Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 02:39:15 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger said: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:24:46AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > a file on disk is specified to survive reboots.. UNLESS it is specifically > > in part of the fs that is discarded on reboot. vast difference between them. > > Well

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 09:24:46AM +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > a file on disk is specified to survive reboots.. UNLESS it is specifically in > part of the fs that is discarded on reboot. vast difference between them. Well, most systems clean up /tmp on boot, so they discard the content as wel

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:12:23 +1000 David Seikel said: >> >>> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villa

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:12:23 +1000 David Seikel said: > >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri >> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard >> > wrote: >> > > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:12:23 +1000 David Seikel said: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard > > wrote: > > > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : > > >> the reasons are many but here are some

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:09:31 +0100 Vincent Torri said: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:43:36 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger > > said: > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > >> > Jokes aside, we appr

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:14:10 +0100 Vincent Torri said: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler > wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri > > said: > > > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote: > >> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri > said: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote: >> > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : >> >> the reasons are many but here are some: >>

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard > wrote: > > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : > >> the reasons are many but here are some: > >> > >> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they sup

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:43:36 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger > > said: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it >> > cannot block devel

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:15:25 +0100 Vincent Torri said: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote: > > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : > >> the reasons are many but here are some: > >> > >> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they suppor

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:43:36 +0100 Joerg Sonnenberger said: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it > > cannot block development because features that is in the standard for > > 12 years witho

Re: [E-devel] EpyMC first public annoucement

2012-12-17 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Tom, you can go and see the screenshots on the website. http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/EpyMC?ts=1355774677&updated=EpyMC Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Tom Hacohen wrote: > Could you please upload some screenshots/videos? :) > > Sounds cool, can't wait to see h

Re: [E-devel] EpyMC first public annoucement

2012-12-17 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Wow this looks decent :) It also has nice animations. It looks like you also have a good theming skills. Coolz! Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Davide Andreoli wrote: > Hi all, > today I'm pleased to present the result of the work I have done in the last > years: EpyMC

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote: > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : >> the reasons are many but here are some: >> >> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they support the os they >> work >> on. >> 2. frankly linux has much more mom

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: >> > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it >> > cannot block de

Re: [E-devel] EpyMC first public annoucement

2012-12-17 Thread Tom Hacohen
Could you please upload some screenshots/videos? :) Sounds cool, can't wait to see how it looks. On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Davide Andreoli wrote: > Hi all, > today I'm pleased to present the result of the work I have done in the last > years: EpyMC > > What's EpyMC? > in short: an xbmc c

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:57:36PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it > > > can

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it > > cannot block development because features that is in the standard for > > 12 years withou

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 07:10:01PM -0200, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > Jokes aside, we appreciate to have E to run well on that, but it > cannot block development because features that is in the standard for > 12 years without being implemented. First of all, shm_open is an optional part of P

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Maxime Villard wrote: > Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : >> the reasons are many but here are some: >> >> 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they support the os they >> work >> on. >> 2. frankly linux has much more mom

[E-devel] EpyMC first public annoucement

2012-12-17 Thread Davide Andreoli
Hi all, today I'm pleased to present the result of the work I have done in the last years: EpyMC What's EpyMC? in short: an xbmc clone written in python that use the EFL. while the long one can be found here: http://code.google.com/p/e17mods/wiki/EpyMC?ts=1355774677&updated=EpyMC The name stand f

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: stefan trunk/e/src/modules

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:06:36 -0200 Leandro Pereira wrote: > On 12/17/2012 12:38 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > DEVILHORSE! > > > > Classic: http://i.imgur.com/wzbwQ.jpg > > > Leandro > hahaha oh wow -- Lo

Re: [E-devel] Issues with make distcheck on E-MODULES-EXTRA

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:35:51 -0200 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: > It's because we force installing to e17 system dir. Somehow the resulting > rule for make install is missing DESTDIR prefix. > > You can look at the generated rule and look for directory and DESTDIR. And > test with "make insta

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/e/src/modules/everything

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:40:01 +0100 "hannes.janet...@gmail.com" wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Enlightenment SVN > wrote: > > Log: > > arghhh this damn typo took me an hour of ecore internal debugging to find! > > damn you jeffdameth!!! > > > > > > Author: discomfitor > > Date:

Re: [E-devel] Single tree docs - missing files

2012-12-17 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:30 PM, wrote: > Hello all, > > I've started looking into making the single tree docs sane. While most of the > issues where small things I expected, it seems there are several missing > files. > In particular the *.dox files that were present in several of the libs doc

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: discomfitor trunk/e/src/modules/everything

2012-12-17 Thread hannes.janet...@gmail.com
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > arghhh this damn typo took me an hour of ecore internal debugging to find! > damn you jeffdameth!!! > > > Author: discomfitor > Date: 2012-12-17 09:13:35 -0800 (Mon, 17 Dec 2012) > New Revision: 81166 > Trac:

[E-devel] Single tree docs - missing files

2012-12-17 Thread jgastal
Hello all, I've started looking into making the single tree docs sane. While most of the issues where small things I expected, it seems there are several missing files. In particular the *.dox files that were present in several of the libs doc folder. At least Ecore and Evas had their examples.

Re: [E-devel] [e] OpenBSD & shm_open()

2012-12-17 Thread Maxime Villard
Le 17/12/2012 01:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : > the reasons are many but here are some: > > 1. devs are almost all on linux... so guess what? they support the os they > work > on. > 2. frankly linux has much more momentum than the bsd's (excluding osx as you > say) and that lead

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: stefan trunk/e/src/modules

2012-12-17 Thread Leandro Pereira
On 12/17/2012 12:38 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > DEVILHORSE! > Classic: http://i.imgur.com/wzbwQ.jpg Leandro -- LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and

Re: [E-devel] Potential NULL derefs in elm_widget

2012-12-17 Thread Tom Hacohen
ELM_WIDGET_DATA_GET? :) Why RETURN? You are not returning out of the function... On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:38 PM, daniel.za...@samsung.com < daniel.za...@samsung.com> wrote: > Hi, > > You are right, it is better if it can be returned as out. This macro is > internal just to concentrate the eo_da

Re: [E-devel] Potential NULL derefs in elm_widget

2012-12-17 Thread daniel.za...@samsung.com
Hi, You are right, it is better if it can be returned as out. This macro is internal just to concentrate the eo_data_get. Before, it was a little bigger because of backward compatibility. Now I think we can remove it. Anyway, if we keep it, I thought changing the name of this macro to ELM_WIDG

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: stefan trunk/e/src/modules

2012-12-17 Thread Christopher Michael
On 17/12/12 14:36, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > e/randr: Add missing header for distcheck > >Be nice to devilhors and fix make distcheck for him. > What ?!?!?!?! Unheard of Who in their right mind would be nice to me ??? ;) Thanks ;) dh > Author: stefan > Date: 2012-

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: stefan trunk/e/src/modules

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
DEVILHORSE! On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Enlightenment SVN < no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > Log: > e/randr: Add missing header for distcheck > > Be nice to devilhors and fix make distcheck for him. > > Author: stefan > Date: 2012-12-17 06:35:58 -0800 (Mon, 17 Dec 2012) >

Re: [E-devel] Potential NULL derefs in elm_widget

2012-12-17 Thread Tom Hacohen
Hey Gustavo, eo_data_get_from_type already exists, it's called eo_data_get. eo_data_get already handles everything that's needed to be handled and already reports an error when it's the wrong type. As for this macro, it looks very bad. I would at the very minimum take "wd = " outside of it, as it

Re: [E-devel] Package 'elementary' requires 'elocation >= 1.7.99' but version of elocation is 0.1.0.81014

2012-12-17 Thread Flávio Ceolin
Hi, On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 11:05 PM, David Seikel wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 08:47:14 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 01:41:09 +1000 David Seikel >> said: >> >> > On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:16:07 +1000 David Seikel >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Think it's a re

Re: [E-devel] Potential NULL derefs in elm_widget

2012-12-17 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Hello. > > I'm just investigating some potential NULL dereferencing in elm_widget and I > wanted to get an opinion on that from Glima and maybe the EO devs. > > The root problem is this macro: > > #define ELM_WIDGET_DATA_GET_NO_INST(o, wd)

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: asdfuser IN trunk/efl/src/lib: . ecore_audio

2012-12-17 Thread Daniel Willmann
On 12/15/2012 03:26 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:38:02 -0800 "Enlightenment SVN" > wrote: > >> Log: >> efl: Introducing ecore_audio - the audio API for efl > > How does this relate to multisense? As I understand it edje multisense is the framework that lets you do more than

[E-devel] Potential NULL derefs in elm_widget

2012-12-17 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. I'm just investigating some potential NULL dereferencing in elm_widget and I wanted to get an opinion on that from Glima and maybe the EO devs. The root problem is this macro: #define ELM_WIDGET_DATA_GET_NO_INST(o, wd) \ wd = (o && eo_isa(o, ELM_OBJ_WIDGET_CLASS) ? \ eo_d

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Enlightenment-intl] Potuguese update and some thoughts abot enlightenment translation

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:55:03 + Michael Blumenkrantz > said: > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:10:58 +0900 > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:18:20 +1000 David Seikel > said: > > > > > > > On Sun

Re: [E-devel] Git Spam

2012-12-17 Thread Christopher Michael
LMAO :) Well, you know what they say ... If You Can't Beat Them, Join Them :P dh On 17/12/12 11:54, Daniel Juyung Seo wrote: > Hahahaha that was huge. > > Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz < > michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hahahahaha

Re: [E-devel] Fwd: [Enlightenment-intl] Potuguese update and some thoughts abot enlightenment translation

2012-12-17 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:55:03 + Michael Blumenkrantz said: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:10:58 +0900 > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 11:18:20 +1000 David Seikel said: > > > > > On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 18:22:45 +0100 Massimo Maiurana > > > wrote: > > > > > > > f

Re: [E-devel] Git Spam

2012-12-17 Thread Daniel Juyung Seo
Hahahaha that was huge. Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ) On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz < michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote: > hahahahahahahahaha > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, David Seikel wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:22:09 + Christopher Michael > > wrote:

Re: [E-devel] Git Spam

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
hahahahahahahahaha On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:47 AM, David Seikel wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:22:09 + Christopher Michael > wrote: > > > Please...Lets Squash Some commites ?? > > Welcome to the SVN spammers club. B-) > > -- > A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants > coz th

Re: [E-devel] Git Spam

2012-12-17 Thread David Seikel
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:22:09 + Christopher Michael wrote: > Please...Lets Squash Some commites ?? Welcome to the SVN spammers club. B-) -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. signature.asc Description: PGP signat

Re: [E-devel] NOTICE: E17 and EFL trunk stability advice

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
calling it now, hero of the week for breaking trunk so I don't have to deal with more bug reports On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri < barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote: > Hi all, > > E17 is about to be released and it's highly ADVISED that you run that > with STABLE EFL (1.7

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: cedric trunk/efl/src/lib/evas/canvas

2012-12-17 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Monday, December 17, 2012, Enlightenment SVN wrote: > Log: > efl: detect all text change properly and don't destroy text if we don't > relayout it. > > > Author: cedric > Date: 2012-12-16 19:34:08 -0800 (Sun, 16 Dec 2012) > New Revision: 81061 > Trac: http://trac.enlighten

Re: [E-devel] EO_DEFINE_CLASS does really unlock _my_lock.mutex?

2012-12-17 Thread Tom Hacohen
Well. The code creates a lock per class and uses a global lock to handle the lock per class creation. It's needed because classes are actually created on the fly. Just reading through the code and seeing where it returns and when it's released and looks that it's just fine. I would recommend you t

Re: [E-devel] E SVN: raster IN trunk/web/www: . i p/index/d site theme/css ti

2012-12-17 Thread Michael Blumenkrantz
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Enlightenment SVN < no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote: > Log: > stage 1 for e.org - fix look/styling/theme no - i didnt do trac... > or generated docs... :/ > > > > Author: raster > Date: 2012-12-17 02:01:51 -0800 (Mon, 17 Dec 2012) > New Revis

Re: [E-devel] EO_DEFINE_CLASS does really unlock _my_lock.mutex?

2012-12-17 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. On 15/12/12 19:52, Tom Hacohen wrote: > It's hard to guess without the claimed path. What's your tools output? Well, not really much more information then I already wrote. One example (of 105) would be: Variable '_my_lock.mutex' locked on line 634 was not unlocked. That is the same stat