But still It's not only a question of round and big apertures, IMHO the same
prime of different manufactures has very different Bokeh.
Bokeh comes out from the addition of several factors: number of blades,
number and composition of the lenses and from the balance between the
different aberrations
- Original Message -
From: "James McCauley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Alternatively, look at JackRabbit units (only availiable in US). I
know
> lots of press pros there use them.
> Hope I've been of some help,
Yes indeed you have been of some help but what are jack rabbits or should
- Original Message -
From: "Mick McCarron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> bodge. If you can, buy the Turbo battery pack, or buy the Canon battery
> pack, they provides a high voltage supply to a speedlight and uses the
> connector socket.
But do or will they screw on to the camera base?
Richa
Steve wrote:
>
> Hi. I've been extremely busy the last 2 months and haven't taken out
> my EOS gear in ages. and so I'm pretty out of practice. My
> co-housing community had a ribbon cutting ceremony today and asked me
> to be the photographer (which was great for me.) Anyway I was
> shooting th
>
> Stiner, Jason wrote:
>
> Again, I'm not sure what speed I'm looking for. I would like as little
> grain as possible. I am interested in shooting both natural and urban/urban
> decay landscapes. I am currently shooting Provia 100 and Velvia color
> slides. Not knowing much about B&W film
Karen Nakamura wrote:
>
> True, but if you're taking landscapes without a tripod, well. to be
> blunt, you're an idiot.
>
> Also, most landscapes are taken with relatively short focal lengths, thus
> reducing the need and effect of IS.
>
> For good landscapes:
> * Good prime
> * Short f
Ken Durling wrote:
>
> My 28-135 IS is really loud. Almost every morning I can hear it
> yelling from the closet - TAKE ME OUT AND SHOOT WITH ME!!!
>
> I hear the 100-400 IS is even louder.
>
> Ken Durling
It is, I can hear it calling me clear from the dealer across town!
Skip
--
Shadowc
Hi. I've been extremely busy the last 2 months and haven't taken out
my EOS gear in ages. and so I'm pretty out of practice. My
co-housing community had a ribbon cutting ceremony today and asked me
to be the photographer (which was great for me.) Anyway I was
shooting the initial speechifying
> Anything I shouldn't miss in NY? ;-)
yeah, if you want to shoot with a tripod in any public place (empire state
building, world trade center, grand central, etc) you have to get a
permit. all it really says is that you are aware that people can get hurt
when there is a tripod out.
I first lea
On Fri, 04 May 2001 20:12:50 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>Mortimer Snerd wrote:
>
>> PS The Lexus IS I test drove says: "I wanna be a BMW!"
>
>Geez--they're putting IS on cars now? Does it smooth out the ride??
>
>fcc
>
Nah - it just keeps your image stable.
I drive a "consumer zoom."
Ken Durli
Mortimer Snerd wrote:
> PS The Lexus IS I test drove says: "I wanna be a BMW!"
Geez--they're putting IS on cars now? Does it smooth out the ride??
fcc
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http:/
>From: "Chris T. Daida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Ken Durling wrote:
> >
> > I'm aware
> > that it makes it somewhat less stable on a tripod, or is that an
> > understatement? Is it pretty quick to remove it and revert to the
> > standard battery config?Any other downsides one should consider?
>
Pierre Bellavance wrote:
> I'm thinking of getting Canon's 2X TC to use with my 100-400/4.5-5.6L IS Lens.
>
> I would use the 800mm length with a monopod, mainly for bird pictures.
Hi Pierre,
Consider first that you will have in effect a 200-800/6.7-11 lens. Depending on
what body you're usin
"F. Craig Callahan" wrote:
>
> Kim wrote:
>
> > > And does it twist slightly if torqued (like the Rebel 2000's
> > > BP-200)? I really hated that.
>
> Depends on how much force you use. :-)
>
> "Twist" may be too strong a word, but I can make it move if I want to.
F. Craig,
Thanks. Actually
Kim wrote:
>
> I was going to say, the BP-300 can't twist because it has the contact
> thingies that go up into the battery compartment of the camera...but I see
> that the BP-200 has the same thing so I don't see how it could twist either.
I'm talking about fractions of a millimeter of movement
Michael Quack wrote:
> You are not missing something obvious, it is Canon
> to have missed this obvious thing. Considering that
> all EF lenses feed back distance info (you can check
> that by looking at the EXIF data), it is really
> dumb beyond cure not to use this info.
>
What if you using '
As the *ORIGINAL* poster, let me jump in here before this starts some sort
of IS/non-IS feud! =) First of all, nearly every comment I have received so
far has been helpful. Even as a novice, I enjoy hearing opinions from both
sides and I think that it's exhibited well here (minus a few rude/offe
Kim wrote:
> > And does it twist slightly if torqued (like the Rebel 2000's
> > BP-200)? I really hated that.
Depends on how much force you use. :-)
"Twist" may be too strong a word, but I can make it move if I want to.
fcc
*
***
**
>
> I need focal lengths above 105mm. The Canon 70-200/2.8 is way too
> expensive, and even second hand Sigma 80-200/2.8 and Tokina 80-200/2.8 are
> too expensive for my tight budget. So, I have to step down to something
> slower. I see second hand 70-210/4 Canons go very cheap. Is this lens
>
--- Ken Durling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My 28-135 IS is really loud. Almost every morning I
> can hear it
> yelling from the closet - TAKE ME OUT AND SHOOT WITH
> ME!!!
Really? My 70-300 IS says "Please don't drop me!".
MadMat
PS The Lexus IS I test drove says: "I wanna be a BMW!"
__
- Original Message -
From: "Marius Sundbakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "EOS Mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 12:35 AM
Subject: EOS Canon 70-210/4
>
> I need focal lengths above 105mm. The Canon 70-200/2.8 is way too
> expensive, and even second hand Sigma
Is it just me, or is just about every attempt at
machine translation (ie, BabelFish) of Japanese to
just about any other language howlingly funny? :-)
The computer age has truly arrived if we can make
computers speak with horrible accents and
recent-immigrant grammar... ;-) (I can almost picture
> And does it twist slightly if torqued (like the Rebel 2000's
> BP-200)? I really hated that. I got the sense, everytime I picked
> up the camera, that I was holding two separate items held
> together by a screw (which they are). But it can't be
> unreasonable to expect that they mate together fi
I'm thinking of getting Canon's 2X TC to use with my 100-400/4.5-5.6L IS Lens.
Has anyone tried this combination?
Is the loss of sharpness at 800mm very noticeable?
I would use the 800mm length with a monopod, mainly for bird pictures.
Thanks
Pierre
*
***
***
> hood for my 28-135, and probably a BP-300 battery grip. People have
> been speaking pretty fondly of this addition to the Elan 7. I'm aware
> that it makes it somewhat less stable on a tripod, or is that an
> understatement? Is it pretty quick to remove it and revert to the
> standard battery
Ken Durling wrote:
>
> I'm aware
> that it makes it somewhat less stable on a tripod, or is that an
> understatement? Is it pretty quick to remove it and revert to the
> standard battery config?Any other downsides one should consider?
And does it twist slightly if torqued (like the Rebel 20
I'm going to be in NY next week, and I'll stop by B&H and get a lens
hood for my 28-135, and probably a BP-300 battery grip. People have
been speaking pretty fondly of this addition to the Elan 7. I'm aware
that it makes it somewhat less stable on a tripod, or is that an
understatement? Is it p
--- Julian Loke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
http://www.canon.com/camera%2Dmuseum/tech/report/200010/200010.html
>
> > "Gary Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Elan 7 is the Japanese domestic market name for
> > the camera, just as its predecessor the Elan IIe
> > was known in most countries as the
--- James McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious, but
> if it's accepted that
> there is a formula for producing a correct flash
> exposure (e.g. ISO rating
> + subject distance = X amount of light for correct
> exposure) couldn't the
> flash calcula
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> So where does the EOS 3 fit in? And what will the
> replacement for A2E be called, now that we have EOS
> 30
> and EOS 33?
The replacement for the A2 is the EOS 3 AND/OR the EOS
7/30/Elan 7, depending upon your priorities. I know
that doesn't satisfy those wh
Hello Gerard,
I will try to give some information AFAIK.
If you use ECF, or 'automatic choosing of FP' and you set the lens to M, the
camera doesn't know under which FP the subject is placed. So it switches to
the most logical point: the central point.
In case you use manual choosing of the FP
I generally like Tokina
stuff as an arguable close second to Canon in many instances, so I'm hoping
the 24-200 will prove to be a decent quality general purpose lens. 24mms
wide would be nice to have on this kind of zoom.
Gary Russell
Hi Gary,
Last week Amateur Photographic issue has a intere
Julian Loke wrote:
Hi Gang,
Is that the lens (28-200 XR = model A03E) which has the dubious honour
of being the first Tamron lens that was recalled due to incompatibility
with EOS Cameras?
Wonder what would have happened if Henry did mount it on an EOS camera?
-
>> http://eosdoc.com/manuals.asp?q=bodies
> "Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Unless I am missing it, what your table fails to do is tell
> me what the USA name for a Canon EOS Kiss was/is.
> North AmericanInternational Japanese Intro Date**
>
On Fri, 4 May 2001 10:57:56 -0700 , you wrote:
>Ken Durling wrote:
>
>My 28-135 IS is really loud. Almost every morning I can hear it
>yelling from the closet - TAKE ME OUT AND SHOOT WITH ME!!!
>
>I hear the 100-400 IS is even louder.
>
Can anyone tell me the difference between a Canon 2x converter and a generic
2x converter, such as Tamron or Jessops?? And the huge difference in price?
This may be a silly question to some, no doubt...
Is it something obvious such as there being a big difference with the
quality of the optics.
I
> > Yodobashi price for EOS 7 is 85,000 yen for body only.
> > I doubt you'd get it for much less than that, no matter where you shop
here
> > in Japan.
> > Enough said!
>
> Yowwch! Are you serious?? "Enough said!" is right. Thanks for the
> news.
>
> Well, this may be a dumb question by now, but
At 01:30 PM 05/04/2001, you wrote:
>See: "Emergency notification"
>http://world.altavista.com/tr?lp=ja_en&tt=url&url=http%3A//www.tamron.co.jp/
> and
>http://world.altavista.com/tr?lp=ja_en&tt=url&url=http%3A//www.tamron.co.jp/ea03-01.htm
Both URLs returned < BabelFish Error 3012 ... Not a valid
> "Tom DelRosario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... RC-1 and the RS-60E3 ...
> I realize that the wireless remote can't be used behind the camera;
> are there any other limitations to either one?
Hi Tom,
RC-1 cannot do:
1) Reliably release from behind the camera
2) Continuous release
3) Single-p
Tom DelRosario wrote:
>
> Maybe it's time to finish that table in EOSDOC cross referencing
> ALL EOS camera bodies (film, digital):
> http://eosdoc.com/manuals.asp?q=bodies
>
> I got the table to render at width 640 without scrolling. Now to
> clean up the formatting...
>
> Do you agree with t
> "Dan Honemann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but I've been using the web access and just using the "Forward"
> button and the HTML dialogue boxes for generating and sending
> messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (as instructed on the opening message page).
> But from now on, I'll copy messages
> Can anyone tell me where I can get a subscription to EOS magazine?
http://www.eos-magazine.com/index.html
Kim
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
Hi all,
I am relative newbie and a novice to photography. I am an silent observer of
this list noe for little over an year. las night I was browsing on the web
and through some liks I end-up on the Fuji Film web site. Just with curisity
looked at the data sheets of few very widely mentioned/talke
http://eosdoc.com/manuals.asp?q=bodies
> "Tom DelRosario" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, you consider the D30 to be in the "mid" market segment!
> That is a $3000 camera (more expensive than the 1V and the
> EOS 3 combined) and I thought it was used by many pro sports
> photographers. Should
Can anyone tell me where I can get a subscription to EOS magazine?
Thanks
Lee
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
Ken Durling wrote:
My 28-135 IS is really loud. Almost every morning I can hear it
yelling from the closet - TAKE ME OUT AND SHOOT WITH ME!!!
I hear the 100-400 IS is even louder.
Ken,
I have both lens and mine are quiet.
PK
*
The 'Canon Eos Elan 7/7E, Eos 30/30E' Magic Lantern guide is on backorder at
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/188340388X/qid%3D988998997/026-4526
585-4091610 , have any of you guys or gals across the pond seen a copy? If
yes, does it go any further than the Canon manual? It is available he
My 28-135 IS is really loud. Almost every morning I can hear it
yelling from the closet - TAKE ME OUT AND SHOOT WITH ME!!!
I hear the 100-400 IS is even louder.
Ken Durling
Website http://home.earthlink.net/~kdurling/
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
***
**
From: Michael Quack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: EOS ETTL and Metering mode.
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 09:07:33 +0100
> From: James McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: EOS ETTL and Metering mode.
>
> couldn't the flash calculation simply be
> linked to the lens' focus distance so th
Lance Bledsoe wrote:
> I'm looking for some sort of "generic", 3rd party tripod
> collar which could mount on an EOS 28-70L. I use this lens
> a bunch for portraits on my D30 and I'd like to have the ability to
> rotate around the lens like the 70-200L and other longer lenses.
I'm looking at
> This may
> sound picky, but if you use a 20mm lens on an XL1 and expect to get
> the same thing as a 144mm on your EOS, you will be really surprised.
> The angle of view is truly divided by 7.2 as you expect, but the
> perspective is still that of a 20mm, wide angle distortion and all.
> So don'
Tom DelRosario wrote:
> I realize that they are only $20 each and I could probably just get both the RC-1
>and the RS-60E3, but could anyone tell me of real world experience with either model?
> I realize that the wireless remote can't be used behind the camera; are there any
>other limitati
DM> Hello everyone,
DM> Sorry if this is an off topic message.
DM> I'm planning to visit Austria (Vienna and Innsbruck) next month and buy
DM> lenses and accessories there. Here in Georgia (Caucasus) they are not
DM> available, even if, they are for triple price.
DM> Lenses are: 28-70 L f/2.8 and
> "Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. It was here earlier this week, but I did not get to mount it
> to a camera body. The lens itself is very compact. Remarkable what
> they do these days.
Hi Gang,
Is that the lens (28-200 XR = model A03E) which has the dubious hono
BT> Jani,
BT> At 06:30 04/05/01 , Jani Patanen wrote:
>>I had my 28-135 IS taken to service because the
>>IS sometimes started vibrating, ie the effect was opposite of
>>stabilzing the image. I got the lens back yesterday, they had
>>changed some circuit..
>>
>>Before the service, the sound of IS
-Original Message-
From: Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Just received a press release yesterday from Tamron, they have a new
smaller
>28-200mm lens that now uses a 62mm filter size (older one was a 72mm). It
>is significantly smaller and will make for a great travel le
At 11:31 AM 05/04/2001, you wrote:
> Anyone seen it yet?
Yes. It was here earlier this week, but I did not get to mount it to a
camera body. The lens itself is very compact. Remarkable what they do these
days.
--
regards,
Henry Posner
Director of Sales and Training
B&H Photo-Video, and Pro-A
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 09:07:33 +0100
> From: James McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: EOS ETTL and Metering mode.
>
> Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious, but
> if it's accepted that there is a formula for
> producing a correct flash exposure (e.g. ISO rating
> + subject dis
--- Karen Nakamura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >True in general, but under the conditions the
> original
> >poster and I have given (small aperture, polarizer,
> no
> >tripod, 'slow' film, landscape pictures) you are
> VERY
> >likely to benefit from IS. For instance on a SUNNY
> day
> >with ISO
Hi Jani,
Jani Patanen wrote:
> I remember asking about it then from the EOS list and someone
> from belgium said he had same problems after hitting the lens.
> He sent his to canon for repair and it was repaired under
> warranty and the work order said "re-calibration of image stabilizer".
Tha
Stiner, Jason wrote:
Again, I'm not sure what speed I'm looking for. I would like as little
grain as possible. I am interested in shooting both natural and urban/urban
decay landscapes. I am currently shooting Provia 100 and Velvia color
slides. Not knowing much about B&W film (hence this dis
Just received a press release yesterday from Tamron, they have a new smaller
28-200mm lens that now uses a 62mm filter size (older one was a 72mm). It
is significantly smaller and will make for a great travel lens. Anyone seen
it yet?
Peter K
*
***
*
> Jani:
>
> I'm wondering if your lens' IS vibration events started out
> on an ocassional basis and then worked up to doing so frequently?
> Or, did your 28-135 IS just all of a sudden start doing it?
I think it had something to do with me dropping the lens.
Could be coincidence, but it h
> > I had my 28-135 IS taken to service because the
> > IS sometimes started vibrating, ie the effect was opposite of
>
> My 28-135 IS vibrates also, just lasts a second or two and doesn't happen
> all the time. Seems to mostly happen when panning. Does this sound like
> the same problem ?
Yes,
Ian wrote,
> Anyone out there with the 28-125 IS experience a "shaking" IS when the camera
> is held NEAR vertical or at odd angles? Is the IS not to be used at "odd"
> angles? My 75-300 IS doesn't exhibit this behaviour.
>
YE, I had that. When you held the camera + 28-135 IS in the ve
Mine does this maybe once every two months.
I wonder what causes this. Maybe an old camera battery?
Pierre
At 06:29 5/4/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>-Original Message-
>From: Jani Patanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >I had my 28-135 IS taken to service because the
> >IS sometimes started vibra
On Fri, 4 May 2001 08:19:33 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Hi Ken,
>
>The thread was actually from the Elan7E List:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/elan7e
>
Ah, no wonder! Looking in the wrong place.
>If the Servo AF is working, perhaps you might be able to open up
>wider than f/11 :-)
Yes, but under
Hi, all.
Anyone out there with the 28-125 IS experience a "shaking" IS when the camera
is held NEAR vertical or at odd angles? Is the IS not to be used at "odd"
angles? My 75-300 IS doesn't exhibit this behaviour.
I'm kind of answering my own question, but really don't want to be without that
-Original Message-
From: Jani Patanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I had my 28-135 IS taken to service because the
>IS sometimes started vibrating, ie the effect was opposite of
>stabilzing the image.
Jani:
My 28-135 IS did the vibration thing very briefly about 2 weeks ago. It was
disconcert
Yes, but a 20mm lens at 1.4M has the same subject magnification as a
200mm lens does at 40M. Check it out!
Mr. Bill
Vicente wrote:
>
> With a 20mm lens at 5m you get a magnification of M=0.0040, at f/8 you get
> DOF from 1.4m to infinity.
> With a 200mm lens at 50m you get at magnification of M
Better yet: EOS 33 1/3
Mr. Bill
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***
At 14:51 04/05/01 , David Magradze wrote:
>I'm planning to visit Austria (Vienna and Innsbruck) next month and buy
>lenses and accessories there. Here in Georgia (Caucasus) they are not
>available, even if, they are for triple price.
Sorry, but this message reminded me of Edward J. Baumeister o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
> I had my 28-135 IS taken to service because the
> IS sometimes started vibrating, ie the effect was opposite of
> stabilzing the image. I got the lens back yesterday, they had
> changed some circuit..
My 28-135 IS vibrates also, just lasts a second or two and doesn'
Hello everyone,
Sorry if this is an off topic message.
I'm planning to visit Austria (Vienna and Innsbruck) next month and buy
lenses and accessories there. Here in Georgia (Caucasus) they are not
available, even if, they are for triple price.
Lenses are: 28-70 L f/2.8 and 70-200 L f/2.8.
Accessor
> "Ken Durling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: EOS Elan 7 focus tracking (lost the thread!)
Hi Ken,
The thread was actually from the Elan7E List:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/elan7e
If the Servo AF is working, perhaps you might be able to open up
wider than f/11 :-)
Cheers
Julian Loke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Skip,
>
> That question was actually posed by Gary Fisher. I just did
> the cross-reference table. EOSDOC is supposed to be a self-
> sustaining collaborative effort (like photo.net)
>
> So where does the EOS 3 fit in? And what will the
> replacement for A2E b
>> > 3) Depth of Field is controlled by two things and two things only.
>> > Subject magnification and aperture. It doesn't matter whether you
>> > increase your subject magnification by moving closer or by using
>> > a lens with a longer focal length your depth of field will be
>> > reduced.
>If you put a 20mm and a200mm lens on a camera, both at the same aperture
>and vary the camera-to-subject distance so the image is the same size on
>the film, depth of field will not differ.
It's not true at all. Not out of macro regions.
You can say it louder but it will not be true.
Just us
> Has anyone on here had any experience with the above power pack.
> I note that the cable into the flash unit's battery container requires a
> rather unsightly modification to the cover plate.
> Richard Corbett
I used the Quantum Turbo for @ 3 years with few complaints, until I
wanted to run
Jani,
At 06:30 04/05/01 , Jani Patanen wrote:
>I had my 28-135 IS taken to service because the
>IS sometimes started vibrating, ie the effect was opposite of
>stabilzing the image. I got the lens back yesterday, they had
>changed some circuit..
>
>Before the service, the sound of IS was barely au
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 02:44:33PM -0400, Karen Nakamura wrote:
> if you're taking landscapes without a tripod, well. to be
> blunt, you're an idiot.
Most of the time, yes, but sometimes you just can't use a tripod.
I've taken landscape shots from a boat with no stable surface, from
airpla
>> What I found more interesting is the implication that evaluative
>> metering simply bases the reading on the subject falling under
>> the chosen AF point.
> However, D30 users (who quoted Michael Quack and this List)
> observed that evaluative metering is very much like spot
> metering at the s
> "Robert Spector" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you go on vacation, what is the best way to suspend access
> to the EOS mail list? Should I unsubscibe or is there another road?
Hi Robert,
There is no way to "suspend" access to the EOS List. You should unsub-
scribe completely. Otherwise, y
I had my 28-135 IS taken to service because the
IS sometimes started vibrating, ie the effect was opposite of
stabilzing the image. I got the lens back yesterday, they had
changed some circuit..
Before the service, the sound of IS was barely audible.
now you can easily hear it even when the cam
> Skip wrote: ...
> Julian, you ask the question on the DOC, "Where did the A2 name
> come from?" In my opinion, it was to emphasize the linearity
> from the old FD mount cameras. The pro F1 begat the pro EOS 1,
> thus the A-1, top consumer camera, begat the A2. Of course,
> this bypasses the "T
OK, I can't find what thread we were talking about it in, but I did an
experiment yesterday with the rapid focus tracking of my Elan 7
coupled with the 75-300 III lens. In any case, I had reported some
difficulty in combining AI Servo with continuous frame advance - that
focus didn't seem to be h
Who was asking about fill flash? I just got back a couple of prints
that illustrate one use of it pretty well - some 90 degree down shots
into the open bells of some striped tulips - with and without fill
flash (I even used the on-camera flash - it was perfect). With the
fill flash the colors in
>
>True in general, but under the conditions the original
>poster and I have given (small aperture, polarizer, no
>tripod, 'slow' film, landscape pictures) you are VERY
>likely to benefit from IS. For instance on a SUNNY day
>with ISO 100 ('slow' film), aperture of 16 (with
>landscape you often wa
I need focal lengths above 105mm. The Canon 70-200/2.8 is way too
expensive, and even second hand Sigma 80-200/2.8 and Tokina 80-200/2.8 are
too expensive for my tight budget. So, I have to step down to something
slower. I see second hand 70-210/4 Canons go very cheap. Is this lens any
go
EOSers,
Just a quick question... is the old Canon ML2 ring light compatible
(in terms of ttl metering) with my EOS system?
Julian Dadag
_
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
*
*
Manoj Shrivastava wrote:
>
> Valvia - Granularity is 9
> Provia - Granularity is 10
> Superia - Granularity is 4
>
> What does this mean?
> Is bigger number is better or smaller number is better?
The smaller, the better. Granularity for print and slide films
are calculated using different
91 matches
Mail list logo
