On 05/21/2013 04:58 PM, Robert Jacques wrote:
> the response to the question on logical const (at 32:11).
I think 31:22 is more precise.
Ali
On Fri, 10 May 2013 05:08:09 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Andrei
Thanks. I noticed a subtle error in the response to the question on
logical const (at 32:11). Specifically, overloading the function on
immutable doesn't allow you
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 08:08:37 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out, but I think there is a problem
with the
forum software (I guess you are reading the NG using the web
forums?).
My client properly set the In-Reply-To: header. I checked
manually the
e-mail you repli
On 5/12/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Again, I don't understand what the problem is.
I understand now this is made this way to encourage discussions. I
apologize if I sounded smug, it was uncalled for.
On Thu, 16 May 2013 20:52:35 +0100, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:13:27 Regan Heath wrote:
So, who's responsibility is it to ensure the function/method call
executes without errors caused by mutable shared data?
I think that for the most part, the question of thread
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 19:52:51 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:13:27 Regan Heath wrote:
So, who's responsibility is it to ensure the function/method
call executes
without errors caused by mutable shared data?
I think that for the most part, the question of thre
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:13:27 Regan Heath wrote:
> So, who's responsibility is it to ensure the function/method call executes
> without errors caused by mutable shared data?
I think that for the most part, the question of thread-safety and const that
you've been discussing is moot. const by
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:13:27 Regan Heath wrote:
> So, I think in cases where the function/method doesn't need to retain the
> argument for longer than the lifetime of the call it should accept
> const(char), otherwise as you mentioned earlier it's better to simply
> require the caller provide
On Thu, 16 May 2013 12:06:18 +0100, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 10:41:51 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
True, it's not enforced. But, that's because the responsibility lies
with the caller, and I think this is a reasonable position to take in
these cases (std.file methods which use
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 10:41:51 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
True, it's not enforced. But, that's because the
responsibility lies with the caller, and I think this is a
reasonable position to take in these cases (std.file methods
which use but do not retain the argument post-call)
You see, i
On Thu, 16 May 2013 11:25:48 +0100, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 10:13:28 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
...
I agree that this is a caller responsibility. What leaves me in doubts
is how this responsibility is enforced though. With const nothing in
type system prevents caller to v
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 10:13:28 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
...
I agree that this is a caller responsibility. What leaves me in
doubts is how this responsibility is enforced though. With const
nothing in type system prevents caller to violate that "contract"
and mutate data during function
On Wed, 15 May 2013 18:32:03 +0100, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
What's less clear is what to do when a function accepts strings but
isn't really operating on them (e.g stuff in std.file or std.net.curl),
as they may need immutable(char)[]. In that case, it depends on what's
being done with the
On 05/16/2013 02:55 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-05-16 05:48, deadalnix wrote:
>
>> Completely off topic : your NG client is splitting the discussion,
>> creating a new one on every answer you make.
>
> At don't see a split in this topic at all using Thunderbird. That's
> probably a first
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 17:32:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
You probably should actually quote part of the message so that
it's easier to
figure out exactly which message you're replying to it.
It is hard to quote the video :) I was referring to the part
starting somewhere here: http:/
On Thursday, 16 May 2013 at 07:55:14 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-16 05:48, deadalnix wrote:
Completely off topic : your NG client is splitting the
discussion,
creating a new one on every answer you make.
At don't see a split in this topic at all using Thunderbird.
That's probably
deadalnix, el 16 de May a las 05:48 me escribiste:
> On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 20:08:23 UTC, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >OK, yeah, I thought I read 10 months somewhere and didn't do the
> >math
> >myself. 2.5 months is still high for my taste (and I insist, only
> >if is
> >just a marketing issu
On 2013-05-16 05:48, deadalnix wrote:
Completely off topic : your NG client is splitting the discussion,
creating a new one on every answer you make.
At don't see a split in this topic at all using Thunderbird. That's
probably a first time.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Thu, 16 May 2013 01:40:51 +0200, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 5/16/13, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
I wasn't around back then. :)
You must be very young, quite a prodigy, really ;)
I'm still learning the alphabet, I'm only at D now!
Now try writing that using only the letters you supposedl
On Wednesday, 15 May 2013 at 20:08:23 UTC, Leandro Lucarella
wrote:
OK, yeah, I thought I read 10 months somewhere and didn't do
the math
myself. 2.5 months is still high for my taste (and I insist,
only if is
just a marketing issue and not the lack of power to edit the
talks), but
more reason
On 5/16/13, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> I wasn't around back then. :)
>>
>
> You must be very young, quite a prodigy, really ;)
I'm still learning the alphabet, I'm only at D now!
On Wed, 15 May 2013 20:18:26 +0200
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 5/14/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> > BTW, for comparison:
> >
> > Dconf 2007: 8/25-8/27 2007
> >
> > Slides posted: 7/10/2008
>
> I wasn't around back then. :)
>
You must be very young, quite a prodigy, really ;)
> On 5/14/
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 14 de May a las 20:26 me escribiste:
> On 5/14/13 7:24 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >Andrei Alexandrescu, el 11 de May a las 20:22 me escribiste:
> >>On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >>>Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
> >>>th
Steven Schveighoffer, el 14 de May a las 20:35 me escribiste:
> On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:26:36 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>
> >On 5/14/13 7:24 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
>
> >>Still, 10 months seems crazy. As
> >>somebody mentioned before, 1 month seems much more reasonable, 2
> >>at mo
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 14 de May a las 20:27 me escribiste:
> On 5/14/13 7:29 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> >Walter Bright, el 12 de May a las 11:42 me escribiste:
> >>On 5/12/2013 3:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
> >>>As frustrating as it is for non-attending enthusiasts like myself, I'd say
> >>>st
On 5/14/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> BTW, for comparison:
>
> Dconf 2007: 8/25-8/27 2007
>
> Slides posted: 7/10/2008
I wasn't around back then. :)
On 5/14/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> Reminds me of Lewis CK's "Everything is amazing, and nobody is happy"
Well there's always going to
On Wednesday, May 15, 2013 09:42:06 Dicebot wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > ...
You probably should actually quote part of the message so that it's easier to
figure out exactly which message you're replying to it.
> Presentation recommends to use a
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
...
After some more thinking on topic I get the feeling that this is
yet another case when having defined and working "scope" for
function parameters would have been extremely useful.
Lets imagine some string processing func
On 05/12/2013 01:44 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 5/12/2013 7:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I was also thinking mon/wed/fri would be a great schedule!
>
> That does fit in with the observed phenomenon that a posting on reddit
> has a shelf life of about 2 days, and the statistics that posti
On 05/10/2013 08:00 PM, Flamaros wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 18:45:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:08:09 -0400
>> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Enjoy!
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
>>>
>>
>> Torrents up for both the low-quality FLV (from YouTu
On 05/12/2013 04:19 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2013-05-11 22:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>
>> He's serious. If you post them all at once, then each video gets minimal
>> impact. A lot of people will look at one, maybe two, and then not
>> bother with
>> the rest, because all of them showed up
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:26:36 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
> > Still, 10 months seems crazy. As
> > somebody mentioned before, 1 month seems much more reasonable, 2 at
> > most.
>
> With three a week we'll be done in five more weeks. Please explain
> why you find that unreasonable.
>
5 we
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:26:36 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/14/13 7:24 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Still, 10 months seems crazy. As
somebody mentioned before, 1 month seems much more reasonable, 2 at
most.
With three a week we'll be done in five more weeks. Please explain why
On 5/14/13 7:24 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 11 de May a las 20:22 me escribiste:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expec
On 5/14/13 7:29 PM, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
Walter Bright, el 12 de May a las 11:42 me escribiste:
On 5/12/2013 3:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As frustrating as it is for non-attending enthusiasts like myself, I'd say stick
with the current schedule. The marketing checks out.
So far, it's been
Walter Bright, el 12 de May a las 11:42 me escribiste:
> On 5/12/2013 3:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
> >As frustrating as it is for non-attending enthusiasts like myself, I'd say
> >stick
> >with the current schedule. The marketing checks out.
>
> So far, it's been a big success on Reddit doing it t
Andrei Alexandrescu, el 11 de May a las 20:22 me escribiste:
> On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
> >that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
> >or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion th
On Monday, 13 May 2013 at 17:18:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/13/2013 9:04 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Also keep in mind, that you can simply ignore the postings for
a few weeks, and
then all will be available at once. This is like waiting for
the season to come
out on dvd or netflix
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Andrei
I just finished watching.
Very, very good presentation.
A lot of interesting stuff in here.
Also those "here comes the correct answer" were really funny,
made me laug
On 05/13/2013 03:41 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Dconf 2007: 8/25-8/27 2007
Videos posted: 7/10/2008
http://forum.dlang.org/post/g54ptt$2so2$1...@digitalmars.com
I found the videos here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/braddr1
Ali
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:43:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Anyway I wish this PR stunt was announce *beforehand*.
BTW, for comparison:
Dconf 2007: 8/25-8/27 2007
Videos posted: 7/10/2008
http://forum.dlang.org/post/g54ptt$2so2$1...@digitalmars.com
Reminds me of Lewis CK's "Everything
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:43:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
Anyway I wish this PR stunt was announce *beforehand*.
BTW, for comparison:
Dconf 2007: 8/25-8/27 2007
Slides posted: 7/10/2008
http://forum.dlang.org/post/g54ptt$2so2$1...@digitalmars.com
Reminds me of Lewis CK's "Everything
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Andrei
Very good presentation. Thank you Ali.
On Mon, 13 May 2013 17:43:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 5/13/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
In about 4 days, I remember coming home and seeing 4 more hours and
saying,
"aw crap, we have four hours of TV to watch" When it became a chore, we
deleted the "season pass".
Isn't this a
On Monday, May 13, 2013 23:43:01 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> Anyway I wish this PR stunt was announce *beforehand*.
Well, AFAIK, it was never stated that the videos would be posted quickly. For
a while, it wasn't even clear whether the conference would even be recorded.
So, we're very lucky to have
On 5/13/13, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> In about 4 days, I remember coming home and seeing 4 more hours and saying,
> "aw crap, we have four hours of TV to watch" When it became a chore, we
> deleted the "season pass".
Isn't this an issue with Tivo only having limited space to keep the
episode
On 2013-05-13 20:41, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
My point was, I would not like to see d conference videos becoming a
"chore" to watch so you can keep up with the latest discussion.
Oh, you mean the discussion. I was just thinking, if you don't want to
watch more, then don't.
--
/Jacob Carl
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 13:49:05 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best
release schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on monday/wednesday/friday.
It'd be paced kinda like a
On Mon, 13 May 2013 14:35:14 -0400, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-13 18:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am happy with any reasonable schedule, including the current. 3 a
week is max.
BTW, this whole "I need it now" mentality reminds me of my first days of
having a TiVo.
My wife and I
On 2013-05-13 18:04, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I am happy with any reasonable schedule, including the current. 3 a
week is max.
BTW, this whole "I need it now" mentality reminds me of my first days of
having a TiVo.
My wife and I liked law and order (the show, but also the real thing
too),
On 5/13/2013 9:04 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Also keep in mind, that you can simply ignore the postings for a few weeks, and
then all will be available at once. This is like waiting for the season to come
out on dvd or netflix :)
Yeah, I'll often record a whole season on the dvr, then wat
On Sat, 11 May 2013 20:22:57 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion that
On Sun, 12 May 2013 01:22:57 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion that
On Sat, 11 May 2013 20:22:57 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
> > that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
> > demand or expectation, and *not* even a suggest
On 5/12/2013 7:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was also thinking mon/wed/fri would be a great schedule!
That does fit in with the observed phenomenon that a posting on reddit has a
shelf life of about 2 days, and the statistics that posting on reddit on a
weekend dooms it.
On 5/12/2013 3:49 AM, John Colvin wrote:
As frustrating as it is for non-attending enthusiasts like myself, I'd say stick
with the current schedule. The marketing checks out.
So far, it's been a big success on Reddit doing it this way. I've also seen a
number of comments on Reddit and Hacker N
On 12/05/2013 01:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release schedule.
Andrei
I think 2 a week is about right.
I watched Ali's twice, and might watch it again, I'm sure I've not taken
it all in yet!
If they are all released too quickly,
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:16:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was also thinking mon/wed/fri would be a great schedule!
Andrei
+1
On 05/12/2013 10:16 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was also thinking mon/wed/fri would be a great schedule!
+1, Reasonable compromise
12-May-2013 17:49, Adam D. Ruppe пишет:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release
schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on monday/wednesday/friday. It'd be
paced kinda like a college class then, ea
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 14:16:26 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/12/13 9:49 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best
release
schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on mond
On 5/12/13 9:49 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release
schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on monday/wednesday/friday. It'd be
paced kinda like a college class then, e
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best
release schedule.
I kinda like the idea of one a day on monday/wednesday/friday.
It'd be paced kinda like a college class then, easy to remember
timing, and should keep
On 5/12/13 9:14 AM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/12/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release schedule.
Let's take a quick poll on how often we should make new pull requests.
I say let's limit ourselves to only two per week.
Again, I don'
On 5/12/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best release schedule.
Let's take a quick poll on how often we should make new pull requests.
I say let's limit ourselves to only two per week.
On 12-5-2013 10:47, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 02:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *n
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 22:31:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
It may be a nice idea to offer advance access to Kickstarter
contributors though.
Again, be careful with that decision. For example, this seems to
be reasonable at first, but doing this would NOT be nice with the
developers
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 15:26:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/10/13 11:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-05-10 16:38, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Two a week.
Is there a reason for this?
Maximize impact.
Andrei
Well, just be careful because this could become a double edged
s
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion tha
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion tha
On 2013-05-11 22:50, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
He's serious. If you post them all at once, then each video gets minimal
impact. A lot of people will look at one, maybe two, and then not bother with
the rest, because all of them showed up at once, whereas if they're posted
over a longer period of t
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a
demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion tha
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 08:55:03 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-05-12, 02:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely
suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not*
a demand
o
On 2013-05-12, 02:22, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion that they should all
On Sunday, 12 May 2013 at 00:22:58 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sure - let's take a quick poll on what would be the best
release schedule.
Andrei
I vote one video per day.
I didn't get to go, simply because I could not make the time for
it. (Isn't it always the way...) There are a few videos that
I'm specifically waiting for, but perhaps more importantly I look
forward to sharing them with specific people (the kind of people
who might be able to convince stable
On 5/11/13 7:39 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Furthermore, my whole point was nothing more than to merely suggest
that *maybe* the delay should simply be somewhat less, *not* a demand
or expectation, and *not* even a suggestion that they should all be
released as soon as is technically feasable.
S
On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:31:16 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/11/13 5:54 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> > And it
> > does come across a bit disrespectful to those of us who wanted to
> > go but couldn't.
>
> That I do take issue with. After the organizers and the speakers
> invested very s
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 18:31:16 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Please think it over and exercise reason.
I have no problem with the pace, but then again, I attended the conference, so
watching the videos is a review. And the slower pace makes it so that I can do
things like post each one to my
On 5/11/13 5:54 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
And it
does come across a bit disrespectful to those of us who wanted to go but
couldn't.
That I do take issue with. After the organizers and the speakers
invested very significant effort in making this event happen, the basic
complaint here is that
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 18:15:41 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/11/13 5:35 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> > On 5/11/13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> >> and who will definitely view all of them regardless of how quickly
> >> they're
> >> released, but it produces better PR for the language this way
He's serious. If you post them all at once, then each video
gets minimal
impact. A lot of people will look at one, maybe two, and then
not bother with
the rest, because all of them showed up at once, whereas if
they're posted
over a longer period of time, then each video will have larger
a impa
On 5/11/13 5:35 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 5/11/13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
and who will definitely view all of them regardless of how quickly they're
released, but it produces better PR for the language this way.
P.S. Public relations also encompasses relations with an existing user-base.
On Sat, 11 May 2013 23:35:38 +0200
Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 5/11/13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> > and who will definitely view all of them regardless of how quickly
> > they're released, but it produces better PR for the language this
> > way.
>
> P.S. Public relations also encompasses relati
On 5/11/13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> and who will definitely view all of them regardless of how quickly they're
> released, but it produces better PR for the language this way.
P.S. Public relations also encompasses relations with an existing user-base.
On 5/11/13, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> Yes. This sucks for those who didn't get the chance to go to the conference
> and who will definitely view all of them regardless of how quickly they're
> released, but it produces better PR for the language this way.
I'm glad to see we have our priorities in
On Saturday, May 11, 2013 21:12:00 Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 5/10/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > On 5/10/13 8:15 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> >> Are we releasing one talk every couple of days?
> >
> > Two a week.
>
> Initially I took this as a joke, but are you serious about this? Are
> we goi
On 5/10/13, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 5/10/13 8:15 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> Are we releasing one talk every couple of days?
>
> Two a week.
>
Initially I took this as a joke, but are you serious about this? Are
we going to have to wait 10 weeks for all the videos to be uploaded?
On Saturday, 11 May 2013 at 13:29:08 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
There are speech-recognized subtitles available for English.
Yes I know about those automatic translation tools, but they seem
not work properly, (principally with Programming talks). In fact
in some cases they can confuse m
On 5/11/13 8:41 AM, MattCoder wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Andrei
This can be a hard work, but it's possible to add subtitles on
the videos? (Or at least on the next ones).
PS: There is nothing w
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Andrei
This can be a hard work, but it's possible to add subtitles on
the videos? (Or at least on the next ones).
PS: There is nothing wrong with the speech, it's just for
co
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 18:45:15 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:08:09 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Torrents up for both the low-quality FLV (from YouTube) and the
full-quality MP4 (from archive.org):
http://semitw
On 5/10/13 7:37 PM, "Mariusz `shd` Gliwiński" "
wrote:
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
I've added them to wiki.
Will URLs like http://dconf.org/talks/bright.html be active in like 2 or
more years? It would b
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
I've added them to wiki.
Will URLs like http://dconf.org/talks/bright.html be active in
like 2 or more years? It would be great to have links like
http://dconf.org/talks/2013
On 5/10/2013 5:11 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 5/10/13 8:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Andrei
Vote up!
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1e2boo/dconf_2013_day_1_talk_2_copy_and_move_semantics/
https://news.ycombinator.c
On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 12:08:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Enjoy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
Andrei
Very good talk. One more vote up!
On 05/10/2013 11:45 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Torrents up for both the low-quality FLV (from YouTube) and the
> full-quality MP4 (from archive.org):
>
> http://semitwist.com/download/misc/dconf2013/
Thank you for doing this!
> I don't know how much interest there is in torrents
Never used t
On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:08:09 -0400
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Enjoy!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
>
Torrents up for both the low-quality FLV (from YouTube) and the
full-quality MP4 (from archive.org):
http://semitwist.com/download/misc/dconf2013/
I don't know how much int
On Fri, 10 May 2013 19:48:09 +0200
David wrote:
> Am 10.05.2013 19:28, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:08:09 -0400
> > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >
> >> Enjoy!
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
> >>
> >
> > Will this be going up on archive.org, too?
>
Am 10.05.2013 19:28, schrieb Nick Sabalausky:
> On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:08:09 -0400
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> Enjoy!
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPr2UspS0fE
>>
>
> Will this be going up on archive.org, too?
>
https://archive.org/details/dconf2013-day01-talk02
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo