On 7/9/07, Thom LaCosta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This mailing list's spam filter has blocked 3 attempts by me to reply
to this thread. I think spam filters are more likely to be blame for
the lack of communication being complained of than any failings at
Elecraft.
How do you know that?
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Julian G4ILO wrote:
How do you know that? Did you get a message saying it was blocked? Was
there a
reason?
Yes, I did get a bounce message back to say that my reply looked like
spam. Why a legitimate reply-to from a registered list member should
be considered spam I
Though I really hate adding to what seem to be mostly OT threads, I'm
going to do so here and this will be my only post on the subject.
Several weeks ago, a reflector member sent a message to me, asking
that I post it to THIS reflector on his behalf because every time HE
attempted to post it,
On 7/9/07, Tom Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, it doesn't take much... darn little, actually, to cause the
SPAM-COP detectors to start ringing.
Indeed. But why should that be so? This is a membership-only group.
There is no need for spam filtering. It wasn't important in this
particular
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is
not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of
spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see the
attempts here daily.
In general, if you get a bounce
Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is
not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of
spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see the
attempts here
This is woefully off-topic, but I cannot let this pass uncommented.
The quote in the previous post attributed to Franklin is one of many, many
misquotes floating around out there. The correct quote (see
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin and related links on that page)
is as
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is not
under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds of
spammers 'subscribe' to the list and attempt to post. We still see
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Tom Hammond wrote:
So, it doesn't take much... darn little, actually, to cause the SPAM-COP
detectors to start ringing.
Spamassasian allows the user to specify words that could cause a message to be
trappedit sounds fine in theory...but it's possible to enter a word
On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Thom LaCosta wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net,
and is not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had literally hundreds
of spammers
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Bob Nielsen wrote:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 9:12 AM, Thom LaCosta wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote:
The spam filtering is applied at our Elecraft list host, qth.net, and is
not under our control.
It is absolutely needed. Without it we have had
We do have a subscribe confirmation requirement - and the spammers still
get around it. qth.net and we are too big of a target.
Let's end this thread. Its taking up way too much bandwidth on the list.
Also, guys, please do not try to moderate the list. I'll jump in as
needed. If you think a
12 matches
Mail list logo
