
Because of write caching, you can get very different re
On Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 18:11:12 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
What is wrong and needs fixing is the program exiting with
"success" indication when the output has actually failed.
What's wrong is a program existing with a status code *different*
from one that was supplied by a programmer.
On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 at 06:48:48 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 6/11/2013 10:15 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 June 2013 at 04:23:39 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
I don't agree. Buffering is often done on page size
boundaries - throwing out
a random number of characters and then flushing
On Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 16:50:50 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/11/13 11:57 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
This code DOES fail:
import std.stdio;
int main()
{
writeln("hello");
std.stdio.stdout.flush();
return 0;
}
Ah, I suspected so. (At a point in D's history writeln() did do
a
On Wednesday, 29 May 2013 at 21:45:38 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
Need some opinions for a GUI editor
You can combine both approaches: make the editor an external app
that would communicate with your running application (if it's
compiled in an editor-enabled mode).
On Wednesday, 29 May 2013 at 19
On Wednesday, 6 March 2013 at 08:17:58 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/19npsp/developers_may_be_getting_as_much_as_50_of_their/
What I get from this is that people really like PHP's
documentation style where users can add to it.
For what it's worth, MSDN
On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 04:20:27 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/1/2013 7:46 PM, Denis Koroskin wrote:
I'm no copyright lawyer, but I think ddmd being a derivative
work from dmd
should probably inherit the license from it
It does indeed. But the derived part of the work can b
On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 03:01:20 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/1/2013 6:55 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 02:35:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/1/2013 7:43 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
Wow. You make me feel really lucky that at my day job, I
once made a
request to use
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:11:34 -0800, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Some interesting blog post:
http://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2012/12/19/the-impoliteness-of-overriding-methods/
It's a post about a common problem in class design, I've ran into it a
few times in D too.
Reddit thread:
http://www.
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:47:36 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
I've often thought Java bytecode was a complete joke. It doesn't deliver
any of its promises. You could tokenize Java source code, run the result
through an lzw compressor, and get the equivalent functionality in every
way.
Not
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:37:07 -0800, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/13/2012 12:46 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-12-13 18:27, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I am confused at this commit also.
Walter argues that people are already using it so it can't just be
removed. I
say, they're using an unrelea
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:22:55 -0800, Jeff Nowakowski
wrote:
On 12/12/2012 04:45 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Though one of the downsides would be that if I were to leave, so would
the site.
For the stability of the project, D needs more commodity-based services
like Amazon S3, and less volun
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 03:10:15 UTC, d coder wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Walter Bright
wrote:
No worries there :-) I feel pretty dang strongly about this
issue, from
bad experience.
Even if a language behaves "wrong", it is still usable if it is
predictable.
Agreed.
On Sun, 08 May 2011 17:59:02 +0400, Timon Gehr wrote:
On page 263, TDPL states that struct objects nested inside a function
cannot
be returned, because the caller does not have access to their types.
Using the
auto keyword, DMD lets you do this though. Is this a bug in DMD or an
error in
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:47:53 +0400, maarten van damme
wrote:
I've changed this, I think I'm still kinda confused with lib files.
They've
told me you can't do something with them without a .di file
So I went ahead and made a kernel33.di file. I now import it in
kernel32.d
and my declarati
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:19:37 +0400, Alexander wrote:
On 29.04.2011 21:58, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
You need to replace the assert and compile with -O -release -inline. My
results:
[snip]
Still, straight comparison wins - 2x faster ;)
/Alexander
That's just an optimizer issue. Even if
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 03:10:15 +0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
I often see code written like this:
if (value == somevalue ||
value == someothervalue ||
value == yetanothervalue);
You could use the switch statement. But that introduces indentation,
and is rarely used for a couple of values
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:30:59 +0400, lenochware
wrote:
I was not happy with error message "invalid utf8 character". I am using
international character in my strings and compiler gives me this
message. Of
course, I can switch my source codes into utf8, but here are few tricks
which
can be d
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 22:26:00 +0400, Sean Kelly
wrote:
On Apr 26, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:14:05 +0400, Sean Kelly
wrote:
Right now, traces are generated on throw. It should be possible to
generate them on catch instead. The performance would be
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:14:05 +0400, Sean Kelly
wrote:
Right now, traces are generated on throw. It should be possible to
generate them on catch instead. The performance would be the same either
way however. It would be nice to generate them lazily but I don't think
that's possible.
Sen
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:43:26 +0400, Alexander wrote:
On 26.04.2011 12:57, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On my Windows box with an i7 920, a simple try/throw/catch loop runs at
about 13 iterations per second.
Well, g++ with same loop on same linux system gives ca. 16 iter/s,
which i
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:08:38 +0400, so wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:37:42 +0300, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:34:29 +0400, so wrote:
For me, Logger needs to be simple but feature complete. Here is my
ideal syntax:
Logger log = new
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:58:17 +0400, Jens Mueller
wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:34:29 +0400, so wrote:
>>For me, Logger needs to be simple but feature complete. Here is
>>my ideal syntax:
>>
>>Logger log = new Logger();
>>log.warn("
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:34:29 +0400, so wrote:
For me, Logger needs to be simple but feature complete. Here is my
ideal syntax:
Logger log = new Logger();
log.warn("bewarned");
log.error("error code: %d", 42);
log.fatal("Derp");
Fine if you remove the first line, switching the output is som
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:09:30 +0400, Robert Clipsham
wrote:
Hey folks,
I've just finished porting my web framework from D1/Tango to D2/Phobos,
and in the transition lost logging functionality. As I'll be writing a
logging library anyway, I wondered if there'd be interest in a std.log?
I
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:34:33 +0400, dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Andrej Mitrovic (andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com)'s article
Nice work. I've tried it out with allocating some large float arrays,
quick two test cases were a 94MB and 282MB audio file.
File 1 w/o TempAlloc: 410msecs
File 1 w/ TempAllo
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:12:34 +0400, Don wrote:
I noticed a lively discussion in Bugzilla about the GC, with speculation
about the impact of a precise GC on speed.
But it seems to me that a dedicated GC for pure functions has enormous
unexplored potential, and might be relatively easy to impl
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:39:32 +0400, David Wang wrote:
Dear Walter Bright,
I would like to know that what GUI library you would like to use for D
Language ?
Have you ever considered the GTK+ 3.0? or other library? or you will
produce a
new D library of GUI?
wainting for your kindly fee
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 18:21:52 +0400, Kai Meyer wrote:
Then I suppose I have two options. Do I start where somebody else left
off? Or should I start from scratch? If from scratch, should I be
re-packaging the .zip file distribution, or building from source?
I'm also interested in DDMD.
I do
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:13:19 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 06:44:42 -0400, Simen kjaeraas
wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:46:08 +0200, Morlan wrote:
It is OK if I write
int[char[]] asr;
asr["hello"] = 10;
but the following does not compile:
char[] car =
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:31:54 +0400, FeepingCreature
wrote:
On 28.03.2011 15:19, random lurker wrote:
FeepingCreature Wrote:
On 28.03.2011 03:45, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Hello again
I've stayed quiet for a long time because people started accusing me
of trolling. But now, I REALLY HATE THI
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 00:26:40 +0300, dsimcha wrote:
On 3/25/2011 3:50 PM, Sean Kelly wrote:
On Mar 24, 2011, at 1:00 PM, dsimcha wrote:
BTW, the TempAlloc module also includes a hash table, hash set and AVL
tree that
are specifically optimized for TempAlloc. Should these be included in
t
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:27:45 +0300, Trass3r wrote:
%u Wrote:
What tools (aka debuggers) do you guys use to debug DMD?
Debugging dmd with Visual Studio works flawlessly for me.
I just cv2pdb -C it, open devenv bla\dmd.exe, set the working directory
to the D code I want to compile and then o
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 00:10:28 +0300, Jesse Phillips
wrote:
Denis Koroskin Wrote:
>No you cannot. What happens is that you *open* them with the
> default application, which just happens to be an interpreter whose
> default action is to run the script. Try renaming a .exe into
On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 21:47:54 +0300, Jérôme M. Berger
wrote:
Kagamin wrote:
Don Wrote:
??
It ALWAYS makes a difference. For example, only .exe and .com files are
executable.
On unix, the filename is just a name. Nothing more. By contrast, the
Windows extension actually matters. They're
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011 05:55:20 +0300, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Okay, removing elements from a container sucks right now. You can do
stuff like
removeAny (generally pretty useless IMHO) or removeFront just fine, but
removing
an arbitrary range from a container just plain sucks.
remove takes
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:45:21 +0300, dennis luehring
wrote:
naked INSIDE of the context which is adress with the attribute - looks
very strange to me, because it changes the pro- AND epilog of an
function/codeblock
real blabla(real x)
{
asm{
naked;
mov EAX,[RSP];
naked;
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:12:25 +0300, Russel Winder
wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that DMD generates 32-bit by default and that
for 64-bit you have to give the -m64 option?
Is the eventual plan to use the natural word length of the platform as
the default, i.e. 32-bit on 32-bit and 64-bit on
On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 06:49:26 +0300, Michel Fortin
wrote:
On 2011-02-15 22:41:32 -0500, "Nick Sabalausky" said:
I like "nint".
But is it unsigned or signed? Do we need 'unint' too?
I think 'word' & 'uword' would be a better choice. I can't say I'm too
displeased with 'size_t', but it's
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 02:01:53 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Michel Fortin wrote:
But note I was replying to your reply to Denis who asked specifically
for demangled names for missing symbols. This by itself would be a
useful improvement.
I agree with that, but there's a caveat. I did such
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:12:02 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:26:50 +0200, Walter Bright
wrote:
golgeliyele wrote:
I don't think C++ and gcc set a good bar here.
Short of writing our own linker, we're a bit stuck with what ld does.
That's
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 00:02:39 +0300, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
I am now intensely accumulating information on how to go about creating
a high-performance parser as it quickly became clear that my old one
won't deliver. And if anything is clear is that memory is the key.
One way is the slicing a
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:00:20 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/2/11 7:07 AM, spir wrote:
On 02/02/2011 09:45 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Following ideas and advice from this newsgroup, I have a draft at
http://d-programming-language.org/cutting-edge/phobos/std_algorithm.html
There
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:00:20 +0300, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 2/2/11 7:07 AM, spir wrote:
On 02/02/2011 09:45 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Following ideas and advice from this newsgroup, I have a draft at
http://d-programming-language.org/cutting-edge/phobos/std_algorithm.html
There
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:06:11 +0300, Magnus Lie Hetland
wrote:
I think perhaps some adjustments could be made to the layout, to make it
more suitable to narrow(ish) browser windows (c.f., the discussio about
80 columns -- without starting a huge thread like that again ;)
For one thing, in
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 16:23:21 +0300, Trass3r wrote:
That said I really hope D gets an ARM backend. While it isn't likely
for a DMD to happen, it could for LDC.
As I said in my other answer to this topic GDC has already been compiled
as an ARM cross-compiler.
Good to know, thanks!
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:29:54 +0300, Michel Fortin
wrote:
On 2011-01-30 03:05:59 -0500, Gary Whatmore said:
D's main focus currently is 32-bit x86 servers and desktop
applications. This is where the big market has traditionally been. Not
everyone has 64-bit hardware and I have my doubts
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:32:28 +0300, Michel Fortin
wrote:
On 2011-01-28 17:09:08 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu
said:
On 1/28/11 3:05 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
Not my preferred choices (especially #1), but having containers in
Phobos will certainly be an improvement over not having them. So g
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:46:47 +0300, Extrawurst wrote:
Hi i just want to discuss two points about D version statements.
1) Why is it not possible to negate the condition of a version
statement. I think it is unintuitive and keeps me writing weird
statements like:
version(Win32){}else{versi
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 06:38:40 +0300, Haruki Shigemori
wrote:
Hi.
I cannot get thread ID with Thread.getThis() in specific callback
functions on Windows.
What is the cause of this problem?
import win32.windows;
import win32.mmsystem;
import std.stdio;
import core.thread;
extern (Windows)
void
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 07:19:44 +0300, Jack wrote:
The post "C#'s greatest mistakes" prompts/begs this post. Have at it,
pick up the ball and run with it, don't be shy. I expect Walter and
Andrei to answer (if Walter and Andrei so dare!) after others' posts have
stopped or stagnated into that cess
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 04:33:36 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 04:14:05 +0300, Walter Bright
How can it skip it without knowing the grammar?
#ifdef D_Version2
...
#else
...
#endif
D has a precedence of having preprocessor macros (e.g #line) even if
On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 04:14:05 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Andrew Wiley wrote:
I'm a fan of parsing false version blocks, but it seems like there
should be some sort of exception for version blocks for a different
version of the language. Could they just be skipped with a warning that
an
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:39:31 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
From my experience, a bigger issue is that
version (D2) {
/* some D2 only code involving const etc */
}
simply won't compile in D1, because even if it's D2-only the code
needs to be correct
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:19:12 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My recommendation -- when you are ready, switch wholly to D2. Don't
bother with compatibility, it's just not possible.
From what you wrote, it appears that most of the difficulties were in
dealing wit
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:54:50 +0300, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
Just saw another linker error in d.learn, and it got me thinking
dmd just calls the linker, and the linker spits out link errors. But
what if we had a 'linker wrapper' program which translated mangled names
into demangled n
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:30:03 +0300, Jens Mueller
wrote:
Hi,
I do not understand what's going on behind the scene with this code. Or
better said I have some idea but maybe I do not see the whole point.
void foo(int[] array) {
array.length += 1000; // may copy the array
array[
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:08:01 +0300, Simen kjaeraas
wrote:
Eric Poggel wrote:
On 11/6/2010 6:50 AM, bearophile wrote:
foobar:
Any type can be wrapped by an OPTION type. trying to do the converse
of this is impractical and is bad design.
Discussing this is a waste of time now, this par
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:21:49 +0300, steveh wrote:
Andrei's stance is, either a library addon or ship D without that
feature. D's library already contains both tuples and algebraic data
types. They're simple to use, almost like in Python. The reason for
library addons isn't that builtin fea
Since many people think that non-nullable references can be implemented as
a library and thus don't belong to core language, I've decided to show
that it is in fact impossible to do so.
How do you enforce the following behavior:
class Foo
{
this()
{
// error: variable nonNull
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 18:01:32 +0300, steveh wrote:
Sounds more retarded than the notorious 'retard' here. It's because of
people like u that D3 might not come. If you disagree too much with AA
and WB they have no interest to make D3. This nonnull question might be
good place to give up.
C
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 23:37:09 +0300, Gary Whatmore wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
Adam Burton wrote:
> I wouldn't consider that as the same thing. null represents the lack
of a
> value where as 25 is the wrong value. Based on that argument the
application
> should fail immediately on accessin
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 02:11:59 +0300, bioinfornatics
wrote:
hello,
I have a question (i would like understand), they are many important
people of D community who do not want go to D2, why ?
thanks for answer
Many of the D2-only features are half-baked:
- pure, nothrow and inout are not im
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 00:58:57 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
FeepingCreature wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
FeepingCreature wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
All that does is reinvent the null pointer seg fault. The hardware
does
this for you for free.
Walter, I know you're a Windows programmer bu
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 14:06:20 +0300, Christopher Bergqvist
wrote:
Does D have anything comparable to C++ references à la "void
nullCheckLessFunction(const std::string& notNullStr) {...}" or does it
only
have the equivalent of "void nullCheckingRequired(const std::string*
mightByNullStr) {..
On Sat, 06 Nov 2010 02:41:25 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:44:58 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
To eliminate null pointers is the same as shooting the canary in your
coal mine because its twitter annoys you.
I'm tired of pointing out th
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 23:44:58 +0300, Walter Bright
wrote:
To eliminate null pointers is the same as shooting the canary in your
coal mine because its twitter annoys you.
I'm tired of pointing out that NO ONE is talking about eliminating null
pointers, but rather extending an existing type
On Fri, 05 Nov 2010 14:43:48 +0300, Gary Whatmore wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
Plus a nice Microsoft site that allows you to try it in interactive
way, this is very good:
http://www.rise4fun.com/SpecSharp
D can do that too. We had those interactive versions in the newsrgoup.
We saw no value
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:32:24 +0400, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 29/10/2010 12:50, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:40:35 +0400, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 13/10/2010 18:48, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu schrieb:
On 10/13/10 11:16 CDT, Denis Koroskin wrote:
P.S. For
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 15:40:35 +0400, Bruno Medeiros
wrote:
On 13/10/2010 18:48, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu schrieb:
On 10/13/10 11:16 CDT, Denis Koroskin wrote:
P.S. For threads this deep it's better fork a new one, especially when
changing the subject.
I thought I d
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 11:58:56 +0400, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 29.10.2010 09:26, schrieb Roman Ivanov:
They would be a great help in debugging programs, for example.
NullPointerException is probably the most common error I see in Java.
95% of all times it gets thrown in some weird context, wh
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:41:45 +0400, Benjamin Thaut
wrote:
For my current project I use visualD for debugging. I'm now at a point
where both dsss and visualD won't compile my sourcecode any more. Dsss
gets stuck in some kind of endless loop and because visualD passes all
files to dmd at o
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:23:49 +0400, Olivier Pisano
wrote:
Le 25/10/2010 09:27, Walter Bright a écrit :
Russel Winder wrote:
. . . but they may have been asked before and I just missed them in
trawling around.
Is the intention that D should be the language of choice for
implementing applica
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:55:22 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"bearophile" wrote in message
news:ia0410$1lj...@digitalmars.com...
Nick Sabalausky:
But that's all if you want generalized lexing or parsing though. If you
just
want "lexing D code"/"parsing D code", then IMO anything other than
ad
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 01:33:33 +0400, bearophile
wrote:
Denis Koroskin:
FWIW, similar problem exists:
class Foo
{
void foo1()
{
struct Bar {}
}
void foo2()
{
struct Bar { /* different set of fields and methods */ }
// using Foo.foo2.Bar
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 01:06:02 +0400, Peter Alexander
wrote:
On 23/10/10 7:30 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Peter Alexander wrote:
There have been threads about what the biggest issues with D are, and
about the top priorities for D are, but I don't think there has been a
thread about what the best
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:47:56 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/19/10 8:06 CDT, Justin Johansson wrote:
This module should be removed altogether from Phobos forthwith.
The code was obviously submitted and accepted without peer
review, either that or the peers were idiots as well.
It w
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 12:37:35 +0400, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-10-19 00:01, Denis Koroskin wrote:
Okay, we've finished what we started with Aleksey today, so I decided to
share it with you. This is a rough cut, it lacks comments, but it is
already usable.
deepCopy is a function that
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:53:45 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.vksxyn15o7c...@korden-pc...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:26:23 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 06:26:23 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:op.vkshh4bdo7c...@korden-pc...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:41:54 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Rainer Schuetze" wrote in message
news:i9f2ce$30r...
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:07:16 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I don't know if others have noticed this before, but I think I've found a
notable limitation in D's metaprogramming potential: There doesn't
appear to
be a way to have mutable global state at compile-time.
Challange:
Create two..."
Okay, we've finished what we started with Aleksey today, so I decided to
share it with you. This is a rough cut, it lacks comments, but it is
already usable.
deepCopy is a function that makes a deep copy of your object, and
everything it points to. As simple as that.
Essentially it is a b
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 00:41:54 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Rainer Schuetze" wrote in message
news:i9f2ce$30r...@digitalmars.com...
I've used ddmd as a medium sized project for testing. It has more than
400
files with most modules mutually importing each other. Some remarks:
- compilatio
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:41:22 +0400, Gour D. wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:23:02 +0400
"Denis" == "Denis Koroskin" <2kor...@gmail.com> wrote:
Denis> What D currently lacks is a code written in it. I also think a
Denis> stable standard IDE and GUI libr
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:01:05 +0400, Gour D. wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:52:34 -0700
"Walter" == Walter Bright wrote:
Hello Walter,
Walter> 1. People who won't use D for an irrational or unflattering
Walter> reason. They'll search about for some other reason that is
Walter> publicly accept
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:01:57 +0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
We've just tried programming with a friend in pair in D, and after
spending about an hour trying to figure out the program misbehavior we
understood it was a dmd codegen bug (I'll submit a report sh
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:25:52 +0400, Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
On 18-ott-10, at 18:14, Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:07:38 +0400, Don wrote:
Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:59 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Java was big long before it was open-sourced, and C# is big in
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:07:38 +0400, Don wrote:
Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:59 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Java was big long before it was open-sourced, and C# is big in spite
of the fact
that its main compiler isn't open source and the one that is (Mono) is
so far
behind the
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:51:34 +0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
htod could also use a --help switch so we don't have to fire up the
browser every time we need to remind ourselves on what arguments it
can take. Or, you know, Walter could give us the source code and we'll
fix it for him. Hehe. :>
H
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:22:32 +0400, BCS wrote:
Hello Denis,
On some platforms it is desired to align struct Vec { float[4] data; }
on 16 bytes.
At a guess, that is aligning the structure in memory, not the members in
the struct. I think the 2nd is the question here.
Yes, I was talkin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 06:00:49 +0400, Walter Bright
wrote:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/attribute.html#align
Over time, it has become clear to me that there are only two useful
alignments:
align // set to whatever the C ABI alignment is
align(1) // pack everything in, no ali
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:57:02 +0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Is there a technical reason why the l- and r- values for opEquals must be
const? If the restriction is purely for the intuitive notion that
there's no
heisenstructs, then I have an example I think might be worth
consideration:
lazy
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:22:46 +0400, Steven Wawryk
wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
== Quote from Steven Wawryk (stev...@acres.com.au)'s article
C and C++ qualify. I'm new to D and still learning about it, but with
the deprecation of scoped classes and delete, I'm not sure that D
qualifies.
Why?
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 04:17:18 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 10/16/2010 05:57 PM, kenji hara wrote:
Current dmd does not enough support runtime reflection.
[snip]
I think runtime reflection is not needed. What you'd need to do for the
"loose duck" is generate code that throws for al
Sorry, I misclicked a button and send the message preliminary.
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:16:40 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
A final option is to disable the copy constructor of such an unsafe
appender, but then you couldn't pass it around.
What do you think? If you think it's worth h
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:16:40 +0400, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:52:29 -0400, Denis Koroskin <2kor...@gmail.com>
wrote:
First I'd like to say that I don't really like (or rather use) Appender
because it always allocates (at least an internal Dat
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 00:37:10 +0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I was talking to Walter about Kenji's adaptTo. We both think it's a very
powerful enabler, but adaptTo is a bland name. After discussing a few
marketing strategies, I proposed "duck". It's short, simple, and evokes
"duck typi
irst I'd like to say that I don't really like (or rather use) Appender
because it always allocates (at least an internal Data instance) even when
I provide my own buffer.
I mean, why would I use Appender if it still allocates? Okay, you have to
store a reference to an internal representation
1 - 100 of 899 matches
Mail list logo
