Dear All,
Can I block all MP3 files to and from from our Exchange server???
Carine
Improve your customers' satisfaction at a lower cost.
Click here for details :-
http://www.scs.com.my/scsNews.asp?article=30
With a thirdparty products you can block MP3 files being send from and to
your Exchange Server.
Also you should try to get your hands on a copy of the September edition of
Windows 2000 Magazine which has a script to automatically remove Napster
from workstations.
--
Dear Ed,
Mistaken, but not in that way. I had read to get around this to
use-forward to fublic folder- not move to folder. But I cannot find such a
command past forward to contact/ recipient.
Although it seems moving to a public folder used to work on the client
machine. thanks
Have any of you ever considered just how far up your own arses you really
are?
I mean come on. Some of us just don't get to sit there all day playing with
one product. We are employed to keep a whole network or bunch of networks
going.
Yes I looked in the knowledge base, from my quick search I
Q273478 perhaps? otherwise no comment
Roger Mackenzie (Glasgow University)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 September 2001 08:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing Exchange 2000 after abortive install
Have any of you ever considered just
I was just noticing that most of the gurus of the list had plenty of time
to respond to the list regarding various questions. Am I missing
something?
I have been updating virus software, scanning mailboxes, patching iis/owa
servers etc. all night. We were hit externally, but we only had to
Sorry for the off topic, and yes - I'm also just off to find an access
mailing list as well.
I have a problem with a chap who has been experimenting with Access
security on some of the network databases. Problem is that all of a
sudden when trying to open any of these databases MS Access
All current IIS patches.
Mail scanned by www.messagelabs.com
Firewall set to block .eml[1]
Users housetrained.
[1] Thanks to a tip on the Raptor mailing list
Les Bessant mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IT Manager, Sanderson Townend Gilbert
Acting in a personal capacity
http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
hmm.. that sounds funny...
Ok try this then, Open MSAccess. Don't open any datbase. goto
tools--security--user Grps. and accounts -- and try changing the password
for the admin.
Then try to open the database
Otherwise this has something to do with the MSoffice netowrk inst. Which I
have no
We don't need no stinkin' patches!
Andy David
J Muller International
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 06:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: today's admin backwards virus
I was just noticing that most of the
Sounds like a mail loop. Put limits on your mailboxes. Restrict send
at nn megabytes. That will stop it for the moment, if that's what it
is, and buy you some time to react. Now go get a good online backup of
your server to get rid of all the 5mb log files. (You have a whole
bunch of them,
Ok, first things first, yes I have owner rights to the Org Forms Library,
second I started the whole thing by opening up the form, and taking a name
out of the To: line, and adding a name. I go to publish the form. Some
times just publish form, sometimes publish forms as. When I go back into
hi,
I have one exchange server on which are hosted many domains( or will be)
each in their own OU. Everything works fine except that each domain can
see everyone in the other domains through the Global Address List.
Now I know you can create multiple Global Address Lists, which I have
done. I
The important thing is that there is a patch for IE 5 and 5.5. IE 6.0
shouldn't need a patch since this issue was identified quite a while back.
The Media Player launch is annoying but relatively harmless, since Media
Player apparently can't launch an .exe file. Are you getting the prompt to
Look for the ASP hosting white papers on www.microsoft.com
Yours,
Julian Stone
Exchange 2000 Consultant
Netstore - Europe's leading Application Service Provider
-Original Message-
From: Pat Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:11 PM
To: Exchange
This problem is solved.
Thanks to Antonio for this information
Gee - is there anything that this list cant doo
/eye's to the ceiling in aspiring awe
Regards
James Johnston
BT Ignite Solutions, eCRM
Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DDI : 01392 459076
Cell: 07771
He has added a password to the Admin user within Access - this switches on
Access security. Go round to his desk with a big stick and ask him what he
used as the password. If he can't remember, persuade him violently with the
stick!
If he hasn't created a new workgroup file (system.mdw) using
You also need to restrict receive at nn+xx megabytes if you want the
mailboxes to quit growing.
Joel K. Osborn
Information Systems Technical Specialist
Wisconsin Department of Transportation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hello All,
I was wondering how people are dealing with the absence of Trust Level on
the cc:Mail connector and E2K mailboxes. In Exchange 5.5 we used the Trust
Level on the connector to restrict directory synchronization with cc:Mail to
certain mailboxes.
By default we don't want all mailboxes
On my Exchange box, when I try to log on, I keep getting Dr. Watson error
that says the following:
Explorer.exe
Exception Access Violation (0xc005), Address:0x77f7d18e
Everytime I close that down, another one pops up in about 5 seconds.
There isn't even enough time to open the Run command
My thinking was the loop, if present, would be stopped by the machine
not sending. This way, the user wouldn't lose any valid incoming mail.
-Original Message-
From: Osborn, Joel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 08:09 AM
Posted To: MSExchange
You stop the .eml files by getting all the (attacking?) PCs on
your network virus scanned with up to date antivirus software
with today's virus patterns. Also shut down your IIS services
if you think they may have been compromised.
Cheers,
Phil
-
All,
I have a remote office that is currently on ccmail, which does a dialup sync
twice a day. As this is the last office to be converted over to Exchange,
there is a tremendous political push to get this office converted over to
Exchange. This office does not have direct network connectivity
You must use a custom form to change it. On the actions tab (in design
mode) you can change the behaviour of the default actions.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Raul Rivera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 17, 2001 3:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Office Assistant
Can you try just saving the form as an OFT and delete the forms from the org
forms library? Then if you have some items based on the form, try to open
them, if they open with the old form, it is still in the cache or is
published on the folder or personal forms library (I know you've cleared
Nope that works too.
-Original Message-
From: Hurst, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 14, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Public folder permissions for DL
I believe the problem is not in adding people BUT removing them, even though
they are removed
Jennifer,
What AV are you using? Most (all?) are capable of auto-update. I use
Symantec and grab updates 4 times a day automatically. Scanning mboxes is
automatic too. Patching servers doesn't take all that long. Cleaning up from
a hit, well that's another story, we've been lucky so far.
Adil mentions that he has 10MB free on the C: drive. Sounds like a
small office
installation with all data on the server C: drive (I could be wrong).
1. Check/Move Information store to a partition with more space.
2. Move the page file to another partition with more space.
3. Remove
Explorer.exe
Exception Access Violation (0xc005), Address:0x77f7d18e
the virus seems to do something in it's later stages of infection that
causes the problem you describe. Removing the virus has no effect.
We have two servers with the same problem, and have tried everything to
correct it
Dear anyone,
We have 3 sites; A, B and C. Site A is connected to site B with a slow
line. Site B is connected to site C with a faster line. Between site A B
and B C X.400 and Directory Replication Connectors are set up.
A new fast line is going to connect site A to site C. The idea is to
Situation-
I have recently upgraded our Exchange 5.5 sp4 server to Exchange 2000
sp1. I built a new server and used the move mailbox method. The new
server has been up and functioning for about a week now. I finally was
content and decided to pull the old server. I did follow the Q article
The same thing happened to me. It is Nimda. My box appears to be hosed. I
was able to boot, but not log on. As soon as I logged on, and the desktop
loaded, Doc Watson kept popping up. I booted the system, did not log on,
mapped the C$ drive to a machine that had new signature files, and
You just said in a previous message that you were up all night patching
boxes and scanning mailboxes and updating your av files. Which is it?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Walden H.
Leverich
Sent: September 19, 2001 9:57 AM
To:
Try opening the form in design mode by going into Tools\Forms\Design a Form
and select the form, then go into the properties of the To: field Value tab
and see if there's an initial value for that field. If there is, change it
to what you want it to be and then try Tools\Forms\Publish Form As.
All of our AV stuff is essentially done automatically, updates and mailbox
scans are scheduled and run automatically. We still have to pop in and
ensure that everything is running as it should etc. but that doesn't take
too long in the run of a day/week. What does take some time is keeping up to
Hello All,
I have an Exchange Server 5.5 sp4. The only Exchange server in the domain
thus no site replications and no plans to add any new Exchange server to an
existing site for at least the next month or so. Can you run Consistency
Adjuster at any time or does it require the service to be
If you have a permanent connection to the Internet with this office/server -
you MUST get a firewall. Corporate data is now at risk 24x7. *When* you
get a firewall, you can set up a VPN.
===
We have 3 sites; A, B and C. Site A is connected to site B with a slow line.
Site B is connected to
He has 10 MB free because the server quits at that point.
Run a full backup, set the proper limits, find what's in the queue, kill the
rules, torture the person or persons responsible.
I have minions who can assist every step of the way for an oh-so-modest fee.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO,
If your users are authenticating when starting Outlook, then the Exchange
server is proxying the login to the BDC. Make sure the Exchange server can
find the DC with WINS.
-Original Message-
From: Bean, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 7:30 AM
To:
Hi Guys
Some time ago I moved exchange to a new server with the help of Ed Crowley
method, we did not create a new internet connector at that time as we had
it running on another server. There is now need to install IMC on the
exchange server. I created a new connector and gave it a cost
Thanks It had an initial value set in the value tab. I would like to thank
everyone for their help in this situation.
CC
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Form not
couldn't you set it up so that it replies with a template or something?
I've never done this, so I don't know how well it works.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
Jennifer,
Most everyone has already hit on the obvious, most of us use the auto-update
feature from the A/V product of our choosing. Then we go the extra step and
use some sort of filtering, be it at the fire wall or just simple attachment
blocking in our e-mail server A/V product. Here I block
What were your search terms, Tim?
What were *your* search terms, Roger?
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Pinky,
Oh, the other thing we did was, well we threw IIS right out
the window!!
so how are you hosting? do your users miss owa?
dan.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
So, does anyone have a strong opinion on what filtering software to use? We
haven't done anything along those lines before (hell, we didn't have
antivirus until last year). I just want to use it for blocking attachments;
we don't care about abilities relating to disclaimers or scanning for
Well, there's a fundamental problem we have here; we're a public library,
and freedom to write and receive email here is not to be impinged in any
way. Even in blocking certain attachment types, I'm kind of stepping over
the line. So, in terms of filtering for any virus-related terminology, I
Antigen, Trend Micro, and probably others. These are some of the most
popular though...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:59 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: today's admin
ah... it works on some and not others. There's a foothold.
Turn on archiving on the IMS. Identify a message that did successfully
deliver and one that did not. Find them in the \imcdata\in\archive
directory. Parse them out to see what is different between them. Check your
logs for any errors
My users don't use OWA right now, that is something we are not even talking
about until Exchange 2000, but then we will be back in the business of
running IIS in patch and run mode as we did before we got rid of it. I have
very strong feelings about admins that run servers and don't keep them
So what do you use with IIS? What about your OWA?
I'm not worried. I just like asking leading questions.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
I'm not an administrator. I'm a CEO. Works for me.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker
Sent: Wednesday, September 19,
How long have you been doing tech support? You should know that users will
find a way!
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Then why have any AV software at all? You wouldn't want to impinge upon
someone's right to send you a virus and their right to make you execute
it!! Content filtering for words and language in the context of defending
against attacks is not the same as blocking for objectionable words (which
is
Query on Remove Exchange 2000 Completely. It's in the first 5 links. I
have a personal rule that I never give out a KB article that I find in the
first 5 links of a reasonably simple search.
Exchange is cruel with strong sadistic tendencies, so get used to it and
learn how to make reasonably
We use ScriptLogic to do this for us. I know there are other ways, too.
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
That is
The nice thing about MAILsweeper for SMTP (and I'm assuming others - I haven't used
them) is that you can quarantine messages, not just block them. We had MAILsweeper
quarantine all suspicious incoming content and send a notification to the recipient
that they had a message in quarantine.
Yeah, I know ... I used to design and build applications systems and would
always keep Bullet-proofing in mind :) ... In any case, the problem has
now gotten worse.
Either the on-site technician or the client or possibly MSX has now screwed
up what was originally functioning when I first posted
One way, without buying anything, is to customize the outlook.prf file to
set:
MailboxName=%UserName%
Create a batch file to run newprof.exe to create a batch file using the
.prf file you make and set it to run in the user's logon profile.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq
If it's outbound mail that's in the queue, check your IMS server's DNS
settings.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Also check name resolution through DNS.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bueffel, Scott M
- CNF
Sent: Wednesday,
Oopps .. this should make for a better read on the second last paragraph.
Now the client can't even display the contents of her own Contacts folder.
When she attempts to view the folder, Outlook reports back saying Unable to
display the folder and the View menu does not show the usual menu entry
Don't do it over the Internet if you have no firewall and no VPN.
RRAS will potentially eat up your phone bill. You may not be able to bring
the server into your org.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original
I would create the new connector first, set the cost of the old connector to
be higher than the new one, and watch the queues to make sure everything is
working. Then you can shut down the old connector.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
I tried that, and had issues. I believe the issues were in my batch file
Do you have an example?
Dustin Krysak
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 19, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook profiles
Take down the dir-rep between B and C. Let it settle a little. Then put the
Dir-rep up to C from A. No mail connectors need necessarily go down. If the
link between B and C remains, you can keep their connector with a cost of
100, so you can use it in emergencies.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO,
Well, I just put in a 24 hour shift to patch the ol' web, email, main and
terminal servers in one form or another and clean up 30 workstations. Was a
little too late in the blocking of all .exe files on the sybari but I think
this one entered thru the front web door on a client PC hitting an
Like the current problem is preferable...
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Winterton,
Robert K
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 4:49
Call Microsoft and ask for an Exchange 2000 CLN engineer. They're
responsible for fixing your Free/Busy woes. All of them. If they try and
transfer you to Admin, tell them they're not supposed to do that. It's a
Client issue. Make another call for the Org Forms stuff. IIRC, that's a
Client issue,
Well, turns out it was. Not to mention that doing as you suggested still
would not have solved the problem (in this case).
-Original Message-
From: Great Cthulhu Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Form
Which is why the ultimate solution is to make someone else have to put up
with the things.
(:=
Great Cthulhu Jones
CEO, R'lyeh Consulting
http://www.zzzptm.com/cthulhu
http://www.bad-managers.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
I recall reading a KB article that NDS for NT breaks a BDC's ability to do
pass-through authentication. Sorry I can't remember the number and the facts
may be slightly incorrect, but the description jives with what's in my
(fallible human) memory.
Call MS about this one.
- Original Message
I'm running Exchange 2000 in an AD environment, and I would like to be able
to forward emails coming into the company to an external address. As simple
as this sounds, I can't seem to find anything on this. Can anyone help or
point me into the right direction?
Much appreciated,
Denyse
Maybe it's just me, but, if your servers were infected I would rebuild them
as a matter of principle. You are only cleaning up the symptoms and closing
the hole after someone has already been in and touched you. The only way
that I know of to be assured of having truly cleaned the system is to
hi all!
i have one exchange server 5.5 with sp5. this server connects to a mail
relay where webshield smtp is installed and where all mail from/to the
outside world comes/goes.
today i received a message from other mail server (external) like this:
Message REJECTED due to incorrect
I was wondering if anyone has used the exmerge program to only export a few
of the accounts on the exchange server. I have exchange 2000 and need to be
able to backup a handful of accounts differently from all of the other
accounts. I would like to be able to use exmerge to copy out the mailbox
sounds like they want your HELO fqdn to match your MX record. does it?
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
-
Don't
At 01:42 PM 9/19/2001 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sounds like they want your HELO fqdn to match your MX record. does it?
uninformed speculation
It's probably simpler than that. They're probably expecting something that
looks like a FQDN in the HELO. I expect that, WINS-like, the server
Either that or it IS a FQDN, but it's not resolvable in DNS. Are you
having any external DNS problems with your domain? Made any changes recently?
Of course, it could be that the destination is having problems resolving
DNS generally.
Oh, uninformed speculation -- the Wednesday game for
Post the batch file.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dustin Krysak
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 9:45 AM
To:
Wanted to implement OWA for my Exchange server.
What is the correct order of the NT/Exchange service pack and hot fixes on a
new installation?
My understanding is ...
NT
SP6
IE 5.5
Option Pack (bring IIS up to 4.0)
Exchange OWA
Exchange SP4
Someone told me I should now re-apply SP6 but I
That is a side benefit, for sure. And that is exactly the sort of
information I was looking for. My intent here really is to gather as much
information as possible from people already using various products. We
could have really used that sort of information before we purchased Arcserve
two
When I scanned one of our servers with NAV, from a boot floppy it was
finding a lot of EXE's that it said was infected with NIMDA. The last folder
I saw that had several infected EXE's was Program File\Outlook Express
It could not clean these, they were different file sizes.
I did not want to
Technically you should install the Option Pack before installing SP6. If you
do it your way, you should re-apply SP6 after installing the Option Pack.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: David Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:54 AM
To: Exchange
Yeah, I know but Opt Pack requires SP3 to load and since it was a new
install I had already loaded SP6.
Thanks for the info
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Parkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange/NT
No you won't see 2 C sites. Why disable the other connector? Just give it
a higher cost. In that way you'll have a backup if the fast line between A
and C goes to lunch.
Is the first paragraph preview of an upcoming question? Coming soon to a
mailbox near you?
S.
-Original Message-
Good points Eric. That is exactly what we are doing with NAI's Webshield
SMTP. I should have mentioned that we are quarantining rather than blocking
in the true sense.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver, Washington
[EMAIL
You have it set up to send all attatchments to administrator email box?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: today's admin backwards virus
Good points Eric. That is
Thanks Ed, I'll look into that.
Would it make sense to do this from the client side (by using the rules
wizard)? It would obviously have to be a server only rule, but I'm
wondering if that makes sense.
Denyse
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
They are attempting to block SPAM by accepting only mail from hosts where
the string in the HELO can be resolved to an IP address, and possibly also
checking that a reverse DNS lookup on the IP address of your end of the SMTP
conversation matches the HELO string.
If they are smart, they will
Ken,
We use Groupshield here as well, and we do have it quarantining those
messages that contain virus-infected attachments. I was not aware of any
ability to actually block attachment types through Groupshield, or am I
reading you wrong?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Matt,
In Groupshield you can go to the On-Access tab and then select Attachment
Blocking and then Specified Attachments that is where you would set the
extensions that you wish to block.
-
Taken from the Help file in GSE:
4 In the Attachment blocking box, select one
Ditto!
Michael Semiglia
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:37 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: nimda virus changes on me
Maybe it's just me, but, if your servers were infected I would rebuild them
as
I just had a similar problem today. Seems that Snip.net has turned up all
the UCE parameters and now requires a FQDN when issuing a helo command. My
Trend Internet Virus Wall was not issuing a FQDN only its computer name. I
just had to add my domain name under My computerpropertiesnetwork
FYI - there's a payload, apparently.
http://www.symantec.com/press/2001/n010919.html
-Michèle
Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com
Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley
Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk
I think I may have got it working ... I'm still testing... If it isn't, I
will post it. Thanks for the help.
Dustin Krysak
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: September 19, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Auto config Outlook
Actually, in my tests to see what was going on, I was doing this with a
newly created profile on my workstation.
Here's another stupid thing ... After I called our email administrators to
ask if they had made any changes, between the yesterday morning when it was
working (as tested by myself
Hi,
We're using Outlook 2000 sr-1 w/Exchange 5.5. When a user XYZ addresses
a message to AM, the check names dialog box appears asking them to select
between two users: AM and AMS. The user would prefer not to select the name
everytime. The problem is this does not happen with every Outlook
In 'real life' I'm not an system administrator
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
--
- Original Message -
From: Jennifer Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Your assumption was correct and it worked beautifully, thanks again.
Denyse
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forwarding emails to an external address
You mean for single
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
