downs wrote:
downs foo.betweens(src=\, \) /select/ (string s) { return
s.find(criteria) != -1; }
Heh, I love that infix expression syntax. Too abd it ends up with a
completely useless wrapper struct 2 function calls, but hopefully LDC
can inline that out.
downs auto videocon =
Stewart Gordon wrote:
Have you written a compiler for a superset of C in which arbitrary
forward references are allowed? How did you do with overcoming the
difficulty that is C's context-sensitive grammar?
C (minus preprocessor, of course) is only context-sensitive with regards
to casts
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
It also says that Java 6, a language compiled as I proposed D could be,
has escape analysis.
Java's escape analysis is done at runtime (during JIT compilation) AFAIK.
LDC can compile to bitcode and link-time codegen could be used to deal
with escape analysis...
Robert Jacques wrote:
ship/sell D libraries in binary format.
Does anyone sell static libraries anymore? There are too many problems
with static linking for that to be very viable. Most libraries I've seen
are sold as DLLs.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Michael
Rynnmichaelr...@optushome.com.au wrote:
I took away all the safety features of const, immutable and any other
things that dmd 1.0 complains about, as recommended for the std2.
Well, different people feel differently about these things. IMO, the
bearophile wrote:
grauzone:
Then what is there to complain?
I have paid for 2 GB RAM, so I am allowed to desire a 1800 MB array :-)
I agree it's a bug, and probably a rather major one. However in a real
use case, any program that needs 1800+ MB arrays should be 64-bit only.
Eljay wrote:
As cent/ucent, should a keyword be reserved for 256? 512? 1024?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Most programming languages are loathe to add new keywords, because that has the
chance to impact existing code.
So the time to add keywords for D 2.0(alpha) is now, since the language
bearophile wrote:
I don't think so, I am running a 32 bit GCC on a 32 bit XP operating system.
I think the bug is elsewhere (in DMD).
Have you tried with DMC?
Paul D. Anderson wrote:
I was browsing the Python spec yesterday and came across this interesting and
useful syntax:
/ (one slash) means floating point division, e.g. 5/2 = 2.5 even though 5 and
2 are integers
// (two slashes) means integer (floor) division, e.g. 5.0//2.0 = 2.0 even
though
Daniel Keep wrote:
function-declaration
puretrue/pure
returnTypeSomeType/returnType
namefoo/name
parameters/
body
comment ... /comment
/body
/function-declaration
Ah, you saw the announcement for Microsoft's new .NET language?
Michel Fortin wrote:
As you know, I tried to write some guidelines[1] for naming things in D.
Those guidelines looks well at first glance, but then you look at Phobos
and you see that half of it use some arbitrary naming rules. Take
writefln for instance: following my guidelines (as they are
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
One little niggle though: At the end of the paragraph that explains the
hello world's import statement, it says Repeated imports of the same file
are of no import. Sounds like a typo snuck in there.
Or a pun ;-P.
Walter Bright wrote:
Having optional parentheses does lead to unresolvable ambiguities. How
much of a problem that really is is debatable, but let's assume it
should be resolved. To resolve it, a property must be distinguishable
from a regular function.
One way is to simply add a property
Hi, hope you're all enjoying the properties debate.
I've been seeing the too many keywords argument a lot lately, and I
think it's definitely a valid argument. shared and body in
particular are rather annoying keywords since I frequently use them in
code. And if users are deciding not to use
Walter Bright wrote:
Chad J wrote:
This makes things more difficult for syntax highlighters. A number of
them will just not work correctly because they don't actually parse the
code.
That's true. Another thing keywords provide are anchors that enable
better error recovery.
Read Herb's
Oliver Hoog wrote:
And requiring try/catch to have
braces introduces inconsistency.
That was probably a bad idea. However note that D is actually the
inconsistency here -- C++, Java, and C# all require the braces.
Chad J wrote:
This makes things more difficult for syntax highlighters. A number of
them will just not work correctly because they don't actually parse the
code.
That's all I've got.
Ehhh How often will you actually use the identifiers? The point
isn't to make them free for use, it's
Ali Cehreli wrote:
If the default behavior for dout.writefln is to print bool values as the true and
false strings, then the opposite should be available and arguably be the default:
// true and false should be acceptable inputs:
bool b;
din.readf(b);
Am I wrong?
Thanks,
Ali
P.S.
Tim Matthews wrote:
On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 16:29:28 -0300
Ary Borenszweig a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?LanguageDevel/DIPs/DIP6
Are pragmas not already here for this?
Nope, they're for compiler-specific extensions
aarti_pl wrote:
Please add another syntax proposals (max. 2 best proposals - with
example code) and correct mistakes in questions (if any):
I like the C# style:
int size
{
get { return _size; }
set { _size = value; }
}
get, set and value are only keywords within a property
BCS wrote:
will it find it if I ask out of order? Say, QDL?
No... what's the use case there?
JDT does have auto-corrections for misspellings of variables, though (I
think based on Levishien distance, so it's dictionary-independent)...
this might be intersting to add to autocomplete. So if
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
2. modifiers that don't make sense should be disallowed.
There's been wars about this one. IMO, this is a good thing for writing
templated/generic code -- if a modifier only makes sense in one instance
of a template, all the others should not be marked as errors.
I
Walter Bright wrote:
Compare your car with a Model T. The T is simple, easily repaired,
easily understood. But who wants to drive a T these days compared with
driving a modern car?
It would be the _ultimate_ pimpmobile.
downs wrote:
1) If it's a word, put it in the standard library.
2) Otherwise, put it in the compiler.
for - compiler.
foreach - library.
But for is a word, while foreach isn't! ;-P
Dimitar Kolev wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
I don't see what advantages this has over other proposals. What is wrong
with a.a such that we have to resort to a#a?
-Steve
People are crying over compilers not know which is a property and which is not.
Actually, one of the major
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
...
The number of people taking this seriously worries me.
BCS wrote:
for({} false; 42) {}
Eww...
Don wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Don wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Michiel Helvensteijn escribió:
Walter Bright wrote:
immutable - data that cannot change or be changed (imagine it is
stored
in ROM)
const - read only view of data, you cannot change it but others can
enum
Don wrote:
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Michiel Helvensteijn escribió:
Walter Bright wrote:
immutable - data that cannot change or be changed (imagine it is
stored
in ROM)
const - read only view of data, you cannot change it but others can
enum - compile time constant, has no
Michel Fortin wrote:
On 2009-07-21 05:31:13 -0400, Michiel Helvensteijn
m.helvensteijn.rem...@gmail.com said:
Robert Jacques wrote:
Well /* */ are excellent for toggling code sections. I tend to use
constructs such as // */ or //* or /*/ which allows me to turn on of
off
blocks with
Trass3r wrote:
Robert Fraser schrieb:
Windows or Unix?
Currently I only need Windoze, but knowing the linux situation wouldn't
be bad either.
There's no Windows stack trace that works with the newest Phobos AFAIK,
however if you're using D2, you could probably copy Tango's stacktrace
D. Reeds wrote:
can anybody help me translate this c code into d, im using D1+tango combo. i'm new to D and got stucked on multi-dimension array part.
int levenshtein_distance(char *s,char*t)
//Compute levenshtein distance between s and t
{
//Step 1
int k,i,j,n,m,cost,*d,distance;
Stewart Gordon wrote:
With apologies to Bruno Medeiros
All this talk about getting D2 finished (and other things like what
comes next) makes me worried. People talk as if D2 is nearing
completion: there are even threads about the coming or even requesting
the release of the finished
BCS wrote:
One thing Walter is adement about is that copy-n-paste C code must run
correctly (i.e the same) in D or not compile. As for the C style type
syntax, I'd be willing to see that go en-total.
It's useful if you have a .h that you both include in a C/C++ file and
run through a
File is probably too big. Remember that for every byte in your binary,
DMD is likely allocating several hundred for the literal xpression
object + codegen for the expression, etc., and frees very little
dynamically allocated memory.
Trass3r wrote:
Here are the files, if you want to try out:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Andrei
Alexandrescuseewebsiteforem...@erdani.org wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Jarrett
Billingsleyjarrett.billings...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:33 PM,
Daniel Keep wrote:
But this is quite cool; always nice to have another alternative. :)
What are the other alternatives? The interlinks are all but necessary
for larger/OO projects.
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
phobos: http://downloads.dsource.org/projects/descent/ddoc/phobos/
Tango: http://downloads.dsource.org/projects/descent/ddoc/tango/
*drool*
I agree about the source code -- it's probably the main reason the Tango
docs are so slow and it's useless 95% of the time.
BLS wrote:
Vladimir Voinkov wrote:
std.regex can't be used in compile time function call. It's quite
frustrating...
see dsource.org .. afaik there is a compile time regex project. hth
http://www.dsource.org/projects/scregexp
But the generated functions aren't CTFE-compatible AFAIK. A CTFE
Walter Bright wrote:
Optlink does not discard unreference symbols, it just doesn't pull them
in from the library. If it did always pull in everything from the
library, then the minimum D executable size will be the size of Phobos.
Since that isn't happening, something else is happening with
Walter Bright wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Hmmm... well, I built a 3rd-party library (Platinum UPnP + Neptune)
into two static libraries (with VS). I then wrote a C wrapper function
around one, just to test out the functionality I needed (a fraction of
what was available). Originally, I wanted
Walter Bright Wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Your explanation sounds likely, however it seems VS is discriminating on
the per-symbol level...?
Let's say the C++ source file looks like:
int foo() { ... }
int bar
bearophile wrote:
(P.S.: Is Walter around still? He's pretty silent lately. Talking when he's not
around looks quite academic).
He gave a D talk on Wednesday night. I get the feeling the next release
is going to be something big.
Steve Teale wrote:
template isInputRange(R)
{
enum bool isInputRange = is(typeof(
{
R r; // can define a range object
if (r.empty) {} // can test for empty
r.popFront; // can invoke next
auto h = r.front; // can get the front of the
grauzone Wrote:
Your example doesn't compile right now.
The @@@ was meant as an example to be replaced with any code. Yeah, you
probably knew that.
But if you use a string mixin,
the code doesn't even have to be syntactically/lexically valid:
is(typeof({ mixin(@@@); }))
True -- both
bearophile wrote:
template isInputRange(R) {
enum bool isInputRange = __traits(compiles, {
R r; // can define a range object
if (r.empty) {} // can test for empty
r.popFront; // can invoke next
auto h = r.front; // can get the front of the
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
I'm bad at meeting deadlines. Partly because I mismanage my time, but
a large part of it is also because being a perfectionist, I never know
when to _stop working on something_. After nearly two years in
development, I think I'm ready to call MiniD 2 gold.
Tim Matthews wrote:
Anders F Björklund wrote:
Last but definitely not least, two windowing libraries complete the
language's offering quite spectacularly. The mature library DWT is a
direct port of Java's SWT. A newer development is that the immensely
popular Qt Software windowing library
dsimcha wrote:
It has bitten me several times when I have a named enum type next
to an integer type or something that an integer can be implicitly converted to
in a function param list:
enum MyEnum {
FOO,
BAR
}
Try...
typedef int _MyEnum;
enum MyEnum : _MyEnum
{
FOO,
Has anyone been able to successfully link (statically) to a library
generated by MinGW? I compiled the libraries in question (FFMpeg avutil,
avformat, and avcodec) under MinGW, ran objconv on it to convert it to
OMF (no errors) and passed it to optlink along with MinGW's libgcc. At
this point
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3070
Summary: Implicitly conversion on function call
Product: D
Version: 2.030
Platform: x86
OS/Version: Windows
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
);
}
/**
* Mime on Fire (mime) -- Simple UPnP server for XBOX360
* Copyright (C) 2009 Robert Fraser
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it andor
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
Robert Fraser wrote:
[...]
BTW, the code is D1+Tango... it shouldn't be overly hard to port,
though, since the only part of Tango it uses is tango.sys.SharedLibrary.
As for D2, change char[] to string, and all should be good.
davidl wrote:
Also the whole paradigm of coding a runtime vararg func is so
troublesome and even much complex compared to the compile time vararg.
Maybe we should borrow something from compiletime to aid the runtime
vararg programming.
Got my vote!
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
It's not foolproof, but I found it useful enough; maybe others will too.
// Parsing mangles for fun and profit.
char[] _getJustName(char[] mangle)
{
size_t idx = 1;
size_t start = idx;
size_t len = 0;
while(idx mangle.length mangle[idx] = '0'
David Ferenczi wrote:
== Quote from Sergey Gromov (snake.sc...@gmail.com)'s article
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:28:12 +0100, Hoenir wrote:
The D_Version2 version identifier doesn't work properly for me.
Tried compiling with dmd 1.039. D_Version2 is set even if I pass -v1 to it.
Is this a bug or am I
Lionello Lunesu wrote:
bearophile bearophileh...@lycos.com wrote in message
news:h0ggl7$60...@digitalmars.com...
From the last C#:
http://codepad.org/kQgbwAqJ
Bye,
bearophile
Lionello likes this
In D if you want to treat a Template!(SomeClass) as a Template!(Object),
it's as easy as
bearophile wrote:
Robert Fraser:
In D if you want to treat a Template!(SomeClass) as a Template!(Object),
it's as easy as cast(Template!(Object)) cast(void*) x
How is this related to Covariance/Contravariance and in/out keywords, as shown
in C#4?
Bye,
bearophile
Errr... isn't
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Daniel Keepdaniel.keep.li...@gmail.com wrote:
I hate in-browser rich text editors; every single one I've ever used
sucked massively.
For example, when I was posting on Blogger, I had to write every post
manually because their rich
Robert Clipsham wrote:
Dunno if anyone else thinks this, but the operating system looks very
confusing with all the LDC only identifiers mixed in. I think it'd be a
good idea to find out which of them are deprecated and remove them, eg
only keeping one of either solaris or Solaris etc.
Frits van Bommel wrote:
Fractal wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley Wrote:
Because those are the three string encodings D supports, and only
supporting one is a dumb idea.
Why? wchar is full compatible with all languages (if it is not please
tell me)... also when I have many strings in different
Fractal wrote:
Thanks for the correction... then adding a String struct to simplify it?
Fractal
Why? char[] _is_ a string. wchar[] and dchar[] are basically there for
compatibility with libraries that want them.
That being said, tango.text.Text is a string struct of a sort,
although it's
Fractal wrote:
Hello
Using Windows, I created a DLL with D, and when I try to create my test
executable (also with D), the ImpLib program displays an error saying that
there is no any exported function. The DLL source only contains a class with
the export attribute like:
export class Foo
{
Brad Roberts wrote:
davidl wrote:
I will attach a compilable nedmalloc source, corresponding compile
batch, and a simple test app. In two post of this thread because of the
attachment size limitation of 51k.
In the future, please, a website.. or bugzilla, or anything but sending a bunch
of
Sjoerd van Leent wrote:
User application - An application with custom windows, dialogs and menus to
interact with the GIS database(s)
There are like 20 of these for D, most of which work reasonably well.
I'd recommend DWT, which is cross-platform, and the newest branch is
stable on D1+Tango
BCS wrote:
If you can
assume that any FPU will be designed to work with IEEE 754 (would that
be valid now days?)
Not at all!
IIRC, some of the PS2's CPUs don't implement NaN or Infinity (just check
out the Advanced page of PCSX2, you can set how accurately the various
PS2 CPUs FP
eris wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
eris:
Is there any way to get around including the exclamation point?
!(int) tells the template what type is T. Somewhere you have to tell it what
type of items you want to put inside it.
The alternative is like the old Java, where your collections contain
bearophile wrote:
Yes, for such tiny benchmarks I have seen several times 10-12 higher allocation
performance in Java compared to D1-DMD. But real programs don't use all their
time allocating and freeing memory...
Bye,
bearophile
For the compiler I'm working on now (in D), I wanted to check
d-bugm...@puremagic.com wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3050
Summary: Allow exception in CTFE (patch)
Product: D
Version: 2.030
Platform: x86
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Keywords: patch
grauzone wrote:
Sorry to dig up this old post, but I still don't understand why
'package' functions cannot be virtual? Is there a good reason for
this? I can't see why we can't use polymorphism on 'package' functions!
Is there way to make it virtual without making it public? (e.g. a
What's the difference between:
D 1: 40.20 DMD
D 2: 21.83 DMD
D 2: 18.80 DMD, struct + scope
and:
D 1: 8.47 DMD
D 2: 7.41 DMD + scope
...?
Sam Hu wrote:
bearophile Wrote:
I have tried the new JavaVM on Win, that optionally performs escape analysis,
and the results are nice:
Timings, N=100_000_000, Windows, seconds:
D 1: 40.20 DMD
D 2: 21.83 DMD
D 2: 18.80 DMD, struct + scope
C++: 18.06
D 1: 8.47 DMD
D 2:
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Tue, 02 Jun 2009 22:29:28 +0300, Jérôme M. Berger jeber...@free.fr wrote:
Leandro Lucarella wrote:
You have a good command-line support.
Maybe you do, but that's not the impression the Git fans here were
giving:
- Robert Fraser on win32 support: git's
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Denis Koroskin 2kor...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:op.uuthxivwo7c...@soldat.creatstudio.intranet...
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:21:42 +0400, Tim Matthews
tim.matthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Knud Soerensen wrote:
Tim Matthews wrote:
It's things like
Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
- Here's the same for Mozilla:
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/preed/2007/04/version_control_system_shootou_1.html
From the article:
While they've made recent progress, Git was lacking in Win32 support and
it was unclear that this would ever change and if it did
BCS wrote:
Hello Saaa,
You have to write it yourself. Here's a good starting point:
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/lex.html#identifier
Yes, that was my starting point and it seemed quite complex, thus my
question :)
I think I'll stay with my simple check for now as it isn't really
zsxxsz wrote:
Hi, I written one thread pool in which each thread is semi-resident. The
thread-pool is different from the Tango's one. Any thread of the thread-pool
will exit when it is idle for the timeout. That is to say, all threads for
jobs, and no job no thread. The thread-pool was from my C
Trass3r wrote:
bearophile schrieb:
Thrust is a CUDA library of parallel algorithms with an interface
resembling the C++ Standard Template Library (STL). Thrust provides a
flexible high-level interface for GPU programming:
http://code.google.com/p/thrust/
Something like this (but OpenCL) for
Walter Bright wrote:
The D compiler source doesn't use any templates, rtti, or clever macro
hacks. Whether it's well designed or not, I'll let others decide. It is
written in a D-ish style.
I ported part of the DMDFE to Java, and found it quite well-designed
(with the exception of the
BCS wrote:
Hello Steven,
On Thu, 28 May 2009 11:39:28 -0400, Matti Niemenmaa
see_signat...@for.real.address wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
If we were importing compiled files (or even generated files), then
the
compiled file could have annotated the static this with the
dependencies it
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Frits van Bommel fvbom...@remwovexcapss.nl wrote in message
news:gvlsjc$188...@digitalmars.com...
Denis Koroskin wrote:
FWIW, NNTP (which is used in newsgroups like this) falls into Usenet
category:
Wikipedia quote
Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2009 08:14:45 -0400, Frank Benoit
keinfarb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Unknown W. Brackets schrieb:
Probably a silly idea, but what about (or similar):
static this: mod.name, mod.name2, mod.name3
{
}
For a dependency list. I may be wrong, but afaik
Unknown W. Brackets wrote:
Because you've never tried to use data initialized circularly. I wonder
what would happen in Java if you did?
-[Unknown]
Frank Benoit wrote:
Unknown W. Brackets schrieb:
Probably a silly idea, but what about (or similar):
static this: mod.name, mod.name2,
grauzone wrote:
Robert Fraser wrote:
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Robert Fraser
fraseroftheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
unsupported char 0xe2, both with using and not using a BOM
BCS wrote:
Reply to Robert,
Hmm... I'd say x.⊆(y) is preferable x.isSubsetOf(y), but it's not a
huge deal.
Only until you have to type it. I think universal alpha includes only
the union of things that can be easily typed on standard keyboards. I
don't think any keyboard (ok maybe an APL
Jarrett Billingsley wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Robert Fraser
fraseroftheni...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question: I want to use some unicode identifiers, but I get
unsupported char 0xe2, both with using and not using a BOM. The characters
in question are the superset
Hey all,
Without revealing too much I'm currently working on a programming
language for a research project (it's implemented in D, of course!). I'm
trying to figure out a good syntax for type annotations. I realized that
under my current scheme the fun keyword in my language now serves
three
Robert Fraser wrote:
fun fun $a() lazyApply(fun $a($b) f, $b x) = fun $a() = f(x);
And don't forget to take your fun fun (a banger in the mouth if you get
the reference :-)).
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Saaa em...@needmail.com wrote in message
news:gv6qcj$2ck...@digitalmars.com...
If I could get that in a super fast, light programming editor, I'd use
that instead. But I can't.
Wasn't there an effort somewhere to port eclipse to D ?
I have no idea, but that does
Daniel Keep wrote:
The only way Flash will die if if at least the following happen:
...
5. Silverlight replaces it (and then we're all doomed).
Saaa wrote:
Is the executable name any of bud or bud.exe? I think that's what the
process name is for Eclipse, and the links are associated to the process
name (not to the name you choose for the external tool).
:)
May I suggest adjusting the filter to bud*.exe or add a note on dsource as
I
nobody wrote:
$ g++ alloc.cpp -o alloc
$ time ./alloc
real0m1.946s
user0m1.688s
sys 0m0.256s
$ dmd -O -release allocd.d
$ time ./allocd
real0m22.734s
user0m22.353s
sys 0m0.360s
$ cat alloc.cpp
#include vector
typedef std::vectorint intvec;
typedef intvec*
Robert Fraser wrote:
nobody wrote:
$ g++ alloc.cpp -o alloc
$ time ./alloc
real0m1.946s
user0m1.688s
sys 0m0.256s
$ dmd -O -release allocd.d
$ time ./allocd
real0m22.734s
user0m22.353s
sys 0m0.360s
$ cat alloc.cpp
#include vector
typedef std::vectorint intvec
bearophile wrote:
I have a tuple of classes (D1 language), I'd like to instantiate one of them
directly with new, but it seems I can't:
template Tuple(T...) { alias T Tuple; }
class Foo { static void foo(){} }
class Bar {}
alias Tuple!(Foo, Bar) ClassTuple;
void main() {
alias
dsimcha wrote:
Also, while we're fine tuning input
ranges vs. forward ranges, I think the concept of iterables as a catch-all for
ranges, opApply, builtins, etc. needs to be introduced and fine tuned, too.
We've
shown on this NG previously that, while ranges are usually preferable for the
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
struct R
{
bool empty();
ref int front();
void popFront();
}
ref int popNext(ref R fwdRange)
{
auto result = fwdRange.front();
fwdRange.popFront;
return *result;
}
void main()
{
R r;
int x = r.popNext;
}
This should work, I just
reimi gibbons wrote:
2) how reliable is bcd to create binding for c libraries?
C? Very reliable (unless it uses weird compiler directives). C++ is a
bit trickier.
Frank Benoit wrote:
Alexander Pánek schrieb:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
Thank you for bringing a real example that gives something to work on.
Awful!
Well, one of your cases was wrong. Using the +1 at the end one of
those cases become:
case 'A' ..
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Let me add one more, although more than sure someone will find a remedy
for it, too.
a...b
vs.
a.. .b
and of course the beauty
ab
Oh, and this speaks more about the .b syntax than anything else. Does
anyone actually use this...? If it was removed, b could
Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Oh, and this speaks more about the .b syntax than anything else. Does
anyone actually use this...? If it was removed, b could still be
accessed by its fully-qualified name, so its' removal not a huge loss.
But that will make porting C code harder
Guess who'll say that.
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
