will be commencing work shortly on updating AS/NZS 3548 to align with
the latest version etc of CISPR etc. It is therefore not likely this will
be completed year. At this time it is not clear if the conducted emissions
requirements on telecom ports will be included in the new version or not.
Best regards,
Kevin
Hello group,
Does Australia implement (or plan to implement) limits for conducted emissions
on telecom ports as in EN 55022:1998?
Also, who makes T-LISNs for these tests?
Thanks,
David.
David Gelfand
Regulatory Approvals
Memotec Communications Inc.
Montreal Canada
Separator
_
Subject: Re: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Author: Ken Javor SMTP:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com at ADEMCONET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/8/2000 5:31 PM
The point is that RE/CE protect broadcast bands. Making an RE measurement
...@transition.com
To: ieee pstc list emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 1:35 PM
Subject: RE: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Has anyone seen problems with ethernet and conducted emissions? I have a
home office with 4 PCs networked with ethernet running over UTP and I
, 2000 8:37 AM
To: Gary McInturff; Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com;
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Reference CISPR 22:1997, Clause 3.5
telecommunication ports
Ports which are intended to be connected to telecommunication networks (e.g.
public switched
...@ieee.org
Subject: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Date: Fri, Sep 8, 2000, 3:51 AM
Ken and Cortland and many others that entered this subject :
First, radiated emissions are best measured with radiated (not conducted)
measurements. There is a correlation between CM currents and RE
...@compuprint.it]
Reply To: Paolo Roncone
Sent: Friday, September 08, 2000 3:51 AM
To: 'Ken Javor'; 'Cortland Richmond'
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org'
Subject: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Ken and Cortland and many others that entered this subject :
First, radiated
.
Regards,
Eric Lifsey
Please respond to Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com
To: Eric Lifsey/AUS/NIC@NIC, emc-p...@ieee.org
cc:
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
This sort of question has already come up in CISPR SC G (the owner of CISPR
22). There is a CDV (Committee Draft
is our next step to get a formal review?
David
__ Reply Separator
_
Subject: R: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Author: Paolo Roncone SMTP:paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it at ADEMCONET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
-
From: Ken Javor ken.ja...@emccompliance.com
To: michael.sundst...@nokia.com; paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it;
eric.lif...@ni.com
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
So you are saying that an emission limit
'
Oggetto:Re: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Although I don't work commercial EMC on a regular basis and I do not know
over what frequency range the telecom port CE are controlled (I assume here
150 kHz - 30 MHz), I believe that there is a mistaken premise inherent in
the comments
Hi All,
I could not resist adding my two cents worth. In the last
several years I spent at Bell Labs in NJ (moved to CA 4 1/2
years ago), part of my funding came from a group that was
responsible for UTP (Cat 5) and associated hardware. On
immunity performance, we were not able to find a
.
--
From: Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
To: 'eric.lif...@ni.com' eric.lif...@ni.com
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Date: Thu, Sep 7, 2000, 9:45 AM
Hi Eric,
I 100% agree with you. The scope of emissions standard should
[SMTP:eric.lif...@ni.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 6 settembre 2000 17.55
A:emc-p...@ieee.org
Oggetto: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
All,
As a not-quite-outside-observer (strictly EN 55011 here) of this
thread, it's
not fun seeing LAN ports classified as telecom; IMO that's
Emissions on Telecom Ports
Hi all,
just thought I'd throw a few Euros in...
First, until folks in the computer world know what shielded cable means (
anything less that 40 dB is lossy insulation;-))) ), I'd stear clear of
specifying them. This is 20 years of experience talking, and shields
anything else would be covered by immunity
standards.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Cortland Richmond [mailto:72146@compuserve.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:01 AM
To: Paolo Roncone; ieee pstc list
Subject: Re: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Paolo Roncone wrote
.3com.com; c...@prodigy.net; cet...@cetest.nl
Cc: emc-p...@ieee.org; gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com;
john_mo...@eur.3com.com
Sent: 9/7/00 6:09 AM
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Hello Group,
North America has likely the largest installed base of Ethernet,
Fast
.
--
From: Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
To: 'eric.lif...@ni.com' eric.lif...@ni.com
Cc: 'emc-p...@ieee.org' emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Date: Thu, Sep 7, 2000, 9:45 AM
Hi Eric,
I 100% agree with you. The scope of emissions standard should
Hi all,
just thought I'd throw a few Euros in...
First, until folks in the computer world know what shielded cable means (
anything less that 40 dB is lossy insulation;-))) ), I'd stear clear of
specifying them. This is 20 years of experience talking, and shields seem to
cause more problems
...@compuprint.it
Subj: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Chrg: $0.00 Imp: Norm Sens: StdReceipt: NoParts: 1
From: Paolo Roncone paolo.ronc...@compuprint.it
Subject: R: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 16:45:03 +0200
Reply
[SMTP:eric.lif...@ni.com]
Inviato:mercoledì 6 settembre 2000 17.55
A: emc-p...@ieee.org
Oggetto:Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
All,
As a not-quite-outside-observer (strictly EN 55011 here) of this thread, it's
not fun seeing LAN ports classified as telecom; IMO
the installation you
must use STP everywhere. Therefore invoke the STP loophole.
David Sterner
ADEMCO Syosset NY
__ Reply Separator
_
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Author: Gert Gremmen SMTP:cet
: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 10:40 AM
To: Pryor McGinnis
Cc: david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org;
gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com; John Moore
Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Pryor,
Unfortunately, I don't think the definition is in question. It
specifically
states
cc:(Chris Allen/GB/3Com)
Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
I do not disagree with the positions posted on this subject. My question is
how does the EU interpret and enforce this requirement/definition.
Pryor
- Original Message -
From: david_ster...@ademco.com
.
David
__ Reply Separator
_
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Author: Mowbray; John H SMTP:jm134...@exchange.canada.ncr.com at
ADEMCONET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/5/2000 12:06 PM
Gary
If you
__ Reply Separator
_
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Author: Gary McInturff SMTP:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com at
ADEMCONET
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date:9/5/2000 10:54 AM
'; Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com;
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject:RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Define telecom port.
A LAN port isn't neccessarily a LAN port. Ethernet ports do
not
connect directly to the Telecommunications network
-
From: Pryor McGinnis [mailto:c...@prodigy.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 8:37 AM
To: Gary McInturff; Pettit, Ghery; david_ster...@ademco.com;
emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Reference CISPR 22:1997, Clause 3.5
telecommunication ports
Ports which
Subject: Re: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Confusing isn't?
- Original Message -
From: Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com
To: david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org; c...@prodigy.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Confusing isn't?
- Original Message -
From: Pettit, Ghery ghery.pet...@intel.com
To: david_ster...@ademco.com; emc-p...@ieee.org; c...@prodigy.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions on Telecom Ports
Actually, it's
30 matches
Mail list logo
