2010/10/8 Charles Marcus
> On 2010-10-08 10:27 AM, El Cico wrote:
> > If I go to help-->About LibreOffice I see:
> >
> > LibreOffice 3.3.0
> >
> > OOO330m7 (Build:9526)
> > ooo-build 2010-09-24
> >
> > Copyright © 2000, 2010
> > Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> >
> > Don't thi
Hey Jonathon,
Welcome to this list. There is one thing which also needs to be understood
and mentioned: the Document Foundation does not take the copyright of its
contributors. So we should not be listed as copyright owners.
Charles.
Le 8 oct. 2010, 7:10 PM, "jonathon" a écrit :
On 10/08/2010 0
Le Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:21:54 +0200,
Sophie Gautier a écrit :
> Hi Maho
>
> 2010/10/10 André Schnabel :
> > Hi Maho,
> >
> > Am 10.10.2010 03:41, schrieb Maho NAKATA:
> >>
> >> Hi Folks,
> >>
> >> I'll do the best.
> >
> > It's great to have you here - warm welcome from my side. :)
>
> I join Andr
Hi,
Le Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:54:45 -0400,
Drew Jensen a écrit :
>
> >
> > I just tried again and the main page let me edit it. Typical! Ask a
> > question and find the answer; report a bug and it starts working.
> > LOL. I'll see what happens tomorrow.
> >
>
> I edited those pages right after
purpose, as opposed to, the differences in vision of
> implementation process, that it is and will be, only a small matter
> of time before the groups are pursuing mutually beneficial activities
> once again.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Drew Jensen
>
>
>
Hello Marco,
Le Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:58:14 +0200,
"M. Fioretti" a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 12:00:56 PM +0200, Charles-H. Schulz
> (charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org) wrote:
>
> > On the other hand, I and others do not tolerate being "fired" by
> &
ailure.
>
> So I guess that puts Louis in a difficult position?
>
He must surely be caught between a rock and a hard place. This being
said, I don't think this attitude stems from him. I believe someone
else is pulling the strings.
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité
s "an user community".
I don't think we should have particular membership rules for general
users, but if any user wants to contribute (based on the criteria
defined on the page we're talking about), he/she should be welcome,
encouraged and, based on his/her contributions, b
Hello Gianluca,
Le Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:05:50 +0200,
"Gianluca Turconi" a écrit :
> In data 19 ottobre 2010 alle ore 14:34:33, Charles-H. Schulz
> ha scritto:
>
> > I can understand why you want to make that distinction. My own
> > interpretation, aside the fact
ct.
> >
> > I'm looking forward to a constructive discussion,
> >
> > André
> >
> > --
> > E-mail to
> > discuss+h...@documentfoundation.orgfor
> > instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at
> > http://www.documen
Le Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:39:29 +0200,
Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
> Il 19/10/2010 17.19, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
>
> [...]
>
> > So, if I understand you well, you do indeed raise a good question,
> > but one which, to me, adds more gray zones. Let me rephrase h
Marco,
Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:46:22 +0200,
"M. Fioretti" a écrit :
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 13:27:55 PM +0200, Charles-H. Schulz
> (charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org) wrote:
>
> > "M. Fioretti" a écrit :
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 12:00
Ciao Gianluca,
Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:01:55 +0200,
Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
> Il 19/10/2010 18.11, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
>
> [...]
>
> > Well, I think that the split between these two visions is somewhat
> > articifical. To be frank I don't think
ho we call contributors/members.
Best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
All messages
Hello,
Le Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:16:37 -0400,
Drew Jensen a écrit :
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 16:57 +0200, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> > Il 20/10/2010 16.36, Mike Dupont ha scritto:
> > > 1. what will it cost if you have to rewrite the authors code and
> > > all derived works.
> > > 2. what if you jus
Ciao Gianluca,
Le Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:37:14 +0200,
Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
> Il 20/10/2010 17.37, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
> > yes. So now, do you like what you see?:-)
>
> Well, generally speaking, yes.
>
> I'm just a bit worried about the point of view abo
in LibO, at this time
> I will not be continuing active work for/with the group. Of course, I
> could change my mind at any time! If so, I'll let you know.
>
Thank you very much for your contribution. May I/is it appropriate to
know why you intend to stick to OOo for the time being?
T
have for the moment no
indication. The statements delivered by Rob Weir and Bob Sutor on their
blogs explain their position, I think.
Best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org for instructions on how to
velopers for that. But we could do something else: acting as
the defenders of all the copyright owners. And then, it does not
require a copyright assignment, it only requires, if a problem arises,
that enough contributors or all the contributors signs a small paper
saying "The Document Fou
Hello BRM,
Le Thu, 28 Oct 2010 07:12:59 -0700 (PDT),
BRM a écrit :
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Charles-H. Schulz
> > 4) the notion that we cannot change license because we don't have
> > copyright assignment needs to be put to rest once and for a
Hello Andrea,
Le Sat, 30 Oct 2010 17:10:07 +0200,
Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > We initially agreed not to request the assignment of copyright for
> > code contributions, and we can only witness that it's been so far
> > the right deci
".
-for us it's only a matter to change the default setting in our
software. I'm sure it would be interesting to discuss what would be the
best solution -(i.e check the better defaults thread) and it needs to
be discussed, but I wanted to clarify there was no real vendor specific
Gianluca,
Le Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:08:37 +0100,
Gianluca Turconi a écrit :
> Thanks to you and André for your replies.
>
> See below for further comments.
>
> Il 31/10/2010 12.52, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
>
> [...]
>
> > I think your question would be
LibO
and OOo (for that matter) are not supporters of ISO 29500; they
implement what they can understand from the proprietary file format of
MS Office 2007 and 2010 called OOXML.
Best,
Charles.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Leif Lodahl
>
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Do
Hi,
Top posting from my phone...
This is not an easy answer to give. Both strategies have pros and cons. My
advice would be to start where we are but alter the numbering scheme wildly:
3.3, 3.5 and then 4.0 instead of 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 like OOo.
Charles.
Le 3 nov. 2010, 12:03 PM, "Michael Meeks"
Heh... Was on Preview mode. Sorry, it's fixed now.
Best,
Charles.
Le Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:11:50 +0100,
André Schnabel a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Am 03.11.2010 21:52, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:
> > I've posted the minutes of our call today on the wiki, at the
> > St
Gianluca,
The last minutes of the SC meeting explains that we will revisit the issue
once the Foundation is properly established.
Charles.
Le 7 nov. 2010, 2:37 PM, "Gianluca Turconi" a
écrit :
Il 07/11/2010 4.20, Michael Meeks ha scritto:
> > The choice to not aggregate ownership is a delibera
Hello all,
please read the first real draft of the Community Bylaws here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/CommunityBylaws
Feel free to comment on our beloved discuss list.
best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Founding Member,
The Document Foundation.
--
E-mail to steering-discuss+h
Andrea,
I disagree with your analysis, because it fails to include the development
specifics.
But anyway, we'll see. :-)
Charles.
Le 17 nov. 2010, 12:29 AM, "Andrea Pescetti" a
écrit :
On 07/11/2010 Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > The last minutes of the SC meeting
explai
in place, it could get more recognition in
> a possible reconciliation phase than what it can get by merely
> relying on moral suasion.
What do you think of this idea?
http://blog.nooku.org/2010/11/nooku-contributor-agreement/
(It does not involve copyright).
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Co
AM, "Davide Dozza" a
écrit :
Hi Charles,
Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
> Andrea, > > I disagree with your analysis, because it fails to include the
development > specific...
What do you mean with "development specifics"?
Maybe after we have clearly define
nees only.": That could
> give rise to a difficult situation...
Yes. :-)
> IMHO, you would need to
> establish a clear procedure for this, to avoid some tense deadlocks in
> the future...
Well, I think we can submit the Chairman's choice to the popular
election then (under
te the ESC part; it will at least simplify the
chairman story. But having him/her part of the BoD would also nix its
role I fear.
Best,
Charles.
>
> HTH,
>
> Michael.
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe in
Le Mon, 22 Nov 2010 18:04:27 -0800,
NoOp a écrit :
> On 11/22/2010 10:10 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> > Is the take over of Novell going to affect the document foundation?
> >
>
> Actually, isn't this sort of thing the reason TDF was created to
> begin with?
>
Yes exactly. And I'm glad to have Mic
Le Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:31:00 +1300,
Graham Lauder a écrit :
> On Tuesday 23 November 2010 07:10:31 Ian Lynch wrote:
> > Is the take over of Novell going to affect the document foundation?
>
> And my question would be; do any of the 882 patents sold to the
> Microsoft consortium affect the go-ooo
Hello David,
Le Tue, 23 Nov 2010 04:20:48 +0800,
David Nelson a écrit :
> Hi Charles, :-)
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 00:18, Charles-H. Schulz
> wrote:
> > thank you a lot for this!!!
>
> No problem. I've got a watch on the page, and will visit whe
Nathan,
It means tis people are working for Novell and that I'm glad to have them
with us.
Charles.
Le 23 nov. 2010, 6:12 PM, "Nathan" a écrit :
On 11/23/2010 05:05 AM, Graham Lauder wrote: > > On Tuesday 23 November 2010
21:14:39 Charles-H. Sch...
can you clarify what you mean by having " And
Hello David,
Le Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:42:12 +0800,
David Nelson a écrit :
> Hi, :-)
>
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 00:52, Charles-H. Schulz
> wrote:
> > yup. But after Michael's points, I also think we might clarify and
> > simplify all this a great deal. In a nut
website
(currently accessible here: http://test.libreoffice.org) and that we do have
other tasks listed here: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Work_Items
Your help is welcome!
Charles-H. Schulz.
2010/11/25 David Nelson
> Hi, :-)
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:20, Sonic4Spu
Bernhard, Cor,
2010/11/25 Cor Nouws
> Hi ,
>
> Bernhard Dippold wrote (24-11-10 23:51)
>
>
> Vote only once a year (as any election draws action from the "normal"
>> tasks a shorter term will take too much resources) and elect all BoD
>> members.
>>
>
> Voting each year for all members, that ca
Bernhard,
2010/11/24 Bernhard Dippold
> Hi Michael, all,
>
> one question on the ESC:
>
> Michael Meeks schrieb:
>
>> Hi Drew,
>>
>> On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 07:56 -0500, drew wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>
>> The ESC, do you see this as a very active group, for instance working as
>>> the release tea
Thorsten,
2010/11/25 Thorsten Wilms
> On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 10:09 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
>
> > I would be very surprised if the original mission statement were to be
> > changed at that stage. So perhaps the Mission page that was opened
> recently
>
ssing this for quite some time now, we would
welcome your comments on this list until this week-end. If no strong
veto is cast until then, we'll consider them to be adopted.
David, as usual, please feel free to review the language... thanks!
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Founding Member,
The Document
ns that a founding member of the TDF will be revoked if
> he/she does not participate on a xxx period of time? Shall we give
> them a "honorary membership" (dangerous).
Honorary membership is indeed a dangerous path. But on the other hand,
any member can regain its membership statu
Last call: are we good on this?
best
Charles.
Le Mon, 06 Dec 2010 08:19:18 +0100,
Florian Effenberger a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Cor Nouws wrote on 2010-12-06 08.09:
> > If those two or three employ so many developers on LibO that they
> > can have a very large majority when voting for BoD seats, th
Hello Drew,
Well spoken. And with that, I declare the Community Bylaws adopted
(provided nobody from the SC punches me in the face right away)...
Huzzah!
Charles.
Le Mon, 06 Dec 2010 06:25:16 -0500,
drew a écrit :
> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 11:08 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> >
Hello Michael,
Le Tue, 07 Dec 2010 11:59:07 +,
Michael Meeks a écrit :
> Hi Charles,
>
> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 11:08 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Last call: are we good on this?
>
> Sigh; I only just got to reading the final draft, busy day
> yesterday
membership; and I think we cover that in the criteria
> for membership elsewhere: good reputation, and doing non-trivial work.
>
> Or do we plan some special one-off thing for entirely new
> contributors since we created LibreOffice ?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
Hi everyone,
2010/12/14 Sigrid Carrera
> Hi Johannes,
>
>
> 2010/12/14 Johannes A. Bodwing :
> > Hello Benjamin,
> >>
> >> ...
> >
> >> ...
> >> Jono has written a book called "The Art of Community," which describes
> his
> >> approach. It's available to purchase or download under a CC license f
Hi,
Le Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:45:29 +0100,
Cor Nouws a écrit :
> Benjamin Horst wrote (14-12-10 16:21)
>
> > I agree with you about the possible negative connotations of the
> > term "manager," but I think it's just a terminology problem. You
> > could think of the role as "Community Facilitator"
Johannes, Barbara,
Did you have a look at our community bylaws? Most of your points are
addressed there.
Best,
Charles.
Le 16 déc. 2010, 9:41 PM, "Johannes A. Bodwing" a écrit :
Hello,
> > On 12/16/2010 3:45 AM, Cor Nouws wrote: >> >> Benjamin Horst wrote
(14-12-10 16:21) >> >>> I ag...
What
p; best wishes,
Charles-H. Schulz
Co-Founder & Steering Committee Member,
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
ssively become effective, we will gain more and more contributors and
perhaps this choice, through contributions, will change. But at this stage
it's unnecessary to argue over that on mailing lists.
Thank you.
Charles-H. Schulz
Co-Founder, The Document Foundation
& sometimes Member of
s ready.
Please have a look there, it might answer some of your questions:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/CommunityBylaws
As for the general tone of this mailing list and this discussion, you (not
you Johannes, in particular) will read in the same documents that offensive
and improper behavi
work I believe there's a slight
misunderstanding here: Michael's own exploratory work might be used one
day for the LibreOffice website, but it is at this stage not considered
for an "upgrade".
best,
Charles.
>
> zf
>
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exé
gest any changes please feel free to let
> > us know over on the website mailing list.
> >
> > Michael Wheatland
>
> So libreoffice is not planning on using the already-established
> opendesktop.org websites for distributing its extensions?
>
At this stage no change ha
Michael,
Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 00:28:58 +0930,
Michael Wheatland a écrit :
> On 03/01/2011 8:46 PM, "Charles-H. Schulz" <
> charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Le Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:58:18 -,
> > Zaph
Hello Michael,
Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:26:09 +0930,
Michael Wheatland a écrit :
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
> wrote:
> > "to implement the Silverstripe CMS on Drupal.org" does not seem to
> > mean anything to me. "With a view to go with
Barbara,
Le Mon, 03 Jan 2011 10:55:21 -0600,
Barbara Duprey a écrit :
> On 1/3/2011 3:06 AM, Davide Dozza wrote:
> > Il 02/01/2011 20:41, Charles-H. Schulz ha scritto:
> > [...]
> >
> >> inconsistencies. However, it's fortunately or unfortunately,
>
Michael,
2011/1/4 Michael Wheatland
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Michael Wheatland wrote (04-01-11 02:59)
> >>
> >> If everyone was as clear and concise as you there would be no
> >> confusion about any issues.
> >
> > No, to me this is an obvious example of someone ap
Hello Michael,
2011/1/4 Michael Wheatland
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
> wrote:
> > Hello Michael,
> >
> > Le Tue, 4 Jan 2011 01:26:09 +0930,
> > Michael Wheatland a écrit :
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Charle
them interact with
the poprietary formats of ms office product range. Therefore the OOXML
standard is not really something we are interested to help.
Thanks,
Charles.
Le 4 janv. 2011, 12:38 PM, "Jesper Lund Stocholm" <4a4553504...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
Hello Charles (et al),
20
stabilized:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/CommunityBylaws
And we have lots of things that need to be done and require volunteers.
Let me give you some pointers:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Produce
http://wiki.documentfounda
ling programs on a Mac.
> >
> > NeoOffice is listed since years in the download area of apple.com so
> > this can not be that problematic.
>
>
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documen
Hello David,
See my comments inline.
Le Fri, 7 Jan 2011 23:12:29 +0800,
David Nelson a écrit :
> Hi guys, :-)
>
> I would like to make a proposal. I consider that the libreoffice.org
> website is a resource that can be of strategic importance to TDF and
> the community. I have a bunch of ide
Larry,
Let me remind you that we expect courtesy on our lists.
Thank you,
Charles.
Le 7 janv. 2011, 6:55 PM, "Larry Gusaas" a écrit :
On 2011/01/07 9:38 AM Fabián Rodríguez wrote: > > You're right, at least
for now. Apple controls i...
Your unsubstantiated idle speculation is pure FUD.
Larr
Fabian,
2011/1/10 Fabián Rodríguez
> On 11-01-09 08:28 PM, Andy Brown wrote:
> > On Sun Jan 09 2011 07:04:12 GMT-0800 (PST) RGB ES wrote:
> >> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/forums/
> >> They are "hidden" (no link on the help page) and you cannot post on
> >> them yet, but they exists and
Ivan
"Dents", they arecalled dents :-)
Best,
Charles.
Le 12 janv. 2011, 10:13 AM, "Ivan M." a écrit :
Hi David, all,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:41 PM, David Nelson
wrote: > Hi, :-) > > On We...
Thanks! The identi.ca API includes search which outputs JSON [1],
which is what we currently use
continue using it now. In the future, we will see.
>
No worries, you can use identi.ca and twitter at the same time (each
time you 'dent' it's synced with Twitter, so we can have both of them.
Best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Documen
ck that.
Please let me reiterate, Larry, that the tone of our discussion on the
mailing lists should be civil. Therefore, understand that not everyone
shares your passion or interest for the Mac platform.
Thank you,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
U
Le Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:05:16 -0600,
Larry Gusaas a écrit :
>
> On 2011/01/12 11:00 AM Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Please let me reiterate, Larry, that the tone of our discussion on
> > the mailing lists should be civil. Therefore, understand that not
> > everyon
Hey Jonathan,
1) Sigrid is right, we would need to ask for Oracle to relicense.
2) The new, non-Oracle patches are however licensed under a dual (L)GPL
v3 + (note the + which allows us to upgrade) and MPL + as we found we
had several code lines written under that license inside the existing
OOo co
.
Best regards and happy new year to everyone,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Co-Founder & Steering Committee Member,
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-dis
Hi,
I believe that Olivier has a point here, but Francesc (welcome,
Francesc!) has an interesting idea. Wiki pages collecting
methodologies, feedback on migrations, knowledge, etc. can only help
rising the level of service providers and help even our developers and
marketeers gain a deeper underst
of best practices in migration projects. Just that it will not lead to a
> single push of a button.
> >
> > Olivier
> >
> > Em 16-01-2011 09:49, Charles-H. Schulz escreveu:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I believe that Olivier has a point here, but F
> > Apple reviews all of the software that an author might want to put
> > on the store and has the final say in whether the app actually
> > appears there or not ?
> >
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
>
>
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
Hello Bob,
Le Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:18:17 -0700,
Robert Holtzman a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 04:37:55PM -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
> > On 2011-01-12 12:25 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > > Le Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:05:16 -0600,
> > > Larry Gusaas a écrit :
>
gt; What do some of the big boys think?
>
> On 01/17/2011 05:32 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Jonathan,
> >
> > You should also ask all the other devs now :-)
> > What I would like to have, more seriously, is lawyers working on
> > this...
> >
>
ike this saves a lot of verticle space and most of the main
> editing options are clearly visible. We can surely work on this and
> improve.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Animesh Meher
>
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exéc
Alex.
I hope nothing too bad happened to you...
Take care
Charles.
Le 17 janv. 2011, 7:21 PM, "sophie" a écrit :
On 17/01/2011 21:14, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
[...]
> > This lawyer is busy trying to find time to get its head round the draft
> TM usage policy/guide...
Oups, I hope you're saf
Rainer,
We are a bit behind this these days, but thanks for the reminder ;)
Best,
Charles.
2011/1/20 Rainer Bielefeld
> Hi,
>
> I can't find us on http://www.odfalliance.org/members.php#viewall.
>
> May be TDF should become member?
>
> Or is a.m. page only outdated?
>
> Regards
>
> Rainer
>
>
Hi,
Le Fri, 21 Jan 2011 14:21:14 +,
Michael Meeks a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 15:46 +0100, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> > Please find the more or less final draft of the trademark policy of
> > the Document Foundation:
> > http://
Hello all,
Short note:
We will be discussing this tonight at our SC confcall.It has been put
on our agenda.
Best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http
Hello Jaime,
Le Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:49:03 +0100,
"Jaime R. Garza" a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> for when is it planned to have Automatic Update for Windows & Mac
> LibreOffice, for Linux usually makes no sense?
>
> My opinion, the user should be able to decide if it's completely
> Automatic, or
ion. That should be actually
> very easy, don't you think so?
>
> Cheers!
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:09, Charles-H. Schulz <
> charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Hello Jaime,
> >
> >
> > Le Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:49:03 +0100,
I have LibreOffice 3.3.0 rc3 and I was not notified of the rc4.
>
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:17, Charles-H. Schulz <
> charles.sch...@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Actually that does already exist, if I'm not misstaken, except it
&
;Jaime R. Garza" a écrit :
> I would love to, if I could! Maybe I'll have to learn how to make
> extensions and probably make one.
>
> If it's already implemented for the stable releases, why not add it
> to the RCs too, as optional?
>
> Cheers!
&g
nt us anything :-)
Best,
Charles.
>
> http://odftoolkit.org/
>
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** Al
bit tough - many folks will be at FOSDEM starting Friday
> - maybe have 1-2 days of next week, too?
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Thorsten
>
Yes, I would much rather try to work on the ongoing issues (TM
policies, fundraising/foundation)...
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécuti
l discussion?
>
> The general discussion list for LibreOffice would be then
> disc...@libreoffice.org.
>
> HTH
>
> Sigrid
>
For the moment, we'll only keep one discuss list, the present one, for
both TDF and LibreOffice.
Best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécut
Le Wed, 2 Feb 2011 16:11:18 +0100,
Sigrid Carrera a écrit :
> Ups, sorry.
>
> 2011/2/2 Charles-H. Schulz :
> > Hello Kevin, Sigrid,
> >
> > Le Wed, 2 Feb 2011 15:49:04 +0100,
> > Sigrid Carrera a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi Kevin,
> >>
> >
s @ libo.org could focus on the application?
>
> we're right now restructuring a few lists, and indeed plan to have a
> separate discuss@tdf and discuss@libo.
>
> Florian
>
Well, do we want to have 2 discuss lists? We're going to have some more
reading to do :
ng
> that I suppose.
>
> ATB,
>
> Michael.
>
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org
Chynte,
thank you for your email. I believe although I'm not sure that PyUno is
deprecated . But your suggestions are of technical nature, may I suggest you
continue that part of the discussion on our developers' mailing list?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Best,
Charle
Hello Christophe,
Le Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:28:43 +0100,
Christophe Strobbe a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about licences and copyright. As many of you know,
> contributing code to the core of OpenOffice.org requires that one
> signs the Oracle Contributor Agreement [1] (which is identic
Hi,
@Bernhard: now we "just" need the logos without the TDF mention to be put on
a page with its source on the wiki, and I think we'll be ready to announce
our trademark policy Do you think you or Christoph can do that?
Thank you,
Charles.
2011/2/15 Charles-H. Schulz
>
You can copy and paste it here,of course :-)
Charles.
Le 26 févr. 2011, 5:25 PM, "Howard Barr" a écrit :
On 27/02/2011 00:54, Italo Vignoli wrote: > > Any chance of getting a copy
of such emails? I would l...
I can forward it to you?
Howard
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
discuss+help@
://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Resources_for_external_use
I would like to close this vote in about 24 hours from now.
Thank you,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h
ust need to
> agree ;) (I can write the suggestions after some time of disussion
> and then call for a vote.)
>
> regards,
>
> André
>
I agree that these are inconsistencies and to your analysis, so +1 for
these minor fixes.
Best,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
ants
to work.
Sorry Daniel for this inconvenience,
--
Charles-H. Schulz
Membre du Comité exécutif
The Document Foundation.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
101 - 200 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
