- Original Message -
From: "Gerard Maas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 11:07 AM
Subject: EOS ETTL Flash Eye Allergy?
EOS'ers...
Has somebody experienced a repeated autonomous reaction of a model
half-closing the eyes when using E-TTL? I had a recent shoot
Guys,
Not my thing, but there is a new Infrared forum.
http://www.irtist.com
Cheers
Keith
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
**
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Eastwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:22 AM
Subject: *** SPAM *** Re: are all EOSs EOS?
Hi
Hi Bob
>
Uh, what more do you want from a lens? The 28-135 I use on my
EOS-3 works on my 20D just as well. The image mak
Nikon has announced that it is cutting back on the film camera range.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06011201nikon_news.asp
In Europe the only film camera will be the F6, with the FM10 also available
elsewhere.
They are also cutting back on the lens ranges.
One wonders how long before Canon
Lei wrote:
Hi, does anyone know how to get to the list archive?
I remembered that I used to be able to get to the archive
and do a search, but somehow it is a dead link now.
Lei,
I always used to access the archives via Julian Loke's home pages.
I presume that this is what you used to use, as I
- Original Message -
From: "Willem-Jan Markerink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 5:02 PM
Subject: EOS Old Agfa APX200S documentation
In the context of these new Agfa near-IR films, I provided someone by
private mail
http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=DownloadDetailAct&fcategoryid=314&modelid=7474
Follow the Drivers/Software link
Cheers
Keith
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.10/120 - Release Date: 05/10/2005
Cotty wrote:
On 2/9/05, James B.Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I haven't checked into using other makers' lenses on EOS cameras but
generally I thought infinity focus was lost. Perhaps there is a place
then for the odd other maker lens. I could use a Pentax 15mm like that
too. Is that a P
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Kopitnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 5:30 PM
Subject: *** SPAM *** EOS Moving to Canon for Digital
I'm a lifelong Nikon user (well, since 1978). I've had autofocus cameras
through the F100, but for the last several years h
Someone on dpReview spotted this first, but anyway.
In the June 2005 issue of the UK magazine Photography Monthly is the start
of their Photographer of the Year 2005 competition. This runs from now until
December 2005.
The overall prize described as a "Canon outfit worth £2,500!"
No further deta
Craig Zendel wrote:
Hi List,
Please can anyone provide a link to the user manual.
Craig,
Try http://www.canon-asia.com/index.jsp?fuseaction=support
Cheers
Keith
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.3 - Release Date: 03/05/
Gary Lim wrote:
I have 20-35 f2.8 on my 20D and I totally love it. It's not as wide as
17-40 f4 but one stop faster.
In terms of the angle of view, I find it sufficient for most uses and use
it
very often on trips (50% - 60% of the time) For anything wider, I just
use
my 15mm. :)
Gary,
Unfortu
Guys,
Does anyone use the 20-35 f3.5 - 4.5 USM on a 20D or similar?
A lovely lens for film, but I seem to remember a statement that it wasn't
very good on a 1.6X digital.
More to the point, I suppose, is how does it compare to the 18-55 kit lens?
Cheers
Keith
--
No virus found in this outgoing
Guys,
Canon USA have added this page:
http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=PgComSmModDisplayAct&keycode=2112&fcategoryid=215&modelid=10464
Cheers
Keith
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.4 - Release Date: 27/0
Stefan Gerris wrote:
Hi David,
What experiences have people had in terms of battery
life when using a battery grip? Do the 4 AA batteries
last longer than the 2 CR2 lithiums?
Well, I never used CR2 Li's in my EOS30 with BP300. Used 4 AA's straight
from the beginning. But there's an easy answer to
Hugo Lopes wrote:
It makes perfect sense. I hope that they also update certain features,
especially the LCD screen. Canon is starting to lag behind as far as lcd
screens are concerned. They maintain the old 1.8" screen from camera to
camera when the current trend is for bigger and higher resolution
- Original Message -
To:
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 6:11 PM
Subject: RE: EOS Possible model between 20D & 1D Mk II
--- Hugo Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A digital version of the EOS 3 is long awaited by Canon users. There is
certainly a huge price gap between the 20D and the 1D Mk
From Bob Atkins's Site:
http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/rumors.html
News of in interview with Canon Spain
http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/1_1717
Cheers
Keith
*
***
***
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, s
Guys,
Follow the links from:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-6464-7576
Only for PC, and will only run on Pentium. Not Mac.
Even so, has received some good write-ups.
Cheers
Keith
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus
Keith Green wrote:
But the EF-S 60mm f2.8 isn't wider than 50mm :-(
Bill Gillooly" wrote:
I wasn't implying that the 60 is wider than the 50, it's wider than the
100!
50mm x 1.6 = 80mm and
60mm x 1.6 = 96mm
Apparently the need for a 100mm equivalent is ve
Bill Gillooly wrote:
Interesting, they are certainly right about the need for a wider
macro-lens. I've been using the EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro and the
multiplication to 80mm equivalent is very noticeable. The EF 180mm
f/3.5 L Macro must become quite a telephoto on the 1.6X cameras. I
wond
EOS 20D
BP-511 Battery 1100 mAH
BP-511A Battery 1390 mAH
EOS 350D
NB-2LH Battery 720 mAH
There is also a NB-2L Battery 570 mAH
Cheers
Keith
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.8.8 - Release Date: 14/02/2005
*
***
**
Bob Turner wrote:
Anyone for the 350D? (Rebel XT USA)
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
Bob,
Did you buy a 20D yet?
Warehouse Express is now down to £979.
The350D is smaller/lighter than the 300D. Perhaps too small, even with new
BG-E3 Battery Grip.
List price of 89
Guys,
For those of us who don't speak Japanese:
http://imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1108413776.html
Cheers
Keith
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.298 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 10/02/2005
*
***
Gary Lim wrote:
I was just testing out the infrared behavior of 20D and found out it's not
very sensitive (if at all) to infrared. It's funny my old G1 and optio
(even my sony camcorder) works well. Just wondering if anyone have the
same experience or simple way to convert 20D to take infrared ph
Felix wrote:
All my family is in the photography business and they have told me that.
Every time they advanced me some news were right-. I don't know the
informer.
Felix,
In the UK, Nikon still have a rebate on the D70.
As the street price is about the same as the 300D, it is actually cheaper.
This
Félix wrote:
Canon will present a new Rebel -here in Europe 350D - with 8mpixels. Some
new Ixus with more pixels too...
Felix,
While we're all expecting something along these lines, where do you get your
information from?
All that I have seen, so far, has been speculation, especially on the
dpRevie
Malcolm wrote:
I recall seeing an article in the EOS Magazine some years ago where it
mentioned that the IS lenses behaved differently on some older bodies, and
when I checked my 28-135 IS on my old EOS film body (EOS10 ?), I did get
the
effect. Can't remember the details, but it was pretty minor
Bob Turner wrote:
I currently have a 10D and looking to add a 20D, is the BP-511 battery
compatible with the 20D or do I need the new BP-511A?
Bob,
511 and 511A are physically the same, the only difference is capacity.
I have the 2-battery charger for BP-511's will the BP-511A fit this
unit?
Some p
Paul Moortgat wrote:
Subject: Re: EOS 1Ds Mk II manuals online
It now has "COPY" written over the pages. If you like one without COPY
on them. I will send mine. It's 3.7 mega.
Paul,
I may be wrong, but if I remember correctly, you can get rid of this by
upgrading to the latest version of Acrob
Mike wrotE:
If they ever became upgradeable I suspect it would be more like a full
camera back that would be replaceable. Something that held the entire
system. But, then again, with the entire system upgradeable, what would be
the point?
Mike,
We could, of course, go medium format with a digital b
Keith Green wrote:
Just how much do sensors cost?
Big Mike wrote:
You are putting way too much thought into it. The price difference
between models is quite simple: The 1Ds.2 is twice as expensive as the
1D.2 >>> because Canon CAN charge more and photographers WILL pay more
for more m
Just how much do sensors cost?
The 1D Mk II is half the price of the 1DS Mk II, a difference of GBP 2600
If we compare the specs of the 1D Mk II and the 1DS Mk II, while there are
differences, such as buffer size, most of the difference in price must be
because of the sensor.
Similarly, the differe
Bob Talbot wrote:
Even on my old EOS 50E (pre digital) there was an internal "sensor" to
distinguish horizontal from vertical format [for the eye controlled
focus]. I believe it was little more than a trapped ball bearing
(mercury too toxic and all that).
Bob,
True, although it didn't always work
Rod Hefford wrote:
I have just been to my camera shop looking to purchase
a 25mm extension tube. I was told that there are none
around because Canon are to release an updated version
and shops have been de-stocking.
Does anyone know anything about this?
Rod,
It is a change to suit the EF-S lenses.
Gerard.Maas wrote:
Some time ago there were some rumors arround about NY-Camera going broke.
Does somebody know how the story ends? Now the NY-Camera website redirects
you to another site with a weird name. Any recent experiences?
Gerard,
Check out this link on dpreview:
http://forums.dpreview.co
Gary Lawton wrote:
I'm trying to purchase the above Tripod Mount Ring for an EF 100mm 2.8
macro lens. WarehouseExpress have incorrectly ordered and shipped the
Tripod Mount Ring A (B) - this is for the EF 200 f/2.8L lens.
Can anyone give me a specific part number or further details for the
correct
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: EOS My 70-200L IS is showing 00 for aperature and freezes
My 70-200L IS is ocassionally showing me "00" for aperature and blinking
"MF" indicator, when it happens
Ron rote:
I have a problem that may have a simple answer, then again maybe not. I
have the Canon 10D. I cannot get the onboard flash to open no matter
how hard I press the button on the prism cover area. Is there something
I am not doing? Is there something short of disassembly that I can do
to get
Richard Jones wrote:
I have a number of questions which I'm sure must have been already
answered on this list, however I'm quite new and so haven't built up
much of an archive.
Is there an archive online somewhere, or could someone send me a couple
of years worth of the list in mbox or tarred/zippe
The latest newsletter is now out. Articles are on the website, not included
in the e-mail.
Current articles include one on Astrophotography, and some FAQs compiled by
Chuck Westfall of Canon USA.
You can enter the site, or sign up for the newsletter at:
http://www.cps.canon-europe.com/home.jsp
Well
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 8:04 PM
Subject: RE: EOS New York Camera
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 14:21:58 -0500
From: Bill Gillooly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: EOS New York Camera
You probably wouldn't have rec
Guys,
The word on dpReview is that New York Camera has ceased trading.
No official word yet.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=10896748
Before anyone orders anything else.
Cheers
Keith
*
***
***
* For list
Simon Rose wrote:
Does anyone know of a better price than £1059 for a 20D in the UK.
I.e. full UK model not grey import from a dealer with a (good) reputation.
Simon,
Warehouse Express seems the cheapest, but in this weeks Amateur
Photographer, AJ Purdy are quoting £1169 complete with a 1GB Ultra I
> Hi all,
> this is a bit OT, but still is about canon...
> I've an old canonet GIII QL 17.
> It uses the mercury-based 625 battery 1.3v that are no more produced.
> Some sites, i.e.:
>
>
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/index-frameset.html?CanonCano
netGIIIQL17.html~mainFrame
>
> rep
--- Keith Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guys,
In the September issue of EOS Magazine they make the
statement about the AF
system on the 20D:
"centre AF point is cross-type, enabling
autofocusing with a maximum
aperture of f8."
Has anyone tried the autofocus with an f8 setup?
How
Guys,
In the September issue of EOS Magazine they make the statement about the AF
system on the 20D:
"centre AF point is cross-type, enabling autofocusing with a maximum
aperture of f8."
Has anyone tried the autofocus with an f8 setup?
How does it compare with an EOS 3?
In all the reviews that I ha
Guys,
Here is a link to an interview with, I think, one of the top men at Canon.
He is described, by Babelfish, as secondary business headquarters chief.
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2004/10/01/187.html
Unfortunately Babelfish gives a less than perfect translation.
Still better than anyt
Bud Kuenzli wote:
adding to my other comment about my fear of formats and future
compatibility, now that Adobe has created their OWN "raw" format,
it's just a question of time before they try to strong-arm canon,
nikon and such to adopt THEIR format. At least that's what I'm
worried about. We'l
Robert wrote:
The raw format is a format just as jpg or any other format. The only
difference is that it is a format for which you cannot get/buy the specs
easily. The raw format has tags to store meta data as do other formats.
Canon's raw format uses (lossless) compression as most other formats us
- Original Message -
From: "Harman Bajwa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: EOS Virus Report
--- Paul Moortgat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've never been so far to see some attachment with a
virus. As soon I
read the blue
Guys,
I keep getting a virus report for e-mails that I haven't sent.
Just to be sure, I downloaded a Bagle clearing program from Symantec, which
found nothing.
The only reason I think that it might be coming from the EOS Mailing List is
because 'Tom', whoever he is, has an a1.nl e-mail address.
Nee
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pdf/canon_1ds_markii.pdf
It's actually 25 pages long, so perhaps brochure is an understatement
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.766 / Virus Database: 513 - Release Date: 17
- Original Message -
From: "Chip Louie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:05 PM
Subject: RE: EOS Adobe Photoshop Elements 3
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Durling
Sent: Friday, Septe
Hi All,
Adobe has announced Photoshop Elements 3.
The big plus is that it includes camera raw support.
I wonder when Canon will start to supply V3, instead of V2 with its
hardware?
Photoshop CS is overkill for what I need. Elements with camera raw would be
ideal.
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:16:28 -0700 (PDT), Bob Meyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
The interesting thing is that it has a dual mode
sensor, that can be used as
12.4 MP, for quality, or as 8 MP for speed.
Although at 12.4 MP this is larger than the 1DS, it
is still a 1.5
multiplier, like all
- Original Message -
From: "Marco Kost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 8:05 AM
Subject: Re: EOS New Nikon
On 16 Sep 2004 at 18:04, Keith Green wrote:
Nikon have announced a new model, the D2X.
The interesting thing is t
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: EOS New Nikon
--- Keith Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikon have announced a new model, the D2X.
The interesting thin
Nikon have announced a new model, the D2X.
The interesting thing is that it has a dual mode sensor, that can be used as
12.4 MP, for quality, or as 8 MP for speed.
Although at 12.4 MP this is larger than the 1DS, it is still a 1.5
multiplier, like all Nikons.
See http://www.nikondigital.org/news/
Hi All,
An alternative to Canon's ring-flash
http://www.sigma-photo.co.jp/english/news/EM_140D.html
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.762 / Virus Database: 510 - Release Date: 13/09/2004
*
***
***
- Original Message -
From: "Marc Davison (home)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: EOS10D at £799 GBP
Keith Green wrote:
Simon Rose wrote:
IF anyone is after a 10D then 7Day Shop are selling them fo
Simon Rose wrote:
IF anyone is after a 10D then 7Day Shop are selling them for £799 gbp inc
VAT and Delivery to the UK! That's the best price I've seen them for so
far
- does anyone know of a better price? (other than buying it from the USA!)
So so tempting...
Warehouse Express are still advert
It looks as if we shall be able to buy a black 300D in Europe, or at least
Germany, soon.
http://www.canon.de/about_us/news/consumer_releases/foto/eos300d_black.asp
There is no suggestion that there are any other changes, but it does look
smart with the BG-E1 battery grip.
(Well I think so.)
Ch
- Original Message -
From: "Nanou Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 4:03 PM
Subject: EOS OT: PM Photographer of the year
Hi guys,
Sorry for the OT but the local store is sold out and I
wonder if any of you could tell me which is the next
Canon have been running a major television advertising campaign for the 300D
in the UK.
I would have thought that this meant that there was still some life in the
body, however prices seem to be in freefall at the moment.
Last week, the lowest 300D price that I found was 619GBP.
This week it is
Thanks for the comments guys. You have said what I already feared, that I
probably wouldn't be satisfied by less than a DSLR.
I do see the shutter lag a problem for action shots.
I must look into used prices, although the 300D is currently selling at
620 GBP - Body only.
Canon have been running a m
Alright, so I am not going to splash out on a 20D, but in order to get a
foot on the digital ladder, I am considering a digital compact.
I know that many people are very happy with their compacts, and indeed own
nothing else, but some of the Pros and Cons that I can see are:
Cons:
Shutter lag.
Michael Stevens wrote:
I guess you didn't follow the link to the following page that said "John's
September through November 2004 Nikon SLR PREDICTIONS"?
Looks like Nikon are raising the stakes again.
http://www.engadget.com/entry/3622842317441586/
So, how long before Canon meet it. Next month?
Che
Looks like Nikon are raising the stakes again.
http://www.engadget.com/entry/3622842317441586/
So, how long before Canon meet it. Next month?
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - R
Now that many of us are either over or underwhelmed, by the D20, does anyone
expect any more imminent releases from Canon.
A 200D, perhaps?
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 -
Willem-Jan Markerink wrote:
Hardly a coincident anymore, this is at least the second time a EOS
camera has been 'released' this way
To paraphrase Oscar Wilde:
To lose one news release may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks
like carelessness.
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certi
The specs quoted on dPreview.com from a Korean site:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=9924289
quote 8.2 MegaPixels and a 1.6 crop.
This would mean that Canon has developed two CMOS sensors, a 1.3 crop for
the 1D Mk II and the 1.6 for the D20.
The Swedish site mentioned
Ken Durling wrote:
Is there a program that will do a batch conversion from RAW to JPEG? I
see PS has a convert to .psd automation, but I doubt he can open those
either. How do you guys deal with this?
Ken,
Both Paintshop Pro 7 and Photoshop have a Batch Conversion option.
In PhotoShop (I am using
Hello All,
In his latest mailing, David Cardinal, the editor of DigitalPro Shooter,
makes the statement that Digital SLRs are less reliable than Film.
Have any of the heavier shooters on this list found this?
You might like to go to http://www.nikondigital.org/, read DPS 2-24 and take
part in th
K.Bibis wrote:
> > I couldn't fine enough info on the web.
> > I guess III is the current version.
> > I have seen II sold 2nd hand and thinking of buying it.
> > What is new in the III edition ?
> >
> > You know of any UK online shops that list it ?
Kei
K.Bibis wrote:
> I couldn't fine enough info on the web.
> I guess III is the current version.
> I have seen II sold 2nd hand and thinking of buying it.
> What is new in the III edition ?
>
> You know of any UK online shops that list it ?
Try EOS Magazine 01869 331741.
They don't have a full list
For all of those who haven't received the March issue yet, I've received the
June copy this week.
If you are still waiting, it might be worth getting in touch with them.
http://www.eos-magazine.com/
One advantage of living in the UK.
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Che
Harman Bajwa wrote:
> Others have probably given valuable ideas and better
> ways to handle this. I had the same problem when I
> first used the A80 and S50 at the same time and got
> hit with identical file numbers. My solution was to
> use good old DOS commands:
>
> 1. Copy all files into a temp
Grant Westerson wrote:
> A few, or more, months ago there was a good email on cleaning your digital
> chip. Can someone point me in that direction?? Thanks!
Grant,
Arthur Morris has just covered Sensor cleaning in his latest Bulletin:
http://www.birdsasart.com/bn134.htm
Cheers
Keith
---
O
Tas Papadopoulos wrote:
>> So, with my digital appetite satisfied for now, (I really wanted a 10D
>> with the 1.6x factor, but I also wanted a swing-out/flip-out LCD, and a
>> better price), time will tell what my split use ration will be between
>> the G5 and the eLAN IIe. Which brings me to my
Robert W. Meyers wrote:
> >I was wondering if people know how severe the differences in quality will
be
> >between these two lenses? The long end is my most important. The range
> >would be kinda neat. However, would I be better off saving and picking
up
> >something like the Sigma 120-300mm F2
Harman Bajwa wrote:
> Is there an accessible archive of messages sent on
> this list or is it possible to search/retrieve past
> messages ?
Harmon,
Go to Julian Loke's home page:
http://members.rogers.com/jul.loke/
Follow the link to 'EOS Mailing List Search Form v1.7'
I usually use the 'Search
Konstantinos Bibis wrote:
> i wanted to ask those who are based in the UK if they know(and
> preferably used) any insurance company for their photographic
> equipment.
Konstantinos,
I use
Glover & Howe Insurance Services http://www.gloverhowe.co.uk/
1 Culver Walk
Colchester
Essex
CO1 1XJ
Th
Hello All,
I just noticed on the Canon Europe CPS website that there is another
firmware update for the 10D.
Version 2.0.1
http://www.cps.canon-europe.com/news/view.jsp?newsId=8
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.co
Thomas Bantel wrote:
> Oops, yes, you're right. Some EOS lenses don't transmit *focusing
distance*,
> but I think all of them do transmit their FL. The question remains, what
> *exactly* do they transmit? The FL as marked on the zoom ring/lens barrel
> or the *true* focal length they have at the
Bob Turner wrote:
> I came across a piece in EOS Magazine that stated something about a
SCSI-USB
> adaptor. I discovered that there is a piece of Adaptec hardware called
> USBXChange. So, I thought of keeping the scanner for the film work that I
> will be doing.
>
> Now, I have managed to install
I wrote:
> I saw a 300D body in my local Jessops window today. The price was list.
> The new EF-S 18-55 lens was not shown, so I do not know if they had one
in.
> Still, all those who have ordered the 300D will now know that its arrival
is
> imminent.
>
Having just looked at the Jessops web-site
Thys wrote:
> A 12-24mm Full Frame lens!
> Looks like Sigma is quitely stealing the lens technology show here (Not
> merely copying anymore but really innovating now - First a 100-300/2.8
that
> gets great reviews and now this!). If only they could get the quality
right
> on this one (optical and
Jim Davis wrote:
> Who said anything about B&H? I was talking about camera shops in
> England.
Jim,
When I referred to mail-order in my earlier post, I was not referring to
solely mail-order suppliers, but to shops with no more than, say, three
sites. Just like B&H.
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoi
Bob Turner wrote:
> I've said it before and I'll say it again, what we need is B&H UK Ltd.
Bob,
Too true.
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 23/09/2003
*
***
I saw a 300D body in my local Jessops window today. The price was list.
The new EF-S 18-55 lens was not shown, so I do not know if they had one in.
Still, all those who have ordered the 300D will now know that its arrival is
imminent.
For those who do not know Jessops, they have over 240 branches
Still no sign of 10D prices dropping in the UK.
What a surprise!
At these new lower prices, for everywhere else, the 300D is going to be
squeezed on price, even before anyone has bought one, which can't be bad
news.
Cheers
Keith
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-v
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: New film EOS 3000V
>
> --- Hugo Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Maybe this is old news but since no one posted it,
> > h
Thanks guys,
I said that it was subjective, and obviously I was right.
I used the Prime as an example, because it is a similar price to the 8000F.
Canon never released the 2720FS in the UK, so if I go for a film scanner, I
will probably go with the Minolta Scan Dual III.
Pricewise, this would com
Having decided that I shall eventually go digital, it doesn't seem a good
idea to invest in a film scanner for my old slides and negatives.
Has anyone tried a recent flatbed, such as the Canon 8000F, for film
scanning.
How good are the results, and is it a viable alternative to a film scanner.
I re
Keith Green wrote:
> > If you use a lens set at 22mm on an EOS 10D, with flash, does the camera
set
> > the flash to as wide an angle as possible, or does it do the 1.6
> > multiplication and set it to 35mm focal length?
Tapani Tarvainen wrote:
> It doesn't s
If you use a lens set at 22mm on an EOS 10D, with flash, does the camera set
the flash to as wide an angle as possible, or does it do the 1.6
multiplication and set it to 35mm focal length?
Cheers
Keith
*
***
***
* For list instru
Tom Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> Well, there is the Canon 24-85mm. I've owned at least three of them,
> they are very nice lenses. USM, full time manual focus, distance scale,
> non-rotating front element, in other words all those things your
> friend's 28-80 doesn't have, plus the 4mm on the wide end and 5
We all know that the slowest recommended hand-held speed for a lens is the
reciprocal of the focal length, but is this only for 35mm or does it hold
true for larger format, and more importantly for smaller such as a digital
sensor?
If I handhold a 200mm lens, then I shoot at say 1/250th of a secon
Bob Meyer wrote:
> Your best bet: Use a pigment ink based printer, like
> the Epson 2200. (Of course, pigment inks present
> their own set of tradeoffs.) Or use the manufacturer
> recommended papers and frame behind glass. Of just
> figure fading is a fact of life, and reprint your
> images
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
