I guess most devs have a pretty wide screen. How about letting
the overview of the current selected module be located to the
right of the modules listing when there is enough horizontal
space. Something like:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/188292/flow.png
I guess that it could be accomplished by
Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced JavaScript
features like a package tree and module tree, as well as fully
qualified symbol
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 14:30:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I suggest:
1. Only expand tree to the level of the current symbol
selected. So for instance, you click on std.datetime, you see
all the top-level symbols of std.datetime *not* expanded. If
you click on std.datetime.Month,
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 14:27:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The right side is pretty empty if you have a wide screen.
Perhaps the symbols can be placed there.
On my current 16:9 1080p monitor, the full width of the page is
utilized by the main documentation, tested with Opera and Chrome
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 08:16:48 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
Would be great if you could make it an accordion with a live
search at the
top.
An accordion is a nice idea, and Bootstrap has good support for
it.
Where would you have the search, exactly, though? And do you mean
the existing
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 06:53:42 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:
I don't think the main documentation order is right in the
first place. If a module provides many functions, like
std.algorithm, I don't see how there could possibly be an
intended order, like these are more likely to be used.
In
On Fri, 04 May 2012 09:56:48 -0400, Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 14:30:38 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I suggest:
1. Only expand tree to the level of the current symbol selected. So
for instance, you click on std.datetime, you see all the
On Friday, 4 May 2012 at 14:48:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I don't see it working that way. If I click on etc.c.sqlite3
for example, it doesn't collapse std.
Essentially, what I mean is, I should only see the parents,
immediate children, and siblings of the currently selected item
On Fri, 04 May 2012 10:59:46 -0400, Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Friday, 4 May 2012 at 14:48:04 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
packages that a module is in. For example, etc.c.sqlite3 is in
packages etc and c. If we make those breadcrumbs instead of part of a
large
On Friday, 4 May 2012 at 15:11:39 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I was envisioning eliminating the rest of the tree, and you'd
have to click on one of the breadcrumbs to get it back. But
that might be weird.
Something like:
etc . c .
sqlite3
* func1
* func2
...
And then you click on etc
I would put a text input above the accordian, with the word Filter
Module or something like that.
It would be great if it were possible to search the module too or perhaps a
module description of some sort, but that is more work.
The purpose for the text input filter on the accordian would just
On 2012-05-04 16:04, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 14:27:38 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
The right side is pretty empty if you have a wide screen. Perhaps the
symbols can be placed there.
On my current 16:9 1080p monitor, the full width of the page is utilized
by the main
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 05:14:43 UTC, James Miller wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 May 2012 at 18:26:11 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced
Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:lbskaseedspulyyna...@forum.dlang.org...
On Wednesday, 2 May 2012 at 21:42:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
While it would be nice if the nav tree were still there w/o JS, and I'm
not
personally a fan of CSS(or HTML)-based frames, this is
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 05:44:47 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 5/3/12 1:26 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced JavaScript
features
like a
On 5/3/12 1:23 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 05:44:47 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 5/3/12 1:26 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme,
On 2012-05-03 08:09, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
I am considering putting the module tree and symbol tree in tabs instead
of below each other.
I think that would be a good idea.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-05-03 08:53, Ary Manzana wrote:
Oh, I just said that because I have a pull request waiting for that
feature to be incorporated in DMD... but I don't think it'll happen...
I really hope we get this functionality.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 5/3/12 2:10 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-03 08:09, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
I am considering putting the module tree and symbol tree in tabs instead
of below each other.
I think that would be a good idea.
I'm not sure. I'd like the symbols to be under the same tree.
With tabs you'd
Would be great if you could make it an accordion with a live search at the
top.
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Ary Manzana a...@esperanto.org.ar wrote:
On 5/3/12 2:10 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-03 08:09, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
I am considering putting the module tree and symbol
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 06:09:31 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 05:14:43 UTC, James Miller wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 May 2012 at 18:26:11 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's
an announcement.
On 5/3/12 6:41 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-03 10:09, Ary Manzana wrote:
I'm not sure. I'd like the symbols to be under the same tree.
With tabs you'd have to click twice to go from one place to another.
I didn't even know the symbols where there until a scrolled down.
The same
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 12:33:33 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 5/3/12 6:41 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-03 10:09, Ary Manzana wrote:
I'm not sure. I'd like the symbols to be under the same tree.
With tabs you'd have to click twice to go from one place to
another.
I didn't even
What I meant with under the same tree is
+ std
+ algorithm
* map
* reduce
* ...
Aha, I was thinking more like below the tree as it is now.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-05-03 14:43, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
There would be a lot of wasted whitespace to the left, and overflow for
long symbol names would become an even bigger issue.
I do understand the problem though, and I want to fix it. Some more
opinions are much appreciated.
The right side is pretty
On Thu, 03 May 2012 08:43:43 -0400, Jakob Ovrum jakobov...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, 3 May 2012 at 12:33:33 UTC, Ary Manzana wrote:
On 5/3/12 6:41 PM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2012-05-03 10:09, Ary Manzana wrote:
I'm not sure. I'd like the symbols to be under the same tree.
With tabs
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced JavaScript
features like a package tree and module tree, as well as fully
qualified symbol anchors. The style itself and
On 02.05.2012 22:26, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
Note about noscript: JavaScript is used to get around the static nature
of DDoc. The sidebar does not work without JavaScript, and neither do
fully qualified anchor names. However, anchors with ambiguous names
(such as those usable for symbols on
On 2012-05-02 20:26, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced JavaScript features
like a package tree and module tree, as well as fully qualified
On Wednesday, 2 May 2012 at 18:26:11 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced JavaScript
features like a package tree and module tree, as
While it would be nice if the nav tree were still there w/o JS, and I'm not
personally a fan of CSS(or HTML)-based frames, this is definitely a very
nice, clean, great-looking theme!
On Wednesday, 2 May 2012 at 21:42:21 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
While it would be nice if the nav tree were still there w/o JS,
and I'm not
personally a fan of CSS(or HTML)-based frames, this is
definitely a very
nice, clean, great-looking theme!
Alright, with some effort, I made it so that
On Wednesday, 2 May 2012 at 18:26:11 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced JavaScript
features like a package tree and module tree, as
On 5/3/12 1:26 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
This project is finally published and documented, so here's an
announcement.
https://github.com/JakobOvrum/bootDoc
bootDoc is a configurable DDoc theme, with advanced JavaScript features
like a package tree and module tree, as well as fully qualified
34 matches
Mail list logo
