The dri-devel list isn't ATI support.
The announcement about the code was fine. I think we all want to know
about other versions out there for comparison sake if nothing else.
Once people started asking about "powered by ati" boards, other
platforms, and other troubleshooting, it was no longer r
I'm having really strange problems running the X server from the trunk
on one of my Red Hat 8.0 system. It dies with a SIG 11. From running an
strace the last thing I see it do is read the PCI data. I suspect by now
there must be people running RH 8.0, so it is probably something local
to my enviro
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:20:07AM +, Ian Molton wrote:
> No rush - I wasnt criticising, just making the statement so people would
> know I intend to have a crack at Voodoo3 support and not drop any code
> on the floor.
I would hope Ian R's texmem stuff doesn't mean dropping the remaining
driv
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 03:58:29PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> The Voodoo 2 specs are available from http://www.medex.hu/~danthe/tdfx/
> . I don't know what's the current state of the tdfx driver in respect
> with Voodoo 2. The tdfx driver is quite different from any other driver
> because it uses
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:49:20AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:31:46AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > Ian Romanick wrote:
> > > > What ends up happening is glXGetProcAddress returns the address of the
> > > > glBegin symbol from my exe
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:44:22PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Michael also implemented agp support for radeon with a similar simplistic
> strategy, but ran into some issues looking at tcl and/or mesa-4-0. I think
> these turned out to be artefacts rather than anything serious. In any case I
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 12:26:41PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> There was some talk awhile back about adding support for AGP texturing in
> the Radeon driver. Whatever happened with that?
I've actually got an implementation of AGP texturing for the Radeon that
seems to work. I've also got Michae
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 11:44:44PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> I'll have a look at that.
>
> Which CVS branch should I start with ?
On the glide side you want to use glide3x, but I don't think they ever
created any branches there. There are glide3x for V3 and glide3x for
V{4,5} branches whi
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 01:20:54PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Removing Glide by adding only the appropriate functionality to the
> > driver would be a good project for someone who wants to start working
> > close to the hardware. It's pretty well defined and can be done in
> > chunks. You
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:32:43AM +0100, Jacek Pop³awski wrote:
> Are there any projects to assimilate Glide, i.e. to put Glide source code in
> tdfx driver? Are there any problems (maybe license?) ? How much performance
> could be gain this way?
As I recall the license really isn't a problem. T
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:54:22PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> But on a daily basis!? At least this was the initial plan..
>
> I was thinking in using a script that made some kind of rotation
> eliminating old releases, only adding a snapshot when there were
> differences, etc... This can be d
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:24:49PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> I have a web statistics package on my webserver
> http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/cgi-bin/awstats.pl were one could get that
> information.
>
> This doesn't mean that I won't put my stuff on DRI website: I've sent an
> email to Frank a
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:50:36PM -0800, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
> > Hello all
> >
> > Just tried to build mach64 branch. Got an error:
> >
> > make[4]: Entering directory `/db2/xfree/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/sis'
> > make[4]: *** No rule to make target
> > `../../../.
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 08:00:35PM +, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > > I'm fairly sure that there is an OpenGL test suite; although I doubt
> > > that it is freely available. Should XFree
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:15:53PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> I completely agree with you.. but I did not give you details :))
>
> What happens is that if you try to use older drm driver with GATOS 2d
> driver the GATOS driver will notice and complain. But if you use GATOS drm
> driver wi
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 02:05:42PM -0500, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> Regardless of the way it is merged the driver major version will need to
> be bumped. GATOS drivers does this but only minor - as I did not want to
> upload a mesa radeon driver just because of the version change.
I'm afraid I
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 04:00:13PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Can someone provide me with a deeper explaination of the SAREA? I
> understand that it is a block of shared memory that is used to store
> internal, device specific state. However, by whom is it shared? Who can
> update it? When?
I'm going to be at a client most of the day, so I don't know that I can
make the IRC meeting. If it happens late enough that I'm home I'll join.
- |Daryll
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
> > The kernel interfaces are highly dependent on the hardware they work
> > with.
>
> different in the sense that they all have a common collection of
> fundamental activities and they all have a collection of disparate
> activities?
>
> or different in the sense that they have *no* common co
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:55:28AM -0600, John Utz wrote:
> one last question before i knock off for the nite
>
> suppose one has two cards.
>
> the first, the FooBarTech VisiBlaster, has special hardware for optimizing
> the generation of very realistic clouds.
>
> the second, the BazGraf
Just to make everything clear:
Starting at 5pm pacific (that's about one hour from now)
On irc.openprojects.net
channel #dri-devel
We don't have anything formal planned. It'll probably be mostly a
Q&A. Several of the developers should make it for at least some of the
time.
We can try to schedul
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 11:51:33AM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> I've finished reading (diagonally of course) through the dri-devel mailing
> lists. It's interesting see 2 years of the DRI development flashing in
> your eyes in 8 hrs - it's like a novel in that you feel for the
> characters, i.e.,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 08:01:14PM +, David Johnson wrote:
> So, the question is how to we get that process going. As a suggestion,
> maybe
> a weekly IRC meeting would help where new developers can ask the experts,
> and
> each other, questions about DRI, XFree or 3D graphics. I am sure i
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 02:40:15AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Okay, sorry, I just had to laugh. Not your fault, I admit that. You are as innocent
>as I used to be.
>
> Here's the deal bro:
Now I'm going to turn this around a bit. You've already seen the answers
from most of us. We're
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:05:33PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> I have a question about "what if physical memory is fragmented"?
> The AGIPIOC_ALLOC call returns a 'physical' address.
> This implies that the ALLOC is a single contiguous chunk of physical
> memory. Right?
>
> However, I cant imagi
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:50:42AM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> But I thought that GATT is simply a scatter/gather table, so
> you only have to update the GATT when you "allocate and bind" pages.
> Then, if you "allocate and bind" the whole range at once, you're done, and
> you dont have to do any
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:46:50AM +0300, Papadakos Panagiotis wrote:
> There are problems with Xfree-4.1.0 and after.I don't know what,but if you
> want tou use Openoffice-Staroffice 6.0 you will have to work with
> Xfree-4.0.3.
I'm running Open Office 638 on XFree 4.1 just fine. Without more
in
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 05:48:56AM +0100, MichaelM wrote:
> Would you consider it a good idea to make DRI part of the source of a
kernel? Direct 3d graphics supported from the boot sequence.
>
> I'm really concerned about your answer. There was a whole thread on
the linux-kernel mailing list
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:49:56PM +0200, Manuel Teira wrote:
> OK. Thank you for the clear explanation. Now I think I'm ready to put the new
> branch in the repository. I'm waiting for the access, guys. As soon as I have
> access (if i'ts not too late here in Spain) I will proceed.
Done
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:14:33AM -0600, jhartmann wrote:
> If you have demenstrated that this is the case then we should remove the version
> system then I guess. I do want to voice my concerns though by writing out my
> argument fully though.
Having a version system is safer. If something doe
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 02:15:42AM +0100, Fray Bentos wrote:
> Hi I submitted a bug report a few days ago concerning the HP_OCCLUSION_TEST
> extention to opengl on the tdfx driver.
>
> Im hopefully gonna fix it myself, but i was wondering if any one can verify that
> the extension works perfectly
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 05:13:40PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, can anyone answer any of the questions below, or do I have to write
> drm for multimedia ?
The DRM is an architecture for accessing hardware directly.
What functions are implemented in any given kernel module is driven by
t
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 04:11:28AM +0200, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
> Yes, I have followed the DRI User Guide (without knowing it. I read through
> it, and I have done exactly as it said). From looking at the log, I can't see
> what would cause direct rendering to fail. The parts of the log
On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 05:36:49PM +0200, Johannes Prix wrote:
> I read in the FAQ, that NVidia provide their own
> binary closed source drivers. Yet visiting the Nvidia
> homepage driver section I find, that there are not only
> binary drivers for several distributions, but also a source
> rpm a
gt; almost a year old which I have used with limited succes (some gl demos
> worked, but were corrupted - q3a unplayable), and a new patch which
> Manuel Teria and Frank C Earl have been working on, but it's over a
> month old by now. Daryll Strauss wants to see a little more before
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 10:09:47PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Very little consumer hardware provides support for the operations
> > necessary to implement much of drawpixels anyway.
>
> Could you please elaborate on this? As someon
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:29:03PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 September 2001 14:41, Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> >
> > > I have the Rage Pro docs from ATI, I would now like to know *how* I can
> > > get the source of the driver that people are working on currently for
> this
>
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 07:05:59PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Daryll, are there dri project private lists I presume that could
> be extended to new developers similar to XFree86's developmental
> list?
There aren't really any at this point. We discussed most things in
public, and sometimes
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:35:33PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> 1. Who is going to take on the leadership position for the project? Although
> this is a community project we do need somebody in charge to act as a sort
> of "project lead" and contact person for people outside of the project.
> Cur
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:12:34PM +0100, Will Newton wrote:
> What are the odds of the project coming under the XFree86 umbrella? AFAIK the
> only reason that DRI was outside of XFRee86 was because it began at PI, and
> then when it moved to VA Linux they hosted it on Sourceforge (?).
>
> XFree
It's hard to answer why vendors won't release specs even for older
boards. We'd have to get answers from the vendors to know for sure. I've
heard a number of responses and have a few theories. I'm not going to
say how valid or invalid any specific one is and these apply to lots
more than just grap
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 05:59:07PM -0700, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> > Fair enough, I just wish you'd be a bit more supportive to those of us who are
> > trying (with very limited resources, mind you) to fix it, as you're probably
> > the man with the single most intimate knowledge of the driver. You
On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 07:08:31AM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> That's sad. But how the world goes.
>
> Daryll, what are you doing, next?
Playing golf, riding motorcycles, and generally taking time off. I'm
waiting to see what happens with the relocation, and I'm looking at
other opportunities.
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 07:45:10PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> when i am testing new code, which branch ought i to be messing with?
> head, mesa-3-5, ???
Generally the trunk is the best bet. That's the code that we believe is
stable and working.
There are a variety of branches which will ha
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 10:04:14PM -0500, Steven Walter wrote:
> Can someone send a copy of the white papers/references for the 3dfx
> VSA-100/Napalm my way? Were they even ever released openly? I know
> that the said document for Avenger (Voodoo3) were, and they used to be
> availible on 3dfx's
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 06:29:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 1) is anyone still maintaining the Glide source/CVS ?
Not really.
> 2) anyone noticed problems while compiling Glide3 for Voodoo5 with debug
> on?
> I get this error with the GL apps i tried (gears, Quake3, mine), except
This might be useful to some of the folks here, so I thought I would
pass it along.
- |Daryll
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:41:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PR
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:28:33PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
> -
>Frankÿÿÿî/Ýz÷¥¨¥x%ËC®/Ýz÷¥þX¬¶Ïì¢êÜyú+ïçzØm¶ÿþX¬¶Ïì¢êÜyú+ïçzßåËlþX¬¶)ߣ÷k÷^
>
Is that Unicode for Worsley? :-)
- |Daryll
¸z÷¥¨¥x%ËC®'^½
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:48:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
> Linux.
>
> 2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
> X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
>
> insmod /path/to/it/radeon_d
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 11:50:20AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:46:05 +0200
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >List-Id:
> >Subject: Card & Motherboard
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 12:34:22PM -0400, Jon Niehof wrote:
> Did anyone else get spam apparently harvested from this list?
>
Yes, I goofed and approved a piece of spam that put in the moderation
queue. Your addresses have not been picked up.
I shouldn't go through the queue when I'm still waki
Alan Cox posted this on the kernel list. Matrox should fix this in their
driver.
- |Daryll
> [BUG] ouch x 2: no check either way.
>
>/u2/engler/mc/oses/linux/2.4.5-ac8/drivers/char/drm/mga_state.c:835:mga_iload:+ERROR:RANGE:827:835:
> Using user
The documentation makes a good base and is mostly still correct. The
problem is that this stuff is growing very quickly. For example, we've
come up with fairly standardized ways of writing a device driver. From
an architectural point of view it's still just a device driver, but from
an implementat
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:21:38PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Yep. I think any serious project out there works the same way
> also, at least all the Sourceforge projects do. With XFree86
> specifically I don't even know who all has CVS write priveledge.
> Do just the core developers have wri
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 01:56:21PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> I am not clear about the state of the DRI tree with regard to the new
> XFree86 release. I updated my CVS tree and was surprised to find that
> only a few minor changes had been made since my last update on May 21.
> Does that in
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:29:21AM +, Andrew Richardson wrote:
> What is exactly involved with this? Is it basically rolling glide functions
> into the tdfx driver code? If so that's easy, right? And how does things like
> libtexus (?) fit in to this? Although I can't promise anything I can t
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 01:27:29PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> I've got the dlopen() stuff working but haven't put the glide headers
> into the XFree86/DRI tree yet. Any opinions on where they should go?
>
> I think either xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/tdfx/ or xc/extras/glide/include/
> are the best ca
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:39:08AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Glide is dead as a developmental library for 3D and is really
> only useful as an in between for DRI.
>
> Would it make sense to make Glide3 a native part of XFree86? I
> think it would simplify bug reporting and bug fixing, etc.
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:20:01PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:00:33PM +0100, Philip Willoughby wrote:
> >
> > >I'm using VIA Irongate too.
> >
> > Err, AMD make the irongate chipsets -- the 75x series. VIA don't -- they
> > make the Apollo series
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 12:07:44PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> I will try to report things here in the future. My idea was by
> doing it in the config tool, i could gage how things should be
> constrained, and then patch X to avoid allowing combinations that
> are unuseable.
Well as a practic
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:46:34AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> Right, but what I want is "Here are your options, and you cannot
> choose DRI in a configuration that will make the machine lock up
> due to memory constraints.&qu
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 08:23:21AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Then, you should have at least a couple megabytes left over for
> the X pixmap cache and for OpenGL textures.
Please realize these are important and significant parts of the
calculation. For example, in the tdfx driver you can be using
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 10:22:14PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 07:45:31PM -0400, Norbert Veber wrote:
> > > Change the line in your XF86Config file from
> > >
> > > Driver "ati"
> > >
> > > to
> > >
> > > Driver "radeon"
> > >
> > > Does that make a difference ?
> >
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:35:09PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> >> Daryll Strauss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Actually, the SGI SI has all the man pages although not in their
> > standard format. Since that does have a reasonable license I'll tak
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 07:26:44AM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
> > Lastly, it would be nice if the OpenGL man pages where included, too
> > (see ftp://ftp.sgi.com/opengl/doc).
>
> I would love to, but I haven't been able to get a straight answer out of
> anyone from
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 09:59:17AM -0400, Allen Barnett wrote:
> I'm not sure if this package is intended for developers and on
> non-Debian systems, but I fearlessly tried it out on my RedHat 7.1
> installation anyway. If I missed the point, please ignore the following.
We have a bit of a proble
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 05:29:29AM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> What about your tdfx GLX context fix?
>
> Nathan's tdfx Xv driver patch?
> Still an issue with 1280x1024x24 (x16?) and above.
>
> Will the mesa-3-5-branch ready for 4.1.0?
No, Mesa 3.5 will not be in the 4.1 releases.
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:02:55AM +0300, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since I'm not under any NDA and I've started to see some info about this
> card, then I thought to ask this:
>
> Matrox are planning to release Matrox G550 card until the end of this month.
>
> The card, from a techni
On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 10:29:43PM -0400, Zilvinas Valinskas wrote:
> >
> > Of course, this being an open source project, and the G200/G400 specs
> > freely available, you could always work on it yourself :-)
> >
> > -- Gareth
> What about Radeon specs. ? Are they freely available ? ...
> *sigh
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 01:16:59AM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> I wrote:
> > The DRI glide is ONLY useful for the DRI. It won't function in stand
> > alone mode at all. In other words, there isn't just V3 and V5 versions,
> > but also V3-non-DRI, V3-DRI, V5-DRI versions. But, Glide is dead and I
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 03:12:46AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2001, Daryll Strauss wrote:
>
> >It depends on what part of the process you want to solve.
> >
> >For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
> >dynamically loa
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 04:56:40PM -0500, opium forthemasses wrote:
> I compiled from CVS ( May 4, 11:57pm), and everything works beautifully..
>
> Direct Rendering, "gears" app reports 500+ fps, Maya for Linux works like a
> charm. So much better than the Maya Windows environment. I can now d
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:41:51PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> As Daryll said, the GL redbook is a good choice. I figured I'd comment
> specifically because I'm a firm believer that Amazon should DIE DIE DIE.
> *ahem* Here's the book from fatbrain (owned by Barnes and Noble, but a
> nicer form
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 06:48:25PM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
>
> I want to learn how to program 3d programmes.
> Especially for using the OpenGL/Mesa API.
> I am real beginner in 3d programming so it
> should be a book for beginners.
>
> Does anyone know a good book about that topic?
>
The
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 08:19:44PM -0500, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 01:32:07AM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
> > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > Speaking of which, I've been thinking about ordering Tribes2 and was
> > > wondering if there are any issues that we should be aware of?
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:02:05AM -0400, Jon Niehof wrote:
> > For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
> > dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what
> > hardware it is running on and passes that to the client (via the PCI
> > id). If you did this, y
It depends on what part of the process you want to solve.
For the DRI, the easiest solution would be to have the dri_tdfx.o
dynamically load the appropriate Glide. The X server knows what hardware
it is running on and passes that to the client (via the PCI id). If you
did this, you could also cha
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:09:46AM -0400, David Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 02:48:10PM -0500, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> >Does the DRI project offer CVSUp access? I'm collecting CVS trees in
> >the interest of being able to do speedy local CVS operations, and CVSUp
> >is the most efficient
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:56:35PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:25:48PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > I expect to have Alpha Linux packages online too, within the week.
> >
> Alpha (compiled with -mcpu=ev5) Packages are now up too.
-mcpu=ev56 would be a substantia
On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 05:17:25PM +0100, Philip Willoughby wrote:
> > Is there a good reason for the xc directory nested in the DRI CVS xc
> > directory? I ask because it requires 119Mb of disk space, takes an age to
> > download
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 07:35:14PM +0530, Damarugendra M wrote:
> I would like to know if I could use DRI to
> implement an application which obtains HW
> accleration and runs without using X11.
>
> that is i want to run this app from the console.
> this app may be a game or whatever. it should
81 matches
Mail list logo
