Richard Acosta wrote:
> well.. being 3.43AM, and some minutes since my last message.
> I can't believe this.
>
> I waked up from my bed, turned on the computer, came back to bed and
> connected using VNC from the laptop to make a test and post the debug
> info correctly this time if i could and
Richard, muchas gracias :)
thank you - don't hesitate to come back for help and don't hesitate to
help when you can
Stuart
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Richard Acosta wrote:
> well.. being 3.43AM, and some minutes since my last message.
> I can't believe this.
>
> I waked up from my bed, tu
well.. being 3.43AM, and some minutes since my last message.
I can't believe this.
I waked up from my bed, turned on the computer, came back to bed and
connected using VNC from the laptop to make a test and post the debug
info correctly this time if i could and even capture a motion screen to
Richard Acosta wrote:
>[snip]
>
>No John... i'm not wrong, i think you don't understand me.
>
>I said..
>1) when using Ted Hyde's files, i got the dmesg ending with "unknown
>command line xx" always talking about the same line on the same file
>every time the same since 2.2.6, then 2.2.7, and...
Stuart, i'm sorry, there is a mistake, somewhere on my pastebin posts...
sorry, but will check that before give you an answer.
El 22/12/2008 02:33 a.m., Stuart Stevenson escribió:
> Richard,
>You do NOT understand! The messages you type do not agree with the
> posts you send. You must make s
Hey Richard
How are you starting emc?
_
Keep in touch and up to date with friends and family. Make the connection now.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/
-
Sebastian, you cant plonk... i should plonk there is something
wrong... those were not the files i tryed to send the last time, they
seem like the first files i send when having the firmware load error.
If the website is working fine... i guess my browser (firefox) is
bringing something fro
El 22/12/2008 12:52 a.m., Rafael Skodlar escribió:
> Richard, this kind of response gives open source bad name. You have a
> situation where something worked OK for others but not for you. I assume
> that when they got it working on some systems they assumed it's OK and
> put it on the list. Happen
El 21/12/2008 11:56 p.m., John Kasunich escribió:
> You can say this 100 times, and all you are going to do is piss off the
> people who are trying to support you 100 times!
>
> We want to see the exact text that you are typing on the command line,
> and the exact response you get from your compute
Richard,
You do NOT understand! The messages you type do not agree with the
posts you send. You must make sure the information you send is good
information. It is YOUR responsibility to answer correct. You MUST
make sure the information you send is the information that answers the
question asked
El 21/12/2008 11:47 p.m., Kenneth Lerman escribió:
> Have it your way. Don't post it again. If you don't care enough to find
> the posting and post it again, why should anyone else care enough to go
> searching for your previous posting?
>
Where would i find my postings if i don't receive my o
Richard Acosta wrote:
> El 21/12/2008 06:42 p.m., Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>> Richard Acosta wrote:
>>
>>> El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>>>
Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dme
El 21/12/2008 11:22 p.m., Jim Coleman escribió:
> Richard, I think there might be a misunderstanding.
That's something where we can agree.
> Every time that emc crashes, it creates a dmesg file that tells what was
> going on and what happened when it crashed. the guys that are way better
> than
Richard Acosta wrote:
>
> Now, i have posted the computer specs, i have posted the config files
> used, i have now made a new install to upgrade to 2.2.8, and... voilá..
> the suppossedly to work config does not work.
>
> I guess there must be some people trying to help, ok, and i'm v
Richard Acosta wrote:
> El 21/12/2008 06:42 p.m., Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>> Richard Acosta wrote:
>>
>>> El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>>>
Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dme
Enough already. The word "Plonk" comes to mind.
Richard Acosta wrote:
> El 21/12/2008 06:42 p.m., Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>> Richard Acosta wrote:
>>
>>> El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>>>
Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
El 21/12/2008 06:42 p.m., Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
> Richard Acosta wrote:
>
>> El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>>
>>> Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
>>> Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dmesg output and any other
>>> r
>> Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
>> Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dmesg output and any other
>> relevant logs, then email us the pastebin URL.
>>
>
> HAVE POSTED THE MESSAGES SEVERAL TIMES ¿SHOULD I POST AGAIN WHAT I
> POSTED ALREADY?
>
> cmo
El 21/12/2008 05:42 p.m., John Kasunich escribió:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Richard Acosta wrote:
>>
>>> Is nothing about lazyness... is about being tired of to do something
>>> that is supossed to work.. and it does not! again and again and again.
>>>
El 21/12/2008 05:37 p.m., Stuart Stevenson escribió:
>> "Acercar linea 10 en /usr/shareaxis/images/axis.ngc: bad character "x" used"
>>
>
> this message tells you there is something wrong near line 10 of the file:
> /usr/shareaxis/images/axis.ngc
>
> it even tells you what is wrong:
> bad char
El 21/12/2008 05:45 p.m., Peter C. Wallace escribió:
>> When going your lazy path i got the following two messages.
>> "Acercar linea 10 en /usr/shareaxis/images/axis.ngc: bad character "x" used"
>>
> No Idea, I sure didnt see anything like this.
>
> Is this a new 2.2.8 installation? Maybe its
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Arnold Riter CNC
wrote:
> Hello to everybody,
>
> I'd like to thanks you all for the information which make me able to
> carry out the conversion of a BF20 mill to CNC.
> I've been using cnc for a while with windows based program, and emc2.
> When I decided to use
Hello to everybody,
I'd like to thanks you all for the information which make me able to
carry out the conversion of a BF20 mill to CNC.
I've been using cnc for a while with windows based program, and emc2.
When I decided to use servos in my last project , it was clear for me
that the option of
Richard Acosta wrote:
> El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
>> Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
>> Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dmesg output and any other
>> relevant logs, then email us the pastebin URL.
>>
>
> HAVE POSTED THE ME
doesn't seem fishy to me if he doesn't have an X axis
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:42 PM, John Kasunich wrote:
> Stuart Stevenson wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Richard Acosta wrote:
>>> Is nothing about lazyness... is about being tired of to do something
>>> that is supossed to work..
On 21 Dec 2008 at 17:01, Richard Acosta wrote:
>
> "RTAPI:: ERROR: Unespected realtime delay on task 1
> This Message will only display once per session.
> Run the Latency Test and resolve before continuing"
>
You really should resolve this error before going any further.
http://www.linuxcnc
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Richard Acosta wrote:
> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 17:01:00 -0200
> From: Richard Acosta
> Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
>
> To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] EMC 2.2.7 + 7i43 + Ted's sample,
> and same error than using E
Stuart Stevenson wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Richard Acosta wrote:
>> Is nothing about lazyness... is about being tired of to do something
>> that is supossed to work.. and it does not! again and again and again.
>>
>> When going your lazy path i got the following two messages.
>>
>>
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Richard Acosta wrote:
> Is nothing about lazyness... is about being tired of to do something
> that is supossed to work.. and it does not! again and again and again.
>
> When going your lazy path i got the following two messages.
>
> "Acercar linea 10 en /usr/share
El 20/12/08 17:39, Sebastian Kuzminsky escribió:
> Without seeing what's happening on your computer, we can not help.
> Do what produces the error, then pastebin the dmesg output and any other
> relevant logs, then email us the pastebin URL.
>
HAVE POSTED THE MESSAGES SEVERAL TIMES ¿SHOULD
Is nothing about lazyness... is about being tired of to do something
that is supossed to work.. and it does not! again and again and again.
When going your lazy path i got the following two messages.
"Acercar linea 10 en /usr/shareaxis/images/axis.ngc: bad character "x" used"
"RTAPI:: ERROR: Un
Gentlemen,
I posted this http://pastebin.ca/1290847.
It is the A and B axis compensation I have been working on. I don't
have it coded for EMC. I will work on that.
I posted it for a week expiration.
grab if you want
critique if you want - I would like that
question?
thanks
Stuart
-
32 matches
Mail list logo
