Did you check the DX4WIN web site?
What you want is there
At 09:43 PM 8/8/2013, Tom Johnson wrote:
I am having trouble with my dx4win logging program. Would someone
send a link to their forum? 73 es tnx de N4TJ
Jack Hartley
K4WSB / VP2MSB
#1 DXCC Honor Roll
QCWA OOTC
Celebrating over 1/2
This may help:
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:dx4...@mailman.qth.net dx4...@mailman.qth.net
73,
David, K2DBK
k2dbk.com
k2dbk.blogspot.com
twitter: @k2dbk
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C
jjreis...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
I'm having trouble getting to the FOC web site at www.g4foc.org
This is about 2000z Friday, but it's been this way for several hours.
Site seems back as of 2300z Friday.
--
Jim Reisert AD1C,
MessageHe e-mailed me to see if I had my card. I said that I didn't have it. He
must have dealt with it because it arrived here today
Mark N1UK
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Freedman
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, 18 April, 2013 10:29 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] QSL
A few weeks ago I sent a (first) paypal request to Vlad for 6 band su9vb
contacts and a
separate request for 4o7vb, 4w0vb and e40vb. I always put a summary of contact
info
in the message field. The reply cards for the 4w, e4 and 4o came from Texas
(his xyl?)
within 2 weeks (March), but no
MessageHi Jeff, I sent PayPal on 6/5/2012 and received my card on 9/17/2012.
Other qsls from UA4WHX have taken longer but I have always gotten the card.
Maybe you send him an email, I seem to recall corresponding with Vlad via his
PayPal email address.
73 good luck!
-Joe W4WN
-
Oh, how I couldn't agree more with these comments, they've hit the nail on the
proverbial head.
Nick W9UM
War, Pestilence, Famine and DeathNo prisoners and shoot all survivors.
- Original Message -
I'm replying to this on DX-CHAT.
A lot of those excellent ops are no
Lou,
Could it have been 5T0SP?
73
Tony, W4FOA
- Original Message -
From: KE1F Lou lmecs...@cfl.rr.com
To: dx-chat dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 11:44:52 AM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] 5T5SP operation.
I worked this station on 160 meters and sure could use a
According to posts DX Summit it's SP6FXY
At 11:44 AM 4/4/2013, KE1F Lou wrote:
I worked this station on 160 meters and sure could use a confirmation.
I can't find any QSL information on this operation.
Can anybody help me out?
73 Lou KE1F
Jack Hartley
K4WSB / VP2MSB
#1 DXCC Honor Roll
Yes, as of Jan. 27.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Crownhaven crownha...@bellsouth.netwrote:
Did the price of an envelope to a foreign country just go up to $1.10 by
chance?
Steve, N4JQQ
--**-
To unsubscribe or
YES, IT DID.
In a message dated 1/29/2013 11:57:34 A.M. Hawaiian Standard Time,
crownha...@bellsouth.net writes:
Did the price of an envelope to a foreign country just go up to $1.10 by
chance?
Steve, N4JQQ
---
To unsubscribe
The good news is that I think now you can get an international forever stamp so
you're locked in at the new rate.
73
Ryan, N2RJ
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 29, 2013, at 4:58 PM, leewi...@aol.com wrote:
YES, IT DID.
In a message dated 1/29/2013 11:57:34 A.M. Hawaiian Standard Time,
That's a good call. I worked in on October 19, 1987 and QSLed via
EA2JG.
Bernie, J77A
Bernie McClenny, W3UR
The Daily DX, The Weekly DX
With subscribers in all 50 states and more than 80 DXCC countries
throughout the world.
http://www.dailydx.com/trial.htm
https://twitter.com/#!/dailydx
Bernie, great to hear from you. I appreciate it. No sign of it on the
web. I will check with EA2JG. I really appreciate it. Hope you are
doing well. Keep up the good work in QST.
Steve, N4JQQ
On 1/27/2013 7:48 AM, Bernie McClenny wrote:
That's a good call. I worked in on October 19,
I worked them several times. I believe it was a club station.
73, Zack W9SZ
On 1/27/13, Crownhaven crownha...@bellsouth.net wrote:
I have a QSO in my log for this station on 27 Feb 1993, 10 meters. I
just noticed I don't have S0 confirmed on this band. I search for the
callsign and can't
Are you logged in? Fred started limiting lookups to 25 per day and now
requires login (presumably to enforce it). Paid members get unlimited lookups.
I end up using an alternative like hamqth.com which also has free XML access.
Ryan, N2RJ
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 17, 2013, at 6:53 AM,
It works perfectly fine here.. 73 K7ZD
On 1/17/2013 10:40 AM, Tom Johnson wrote:
I am signing in and using a password, but no joy
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to
imail...@njdxa.org
In the
If that's the case then i'd just contact them. Maybe something is
wrong with your account.
On the homepage they have a contact section where you can open a ticket.
73
Ryan, N2Rj
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Tom Johnson yardmast...@att.net wrote:
I am signing in and using a password,
Sorry - maybe am missing the point - but what does the subject have to
do with QRZ.COM?
GM4FDM
On 21/12/2012 13:00, WX5L wrote:
**
**
*Hello,*
**
*I just did a callsign look-up on qrz.com and the format is totally
different. It’s cluttered and frankly a mess.*
*Anyone elese?*
cost ... SO
PROBLEM SOLVED !! 73, W2CF
Richard T. Schweizer
377 Canterbury Dr.
Ramsey, NJ 07446
Telephone: (201) 825-4318
From: wn3...@verizon.net
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] LOTW cannot possibly catch up
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:56:42 -0500
Blaming
Remember the days when you mailed in cards to the league and it took
3 months. to process?
I'll take 10 days over that anytime.
It used to take 6 years to get your cards back from Box 88. Now I
see even our Russian friends are on LOTW. And I had my PT0S 160 Qso
confirmed in days.
LOTW even at 20 days is a tremendous tool.
I'm not concerned about 20 days for a confirmation. My concern is
20 days (or more) even before the initial transaction is processed
and I get confirmation that the QSOs are safely in the database.
I'm confident they'll figure this out, it's
Having read most of the comments critical of the time lag, I am reminded of
the time when it took forever to get confirmations via the mail and some
bureaus.
This whole issue seems to me to be centered among those who either can't
recall those days or the younger folks who suffer from what
All of us on this reflector are painfully aware that LoTW has a
problem, Additionally we all have seen this discussion go on ad
nausium. All of us are concerned about the problem. None of this is new
NEWS. So far I have told you nothing new. The complaining goes on
on, and accomplishes
On 12/15/2012 Donald Greenbaum wrote:
I don't understand the angst over a backlog of processing data during
the end of the year rush. Unless the world really is going to end in
a week like the Mayans predicted.
73
Don
N1DG
Partly because those of us who have been watching have come
Those days are irrelevant to the subject at hand and it has nothing to
do with instant gratification. It has to do with the current state of
technology, what it can provide, and what it should provide. There's
also no need to talk about spark transmitters or paper logs, either.
Barry W2UP
Might want to consider creating a filter for the thread? Maybe filter
out any messages with LoTW in the subject field ;)
73, Mike, K2CD
Mike(W5UC) Kathy (K5MWH) wrote:
All of us on this reflector are painfully aware that LoTW has a
problem, Additionally we all have seen this discussion
On 12/15/2012 Don Berger wrote:
Having read most of the comments critical of the time lag, I am reminded of
the time when it took forever to get confirmations via the mail and some
bureaus.
This whole issue seems to me to be centered among those who either can't
recall those days or the
Every transaction-oriented software system has a performance bottleneck that
limits its throughput. Eliminating that bottleneck -- either by improving
the software or upgrading the hardware -- always reveals the next
bottleneck.
The ARRL has determined that LotW's throughput is limited by the
without further
distractions.
73, ron w3wn
Note: Just speaking for myself. Not putting on my administrative cap on...
yet.
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Don Berger
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 2:47 PM
To: Dx-Chat
Subject: Re: [DX
4:18 PM
To: w...@suddenlink.net
Cc: Dx-Chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] LOTW cannot possibly catch up
SO, please let me ask; what do the complainers expect to accomplish
by continuing to kick this horse?
How about getting others involved in *doing something* about the
problem? Since the ARRL
Barry,
The reported backlog is simply the time between upload of the last
processed file and the reporting epoch. It is a backward looking
statistic and not predictive.
If you want predictive, look at the number of QSOs in the queue
- which continues to increase - and apply an value for
Go to the LOTW site and read carefully. There is a discussion that
tells, in part, that new hardware is on order, and is expected to arrive
in 6-8 weeks. THEY ARE WORKING ON IT!!! RELAX!!! Constantly getting
your shorts all in a wad is uncomfortable, and bad for your health. It
raises
Go to the LOTW site and read carefully. There is a discussion that
tells, in part, that new hardware is on order, and is expected to
arrive in 6-8 weeks. THEY ARE WORKING ON IT!!!
That is if you *believe* the claim that the hardware will fix it.
With a very large database, decreases in
On 12/14/2012 11:24 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
Go to the LOTW site and read carefully. There is a discussion that
tells, in part, that new hardware is on order, and is expected to
arrive in 6-8 weeks. THEY ARE WORKING ON IT!!!
That is if you *believe* the claim that the hardware will fix
No Ryan, the League is not a dictatorship.
To answer more generically, and not specifically to you (or just you):
However: If you want change, and are not happy with the current situation with
the Logbook server... kvetching about it on this reflector will not accomplish
anything. And I
That's correct, Ron. You complain about it to your division director,
who will speak on your behalf.
But there's nothing wrong with discussing it here, IMO. Maybe they DO
read things here... I work in web technology for a living, and you
know what? Sometimes I do go searching the web for things
OK, great idea, and then what? If we believe that the present IT dept
isn't being truthful with us, why should we expect that our 'insisting
will change anything?
Quite sometime ago I suggested to my director that LoTW be shut down for
as long as necessary to achieve a long term solution.
Barry wrote:
B The other big factor is the need for so many to work every band-mode
B combination. While I can understand wanting a QWSO on each band and
B mode, is EVERY combination necessary? For example, if you worked them
B on 20 SSB, 40 CW, and 15 RTTY, do you also feel obligated to
Hi,
When working from home I am using a low profile station now: 100W and
LongWire. But I noticed many times that if I can't work a DXpedition it is
not a problem that I have no enough output power and they can't hear me.
Very often it mean rather that oters have too much output power.
It
The leaderboard thing isn't all that bad *IF* the DX wants to allow it and
encourages it. If you're running an operation like HK0NA, 7O6T or T32C --
big, loud and there for a long time, I don't see the harm in it. Some
operations are looking for a new DXpedition record. On the other hand, a
At 07:15 12/12/2012, Gary wrote:
. Vince K5VT - SK would really do something neat. Vince would have
this huge CW pileup going, and send 32. I'd spin the dial up to 32
and call once. Bingo! Reward for actually LISTENING to the DX
op 73, Gary K7ZD
This works great on SSB too. The one
: [DX-CHAT] Re: [SPAM]Re: [DX-NEWS] Best Practices for DXpedition
Operating
Barry, you read my mind.. thanks! Certain DXpedition ops (i.e. Vince
K5VT - SK) would really do something neat. Vince would have this huge CW
pileup going, and send 32. I'd spin the dial up to 32 and call once.
Bingo
Even without the DXpedition resorting to antics such as this, I agree
fully that listening generally yields positive results.
73
Ryan, N2RJ
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Dave Gomberg da...@wcf.com wrote:
At 07:15 12/12/2012, Gary wrote:
. Vince K5VT - SK would really do something neat.
Ron, ZL1AMO did something similar. He had a habit of listening down 1
when sending UP.
Barry W2UP
On 12/12/2012 08:15, Gary wrote:
Barry, you read my mind.. thanks! Certain DXpedition ops (i.e. Vince
K5VT - SK) would really do something neat. Vince would have this huge
CW pileup going,
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Jim Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com wrote:
I have a new computer after the old one crashed and I lost all my data that
wasn't backed up. Registered for LoTW again and was successful. Sent Don
Sumner at ARRL HQ an email commending Mike for making the LoTW a
Article on Latino Fox about Catalonia possibly gaining independence from
Spain at some point. That would be nice.
http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2012/11/23/catalonia-independence-dream-never-so-close-to-reality/
On 11/23/2012 1:48 PM, Barry wrote:
I suspect not Lou.
The distance from San Andres Island to the Nicaraguan coast is only 300 Km,
much less than the required 800 Km in the DXCC Entity rules.
Cheers
Peter VK3QI
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of KE1F Lou
Sent: Tuesday, 20
It is moot as far as DXCC is concerned - San Andres and Providencia
(the Colombian San Andres Province) are already a separate entity
(HK0-S) for DXCC. Although the decision impacts maritime rights it
does not appear to involve a change in control of any land area
(islands or cays).
From the
All three of mine validated without issue.
73
Ryan, N2RJ
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 5, 2012, at 4:58 AM, Urb LeJeune u...@w2dec.com wrote:
Has anyone been successful in validating D64K QSOs
on Club Log. I show two QSO but my times do not
validate.
Thanks
73 Urb W1UL ex W2DEC
Al 17 of mine are there too.
- pjd
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Jairam
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 7:56 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] D64K validation
All three of mine validated without issue.
73
Ryan
Urb:
My 6 meter confirmation came via LOTW. Nothing direct yet.
Don
N1DG
At 11:16 AM 8/28/2012, Urb LeJeune wrote:
Has anyone received a 1A0C QSL where a donation was made online?
Thanks Urb W1UL ex W2DEC
---
To unsubscribe or
That's amazing!
Last one I did took about 5 days to process but they sent me envelopes
about 3 times with stickers, and only after I asked when I was getting
stickers (about a week after).
I hope they've gotten better!
73
Ryan, N2RJ
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Tom Johnson
A35 isn't really all that rare. They're not even in the top 100 and
they show up in the major contests.
So I would say find someone else to work. You might even get LoTW.
Ryan, N2RJ
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net wrote:
Via Pathfinder:
QRZ Buckmaster
A search of http://www.ng3k.com/Misc/adxo.html does not show any Vlad
operations in 08, 09, 10 or 11.
73, Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
VE6 QSL Bureau Team
DXCC Field Checker
ve...@telus.net
403-251-0384
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb
From: w4...@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 12:38 PM
To:
Tony Here is a list of Vlad's operations..,( As best as I can
come up with )
3DA0VB - 4 / 2006
4W0VB 1 / 2012
5R8VB3 / 2007
5X1VB11 / 2005
7Q7VB 1 / 2006
http://www.dxcceast.com/ Description: ncdxa-dxcc-east
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Bill Fikis
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 5:15 PM
To: w4...@comcast.net; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Vlad UA4WHX DXpeditions 2008 +
Tony Here
I ALWAYS use my full call and phoenetically.In Scotland we have
GM4FDM
GM4FAM
GM4FVM
GM3FDN
so it not uncommon for a wrong callsign to be logged if WE dont give our
callsigns phoenteically.Basically its a no brainer..
If you want to be in the log, make sure the DX heard your call
In VHF weak-signal circles around here, most of the active ops within
a few hundred miles know me. But if I just sign W9SZ people get me
confused with W9FZ. In fact, it happened in the VHF contest a couple
weeks ago. I was even using phonetics at the time and the other
station said Hi Bruce, I
Waldo Emerson
-- Original Message --
From: Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com
To: dx-chat dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] County Hunter's Net Procedures
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 07:04:37 -0500
In VHF weak-signal circles around here, most of the active ops within
a few
Since many of our DX brethern are interested in county hunting as well, I
disagree that this doesn't belong, even if it's not 100% on topic.
And I don't see any bashing... simply an acknowledgement that the day-to-day
County Hunters have their own way of doing things.
73, ron w3wn
On
Yes, just like we microwavers also have our own way of doing things (which
is different again than both being described here). When you have a dish
with 0.5 degree beamwidth pointed at someone, you know who the other
station you hear is going to be, so callsigns are just a formality and
legality.
Since this post doesn’t have any context included, I don’t have a clue what
he’s talking about. A bad habit of many.
Gerry VE6LB
From: Duane, WV2B
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 7:32 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Since this really has nothing to do with DXing
Since this
OK, since I know what Duane is referring to, let me clarify... putting on the Admin cap first...The question was raised about why County Hunters objected to the use of phonetics on their net. (And I have the feeling that it wasn't neccesarily handled in the best way possible, or the question might
I live in WisconsinI think 80% of the county names in WI are
impossible WITHOUT phonetics :))
My guess Tom? Poor operators.
On 6/18/2012 8:22 AM, Tom Johnson wrote:
I have been frequenting 14.336 lately and have a query. Twice now, I
have been called on the carpet for using
God has spoken. Heed his words.
John
AE5B
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 00:55:06 GMT, you wrote:
From the MARAC county hunting information page: The County Hunter Net which
you found on 14.336 or 7.188 operates during the daylight hours every day and
sometimes into the evening. Most of the time
Guess I won't be joining that group, where I come from if you rely on a spot
and don't actually copy a stations callsign it is not a contact.
DX IS,
County hunting done that way AIN'T
Joe W4WN
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:55 AM, Duane, WV2B w...@juno.com wrote:
From the MARAC county hunting
Their server admins ran out of chewing gum and the bailing wire is still on
back-order.
- pjd
-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Jairam
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:39 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: [DX-CHAT] LoTW down?
Looks
Just curious, did anyone NOT get their 7O6T confirmations via LoTW yet? My
contacts showed up in Clublog and I've sent for a card with a modest
donation, so I'm ok that I will get the confirmations. However, I haven't
(yet) gotten the confirmation on LoTW and I'm just wondering if anyone else
is
I did OQRS and made a paypal donation last Sunday.
Nothing here.
Others are waiting that I know of as well.
Don
N1DG
At 11:41 AM 6/9/2012, David Kozinn, K2DBK wrote:
Just curious, did anyone NOT get their 7O6T confirmations via LoTW yet? My
contacts showed up in Clublog and I've sent for
I MADE A MODEST PAYPAL DONATION REQUESTING LOTW FOR MY 20M CW LOTW
CONFIRMATION. NOTHING YET.
73
BENNY K5KV
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Don Greenbaum d...@aurumtel.com wrote:
I did OQRS and made a paypal donation last Sunday.
Nothing here.
Others are waiting that I know of as
I hate it when you get 6 sequential spots saying something like P5AAA
tnks QSO 9 bands
It contains no usefult information to the reader apart from
My dog's bigger than your dog!
GM4FDM
On 08/06/2012 01:49, Gary K9GS wrote:
Yes Barry!
Kinda along the same lines are people that use the
...@telusplanet.net
Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2012 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Spotting Etiquette
Bingo!
Even better is a spot asking a DXped to QSY to another band/mode. We
all know they monitor the Cluster and respond immediately to such
requests, NOT.
Barry W2UP
On 6/7/2012 10:35 AM
Jim,
Correct callsign is KL2A.
Information sent by KL2A were of interest of many DX operators. Information
that I am not hearing DX or station I just worked is my country #350 is not of
interest for anyone and should not be transmitted over GLOBAL DX Cluster
network.
73's Boris E73Y
07, 2012 8:01 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Spotting Etiquette
Bingo!
Even better is a spot asking a DXped to QSY to another band/mode. We
all know they monitor the Cluster and respond immediately to such
requests, NOT.
Barry W2UP
On 6/7/2012 10:35 AM, GERRY wrote:
Spotting etiquette has
I'm of mixed feelings but on occasion I don't mind it to be totally honest.
If it's a nearby big gun station reporting no-copy once in a while I'm OK
with it. If it's constant then, no. Also, for BC, it's easy enough to block
either one constant annoying station outright or, if you're using a
I agree with this post completely.
At 10:25 6/7/2012, Peter W2IRT wrote:
I'm of mixed feelings but on occasion I don't mind it to be totally
honest. If it's a nearby big gun station reporting no-copy once in a
while I'm OK with it. If it's constant then, no. Also, for BC, it's
easy enough
Yes and no. Someone in London spotting that he can't hear the KH6 on topband
at noon on a midsummer day is of course as much use as a chocolate teapot. But
under some circumstances - for instance during disturbed conditions on the
higher bands or when deep QSB is the order of the day I'll
Bingo!
Even better is a spot asking a DXped to QSY to another band/mode. We
all know they monitor the Cluster and respond immediately to such
requests, NOT.
Barry W2UP
On 6/7/2012 10:35 AM, GERRY wrote:
Spotting etiquette has bugged me for a long time so I thought I'd vent.
I really
Yes Barry!
Kinda along the same lines are people that use the comments field to
talk to the DX station.
On 6/7/2012 7:01 PM, Barry wrote:
Bingo!
Even better is a spot asking a DXped to QSY to another band/mode. We
all know they monitor the Cluster and respond immediately to such
- Original Message -
From: Zack Widup
To: dx-chat
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Leaderboards - good or bad?
Someone has pointed out recently that for DXCC requirements, you could get by
with 9 QSO's which would cover 160 through 10 meters
Dave G0OIL
- Original Message -
From: Tom Wylie
To: list...@ve1dx.net
Cc: NJDXA DX Chat
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Leaderboards - good or bad?
One of my personal yardstick of the goodness of an expedition is NOT the
total number of QSOs
8:17 PM
*Subject:* Re: [DX-CHAT] Leaderboards - good or bad?
One of my personal yardstick of the goodness of an expedition is
NOT the total number of QSOs made
as that depends entirely on the number of operators, stations and
the duration
but I like to look at the TOTAL
that for years anyway...
cheers
Dave G0OIL
- Original Message -
From: Zack Widup
To: dx-chat
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Leaderboards - good or bad?
Someone has pointed out recently that for DXCC requirements, you could get
by with 9 QSO's which
Besides, if DeSoto didn't come up with the idea, someone else would have.
Ryan, N2RJ
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Zack Widup w9sz.z...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I'm sure small pileups would develop occasionally to work some station.
But without DXCC, I doubt anyone would be risking their
H...made a $25 donation before the expedition started and no LOTW for
me.and another OQRS donation on top of that!
NF4A
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to
imail...@njdxa.org
In the
My QSOs showed up in LoTW today, too. I made a _very_ modest donation,
so it looks like everyone who donated any amount via the OQRS system can
expect their confirmations soon.
73,
Scott, N9AA
On 6/6/12 8:51 PM, JIM Abercrombie wrote:
Received LOTW confirmation today. Yes, I made a $25
One of my personal yardstick of the goodness of an expedition is NOT
the total number of QSOs made
as that depends entirely on the number of operators, stations and the
duration
but I like to look at the TOTAL QSOs made by the NUMBER of OPERATORS and
the NUMBER of DAYS taken into account
I think KQ8M's first comment in response to G7VJR's editorial is
on point. Clublog's Leaderboards should be modified to stop
counting at 11 band slots. 11 (or 12 if the operation works
six meters) allows a station to work the operation on each band
plus pick up QSOs on CW, Digital, and voice.
I don't really buy that argument. In the last days of a DXpedition,
they're usually begging.
Those who couldn't make a QSO probably couldn't make a QSO on a
completely clear band anyway. There is only so much you can work with
a dipole and 100 watts.
And finally, DXing is competitive.You can
I disagree. The last day of the Yemen DXpediition was the first day I
heard them well here in Colorado. There were still lots of callers.
Fortunately, I didn't need it, so I never got into the pileups.
ARRL created this mess when they expanded DXCC to include individual
band awards.
On 6/5/2012 4:39 PM, Ryan Jairam wrote:
I don't really buy that argument. In the last days of a DXpedition,
they're usually begging.
You obviously did not attempt to work 7O6T on RTTY. The Europeans
monopolized the few available RTTY band slots and even chased 7O6T
off RTTY many times in
Someone has pointed out recently that for DXCC requirements, you could get
by with 9 QSO's which would cover 160 through 10 meters. You only need one
QSO each on CW, SSB and RTTY, so you could either fit them in amongst your
9 QSO's, or make a total of 11 QSO's to satisfy DXCC requirements.
The
05, 2012 5:04 PM
To: rjai...@gmail.com; NJDXA DX Chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Leaderboards - good or bad?
I disagree. The last day of the Yemen DXpediition was the first day I
heard them well here in Colorado. There were still lots of callers.
Fortunately, I didn't need it, so I never got
_
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Zack Widup
Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 5:59 PM
To: dx-chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Leaderboards - good or bad?
Someone has pointed out recently that for DXCC requirements, you could get
by with 9 QSO's which would cover 160 through 10
Yes, check DX Summit.
Gerry VE6LB
-Original Message-
From: Dino Papas
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 9:33 AM
To: Mail List - NJDXA DX Chat
Subject: [DX-CHAT] A5A on RTTY?
Anyone seen any RTTY operation from A5A yet?
Good Hunting!
73 - Dino KL0S
The RTTY mode is not listed in their in the log page or the
leaderboard. I would assume this means they are not doing any RTTY on
this operation.
73, Zack W9SZ
On 5/31/12, Dino Papas k...@cox.net wrote:
Anyone seen any RTTY operation from A5A yet?
Good Hunting!
73 - Dino KL0S
Well, Jim, I think it is great service by ARRL's computer system.
Also, may be the explanation for high and permanent unemployment. Sorry
abt my comment.
73 Lou KE1F
On 5/29/2012 1:28 PM, JIM Abercrombie wrote:
I submitted my LOTW credits on-line Saturday and we had Memorial day
You can donate via Pay-Pal to the E-mail
address as follows:
d...@citypoint.ru
73
Fred - PY7ZZ
Em 22/05/2012 13:35, JIM Abercrombie escreveu:
On their webpage it says you can donate via paypal, but it does not say to whom
we are supposed to donate. It says to put your call
in the comment
If you use OQRS to QSL you can donate there.
At 12:35 PM 5/22/2012, JIM Abercrombie wrote:
On their webpage it says you can donate via paypal, but it does not
say to whom we are supposed to donate. It says to put your call
in the comment box of paypal, but where do we send the money?
Am I
1 - 100 of 3052 matches
Mail list logo
