On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:06:45AM -0500, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 11:36, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > I have not provided a diff because it is quite a hack and very
> system
> > > specific, at the moment. Effectively, I forced the virtual size to
> be
> > > 2048x768, hac
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 11:36, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > I have not provided a diff because it is quite a hack and very
system
> > specific, at the moment. Effectively, I forced the virtual size to
be
> > 2048x768, hacked the RADEONDoAdjustFrame() function to fix views as
I
> > wanted them, used th
I'd be very interested in seeing your code, hacky or not. We were
actually just discussing this on this list and on the devel list at
xfree86.org. David Dawes said he has some preliminary work for setting
up multiple viewports into a single framebuffer. Sven Luther and
myself, among others, woul
On Die, 2003-03-04 at 01:52, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
> I am pleased to report that thanks to the guidance Jens Owens gave in a
> previous message, I have made 3D work on two heads simultaneously (IIRC,
> the ATI Windows XP drivers didn't do this).
Coolness.
> I have not provided a diff bec
I am pleased to report that thanks to the guidance Jens Owens gave in a
previous message, I have made 3D work on two heads simultaneously (IIRC,
the ATI Windows XP drivers didn't do this). I have not provided a diff
because it is quite a hack and very system specific, at the moment.
Effectively,
Hello, ...
As you may have noticed, i have started a (sub) thread with David Dawes
on this subject on the xfree86 list.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:58:42PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Don, 2003-02-27 at 09:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:14:37AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Mit, 2003-02-26 at 18:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > -- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Don, 2003-02-27 at 09:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:14:37AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mit, 2003-02-26 at 18:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > -- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [ video memory management ]
> >
> > > > How is it done right now ? Is a pa
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:12:24AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2003-02-26 at 21:11, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > [...] because the DRI is just rendering to the framebuffer, it doesn't
> > know if you are displaying it or not, and doesn't even care. The only
> > issue is with size limits of
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:14:37AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mit, 2003-02-26 at 18:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > --- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ video memory management ]
>
> > > How is it done right now ? Is a part of the onchip memory reserved
> > > for framebuffer and XAA
On Mit, 2003-02-26 at 18:16, Alex Deucher wrote:
> --- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ video memory management ]
> > How is it done right now ? Is a part of the onchip memory reserved
> > for framebuffer and XAA, and another part free for 3D use ?
>
> Not sure. I'm not familiar with th
On Mit, 2003-02-26 at 21:11, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> [...] because the DRI is just rendering to the framebuffer, it doesn't
> know if you are displaying it or not, and doesn't even care. The only
> issue is with size limits of the 3D engine, like Michel said, with the
> Radeon 3D engine being limit
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:40:18AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Yes, and you have to divide the fb memory in two, one for each head, or
> > something such, and each head will have its separate offscreen memory
> > manager, possibly using differe
--- Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> > Yes, and you have to divide the fb memory in two, one for each
> head, or
> > something such, and each head will have its separate offscreen
> memory
> > manager, possibly using different screen str
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
>
> --- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How is it done right now ? Is a part of the onchip memory reserved
> > for
> > framebuffer and XAA, and another part free for 3D use ?
>
> Not sure. I'm not familiar with the memory m
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> Yes, and you have to divide the fb memory in two, one for each head, or
> something such, and each head will have its separate offscreen memory
> manager, possibly using different screen strides.
Side note: I know that what people are mostly talking ab
--- Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:28:15PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > right now for these chips you set up the entity as shareable and
> then
> > divide your framebuffer into two or more frambuffers, one for each
> > CRTC. Each instance of the driver then
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:28:15PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote:
> right now for these chips you set up the entity as shareable and then
> divide your framebuffer into two or more frambuffers, one for each
> CRTC. Each instance of the driver then works using its framebuffer.
> each head is distingui
I too am curious about that. I've been working on adding duoview
support to the s3 savage driver. I talked to Tim Roberts a while back
and I figured out the basics of how it works. I've got a semi-working
driver, but alas, I think I need some help getting the second crtc to
output to the vga por
On Die, 2003-02-25 at 01:24, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
>
> I had a look at radeon_driver.c. The first thing that drew my attention
> was the the conditional that was prefixed by
>
> /* Xinerama has sync problem with DRI, disable it for now */
>
> Does this imply that everything is set up alr
Let me begin with the following: I downloaded the texmem branch from
DRI CVS. It fails to compile, giving the error
./config/imake/imake -I./config/cf -s
./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto -f ./config/makedepend/Imakefile
-DTOPDIR=../.. -DCURDIR=./config/makedepend
./config/imake/imake: No such
I too am curious about that. I've been working on adding duoview
support to the s3 savage driver. I talked to Tim Roberts a while back
and I figured out the basics of how it works. I've got a semi-working
driver, but alas, I think I need some help getting the second crtc to
output to the vga por
Sven Luther wrote:
What i think is most important is that a common configuration options or
something such be defined, before every driver go at it in its own way.
I agree. Since there are not open source drivers that support this,
yet...I would bet the configuration options for the first implem
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 11:12, Jens Owen wrote:
> I believe you can implement this at the 2D DDX driver level. Getting
> the configuration file semantics worked out would probably be the first
> step. Then get the driver to read those semantics and initial the
> secondary display pipeline.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:35:47PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 18:11, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:05:21PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:35:47PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 18:11, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:05:21PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 18:11, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:05:21PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> > > > A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:05:21PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> > > A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a second
> > > head supported on a single X11 screen. T
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:27, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
> >http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/Simple_Xinerama_DH.txt
> >
> > This solution provides Xinerama functionality without actually using the
> > Xinerama wrapper.
>
> Could you please point me to the code which needs to be worked on
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 16:09, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> > A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a second
> > head supported on a single X11 screen. Then 3D comes for free:
> >
> > http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/S
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 17:36, Steven Newbury wrote:
> > A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a second
> > head supported on a single X11 screen. Then 3D comes for free:
> >
> > http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/Simple_Xinerama_DH.txt
> >
> > This solution provides Xine
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:35:13AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> >
> >>A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a second
> >>head supported on a single X11 screen. Then 3D comes for free:
> >>
> >> h
A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a second
head supported on a single X11 screen. Then 3D comes for free:
http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/Simple_Xinerama_DH.txt
This solution provides Xinerama functionality without actually using the
Xinerama wrapper.
Wouldn't
Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/Simple_Xinerama_DH.txt
This solution provides Xinerama functionality without actually using the
Xinerama wrapper.
Could you please point me to the code which needs to be worked on for
the above solution so that I know where to st
>http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/Simple_Xinerama_DH.txt
>
> This solution provides Xinerama functionality without actually using the
> Xinerama wrapper.
Could you please point me to the code which needs to be worked on for
the above solution so that I know where to start? Would I have t
Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a second
head supported on a single X11 screen. Then 3D comes for free:
http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/Simple_Xinerama_DH.txt
This solution provides X
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:58:55AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
> A short cut to this whole thing would be to work on getting a second
> head supported on a single X11 screen. Then 3D comes for free:
>
> http://www.tungstengraphics.com/dri/Simple_Xinerama_DH.txt
>
> This solution provides Xinerama
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 03:16, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
On my Mobility Radeon 7500, I would like to have accelerated 3D working
on one screen (primary I assume) of a Xinerama dual-head setup. As it
stands, direct rendering is completely disabled upon XFree86 startup
whenever
On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 03:16, Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
>
> On my Mobility Radeon 7500, I would like to have accelerated 3D working
> on one screen (primary I assume) of a Xinerama dual-head setup. As it
> stands, direct rendering is completely disabled upon XFree86 startup
> whenever two heads
On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 20:14, Jens Owen wrote:
> Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
> > What is keeping DRI from working on one head of a dual-head setup (take
> > my Radeon M7, for example). Does it require a major architectural
> > change, or might it be something more managable that I could work on
Jonathan Thambidurai wrote:
What is keeping DRI from working on one head of a dual-head setup (take
my Radeon M7, for example). Does it require a major architectural
change, or might it be something more managable that I could work on?
Most likely not major architectural changes required.
What is keeping DRI from working on one head of a dual-head setup (take
my Radeon M7, for example). Does it require a major architectural
change, or might it be something more managable that I could work on?
-Jonathan Thambidurai
---
42 matches
Mail list logo
