Don't know that.
I could take a WAG at it.
But since there are so many ANTI WIDE people on this list
I guess I have come out of the closet...
Yes I enjoy Pactor and Amtor ARQ.
John WØJAB
in the middle of fly over country
At 06:29 PM 9/20/2007, you wrote:
Roughly how many different keyboard
Sorry if I went off the deep end.
I don't log any KB to KB as such.
So I can't really answer your question other then that.
John
At 07:02 PM 9/20/2007, you wrote:
We've been around this mulberry bush before; I don't think there are
many anti-wide people on this list, or anywhere else. Most
the link.
I feel sure that he had no clue whatsoever who or even that
it was a KB to KB QSO.
My point being it's just not only Pactor stations. In fact
last week I have see more ALE stations and JT65A then
anything else blasting away on a freq already in use.
John, W0JAB
At 07:15 AM 9/17/2007
Not really Dave.
I pulled the audio going to one of the other TNC's and
ran that into the laptop that has the hell software on it
to copy him. was an RX only setup.
At 11:03 AM 9/17/2007, you wrote:
Since you'd decoded N4CE's callsign, at least you had the option of
sending back a QRL message
Sure Dave.
I could have pulled the keyer from the other rig and plugged
in into this rig. But with a lot of no code hams on the HF bands
I pretty much gave up on that idea.
At 01:27 PM 9/17/2007, you wrote:
Could you not switch to CW and send QRL pse QSY at 10 wpm?
Really Dave I had no way of doing it easy.
But since he is in Houston and the guy I was in QSO with
was in Dallas I can't help but to think he did hear one of us.
But you know how it is when you hear a pactor signal.
Who really cares it's just pactor.
I guess next time it will be 1.5 KW that
Unfortunately this statement is only half true.
The one thing that concerns me a great deal is that the automated
stations are not listening before transmitting and at least here in the
U.S. are operating illegally. And they even are open about this with
comments made by the administrator of
Dave
When a P3 station disconnects there is an ID
in P1 or CW or both.
John, W0JAB
At 07:18 PM 9/15/2007, you wrote:
Since Pactor 3 can't be decoded with soundcard software and the SCS
decoder is relatively expensive, most hams can't decode Pactor 3
messages. Thus when QRM'd by an unattended
.
The one thing that burns me is the untrue and just plain misinformation
that some on this list is spreading as being the fact .
John, W0JAB
At 02:55 PM 9/16/2007, you wrote:
So, it seems that these PACTOR III modem do have the ability to busy
detect before a transmission. I was told recently
to death by many times on this list.
Find a fix for that and you will die a very rich man.
But I really think a lot has to do with those that just *HATE* the
wide modes (RTTY Amtor Pactor) .
John, W0JAB
Got you on the list Patrick.
In the late 70's early 80's I would work
a VK2 every night on Amtor along with G3RSP/MM
and others. Them was the days.
John
At 11:23 PM 9/13/2007, you wrote:
Hi John,
Ah... well the world is not fair...
Anyway, any time you find the propagation to VK2 OK give me
At 07:40 PM 9/13/2007, you wrote:
switch to Olivia, it can handle HELL QRM well,
Andy K3UK
Sorry don't do than mode
looks like DM780 is going to eventually
be a super program. Now if he could only get a linux version working
(never had success in getting wine operational to see if HRD would work
in linux and wine (wine is a program that will allow windows program to
run under Linux ).
John
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED],___
be the reason why it gets hijacked.
Catch you later maybe on the air
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John
VE5MU
Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at
http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/digitalradio/
* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
If I recall this pskmail is a ARQ type program with
a TX RX timing close to Amtor and Pactor. If this is
correct, will it still work with this timing? The last
time a Amtor type linux program come out it could
not do any better then 37.6% of what a TNC did
running side by side.
Rick and John
At 03:34 PM 9/10/2007, you wrote:
Pskmail is slower than a 1k2 Bd TNC, but it takes a bandwidth of 125 Hz
rather than 12 kHz.
12 Khz ? ? ? ? ?
So rather then getting a small block rejected you now have
a muck bigger one trashed. I fail to see why it is so much better.
Bonnie,
that in no way came close to answer Rick's questions.
Would you like to try again, please.
At 06:03 PM 9/10/2007, you wrote:
The ALE High Frequency Network (HFN) is open to
all ham radio operators.
http://hflink.com/hfn
Currently, the HFN Pilot Stations provide text messaging
And in a day or two you will get a message saying
that for you can still do it.
there are two.
The end of train decoding program?
At 08:15 AM 8/29/2007, you wrote:
Hi
I would like to know the name of the program to decode it, and the
switching too. Could you post it in the Files section?
Thanks
Roger
I have also been looking for a way to run Olivia on my iMac. After
several months of researching the web and this group, I do not think
software exists to run Olivia on a Mac. (I hope the venerable Kok
Chen reads this!)
John
AB8O
.
You do have a email account with your ISP right?
Good, then use it !
John, W0JAB
doing my part fighting spam !
There is a sound card program to decode it, if any one is
interested. As well as one to decode the switching up
and down the line. I could post a screen shot from my
station here on the BNFS Hannibal sub ( K line ) if ask.
John, W0JAB
At 06:47 AM 8/27/2007, you wrote:
John,
Sounds like Packet
What's the data sound like?
The TT is used to call up the dispatcher on remote radio
systems up and down the line. A train CAN'T make a
switch move other then by hand.
At 01:44 PM 8/26/2007, you wrote:
I sometimes monitor the local railroad yardmaster dispatch. Every
once and a while I hear
experiments. Thanks again
for all your great work.
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Andrew O'Brien
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: digital radio interactive sked page
BUT the use has been a LOT less
It's good to see at last someone giving dial frequency again.
John, W0JAB
Beaconing ALE, 21117.5MHZ starting 16.15UTC , Sat June 9th, RST reports to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John
VE5MU
RTTY
machines.
John, W0JAB
.
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Rein Couperus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Olivia Software
Try Fldigi, really free. No hidden MS tax.
Rein PA0R
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von
Good points Rick.
At this time 10 is doing well.
Take a look at this map.
http://propnet.findu.com/catch.cgi?last=1
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
absolutely nothing about, as in cognitive radio DSP design.
Please knock it off, and stick with things you have EXPERIENCED.
Your comments are much more worthwhile and enjoyable in that context.
Thank you,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
You better work on your math, Bruce!
A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date:
test mode maybe
he will never even hear on his AM, SSB, or FM receiver that is
maybe 10 years in the future when we are both SKs, it gets
really BORING.
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Roger J. Buffington [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Brucey boy. HSMM is NETWORKED radio. Do you know what
that means? It means that ALL stations...
All stations are on the SAME 100 kHz segment, just as in APRS
packet radio...all stations are on ONE frequency.
Get it yet? So it's still 2.5% of the band, OK?
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original
Very cute, Bonnie!
Obviously there are AT LEAST two sets of regulations
1. What is written in the books (CFR, etc.)
2. What is actually ENFORCED.
Reference: The Sociology of Regulations by Bonnie Crystal, KQ6XA,
as published in the Summer Issue, CQ-VHF Magazine.
Thanks,
John - K8OCL
Bruce,
You are just one big lovable DINOSAUR.
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Comments to ARRL on New Digi Protocols
Date: Sun, 3 Jun
to help him
catch
up. I have my own keeping up ti take care of, ya know (HI) ?
Like they say down here in TX, you can lead a horse to water, but...
Thanks for the feedback, Rick.
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio
and
online that it just ain't so. That to save the band we need more activity
on
it of any kind...but all get back is his BS.
So all I am doing is trying in my modest way to counter Bruce's.
shall we say to be polite?.lack of current data. How's that?
Thank you,
vy 73,
John - K8OCL
control, etc.
Of course, it would be coordinated in each area with the local FM
repeater coordinating group, just like we have always done.
%$# how many times to I have to write that?
Now can we get back to the talking about the subject?
Thank you,
vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
Suggestion?
Don't hold your breath while you are waiting for this to happen (HI).
Vy 73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: kd4e [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] FCC's Riley Cross Clarify
Date
http://www.amvets.org/
Original Message Follows
From: Andrew O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Dead US Veteran/Ham question
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:37:15 -0400
A little different from the usual
At 09:45 AM 5/28/2007, you wrote:
What is all comes down to is the fact that if EVERY op spots the freq, as
seen on the waterfall, then there would be no question about where the
station spotted actually is.
This may be very true Danny but I can only spot dial or a mark
frequency on 3 of the 5
That's fine Danny but I'll say it once again just for you -
I have no waterfall when I operate RTTY or software
or computer or can click on anything. But I can do the math
from the dial frequence to spot a mark dial frequency if that
would make you happy. Maybe you can click on that.
At 06:29
At 07:48 PM 5/28/2007, you wrote:
That what I say John. You cant follow my recommendation, because you dont
use a waterfall.
Danny your recommendation was to get DXLABS. I have no use for it.
As I said I have RTTY covered very well. The other modes you said that
it will do ( CW PSK) - I don't
please to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John
VE5MU
hm interesting, since the beam has a clear shot to the SW.think we
need to do some testing at the antenna
thanks for the info
JOhn
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 5:33 PM
Subject
Thanks for all the info Bob.
But I'll still call the dial frequency for RTTY.
Been doing it that was for over 30 years.
And still using the same equipment - model 28ASR KSR
with a pair of Hal ST-6. Kenwood 520 ( no S or anything)
At 08:11 PM 5/17/2007, you wrote:
Hello John,
Technology
why go that slow? RFSM2400, 141A and some of the other non-ARQ modes like
Olivia will really fly on 440
and be a little bit more secure in that not everyone has the software to copy.
My money would be on RFSM 2400
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: barry whittemore
At 01:36 AM 5/17/2007, you wrote:
It has been long usual to define the frequency of an RTTY signal as the
RF frequency of the mark tone. And so on.
Really ?
In my 37 years I have always seen it given as dial frequency.
Reason: RTTY has fixed tones - never changes. Therefore
if you give the dial
At 08:45 AM 5/17/2007, you wrote:
Have any of you tried modes other than PSK31 on 30 meters? If so, which
ones do you find work the best and can still maintain 40 + wpm speeds
like PSK31?
I have been doing a bit of Amtor and Pactor when I feel up to it.
Still not 100% since having 1/2 a lung
, you wrote:
No John, Only RTTY of the normal digital modes should be given in the
radios dial freq. Once the waterfalls came around with other modes (PSK
ETC) the customary thing is to give the waterfall freq. I know some do as
you, but it has become much the minority that do so.
At 11:47 AM 5/13/2007, you wrote in part:
This is one of the reasons that I do not expect DV to ever become
all that popular on HF.
It is doing very well at this time.
Guys let's not start yet another rant on bandwidth.
All Bonnie was pointing out was that there is no
limit on DV at this time.
I really don't think anyone would run anything wider
that a SSB signal anyway.
John, W0JAB
Your (trying to be) friendly moderator
I don't think it is needed.
I have been on DV for 4 years and have never seen
anyone talk for a min... it just don't happen on DV.
It's just not a long winded mode.
John, W0JAB
At 06:59 PM 5/12/2007, you wrote:
Couldn't DV include a automated brief pause every
1 or 2 min to check for doubling
reducing power, while attempting the same
message gives you an idea of
how robust the software is under low sig conditions..
will be back there tonight 7040.5 USB , 141A
John
VE5MU
Saw your print , but unfortunately the operator goofed first time ,
I might add
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 7:40 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: 141A
VE5MU will be on 7040.5 USB from Z May 9 to Z May 10th please try to
connect and leave Mail.
VE5GPM is off the air temporarily (minor power glitch) and will be back on by
the weekend . I can move GPM to
30M for a few days if anyone is interested.
John
VE5MU
MultPSK ver 4.3 is now
a message. station call is VE5MU.
this is one of the international ALE frequencies.
I'm with Ralph; we need to find a system which is simple enough using sound
cards, to pass messages with 100% accuracy (ARQ), without
the need to purchase an expensive modem such as the one Pactor 3 requires.
John
Does this help?
http://www.signals.taunus.de/TABLES/ALE.HTML
Original Message Follows
From: Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Signals at 14076
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 21:23:36 -
There is a musical
Does this help?
http://www.signals.taunus.de/TABLES/ALE.HTML
Original Message Follows
From: Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Signals at 14076
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 21:23:36 -
There is a musical
Does this help?
http://www.signals.taunus.de/TABLES/ALE.HTML
Original Message Follows
From: Charles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Signals at 14076
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 21:23:36 -
There is a musical
in your comments
John
VE5MU
download the latest version of 141A and try connecting and sending a
message.
software is available from http://f6cte.free.fr/MULTIPSK_TEST_23_04_2007.ZIP
John
VE5MU
companies haven't tried to muscle it
away from us.
We have a D* system here in Dallas, but I don't know how busy it is. I have
an
Icom 2200 with D* capability. I will have to check it out this weekend and
report back.
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED
you are right on top of a strong Euro B'cast station. down 1.5 would help...
john
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:07 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] 7102.0kHz Multipsk ALE Beta Testing
I'm on 7102.0
managed to wiggle thru despite some really nasty QRM from both packet and
Broadcast stations
thanks for doing this, and it worked well under poor conditions
VE5MU and VE5GPM will both be on 14109.5 all day tomorrow. (GPM is there 24/7
right now)
John
VE5MU
- Original Message
type of
file should be able to be sent as can be done in many other countries. There
are also bandwidth limits on VHF bands that clearly prevent the use of wideband
modes where there is space for them.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
You can't the continental U.S., but there are some states and territories where
you can. 7.307(f)(2) spells out the limitations.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 13:43 UTC
Subject: Re
.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 13:04 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: FCC regulations (was Digi Voice)
After giving this some thought I wonder what HF rig would you use with
20 kHz
Bruce,
We call it LISTEN FIRST before transmitting...
You really need to get on the air more, OM! (HI)
And stop wasting your time on this reflector...
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio
Bruce,
That's impressive! Good for you...
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth Limit (was Re: ARRL
wake up ..)
Date: Thu, 3
.
Talk about lonely (except around Dayton time)...I usually fall out of my
chair when the squelch breaks! (HI)
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice
known now.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 20:47 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: FCC regulations (was Digi Voice)
Shifting the bfo in a crystal filter rig does not change the
bandwidth
.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 22:22 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Wider Digital Bandwidth Filters - Hardware Mods
John kd6ozh wrote:
For 20 kHz bandwidths you'd need
There are still bandwidth restrictions in the VHF and UHF bands.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 23:14 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
But content has nothing to do
Good operating practice is to always ID in the mode!
Even in ATV...hold up a QSL card in front of the camera.
Original Message Follows
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No
also, i am listening to this frequency as well, so try a connect to VE5MU also
is the only other segment that allows
mixed voice, data, RTTY and image.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 02:04 UTC
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth Limit
I would
One problem is that very wide modems are allowed only outside the phone/image
segments, which is the opposite of what is reasoable for users. Another example
is that data modes are only allowed a 100 kHz bandwidth on 70 cm which is 30
MHz wide.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message
Yes, we all LOVE the ARRL in reality...it's the only show in town
to defend Amateur Radio here in the US. Therefore, it's sort of
similar to getting along with the in-laws (HI).
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
to change frequencies
because it is considered data. On the 70 cm band, real-time compressed video
could be sent in a 300 kHz bandwidth but not data.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: Howard Brown
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 16:33 UTC
ahem! the politically correct term is folically challenged .. not
bald.. hi hi
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: wa8vbx
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] The ARRL
Well being bald, I don't have
John,
Didn't you read all those many rants on the HSMM pages last year?
They were all saying the same thing Bonnie is writing here,
i.e., the the ARRL bandwidth proposal takes away privileges
because under exisiting regs there is NO BANDWIDTH limit.
It's the secret hidden in the proposal
Yes, that is the way the FCC seems to work to
They really don't seem to care much what digital stuff we send out...
AS LONG AS NOBODY COMPLAINS!
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: wa8vbx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio
changes in the
rules.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 23:50 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: New 200kHz Wideband Digital Voice on 20 meters in
USA?
This is exactly what I've been trying to say
for the phone/image segments. I agree
that digital phone has no bandwidth limit, but image does.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: expeditionradio
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 22:43 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth Limit
there.
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption NOT!
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:15:48 -
Thanks for your frank discussion
joined the ARRL, so there (HI).
73,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: N6CRR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption NOT!
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 00:57:32 -
to the efforts of many members.
Why muddy these waters with ARRL politics?
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Rodney Kraft
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL wake up ..
Don't like it, delete it!
It's
Yes, let's stop beefing and GET ON THE AIR!
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: Steinar Aanesland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL wake up ..
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:04:10 +0200
there is an ARRL specific reflector which would
be a better forum for the incessant anti ARRL arguments. ditto for winlink.
I agree with Steinar and others: let's get on the air and generate RF instead
of this stuff.!!
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: Roger J. Buffington
the Air Ways anyway!
Rod
John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
The International Regs changed last January (2006) to allow
Amateurs to use encryption. However, not for international
traffic. It's only permitted for internal domestic traffic
My digital Ham station on 2.4 GHz is ALWAYS encrypted and the FCC said
that's
OK because we share that frequency with a portion of the Part 15 allocation.
Original Message Follows
From: Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To:
Wow! One of the local head hunters...oppps, I mean
Professional Recruiters!...sorry... recently wanted me to
accept a job as a VP for off-shore technical resources.
Wonder if this is what he was writing about? (HI, HI)
Gotta buy that World if flat book! Tnx Garrett Dave!
73,
John - K8OCL
but there are
ways around that too (MAC filtering, etc.).
John
-
with Part 97
(non-commercial).
So there should NOT be any problemof course, CW above 25 WPM might as
well be encrypted as far as I am concerned (HI).
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio
.
Then you won't have to wait until THEY do it. YOU can do it. OK?
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ARRL wake up ..
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 11:43:06
20m was closed for the night (01:23
local time). The power of a) your CALL3.TXT database and b) Andy's
online sked machine!
Cheers 73 from Shetland (IOTA EU-012)
John GM4SLV
Yawn. How about you move this ARRL rant somewhere else and let's stick to
digital radio stuff?
We've heard all this before , and still remain totally baffled over the US
ham's love of rules!!
John
VE5MU
- Original Message -
From: bruce mallon
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
701 - 800 of 1557 matches
Mail list logo
