Re: [Dri-devel] Re: future of DRI? - why no one plays with Glide3.

2003-03-05 Thread Frank Earl
makes the situation with some of the older chips worse is that they're not suited, as you've noticed, to what DRI offers. They're almost better off with something else- of what, I'm not precicely sure yet. -- Frank Earl --- This SF.net email

Re: [Dri-devel] dri-devel, Re: Gen*ric V*agra for only $5.00 per 100MG dose

2002-11-04 Thread Frank Earl
to muddle through a driver for the chip, I just haven't had the time to sit down and actually do the work. -- Frank Earl --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: ApacheCon, November 18-21 in Las Vegas (supported by COMDEX), the only Apache event

Re: [Dri-devel] dri-devel, Re: Gen*ric V*agra for only $5.00 per 100MG dose

2002-11-02 Thread Frank Earl
On Saturday 02 November 2002 05:18 pm, you wrote: Wasn't VIAGRA a PC Chips relabeling of the VIA MVP4? What would a DRI developer do with that? ;) Write a driver for it?? (If memory serves, the MVP4 had an integrated 3D accelerator, namely a Trident CyberBlade... ;-) -- Frank Earl

Re: [Dri-devel] Anyone has any info on the SIS630 (SIS300 graphics chip) ???

2002-10-07 Thread Frank Earl
is under NDA and useless at the same time (2D and MPEG decode programming)- and it was like pulling teeth to get that much out of them for the 310/630. -- Frank Earl --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http

Re: [Dri-devel] Fwd: [Newbie]Dell Optiplex GX1 and Accelerated Graphics

2001-12-06 Thread Frank Earl
employer's not making payroll...). -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Fwd: [Newbie]Dell Optiplex GX1 and Accelerated Graphics

2001-12-06 Thread Frank Earl
Pro. I looked at it and it didn't seem to me to be optimal compared to what you'd done with Utah-GLX. I'll go ahead and plug it and the pcigart code sometime in the next couple of days so that we can move forward. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 success

2001-12-04 Thread Frank Earl
be putting this in the HEAD until it's had a LOT of pounding on. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: mach64-0-0-2-branch created and updated

2001-10-23 Thread Frank Earl
the way Gareth was coding it at the time he was working on it)- we'll get to it shortly. Right now, we're migrating what's already there to use the DRM properly (since it's just doing direct writes to the register right now...). -- Frank Earl ___ Dri

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: mach64-0-0-2-branch created and updated

2001-10-23 Thread Frank Earl
probably ought to do something like Utah-GLX does for textures, etc. so that we can get this off the ground for people with PCI setups while we look into what it'd take to do PCIGART type work for this driver. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list

[Dri-devel] Re: linux drivers for mach64

2001-10-05 Thread Frank Earl
this weekend...). -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] gears problem

2001-10-04 Thread Frank Earl
and see if it's the same problem. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] gears problem

2001-10-04 Thread Frank Earl
at work... :-) -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Discussion of donation driven DRI project.

2001-09-19 Thread Frank Earl
... :-) -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Discussion of donation driven DRI project.

2001-09-19 Thread Frank Earl
. The CyberBlade are very similar indeed, apart from the E4 which is a bit more different. Cool. This means I'm not going to be guessing too blindly when I get to working on a DRI driver... -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Discussion of donation driven DRI project.

2001-09-18 Thread Frank Earl
to help under NDA and private lists than on open lists. If that. You'd be amazed at how little help you get from many of these outfits, even WITH an NDA. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

Re: [Dri-devel] Hardware specs (was Progress of mesa-3.5 tree?)

2001-09-16 Thread Frank Earl
educate them that it's really in their best interests overall to be helpful to those who genuinely want to help them out by providing support for old and new chipsets for operating systems that they don't have time to support. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Update to Mesa-3.6/4.0

2001-09-15 Thread Frank Earl
a chicken and egg type problem we face here. As for the Rage 128, I've got several of them (incl. one on a PPC machine...) once we get a little further along, I think I'll be chasing that one at least for a little bit. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Update to Mesa-3.6/4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Frank Earl
your new employment- I'd hoped you'd get on with someplace worthwhile. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Progress of mesa-3.5 tree? Update to Mesa-3.6/4.0

2001-09-14 Thread Frank Earl
, I guess, for now at least, I'll settle for working on the old junk- someone's got to do it, right? :- Again, I'm thrilled that you got the job at NVidia. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 DRI. Any progress?

2001-06-19 Thread Frank Earl
and I'm at work right now so I can't look at my reference books...) in increments of 16k. The descriptor table _must_ be aligned on a boundary matching the size you specify for the table- 16k on a 16 boundary, etc. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 DRI. Any progress?

2001-06-19 Thread Frank Earl
and I'm at work right now so I can't look at my reference books...) in increments of 16k. The descriptor table _must_ be aligned on a boundary matching the size you specify for the table- 16k on a 16 boundary, etc. -- Frank Earl ___ Dri-devel