On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:40:16 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> said:
>
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Carsten Haitzler
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 18:17:28 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > said:
>> >
>> >> On 1/23/10, Car
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:51:22 +0900 Tom Haste said:
> This might be a stupid question, but was there any crond jobs that
> include any apt upgrades or some other automated magic? If it is a
> stupid question, feel free to give a stupid answer.
if there were... they wouldnt use "su"... theyd just
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:12:39 -0800 Michael Jennings said:
> On Sunday, 24 January 2010, at 23:45:49 (-0200),
> Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>
> > > So there seems to be a big ol' dpkg running on e2
> > > Owned either by Inc or barbieri
> >
> > I did not run this, I'm pretty sure. And how i
On Monday, 25 January 2010, at 13:52:46 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> it was all owned by root
Well, obviously. :) I was thinking he'd have used pstree to identify
who started the process, but clearly that's not the case
> i think he was basing it off who was logged in at the time. :)
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
Vincent
> Author: quaker
> Date: 2010-01-25 10:53:21 -0800 (Mon, 25 Jan 2010)
> New Revision:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
>
> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
i would like to add that, before giving giving svn righ
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>
>>> Log:
>>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
>>
>> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
>
> i would like to add that, before giving giving svn rights to someone, we
> usually like th
I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
the process.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Quaker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>>
Log:
New e17 packager -
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Quaker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
>>>
Log:
New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
>>>
>>> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
>>
>> i would like to add that, before giving gi
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
> the process.
it's not our job to package our libs and binaries... It's the job of the
package managers o
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Houston wrote:
> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
> the process.
It's a common process and good practice to let people first send patch
to the ML,
On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
>
>> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
>> use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
>> the process.
>
> it's not our job to package
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42 +0100, Quaker wrote :
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >>
> >>> Log:
> >>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> >>
> >> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
> >
> > i would like to add th
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> >> use of our software, then packages/packager
On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre
wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houston wrote:
>>>
I don't think this is a problem... If we are intereste
On this server, having user on server is connected with svn account. They
don't commit, it is just for those ssh reasons. I know it is not a best way.
I'll prepare some new system for next freeze.
2010/1/25 Albin Tonnerre
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42 +0100, Quaker wrote :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:22 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 3:15 PM, Albin Tonnerre
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:07 -0600, Stephen Houston wrote :
> >>
> >>On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Vincent Torri
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stephen Houst
i don't maintain debian stuff directly in libs/apps' dirs anymore. They are
in separated directory "packaging" and they are updated and merged with
generated snapshots. Anyway, i know svn account created just for ssh is bad.
I'll find a better solution and discuss it with raster.
2010/1/25 Albin T
Hi,
We are trying to use Enna in fb mode. But it seems that events are not send
in the same way as other engines do i.e ECORE_EVENT_KEY_DOWN.
I have tried exepedite, All tests run fine but it doesn't respond to any key
events.
When I launch enna I have the same behaviour : no key event.
I know tha
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to use Enna in fb mode. But it seems that events are not send
> in the same way as other engines do i.e ECORE_EVENT_KEY_DOWN.
> I have tried exepedite, All tests run fine but it doesn't respond to any key
> events.
> When I laun
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42:54 +0100 Quaker said:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >>
> >>> Log:
> >>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> >>
> >> ?? how many people involved in packages do you plan to add ???
> >
> > i would like to add
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:46:40 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> >
> >> Log:
> >> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> >
> > ?? how many people involved in p
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:58:48 +0100 Cedric BAIL said:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Stephen Houston wrote:
> > I don't think this is a problem... If we are interested in widespread
> > use of our software, then packages/packagers are an essential part of
> > the process.
>
> It's a common p
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:10:23 +0100 Albin Tonnerre
said:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:42 +0100, Quaker wrote :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Log:
> > >>> New e17 packager - Roman Horn?\195?\173k - a friend of mine.
> > >>
> > >> ?? how many peopl
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:29:59 +0100 Quaker said:
still curious. why is ssh access needed?
> On this server, having user on server is connected with svn account. They
> don't commit, it is just for those ssh reasons. I know it is not a best way.
> I'll prepare some new system for next freeze.
>
>
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 01:08:31 +0100 (CET) Vincent Torri
said:
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Nicolas Aguirre wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are trying to use Enna in fb mode. But it seems that events are not send
> > in the same way as other engines do i.e ECORE_EVENT_KEY_DOWN.
> > I have tried exeped
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:37:25 -0800 Michael Jennings said:
> On Monday, 25 January 2010, at 13:52:46 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > it was all owned by root
>
> Well, obviously. :) I was thinking he'd have used pstree to identify
> who started the process, but clearly that's not the c
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:44:54 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:40:16 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
> >
> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 24 Jan
I think that the urls in Enlightenment website could be more "legible".
For example, the news home's url is:
http://enlightenment.org/p.php?p=news&l=en
But
http://enlightenment.org/news/
is much better
http://enlightenment.org/p.php?p=news/show&l=en&news_id=17
Could be:
http://enlightenment.
On Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 09:38:12 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> i did - and init owned it... which was odd. so it seems it was orphaned at
> some
> point.
Gotcha. Okay, that makes sense. Probably someone's session was
disconnected or crashed somehow.
It's not a big deal at this po
30 matches
Mail list logo
