On Mer 30 mars 2005 3:16, Christian Einfeldt a écrit :
I must admit that as a simple end user who really loves OOo, I find
myself worried that knowledgable programmers are concerned. On the
other hand, I also see that one person commented that Apache uses
Java, or can use Java, and so I'm
Earlier this month Peter Knudsen ask for engineering notation in Calc.
In issue 5930 the registred OpenOffice.org user nn wrote this:
Actually the total number of integer digits, # and 0, is counted.
0.00E+00 and #.00E+00 are equivalent, and ###.0E+00, ##0.0E+00
and 000.0E+00 all force
Claus Agerskov wrote:
Earlier this month Peter Knudsen ask for engineering notation in Calc.
In issue 5930 the registred OpenOffice.org user nn wrote this:
Actually the total number of integer digits, # and 0, is counted.
0.00E+00 and #.00E+00 are equivalent, and ###.0E+00, ##0.0E+00
and
Niklas Nebel wrote:
That's how it's supposed to be, and how it's handled elsewhere. We don't
have support for engineering number formats yet. This remains an open
enhancement issue, and I (nn, that's me) added that comment to clarify
what we need to do.
Btw, thank you for our work Niklas.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Niklas Nebel wrote:
Claus Agerskov wrote:
Earlier this month Peter Knudsen ask for engineering notation in Calc.
In issue 5930 the registred OpenOffice.org user nn wrote this:
Actually the total number of integer digits, # and 0, is counted.
0.00E+00 and
It still doesn't work.
I just tested with a small sample of numbers - too small to recognize that
it doesn't work for all numbers.
Sorry to have misinformed you.
The most enjoyable greetings
--
Claus AgerskovKan jeg, så kan du også
Helper/HjælperHenrik Dahl i
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Btw, thank you for our work Niklas. :-)
OOoAuthors is making the Calc Guide, and we're all very happy with Calc 2.0
Good work!
Glad you like it. :-)
Niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:02, Niklas Nebel wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Btw, thank you for our work Niklas. :-)
OOoAuthors is making the Calc Guide, and we're all very happy with Calc 2.0
Good work!
Glad you like it. :-)
Niklas
We all like it :-) Well nearly all ;-) You probably just
In the article Open-Source Future For Java Enterprise System? from
Information Week stated that Sun will release Java Enterprise System as
open source this summer:
http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=159907676tid=5979
Will the JRE also be open source then?
The
Nicu Buculei wrote:
this is a description of what JES is:
http://www.sun.com/software/javaenterprisesystem/compare.xml
it does not look at all related to JRE.
use Java Desktop System as an example, it is already Open Source, but is
related to Java only for branding reasons.
Sun seems
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:20 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The colors are so KEWL! It's very cool looking!
Part of me died inside.
Welcome to marketing. :-)
--
Smoot Carl-Mitchell
System/Network Architect
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: +1 602 421 9005
home: +1 480 922
Stephan Gromer wrote:
There is indeed some progress on the performance side, however some
effects are still terribly slow and I found anotehr bug too.
Significant Performance problems still exists with
[...]
Have you filed an issue?
Now I did, hopefully not causing any confusion.
Issue
I have notification turned on. We use bugzilla at work and I was aware
of that feature when I created my account and filed the issue. I think
it's like you said, there's a lot of testing going on and a lot of
issues being filed. It takes time to look at them all.
Rich wrote:
if anybody will do
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 04:12, Kevin Cullis wrote:
Hi all,
Where are we on being able to filter WordPerfect docs to OO?
Have a look at the latest OOo 2.0 betas.
--
CPH : openoffice.org contributor
Maybe your question has been answered already?
On Tuesday 22 March 2005 22:51, + Ovi Anton wrote:
[ MODERATED ] ***
Hello discuss,
I am an Acces 97 end user and I looked for an equivalent (on 602
suite, koffice, Open Office 1.4.., etc.) for a long time ago, when
started to search others OS and I found Linux
On Thursday 24 March 2005 13:58, + John Layne wrote:
[ MODERATED ]
I am currently experimenting with 2.0 beta and notice the lack of an icon
for envelope printing. I print lots of individual envelopes with the word
processor and it would be very handy to have an icon for
Hi,
There have been a lot of discussion in these newsgroups about the
association of MSO .doc, .xsl etc files with OOo when installing OOo.
Before releasing OOo 2.0 I would propose something radical: Just give up
that dialoge and making NO association at all at install time between
OOo and MSo
Enrique wrote:
Before releasing OOo 2.0 I would propose something radical:
Just before a release is not the time to propose something radical. Even if you
convince everyone, inc the developers, that droping this dialog and
functionality
is a good idea. The issue is that we are in the *beta*
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Enrique wrote:
Before releasing OOo 2.0 I would propose something radical:
Just before a release is not the time to propose something radical. Even if you
convince everyone, inc the developers, that droping this dialog and functionality
is a good idea. The issue is
Daniel Carrera wrote:
James Walker wrote:
Leave the dialog there, but make the text more understandable.
This was discussed before and an Issue was filed, I do believe. but I
cannot find it now.
If you feel this is important, please do find that issue. Or file a new one.
However, the UI
OK, Daniel.
I posted here, not in IZ, to avoid developer distraction.
Cheers
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enrique wrote:
I posted here, not in IZ, to avoid developer distraction.
You said you were proposing something. I responded to the proposal.
Cheers,
--
Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect,
Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday.
http://oooauthors.org |
On 30 Mar 2005 at 14:11, James Walker wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
James Walker wrote:
Leave the dialog there, but make the text more understandable.
This was discussed before and an Issue was filed, I do believe. but
I cannot find it now.
If you feel this is
Rod Engelsman wrote:
Uhhmm... yes it does. It looks very clear to me. It says that OOo will
automatically open those file types.
It's not. At least not to new users. What's not clear from the wording
is whether or not you will be able to open MSO files *at all* if you do
not check the
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Now, if you can bring down this UI change to just changing a string, that has a
better chance of success. If you can do that, please file an issue.
OK, Daniel, I was trying to save people like you, regular posters in
these newsgroups, quite a lot or work if OOo 2.0 is
Enrique wrote:
Do you see as feasible at this stage to add something like this to that
wording:
If you check these boxes OpenOffice 2.0 will replace Microsoft
applications when opening those files. You will not be able to launch
Microsoft applications by doubleclicking in that files.
On 30 Mar 2005 at 15:19, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Tony Pursell wrote:
I thought more was going to be done to avoid it and I am amazed that
we still have a setup dialog that virtually invites people to do
what they don't really want to do
But why didn't you say this before the UI freeze?
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Tony Pursell wrote:
I thought more was going to be done to avoid it and I am amazed that
we still have a setup dialog that virtually invites people to do what they
don't really want to do
But why didn't you say this before the UI freeze?
I saw the OOo snapshot before the
Tony Pursell wrote:
But on a more constructive note, my suggestion for the wording would
be:
OOo 1.9.79 can be made the default application for opening the
following file types. This means that if you click on one of these files,
OOo will open it, not the Microsoft progam that opens it now.
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 22:35, Rod Engelsman wrote:
Daniel Carrera wrote:
Tony Pursell wrote:
I thought more was going to be done to avoid it and I am amazed that
we still have a setup dialog that virtually invites people to do what they
don't really want to do
But why didn't
Rod Engelsman wrote:
That is *really* disingenuous, Daniel. This problem has been discussed
for *over three years*. UI freeze, my ass! That was before the UI freeze
for 1.1 for God's sake!!
1) Rod, please calm down.
2) Please read what I've said again. People complained about the dialog.
Does the version offered as 2.0 beta constantly change or is it always 1.9.79
-- that is, how do I get the later versions and should I?
And will the download go into an RC sequence at some point as with OOo.1 ?
Thanks
Adrian
Hello Adrian,
Does the version offered as 2.0 beta constantly change or is it always 1.9.79
-- that is, how do I get the later versions and should I?
The snapshots change every other week or so. The latest one is 1.9.87. One of
the
snapshots was called OOo 2.0 beta. After a few more
I've tested this out on my wife. She's been a computer user for many
years and has also done some IT support work in the past. But she
doesn't have the mistrust of computer systems that 30+ years of
software development (plus a degree in Psychology) has given me.
So when the dialog cam up,
--- John W. Kennedy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why, o why, o why, o why, o WHY can we not have a simple do not break
character attribute?
I'm working right now on transcribing an 18th-century document full of
Mr. Sh and the like (actually, that's two em dashes), and I can
find
John W. Kennedy wrote:
Why, o why, o why, o why, o WHY can we not have a simple do not break
character attribute?
I'm working right now on transcribing an 18th-century document full of
Mr. Sh and the like (actually, that's two em dashes), and I can
find absolutely no way to prevent
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 06:22, Ian Lynch wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:16, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
this is a description of what JES is:
http://www.sun.com/software/javaenterprisesystem/compare.xml
it does not look at all related to JRE.
use Java Desktop
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 18:33:21 PM -0500, Chad Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
This whole conversation is beyond me. Java is free, as in beer, it
can be used by anyone on any computer on any platform in the
world Why anyone would exclude it for some stupid political
reason is beyond my
Rod Engelsman wrote:
John W. Kennedy wrote:
Why, o why, o why, o why, o WHY can we not have a simple do not
break character attribute?
I'm working right now on transcribing an 18th-century document full of
Mr. Sh and the like (actually, that's two em dashes), and I can
find absolutely
You know, this sort of thing crops up again and again...
A mother buys an ice cream sundae. It has chocolate sauce and whipped
cream on it. Yummy!
Hands it to her little boy, who looks at it and screams, What's the
matter b, no cherry!!?
Here we have a corporation that acquires a major
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 23:58:49 PM -0600, Rod Engelsman
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Only fly in the ointment is that some small parts of the code are
dependent on a proprietary, though freely distributed, software that
this same company owns.
Maybe I didn't make myself clear enough in the past,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 08:21:30 AM +0200, io ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
It's the some small parts of the code attitude, with all its
implications, that makes me uneasy. This is the complete answer I
gave Bruce on this specific point when he asked for my opinion:
Just to make it clearer: I
Chad Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an icon (iconic) that you can click on to switch (switching)
between (between) the different interfaces of OOo (modes). In other
words, the little deally that lets me go from Writer to Calc to
Rod Engelsman wrote:
John W. Kennedy wrote:
Rod Engelsman wrote:
John W. Kennedy wrote:
Why, o why, o why, o why, o WHY can we not have a simple do not
break character attribute?
[snip]
Has an issue been filed? I would vote for it. It couldn't show up until
v 2.1 at the earliest, but the
Hi Christian,
Actually, I think that this is where Sun might be a bit
misunderstood. Let's see if you guys agree with me.
Sun has produced a number of different products which you might call
environmental products, that is, products which are intended to
seed the environment to change the
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 00:32, Chad Smith wrote:
Welcome to marketing. :-)
Seriously.
It was like his company had paid many multiple thousands of dollars for
the company-wide upgrade, and what do their employees say Wow! That's
pretty!
I like pretty colors and I love good UI. But
Tony Pursell wrote:
I've tested this out on my wife. She's been a computer user for many
years and has also done some IT support work in the past. But she
doesn't have the mistrust of computer systems that 30+ years of
software development (plus a degree in Psychology) has given me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the iconic switching between modes (I love that one).
What does this mean?
There is an icon (iconic) that you can click on to switch (switching)
between (between) the different interfaces of OOo (modes). In other
words, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:20 -0500, Chad Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The colors are so KEWL! It's very cool looking!
Part of me died inside.
Welcome to marketing. :-)
Seriously.
It was like his company had paid many multiple thousands of dollars for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's not what you are saying - it's how you are saying that. it would
have been enough to say that you personally have no need for position
remembering. trying to fight against a feature in every thread
seems... slightly exaggerated.
it's also the same with all flames
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chad Smith wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
the new paste-special shortcut
Yeah, I forgot to mention that one. That thing changed the way I
live. I've added that to every word processing program I use. That's
the coolest little trick ever!
and now imagine that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The concerns are not overstated, quite the contrary. Today the silliest
python app will have less difficulty being included in a Linux
distribution than any given major java app.
Does anyone have numbers on this? Is OOo the most often included office
suite on Linux or
Chad Smith wrote:
This whole conversation is beyond me. Java is free, as in beer, it can
be used by anyone on any computer on any platform in the world...
Disclaimer: Anything I say could be totally wrong. :-)
Not quite. It's not even free in /that/ sense of the word. In particular, Linux
Ah, well that's cool too. I guess that means that if I get SO then
there is no learning curve? I might try that out...
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:28:39 +0100, CPHennessy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 16:12, hackmiester wrote:
Is OO.o derived from StarOffice?
No, it's the
Works great! Thanks very much.
John
- Original Message -
From: CPHennessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: discuss@openoffice.org; John Layne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [discuss] Envelope printing
On Thursday 24 March 2005 13:58, + John Layne wrote:
[
Chad Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have numbers on this? Is OOo the most often included
office suite on Linux or is it not?
Well, about the only distribution I've heard of that doesn't include it
is Slackware. However, inclusion isn't the issue, since most distros
also include
Why, o why, o why, o why, o WHY can we not have a simple do not break
character attribute?
I'm working right now on transcribing an 18th-century document full of
Mr. Sh and the like (actually, that's two em dashes), and I can
find absolutely no way to prevent Sh being broken if it
57 matches
Mail list logo
