evaluations I've done (not many)
all show a strong dependence on wire size.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
2000 Ringwood Ave.
San Jose, CA 95131-1749
V: 408-904-2081
F: 408-904-2095
M: 408-234-3529
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
conductor does.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
equipment) as a
requirement in your installation instructions, including its
isolating nature, its overvoltage protection character, and
that it must be safety certified
As imperfect as Option 3 is, it gets one over the safety
certification hump.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
ventilation
openings are blocked.
Whether or not the equipment is rack mounted, they're over
testing.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
-Original Message-
From: Ned Devine
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 12:19 PM
Hi,
For rack mounted equipment, UL requires all vent
to have the force of law. The Federal Register has
been in its present format for decades and is unlikely to
change any time soon.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
From: Mike Hopkins
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 12:42 PM
Info from outside the EU:
In the US, ANSI and others
noncompliance with the standard.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
2000 Ringwood Ave.
San Jose, CA 95131-1749
V: 408-904-2081
F: 408-904-2095
M: 408-234-3529
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Robert Johnson
Sent: Tuesday, November 25
Richard -
It has to start somewhere. Saying nothing returns the same.
Peter
From: richhug...@aol.com
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 9:42 AM
Peter,
The emc-pstc list is a good place to exchange ideas between
engineers but not a good forum for actioning change.
This message is from the
. Please consider making
the scope paragraphs of CEN standards available on-line, to
help standards users make best use of their available
funds.
I have not yet received any error messages, though it's only
been a few minutes since I sent my e-mail.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
is normally met with 'no one
else has complained,' so I hope that others of like mind
will participate in letting CEN know the community of
standards users need their help.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc
), Techstreet, whcich at
most only repeat the standard's title in the abstract.
Perhaps I'm overlooking an obvious source. Ideas anyone?
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our
. One can
only hope that no one is hurt in the meantime.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your
Thank you for the update, John. I didn't plan to look it
up; it's kind of you to do so for us.
The document contains a number of other items, not related
to reliance on enamel magnet wire as insulation. Could've
bounced on any or all accounts.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
I know I must purchase some standards, but I'd like to
minimize the financial hit. I'd appreciate opinions
regarding these three standards in particular:
That's one...two...thr...FOUR standards...yeah
four... (whudduh week)
EN ISO 4871:1996
EN ISO 9614-1:1995
EN ISO
requirements, though I may be misinterpreting the term
test code.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your
testing necessary, other than to
provide guidance to the final equipment assembler?
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc
than 2kVac specified in IEC60320-1.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
From: Rich Nute
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:07 PM
Hi Peter and Raymond:
Raymond doesn't have to do this.
The dimensions of the standard C14 specify 5 mm
between mains and PE. The dimensions
Raymond - Please see the below.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
From: Raymond Li
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 9:18 AM
Peter,
I am pleased to give you greater details below as
required.
What we don't know (or I've lost track of):
DK2) what mains connected
This is an old issue for some (from a 20MAR1998 FDA
advisory), but an interesting spectrum allocation issue for
your edification
http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/dtvalert.html
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
of the primary circuit involved in breaking down? This will
effect margins and pricing, but sometimes one must bite the
bullet to get into the market or meet a customer's time
constraint.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
impedance
test.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
feeling a little like AA Milne and William Goldman.
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel
.
I recommend you explore this option with the safety
certifier as a practical means of complying with the
production line testing requirements.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list
is not considered
Class II. One is simply limited to not marking with the
aforementioned symbol.
I'd appreciate hearing more from you on this Rich.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
From: Tyra, John
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:30 AM
Great answers Rich!
I do have one
they may be a source of danger to the public.
The standard covers manual, semi-automatic and automatic
equipment. For electric fence energizers, see IEC
60335-2-76. For electric fishing machines, see IEC
60335-2-86.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
This message is from the IEEE EMC
the vendor to update their certification
reports, if the product's manufacturing life will extend
beyond 1JAN2005.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
ptar...@ieee.org
From: am...@westin-emission.no
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 12:14 PM
Hi all,
We are looking for an adapter 240AC/24DC 60W
with the safety
certification houses to allow the earthing impedance test to
be performed with the power supply unsealed, between the
earthing pin, if a direct plug-in or permanently connected
power supply cord, and the point of earthing in the
secondary.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Derek
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 11:47 AM
In a message dated 10/22/2003 1:42:02 PM Central Daylight
Time, john_t...@bose.com writes:
I don't know what type
of these conductive structural resins
in their designs (within the limits of IP consideration).
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Wani, Vijay (V)
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:25 AM
Ken
instance. The
electrochemical potentials shown are geared toward battery
couples.
There are other issues recently brought to my attention that
I will also pursue to better understand the topic.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose
from the end points of others
This is an interesting exercise; both a refresher on
materials and chemistry, and a valuable learning experience.
'Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends...'
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San
the values shown in the
table.
I'd appreciate any input you might have.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion
Reg -
60950 is a product safety standard for ITE
60529 is an ingress protection reference standard for
outdoor use equipment/enclosures
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Reginald
, AS. spearca; akin to D.
spark, sperk; cf. Icel. spraka to crackle, Lith.
sprag[e]ti, Gr. ? a bursting with a noise, Skr. sph?rj to
crackle, to thunder. Cf. {Speak}.] 1. A small particle of
fire or ignited substance which is emitted by a body in
combustion.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety
edification,
irrespective of the content of the safety standard. I might
be inclined to do such a thing on equipment intended for
installation in a hazardous location. This is more a matter
of personal conscience and corporate cya.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
no.
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of
drcuthb...@micron.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 8:16 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: fan question
Question: During a locked fan rotor test do
FYI
http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/opinterview.jsp?id=ns241
21
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc
are
willing to provide their knowledge of additional standards.
I wonder if this will be an item of contention in TC108, as
IEC60065 and IEC60950-1 are blended into the hazard based
standard.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
Acrobat
format that have certain input fields secured, with others
not secured, allowing input of needed information.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Hans Mellberg
Sent: Monday, August
repost
From: Peter L. Tarver
[mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 7:58 AM
To: Emc-Pstc (E-mail)
Subject: RE: UL CSA standards date of expiry
Sylvia, Chris, et al -
I note that the dates on the web page differ from
those proposed by UL
will be.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Sylvia Toma
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 3:30 PM
Hello Chris,
Try this link. It should give you the
information that you're looking
for.
http
Richard -
I recall using that before, to good effect. I'd forgotten
about it. Thank you for the reminder.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Richard Hughes
Sent: Wednesday, August 27
vague, 60950-1 is flexible.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
2000 Ringwood Ave.
San Jose, CA 95131-1749
V: 408-904-2081
F: 408-904-2095
M: 408-234-3529
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003
, will meet the requirements
of the standard, since the intent is to use more plain
language than that.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Homologation Services
Sanmina-SCI Corp.
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 12:07
repost
From: Peter L. Tarver
[mailto:peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:49 AM
To: PSTC
Subject: fuse replacement markings
The following query relates to IEC60950:2000 and
-1, §1.7.6.
Is anyone aware of any CTL decisions for
IEC60950:2000 or -1, where
application.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Cole, Bryan
[LBRT/CCC]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:11 PM
This scenaro comes up often in our designs. We
typically use 0.010 or 0.020
standard that relies on UL746C (Standard for Polymeric
Materials; Use in Electrical Equipment Evaluations) as a
reference standard, you may have a number of other material
parameters to match up, on top of flammability
classification.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina
.
Many labs, however, will provide a template form DoC for
customers to sign. This is a service for inexperienced
companies who need a leg up. It is not the same as acting
as signatory.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar
From: Peter L. Tarver
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 7:18 AM
Where installation codes in the US and Canada apply,
separate PE terminals are required.
I misspoke here.
NFPA 70 (US NEC) §110-14 states, terminals for more than
one conductor and terminals used to connect aluminum shall
be so
currents flow that failure to
maintain tight equipotential bonding within the equipment
can cause significant interoperability issues. In such
cases, though, studs may be a poor choice and ground bars
and similar devices are better suited to the task.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety
These are protection standards. I can't attest to the links
providing the latest information, but this is a interesting
resource.
http://www.who.int/docstore/peh-emf/EMFStandards/who-0102/Wo
rldmap5.htm
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
/en/
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs
perusal shows it has what you need transcribed in
this document, though you may want the source standard.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
2000 Ringwood Ave.
San Jose, CA 95131-1749
V: 408-904-2081
F: 408-904-2095
M: 408-234-3529
peter.tar
on
other, perhaps less tangible benefits.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
The Krusty Grump
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail
I received what amounts to a courtesy response from NARTE
this morning. It only took four weeks and as many weekly
pleas for a response, including boosting the importance of
the last e-mail.
My confidence in the value of NARTE's program is uninspired.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product
Patricia -
Can you be more specific as to what standards are applicable
and what aspect of such testing you are looking for (EMC,
safety, operational, other)
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From
certain they'll give you the most correct information.
I do not think that UL60065 applies, but UL may have a
different story.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC
.
Interestingly enough, it appears to be available at CSA's
Japan site (in Japanese) at:
http://www.jqacsa.org/list/more/data10.htm
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC
I am looking for a back issue of the Journal of
Electrostatics: Volume 33, No. 1, 1994. Anyone mind
sharing?
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product
, Theater Certified For Canada
C22.2 No. 14-M91, Industrial Control Equipment.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Kevin Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 4:51 AM
I am trying to determine
L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: gr...@test4safety.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 2:48 PM
It’s also worth noting that NARTE will begin the
Grandfathering
phase for their Certified Product Safety
Engineer
be generated by flow or
agitation resulting in ignition or explosion.
eek!
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: brent.dew...@us.datex-ohmeda.com
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:26 PM
I got some weird
).
All only consider the first two IP characters. NEMA 250,
Appendix A, paragraph 1, indicates this is doe to NEMA
requirements not addressing corrosion, rust, icing, oil,
and coolants.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar
.
If it is anyone's intent to turn this into a boorish flame
war, let's get it on, but let's do it off the list.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Peter-
This appears to be a case of not reading the standard.
Please buy a copy and read it.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Peter Horvat
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:37 AM
Hi,
Can
.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Jan Heffken
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:11 AM
I realize this has nothing to do with EMC but I
am hoping someone can
guild me
of adding this device
and am hoping some assistance from the list.
The market for the product is primarily Asia-Pacific
(emphasis on Asia).
Anyone already been through this that's willing to lend a
hand?
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose
Bryan -
The only required markings are manufacturer's name and type
designation. Marking the flammability classification is
optional.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Cole, Bryan [LBRT
board could use a laminate that
would not also have that rating; one exception is if the fab
house also made the laminate (cake from scratch, where you
reap and winnow your own grain).
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar
house are
included in this category.
Laminate sheets may or may not be marked individually, but
the paper or other wrapping for a bundle should be labeled,
if the sheets are not.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina
. A quick check of
a couple of laminates Recognitions shows Marking: Company
name and material designation.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Greg Galluccio
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:26
of a telephone message received at a former employer. With
all due apologies to the caller (an intelligent person), the
message was from:
Brain Speck.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
for putting a yoke
on end-users.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Chris Maxwell
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:04 AM
our current thinking is that we don't need to
re-submit the GBICs
L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Kim Boll Jensen
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 1:55 AM
Hi all good people
Just a simple question.
When using a CD or DVD driver in a product (PC
To your advantage in using the 60950-1 standards, under the
scenario you painted.
Peter
From: Brian O'Connell
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 8:32 AM
According to EN60950-1, table 4B, note 1, a
winding temperature measured using embedded
thermocouples no longer requires the 10ºC
naming, it looks the same to me. This
ignores the 10ºC differential for using thermocouples.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Brian O'Connell
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 2:00 PM
Mr Hughes
and the testing is done in a 25C ambient, you're
right, the terms cancel out. But, if you product is
intended for use in a 40C ambient ad tested in a 25C
ambient, the term is nonzero and adjusts Tmax down by the
difference of the two ambient temperatures.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
. As in, passed
into law, or, passed away.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Richard Hughes
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 5:15 PM
Rich, Gregg,
The referenced
document is The Electricity at Work
John -
Or a lower potential test for mains connected equipment,
such as insulation resistance.
More complicated, but less deleterious, tests could include
an earth leakage current test or a touch current test.
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 12:19 PM
Repeated hi-pot
Ilan -
The test methods are entirely different and, therefore, the
result are not directly comparable.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Ilan Cohen [mailto:ico
save any
time over performing both tests.
I wouldn't place any bets that V-2 would pass the glow wire
test.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Ilan Cohen
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 5:01 AM
Guys
Bob -
Try the Standards Australia web site.
http://www.standards.com.au/
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Bob Heller
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 3:04 AM
I
of the equipment; -prevention of fire and its
spread.
EN60215 is referenced in the RTTE Directive and so applies
to your product, if the RTTE applies. From your company's
name, I suspect it does apply.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
2000 Ringwood
.
Answer to your trivia question - Per ISO 3684:1984, the
slash runs 10:00 to 4:00 for a prohibition sign. This is
not always followed, if the ISO 7000:1989, Symbol 0506, is
any example.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
. If this was the question, the
answer is no. If the question was intended to go beyond
this, then, certainly, the issues you mention and many
others, still need review.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From
L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Alexandru Guidea
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2003 9:47 AM
Dear colleagues,
As part of a PCB design required to be compliant
with EN60950, we want
Class 2 power sources, there is no need for any
additional testing to demonstrate compliance with LPS
requirements in UL60950. The LPS requirements are derived
from (though somewhat less stringent than) NEC Class 2
requirements.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI
Alice -
The answer to your questions is certifier dependant.
However, in most cases, the safety certifier mails the
reports to the factories and to their local field
product/factory auditors.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
of needle nose pliers (one with checkering on the jaws).
The residue literally cracks off and more times than not,
leaves a good bead intact.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from
flow over the bead
effecting the sensed temperature. Momentary removal of air
flow can serve as a cross-check, if there is a concern; the
interruption would have to be very short term, to avoid
building up of heat in the sensed part.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI
Bill -
If you're referring to what I think you are, it's fuller's
earth and waterglass, which is a clay-like mineral and
sodium silicate solution.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original
Amund -
I forgot to mention: or against the requirements in CSA22.2
No 60950-1-03/UL60950-1 (publication dated 1APR2003). This
should be your preferred standard for Canada and the US,
going forward.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
2000
watching this hen house. Crowing mode
OFF.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
From: Morse, Earl
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 8:10 AM
The emigration of PC manufacturing to the PAC rim is being
followed
.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Amund Westin
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:17 PM
If you have a Power supply unit tested according
to IEC60950 (1992) 2nd
Andre -
My understanding of the term dark fiber is identical to
Marko's. In the reading I've done, I've never seen it used
to refer to anything other than unused channels or fibers.
If you have other information, I would appreciate your
sharing the source.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:24 PM
Peter L. Tarver peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com wrote:
I also have a current need for this information and would
appreciate being copied on anything off the list.
Why off-list? It seems to me that a lot of people
would be interested
I also have a current need for this information and would
appreciate being copied on anything off the list.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p
.
I can provide a scanned copy to those who wish it.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: richwo...@tycoint.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:56 AM
21CFR1002.30(b
spaces below raised floors in ITE
rooms and references Article 645
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Cereceres, David
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 1:31 PM
Hello
of and read the
standard.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
-Original Message-
From: Alex McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:56 PM
Hi Forum,
Are there any ethernet and PCB
A circuits on 120V circuits; my
208 V circuits, which I can boost to 240V, are all 30 A.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
to accept and when we prefer to receive it.
Regards,
Peter L. Tarver, PE
Product Safety Manager
Sanmina-SCI Homologation Services
San Jose, CA
peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
