McNamara [mailto:mcnam...@umn.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:29 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Do it yourself safety reports?
A client is asking if it is practical to do their own 60950 safety reports for
CE.
The device is battery powered, low power RF (they would have
A client is asking if it is practical to do their own 60950 safety reports
for CE.
The device is battery powered, low power RF (they would have complete EMC
testing done at a lab).
Thanks in advance for your suggestions.
Thanks for all the great past advice!
Curt
: Amund Westin [mailto:am...@westin-emission.no]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 9:31 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Safety tests of transformers
LVD testing of transformers are according to the EN 61558 series.
Which subpart will apply for an oil filled isolation transformer?
EN
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion
list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc
Amund,
I don't think you can apply Exemptions to the RoHS directive across the
definition of "Safety Critical Products" unless your product clearly falls
within the exempt equipment called out in Article 2 paragraph 4. Parts of your
product or components can fall under nume
ROHS mention some exemption of products in the latest directive (Article
2 in 2011/64/EU).
What about so called "Safety critical products", such as IEC61508
certified products ... are they outside the ROHS scope? I do not think
so, but I have heard rumors that it might be outside, so
[mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 12:39 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] US electrical safety standard for product tested to EN
60204?
Curt,
NFPA 79 is harmonized with EN 60204. The US differences are
clearly
this more offline if you wish.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
<mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
From: Curtis McNamara [mailto:mcn
Hi Curt,
I believe UL1647 and CSA C22.2 No. 68 would be the Standards for USA and Canada.
Best Regards,
John
John Allen | President
Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department
www.productsafetyinc.com<http://www.productsafetyinc.com>
630-238-0188
On Dec 3, 20
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
...@esterline.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 11:24 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Which Safety Test Agency Reports are
accepted by City of LA Test Lab (please provide text of requirement or code)
It was always my impression way back then that the case
[mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 11:10 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] Which Safety Test Agency Reports are accepted by
City of LA Test Lab (please provide text of requirement or code)
Hi Leo:
LA requires NRTL certification. (I saw no
]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 11:22 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Which Safety Test Agency Reports are accepted by City of LA
Test Lab (please provide text of requirement or code)
Hi All,
I am working with a client that will be installing a pretty big medical device
oduct Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department
www.productsafetyinc.com<http://www.productsafetyinc.com>
630-238-0188
On Nov 23, 2016, at 4:35 AM, Kevin Robinson
mailto:kevinrobinso...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Leo,
The City of LA maintains an online list of laborat
LA code or
> similar would be really great to get too.
>
> Thx much,
>
> Leonard (Leo) Eisner, P.E.
> Principal Consultant, Eisner Safety Consultants
> Phone: (503) 244-6151
> Mobile: (503) 709-8328
> Email: l...@eisnersafety.com
> Website: www.EisnerSafety.com <htt
code or similar would be really great to get too.
Thx much,
Leonard (Leo) Eisner, P.E.
Principal Consultant, Eisner Safety Consultants
Phone: (503) 244-6151
Mobile: (503) 709-8328
Email: l...@eisnersafety.com
Website: www.EisnerSafety.com
*** Internet E-mail Confidentiality
ylvae in aeternum manent.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Javor [mailto:ken.ja...@emccompliance.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2016 2:10 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Remember the RCA Victor record album picture of th
Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
>
> Interchannel phase differences *measurably* alter the stereo image. Phase
> difference between voltage and current has no effect unless a non-minimum
> phase device is involved.
>
> 'Live versus recorded' demo
I'm assuming they recorded it on Memorex:)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tarver [mailto:ptar...@enphaseenergy.com]
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 3:58 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Some of the articles I'
floor
about 2/3 back from the stage. I couldn't tell
the difference. Midway through the opening
overture, the orchestra put down their instruments
and walked offstage, but the music kept playing.
Rich
-
This message is from t
: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Some of the articles I'd read in some magazine or other (copies available if
you know Mr. Peabody and his boy Sherman), stated some equipment designers
were paying extraordinarily close attention to mainta
gt;
>
> > From: Peter Tarver
> > Reply-To: Peter Tarver
> > Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:37:04 +
> > To:
> > Conversation: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other
> than safety!
> > Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other
> than safety
that is all software and digital circuitry: no fancy audiophile equipment
necessary.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
> From: Peter Tarver
> Reply-To: Peter Tarver
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:37:04 +
> To:
> Conversation: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety
------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-ps
directives:
- Electro Magnetic Compatibility 2004/108/EC
- Electrical Safety 2006/95/EC
- Medical Devices 93/42/EC
- Radio & Telecommunication Terminal Equipment 99/5/EC
+ Improvement of Product Quality and Reliability testing
+ Education
Web: www.cetest.nl (English)
P
sation: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
I recommend reading the ad copy from Audioquest. Some of the more
interesting claims are for their HDMI cables, but their web site is full of
interesting reading.
Sounds like they are made with diamonds.
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 8:44 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
I recommend reading the ad copy from Audioquest
my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
> employer.
>
>
> From: Bfr [mailto:bfr...@direct.ca]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 10:08 PM
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
>
> As they say
Eckert
The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
From: Bfr [mailto:bfr...@direct.ca]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 10:08 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
As they say - "OMG!
rgisticresearch.com/sr-quantum-fuses-review/
>
>
>
>Rich
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-
>----
>This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
>emc-pstc discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your
>e-mail to
>
>All emc-pstc postings are
(256) 650-5261
From: Ken Javor
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:54:50 -0400
To:
Conversation: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
In the USA anyway, there is no need for a lawyer to review marketing claims
that a
ey are.
And don¹t bother telling the emperor he is naked. It¹s not appreciated.
Ken Javor
Phone: (256) 650-5261
From: Dan Roman
Reply-To: Dan Roman
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 22:13:29 -0400
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
I think their guarantee sa
pany that has a good lawyer to review the weasel
words!
--Dan romandan.ro...@ieee.org
Original message
From: Richard Nute
Date: 8/22/16 7:12 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
If you
;John Woodgate' ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
If you put a carefully-chosen fuse in series with a loudspeaker, you can
measure intermodulation distortion in the voice-coil current due to the element
changing its resistance
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 4:12 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
If you put a carefully-chosen fuse in series with a loudspeaker, you can
measure intermodulation
remarkable performance of our original SR20 Quantum Fuses.”
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc
even the same
amp and a different speaker)?
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 22 August 2016 23:15
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
That doesn't work, either.
I am sure is a well-reasoned
approach to the subject)!
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: 22 August 2016 23:15
To: 'john Allen'; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 10:25 PM
To: 'John Woodgate' ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: RE: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Link doesn't work for me. I'm devastated. (;-)
Try:
http://www.synergisticresearch.co
blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 10:52 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
OK, anyone have any ideas on what “effects” changing a fuse to one of those
referred to “might” have (I don’t, except that possibly somet
)?
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: john Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 22 August 2016 22:07
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
Anything is “possible” – just depends on your perspective and your “need
hether the fuses and power cords are certified.)
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc po
affect performance other than safety!
The “proper” fuse can make a difference in audio quality (sarcasm). See the
audio review of replacing an ordinary fuse with a Black Quantum fuse (for only
USD 119):
http://www.synergisticresearch.com/sr-quantum-fuses-review/
Rich
: Monday, August 22, 2016 8:40 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Fuses can affect performance other than safety!
The “proper” fuse can make a difference in audio quality (sarcasm). See the
audio review of replacing an ordinary fuse with a Black Quantum fuse (for only
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not
Just a tiny bit off-topic, but an interesting analysis of functional safety in
motor-control systems, from Analog Devices' Tom Meany, a member of IEC
SC22/MT12, working on the second draft of IEC 61800-5-2
http://bit.ly/2aQOwdT
Cheers,
Barry Rowland
Muenchen
On 4 August 2016 23:18:42
to be in compliance with the proper
component (safety) standard(s). Even Intertek and UL stay far away from the
word "safe." "Safety" testing is done by product standard. UL 508 and the like
have sections to deal with control systems. The best I've seen was actually in
I am working with the big W now and they seem to take their compliance
seriously.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2016 5:55 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
At least Walmart has
At least Walmart has a policy regarding the safety of the products it sells:
http://corporate.walmart.com/suppliers/minimum-requirements
http://cdn.corporate.walmart.com/d1/7e/ee6f5c8942f69ad4183bc0683771/standards-for-suppliers-manual.pdf
The manual covers a lot of stuff, and is simply stated
I'm sure others might do also!
John E Allen
W.London, UK
-Original Message-
From: Ralph McDiarmid [mailto:ralph.mcdiar...@schneider-electric.com]
Sent: 02 August 2016 21:17
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
I wonder how Walmart, K-Mart,
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Afternoon
Interesting article on ECMWEB - "OSHA Cites Macy's, The Finish Line for
Electrical Shock Hazards"
(http://ecmweb.com/shock-electrocution/osha-cites-macys-finish-line-electrical-shock-hazards?NL=ECM-04&Issue=ECM-04_20160801_EC
At Graco Inc. (manufacturer of industrial pumps and sprayers, not the other,
baby products Graco) we're looking for a 4th engineer in our product safety and
compliance group. Perky HR blurb and job description link are below; contact me
directly for pertinent details beyond the on
42&cl=article_7&utm_rid=CPG0400025478&utm_campaign=9488&utm_medium=email&elq2=5b6bd213b60e495db5acd4a96d11a708)
Makes me wonder what their management control of the stuff they buy in to sell
to customers is like if this is how they "manage" s
-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Dave:
“Common denominator” thinking would have the people of Ohio paying for a
product that would have California earthquake protection capability. Also, I
doubt that California customers would be happy with products that would
employment for compliance
engineers (both writing and interpreting it).
Ed Price
WB6WSN
Chula Vista, CA USA
-Original Message-
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 5:59 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
> I cannot see a reason not to have a federal installation code for all
> 50 states. The hodgepodge of local rules and regulations seems, on
> the surface, unnecessarily
> complicated.
is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee-pses.org/emc-pstc.html
Attachments are not permitted but the IEEE PSES Online Communi
Product Compliance
Engineering
Solar Business
Schneider Electric
From: John Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 3:23 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
What a web of “interconnecting” (and not!) US regulations
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieee
multi-mode chargers and 'adaptive' EPS are
not directly covered, but test conditions may be inferred from 10CFR430.
Brian
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:44 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer.
From: Scott Xe [mailto:scott...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2016 10:41 AM
To: Ted Eckert ; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Hi Ted,
Regarding local requirements in a state, county or city, how
m: *Ted Eckert
> *Date: *Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 1:22 AM
> *To: *Raymond Li , "EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG" <
> EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
> *Subject: *RE: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
>
>
>
> Hello Scott,
>
>
>
> The CPSC list you provided
2016 at 3:47 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
And, by the way, don't forget the Department of Energy regulates External Power
Supplies. The whole Level VI thing.
On Jul 26, 2016 10:38 AM, "Ted Eckert"
<07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org> wrote:
one state to the other?
Regards,
Scott
From: Ted Eckert
Date: Wednesday, 27 July 2016 at 1:22 AM
To: Raymond Li , "EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG"
Subject: RE: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Hello Scott,
The CPSC list you provided a link to covers mandator
a link to covers mandatory national
> requirements for products covered by the CPSC. The key words are “national”
> and “mandatory”. There is no mandatory national safety requirement for
> televisions, refrigerators or many other consumer electrical products. OSHA
> has requirements for
Hello Scott,
The CPSC list you provided a link to covers mandatory national requirements for
products covered by the CPSC. The key words are “national” and “mandatory”.
There is no mandatory national safety requirement for televisions,
refrigerators or many other consumer electrical products
requirements, ie. Consumer product safety act under below link
http://www.cpsc.gov/en/Regulations-Laws--Standards/Regulations-Mandatory-Standards-Bans/
I only found very few products related to above category such as Hair Dryers.
No TVs, audios, MWOs, refrigerators, PCs, etc. in the list
NESC and NETA {2013} are both ANSI standards and are both pretty much aimed at
the utility-distribution crowd: aka, 4 kV and above. Colorado Brian Gregory
720-450-4933
-- Original Message --
From: John Allen
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety
W.London, UK
From: Scott Douglas [mailto:sdouglas...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 July 2016 03:59
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
And not to confuse the issue even more, but then there is the N.E.S.C. -
National Electrical Safety Code (or nowadays ANSI
From: Scott DouglasSent: Monday, July 25, 2016 8:59 PMTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGReply To: Scott DouglasSubject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
And not to confuse the issue even more, but then th
And not to confuse the issue even more, but then there is the N.E.S.C. -
National Electrical Safety Code (or nowadays ANSI Standard C2) published
by IEEE. Adopted in most states in some fashion, except for California
which does its own thing. I think this one is primarily aimed at
utilities
various NEC versions enacted locally
(most, but not all, have adopted 2014) vs the referenced product safety
standard that would be used to verify compliance by the AHJ. And the OSHA
cannot affect any force for an organizing change as their statue scopes only
workp
NEC is specifically NFPA 70, otherwise known as the National Electrical Code. Sent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App-- Original Message --From: Brian O'ConnellTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGSent: July 25, 2016 at 7:26 PMSubject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
By 'NEC&quo
more NFPA elements in the scope
statements. So the references are intended to be circular.
Brian
From: Richard Nute
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 2:15:11 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
"Each NRTL has
And a predecessor company to Intertek (Electrical Testing Laboratories) was
founded by Thomas Edison in 1896.
-Dave
From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 6:52 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in
br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
<mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
From: Scott [mailto:0182a58d8335-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Monday, July
ducts with a fairly broad scope of what
they can do. NRTL only covers safety standards for a few laboratories and is
much narrower in scope than A2LA.
Ted Eckert
Microsoft Corporation
The opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of my
employer, OSHA or A2LA. Your mile
certifies
products to.
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and
time?
>
> One common example of committees protecting their areas of interest is food
> safety. Let’s say you want to buy lunch at Taco Bell. (I wouldn’t recommend
> it, but it works for this example.) You order a beef burrito and it is
> covered under the food safety regulati
banned 40
years ago because of domestic spying abuses. Will it work better this time?
One common example of committees protecting their areas of interest is food
safety. Let’s say you want to buy lunch at Taco Bell. (I wouldn’t recommend it,
but it works for this example.) You order a beef
Brexit and other forces presently at
work.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
<mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
From: John Woodgate
out - http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/symposium/index.html.
Be Safe!
John
From: Pete Perkins <0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 12:47 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
>From the WEB: NRTL Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories, or NRTLs, are
>third party organizations recognized by the Occupational Safety and Health
>Administration (OSHA) under Federal code 29 CFR 1910.7 to provide product
>safety testing and certification services for prod
proof of compliance with the
NEC.
The US safety requirements for products are from ANSI standards.
For the products that I most commonly work with UL is important in developing
the standards and closely works with the US committees as well as the
corresponding IEC committee
certify a sample or production? Understand UL listed
certifies both sample and production.
Sorry for my silly questions as you know I am just a new comer in this area.
From: Pete Perkins
Date: Monday, 25 July 2016 at 11:55 PM
To: Raymond Li ,
Subject: RE: [PSES] Safety
Hi John,
What is exact meaning of NRTL approved? Is it a sample for type examination
against applicable safety standard without production audits?
What are the differences between A2LA and NRTL?
From: "Tyra, John"
Reply-To: "Tyra, John"
Date: Monday, 25 July
reports at the same time for a savings in effort
and cost.
:>) br, Pete
Peter E Perkins, PE
Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Affairs Consultant
PO Box 23427
Tigard, ORe 97281-3427
503/452-1201
<mailto:p.perk...@ieee.org> p.perk...@ieee.org
F
Some states have legal requirements for electrical products to be NRTL approved
From: Richard Nute [mailto:ri...@ieee.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 8:26 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Hi Scott:
For consumer and household products, compliance
OSHA has an exception for custom machinery that is self-certified by the
manufacturer.
-Dave
From: Kevin Robinson [mailto:kevinrobinso...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 9:16 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Scott,
>>> What about
What is the best practice for the suppliers/importers to demonstrate the
compliance with relevant requirements?
NRTL certified.
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
recall order.
What about OSHA?
Electrical products that are used by employees are required to be NRTL
certified.
Best regards,
Rich
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
bout OSHA? Is it applicable too
> or to certain product categories only?
>
>
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Richard Nute
> *Reply-To: *
> *Date: *Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 4:02 AM
> *To: *Raymond Li ,
> *Subject: *RE: [PSES] Safety requ
Thanks for all your responses!
What is the best practice for the suppliers/importers to demonstrate the
compliance with relevant requirements?
Scott
From: Ron Wellman
Reply-To: Ron Wellman
Date: Sunday, 24 July 2016 at 12:14 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
: Raymond Li ,
Subject: RE: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Within EU, most of electrical products are covered by LVD and GPSD. In US,
which body, law and standards are responsible for the similar regulatory?
In the USA, we have a number of entities that oversee electrical safety
Within EU, most of electrical products are covered by LVD and GPSD. In US,
which body, law and standards are responsible for the similar regulatory?
In the USA, we have a number of entities that oversee electrical safety:
AHJ, enforcing the local (state, county, or city) electrical
: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Ultimately, everything goes up to the Code of Federal Regulations, CFR. These
are the law of the land. You can find the regulations that both OSHA and CPSC
follow there. In turn, each state has their own set of laws, for
] Safety requirements in US
Actually, I think FDA, FCC, FTA, USDA, CDC, Homeland Security, etc. all report
up to the CFR.
Doug
From: Nyffenegger, Dave
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 8:32 AM
To: Doug Powell; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG <mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subje
From: Nyffenegger, DaveSent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 8:32 AMTo: Doug Powell; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGSubject: RE: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Anything with a laser
: Kevin RobinsonSent: Saturday, July 23, 2016 2:47 AMTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGReply To: Kevin RobinsonSubject: Re: [PSES] Safety requirements in US
Scott, In the US, the regulations rounds on the type of
then FDA regs apply
Most products fall under multiple regulators as for example, a hospital is both
a medical space as well as a workplace. Thankfully, most us regulations
reference voluntary consensus standards so one round of testing will often
satisfy all safety regulators.
Kevin Robinson
401 - 500 of 3779 matches
Mail list logo
