Ive put together a couple ideas on a wiki entry. Its all concept stuff
at the moment so the sourceforge mailing list doesnt work. I think it
could be a great way to get small teams to collaborate on projects and
then promote E and their own country.
eg. "Emulate - EFL based MAME emulator - proudly
Le lundi 4 août 2008, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:49:05 +0200 Raoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> > Here is my feedback about Edje.
>
> aaah raoul! - btw.. calaos is fantastic - what you've done is great and you
> ahve heavily used efl... so it's one of the prime examples he
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008 16:49:05 +0200 Raoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Here is my feedback about Edje.
aaah raoul! - btw.. calaos is fantastic - what you've done is great and you
ahve heavily used efl... so it's one of the prime examples here and your input
is very important (as is that of any o
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Raoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, I think there are more important issues with edje at this time. Writing
> edc using macros are a real pain and a waste of time. Macros are hard to
> write, hard to debug, hard to maintain and unreadable. We need a better way
>
Le Saturday 02 August 2008 21:23:30 Carsten Haitzler, vous avez écrit :
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> babbled:
> > On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 2, 2008, at 6:55 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
> On 2-Aug-08, at 9:41 PM, Blake Barnett wrote:
>> On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:53 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
>>>
>>> It all comes down to when you're doing the 2.0 release. If you do a
>>> 2.0 release in a few months it looks like we just rushed a 1.0 out
On 2-Aug-08, at 9:41 PM, Blake Barnett wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:53 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>> It all comes down to when you're doing the 2.0 release. If you do a
>> 2.0 release in a few months it looks like we just rushed a 1.0 out
>> the
>> door to say we had a 1.0. Major releases shoul
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:53 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
>
> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>
>> Vincent Torri wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>>>
>>>
I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking
about
the impression it gives. Changing th
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:07:40 +0300 Viktor Kojouharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> I disagree. 'Compatibility problems' are non-existent, since they will
> all interact with edje parts, not with one another. And reading
> someone's code will always be harder if you don't know the language
> which
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 5:33 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Andreas Volz wrote:
>>
>> > If the new scripting language is lUA it should be replaced before
>> >
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 23:07 +0200, lok wrote:
>
>> Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
>>
>>> imho, it both lua and javascript are good choices for this. Though I
>>> haven't used lua personally, I only hear good things about it, and the
>>> syntax is very C-ish. As far as j
On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 23:07 +0200, lok wrote:
> Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
> > imho, it both lua and javascript are good choices for this. Though I
> > haven't used lua personally, I only hear good things about it, and the
> > syntax is very C-ish. As far as js is concerned, there's probably a lot
>
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 00:38 +0200, lok wrote:
> Toma wrote:
> > As crazy as it might seem, id like to hear from mekius and devilhorns
> > about how easy and useful embryo was to them in regards to them in
> > various projects in cvs. As an e17 themer, it hasnt proven much use to
> > me, but i consi
Toma wrote:
> As crazy as it might seem, id like to hear from mekius and devilhorns
> about how easy and useful embryo was to them in regards to them in
> various projects in cvs. As an e17 themer, it hasnt proven much use to
> me, but i consider myself further to the edje when it comes to embryo
>
Viktor Kojouharov wrote:
> imho, it both lua and javascript are good choices for this. Though I
> haven't used lua personally, I only hear good things about it, and the
> syntax is very C-ish. As far as js is concerned, there's probably a lot
> more people familiar with it (including me) than lua.
As crazy as it might seem, id like to hear from mekius and devilhorns
about how easy and useful embryo was to them in regards to them in
various projects in cvs. As an e17 themer, it hasnt proven much use to
me, but i consider myself further to the edje when it comes to embryo
and edje talk!
Toma
On Sun, 2008-08-03 at 04:32 +1000, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded it into several
> > commercial products in the past. It was each time a really good choose.
> > It's eas
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 22:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Andreas Volz wrote:
>
> > If the new scripting language is lUA it should be replaced before
> > releasing edje.
> >
> > My proposal is to create a new branch for LUA integration and the
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, Andreas Volz wrote:
> If the new scripting language is lUA it should be replaced before
> releasing edje.
>
> My proposal is to create a new branch for LUA integration and then
> define a fixed time frame for this task. If LUA is integrated in this
> time frame then we releas
Am Sun, 3 Aug 2008 04:32:01 +1000 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
> > I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded it into several
> > commercial products in the past. It was each time a really good
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:58 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>>
>>> I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded it into several
>>> commercial products in the p
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 20:58:05 +0200 (CEST) Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
>
>
> On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >> I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>> I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded it into several
>> commercial products in the past. It was each time a really good choose.
>> It's eas
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded it into several
> commercial products in the past. It was each time a really good choose.
> It's easy to understand, small and I think most important has a really
> big
> If we already know we're going to rip out a major subsystem it isn't
> time to release. Sure we can draw a line in the sand but it's better
> to draw the line where it makes sense. After the lua change. Not an
> arbitrary date for the sake of a release.
Again, you are doing the assumption that
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> Nick Hughart wrote:
>
>> Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>>
>>> There is an icon cache with 100 icons. Latest used icons are prepended
>>> to the list. If an icon is in the cache, the cache does help.
>>>
>>> So for a scenario where a user only triggers efreet_icon
Nick Hughart wrote:
> Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
>> There is an icon cache with 100 icons. Latest used icons are prepended
>> to the list. If an icon is in the cache, the cache does help.
>>
>> So for a scenario where a user only triggers efreet_icon through f.ex.
>> a small favorite menu in e1
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote:
> Nick Hughart wrote:
>
>> dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>>> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>>>
>>>
Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>
>
>
>> I'd say you're so eager to r
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:12 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> As I said, it already happened, don't hide under the "we did not
> official 1.0 yet".
No, it hasn't. If a company jumped on _alpha_ level software and
started to develop around it they have to expect that changes are
coming. Hence the
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:12:00 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> babbled:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> oh of course. details! :) we can dot
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:18 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>>> Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
> I'd say you're so eager to release som
Nick Hughart wrote:
> dan sinclair wrote:
>> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>>
>>> Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
> I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking about
> the impression it gives. Changing things in
Am Sat, 2 Aug 2008 08:17:43 +1000 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The
Rasterman):
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:40:04 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> > One idea I discussed with Vincent today is that our lack of releases
> > has caused many users to lose interest and stop taking n
On Sat, 02 Aug 2008 03:07:27 -0400 Jose Gonzalez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:12:00 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >
> >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Carsten wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:12:00 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> babbled:
>
>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> oh of course. details! :) we can dot the i's and cross the t's soon
>>> enough. :)
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:12:00 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > oh of course. details! :) we can dot the i's and cross the t's soon
> > enough. :)
>
> Unfortunately, this really
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>> Vincent Torri wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking
about
the impression it gives. C
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Nick Hughart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking about
>>> the impression it gives. Changing things in a pre-1.0 is fine and
>>> expect
dan sinclair wrote:
>
> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
>
>> Vincent Torri wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>>>
>>>
I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking about
the impression it gives. Changing things in a pre-1.0 is fine and
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:51 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>
>>
>> How does our changing now affect them any different then if we
>> changed in 6 months?
>
> As I said, you think that we will release the next major release
> (with api changes, etc..) in 6 mont
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking
>>> about
>>> the impression it gives. Changing things in a pre-1.0 is fine and
>>> expected. Releasing a 1.0
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>
> How does our changing now affect them any different then if we changed in 6
> months?
As I said, you think that we will release the next major release (with api
changes, etc..) in 6 months and I don't think that it will happen within 6
months. Mayb
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:37 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>>
>> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
> This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out
> Edje
> with Embryo support and then remove Embryo with Edje2 we'll be
>>
Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>
>
>> I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking about
>> the impression it gives. Changing things in a pre-1.0 is fine and
>> expected. Releasing a 1.0 and then breaking it or making major changes
>> a few mon
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>
> On 2-Aug-08, at 1:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>>
>>
This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out Edje
with Embryo support and then remove Embryo with Edje2 we'll be pissing
off a lot of people that create themes and
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
> I'd say you're so eager to release something you're not thinking about
> the impression it gives. Changing things in a pre-1.0 is fine and
> expected. Releasing a 1.0 and then breaking it or making major changes
> a few months down the road is a very bad
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
>>> This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out Edje
>>> with Embryo support and then remove Embryo with Edje2 we'll be
>>> pissing
>>> off a lot of people that create themes and applications. Better to
>>> bite the bullet an
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> oh of course. details! :) we can dot the i's and cross the t's soon enough. :)
Unfortunately, this really needs to be done sooner than later. Without
a license listed, we now need to get the permission of
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:02 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2-Aug-08, at 12:52 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:39 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're releasing something before it should be released just to give the
>>> impr
>> This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out Edje
>> with Embryo support and then remove Embryo with Edje2 we'll be pissing
>> off a lot of people that create themes and applications. Better to
>> bite the bullet and deal with it now and get it done.
and what about people t
On 2-Aug-08, at 12:52 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:39 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> You're releasing something before it should be released just to
>> give the
>> impression of a 1.0 for something that isn't 1.0. That leaves a
>> worse ta
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:39 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 2-Aug-08, at 12:33 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
>>
>> Guys, maybe you're forgetting about it, maybe you're hiding behind the
>> "we have not released a stable version for this reason", but the fact
>> is that this
On 2-Aug-08, at 12:33 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Guys, maybe you're forgetting about it, maybe you're hiding behind the
> "we have not released a stable version for this reason", but the fact
> is that this will happen even now. Since there was not a release,
> people just assumed that
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:27:30 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>> On 1-Aug-08, at 6:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> > 2. edje - i have been mulling dropping embryo in favor of
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:55 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
> syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As r
>
>
>
> It only seems to be happening to you and Tomas blog. Everyone else is fine.
> It isn't wordpress in general as my blog is wordpress and it works fine.
> Just the two that are served from wordpress.com.
Should I consider moving the blog to another blog hosting service then?
>
>
> dan
>
>
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:57:03 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 8:46 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> There is also a bug in Edje that has bitten us in Ewl a few times
> >> where re-using Edje objects seems to cause strange things to hang
> >> aroun
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:55 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
> syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As r
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:46 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> There is also a bug in Edje that has bitten us in Ewl a few times
>> where re-using Edje objects seems to cause strange things to hang
>> around. I believe pfritz was the last person to look into this so he
>> might have some more
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:53 AM, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
>
>> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
>> syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As relevant posts appear we can add
>> news items about them
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
> syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As relevant posts appear we can
> add news items about them that point back to the blog.
>
> http://enlightenedjournal.wordpress.com/
>
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 02:40:29 +0300 "Luchezar Petkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:17 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can do that. I've been reading the CVS logs, E-devel discussions and stuff
> for years, so I think I can post news
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 20:27:30 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
> On 1-Aug-08, at 6:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > yeah. i agree we need releases. it's probably our biggest issue.
> > right now in
> > lib-space i'd want to clean up 2 major thnigs that are curre
>
>
> This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out Edje
> with Embryo support and then remove Embryo with Edje2 we'll be pissing
> off a lot of people that create themes and applications. Better to
> bite the bullet and deal with it now and get it done.
I completely agree.
>
> Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
> syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As relevant posts appear we can add
> news items about them that point back to the blog.
http://enlightenedjournal.wordpress.com/
Any suggestions, guys?
>
>
> dan
>
>
>
>
--
Luchezar
On 1-Aug-08, at 6:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> yeah. i agree we need releases. it's probably our biggest issue.
> right now in
> lib-space i'd want to clean up 2 major thnigs that are currently
> underway:
>
> 1. eina - move fully to using it. remove all data stuff from eco
On 1-Aug-08, at 7:40 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
> I can do that. I've been reading the CVS logs, E-devel discussions
> and stuff
> for years, so I think I can post news and blog about the major
> events in the
> community/changes in the E(FL). The problem is, I am quite tech-
> interested,
>
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:17 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> as for blogging - yes. we need this. this is good. i've always liked the
> idea
> of a tech-interested person that reads cvs commit logs, hangs on irc and
> reads
> email.. and kind of blogs about the
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:40:04 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
babbled:
> Since the most recent license flamewar was triggered by the motivation
> of community building, I think now would be an appropriate time to
> brainstorm some additional ideas for helping to build the community
> a
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 17:52:31 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:36:55 +0930 Samuel Nicholas
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nick Hughart wrote:
> > > Toma wrote:
> > >
> > >> LoCo's (local communities) are a great way to get people involved.
> > >> You j
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:49 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 20:38:46 (+0200),
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> I have no design, but i have already complained about the web site
>> on the ML. I'm not a good designers, but i think that there are some
>> things that MUST appear on a
On 1-Aug-08, at 10:40 AM, Matteo wrote:
>> because raster did it like that :-D
>> I'm not sure why people don't want to use a cms, but I've being told
>> that they want to keep like that (cvs based).
>
>
> If you keep it CVS-based, it's hard to develop and hard to update
> with news,
> topic an
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Michael Jennings wrote:
>
>>> I agree. And that's exactly the opposite of raster's way of leading
>>> the project. He said that a lot, btw : he does NOT want to impose
>>> things to committers.
>>
>>
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Michael Jennings wrote:
>> I agree. And that's exactly the opposite of raster's way of leading
>> the project. He said that a lot, btw : he does NOT want to impose
>> things to committers.
>
> So why are you afraid he'll do so?
i am not, it's the contrary. I just want that s
On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 20:38:46 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> I have no design, but i have already complained about the web site
> on the ML. I'm not a good designers, but i think that there are some
> things that MUST appear on a web site.
All I'm saying is, if something better had come
First off. Lets clear a couple things up. No one is not involving the
community. I was just saying wait a couple days so that we can clear up
some details with the boss (raster) . Now if you have opinions on the site
share your cms ones in the cms thread and the general ones in the what you
want t
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 19:47:22 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
So what ? Just an example of something that is nice (that is
exchange) does not mean that everything will be nice.
I never said that. But it does illustrate that doing somethin
I think that the community. if it exists, should be involved!!! Then if
raster doesn't mind the e users opinion and does what he belivies right, it
isn't very important. But blog, write the plans and the projects in ml on
the site on blogs where u want. Many users are tired to see that it changed
n
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Downknew Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Sorry... i've read only now the other mails. I'll wait for the new e
> website... but would be nice if the webdesigner involved the community in
> the developement, at least with the mailing list...
>
> With the last mails
On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 19:47:22 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> So what ? Just an example of something that is nice (that is
> exchange) does not mean that everything will be nice.
I never said that. But it does illustrate that doing something in
secret does not inherently invalidate it o
Downknew Wise wrote:
> 2008/8/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Downknew Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Right!!!
>>>
>>> Now the site could have all the contents and the documentation necessary
>>>
>> to
>>
>>> the
Sorry... i've read only now the other mails. I'll wait for the new e
website... but would be nice if the webdesigner involved the community in
the developement, at least with the mailing list...
With the last mails i 've understand that this isn't a community... and e
cannot have its community...
I've downloaded the e site from cvs. The php backend it's ok but ther's a
little problem: seems that the graphic isn't fully divided from the code. In
a website complex, such as this, the graphic side should be indipendent from
the backend to make the update work and the enhancements, the graphic
i
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Michael Jennings wrote:
> On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 19:29:25 (+0200),
> Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> As always, everyone is doing is job without mentioning it. I was not
>> aware of a redesign of the website, i don't know what it will look
>> like.
>>
>> At least, you should
On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 19:29:25 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
> As always, everyone is doing is job without mentioning it. I was not
> aware of a redesign of the website, i don't know what it will look
> like.
>
> At least, you should send a mail about that, also you should
> describe the
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Ian Caldwell wrote:
> the website is in the process of being of being redone. So far it is in the
> planning stages. Stay tuned!
As always, everyone is doing is job without mentioning it. I was not aware
of a redesign of the website, i don't know what it will look like.
At
I agree, a blog itself is not needed but a good news section is. but now
that get-e is mostly closing it's doors I think that opens up more content
writers. I'd honestly like to get into the habit of having one article a
week or biweekly on someone who's using e's components to build a product or
a
hold off on redesigning anything yet We have some very specific plans
that we're talking about... I will let you know at a later point. but there
could be some fun involved in redesigning the website :)
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On F
It will not stay cvs-based We will either make our own php software or
use a cms.
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Matteo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because raster did it like that :-D
> > I'm not sure why people don't want to use a cms, but I've being told
> > that they want to keep like
Correct, We even looked into cms's before we moved the site onto the new
servers. The thing is a lot of them were difficult to design for and quite
cumbersome. I'm looking into the options now of reopening up the cms option.
I know since we've looked into Cms's projects like drupal and joomla have
the website is in the process of being of being redone. So far it is in the
planning stages. Stay tuned!
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Toma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/08/2008, Downknew Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > |Sorry for my bad english, fix me|
> >
> > I think that the e co
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> because raster did it like that :-D
> I'm not sure why people don't want to use a cms, but I've being told
> that they want to keep like that (cvs based).
We went through a couple CMS's before, one of which bro
2008/8/1 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Downknew Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Right!!!
> >
> > Now the site could have all the contents and the documentation necessary
> to
> > the user but it isn't easy to find the informations which you a
> because raster did it like that :-D
> I'm not sure why people don't want to use a cms, but I've being told
> that they want to keep like that (cvs based).
If you keep it CVS-based, it's hard to develop and hard to update with news,
topic and more.
The EFL was (and will) develop with semplicity
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Downknew Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right!!!
>
> Now the site could have all the contents and the documentation necessary to
> the user but it isn't easy to find the informations which you are looking
> for,
>
> I have a question. Why e web site has that layo
Right!!!
Now the site could have all the contents and the documentation necessary to
the user but it isn't easy to find the informations which you are looking
for,
I have a question. Why e web site has that layout? The logo on top it's too
big and hide the really contents. Menu is divised in two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 09:03:18 -0400
dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really don't see the point of a blog. Why not just put your blog
> entry in the news section? The news section is essentially a blog.
>
> dan
Hmmm, right, I think I misu
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
>> right now, e planet has not a lot of topics related to development
>>
>
> You'll also notice that about 90% of planet.e.o content is myself and benr.
> Of everyone on the planet it appears that Toma and Horton are the only two
> who are doing EFL blo
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:34 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>
>> 2. E planet!?! Developers and power users should few lines on e
>> status of
>> developement. This involves.
>
> right now, e planet has not a lot of topics related to development
>
You'll also notice that about 90% of planet.e.o content is my
> That's true, and it is bad. If we want to use it we have to clean up
> the aggregated feeds. In fact planet is just a feed aggregator, a very
> good feed aggregator, but imho it could be good to have an official E
> blog.
I really don't see the point of a blog. Why not just put your blog
entry
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
