Friggin' Lyris!!
Deleted Items count against the store, but recoverable items don't.
Therefore, performing that step is a waste of time and potentially could
lead to a dreaded restore if you are deleting the wrong ones!
Tris
Tristan Gayford
Ok.. Make a file called limits.csv, and put the following line in it(as the
only line):
obj-class,display name, MDB-Use-Defaults,mdb-storage-quota,
mdb-over-quota-limit
Then, from Exchange Admin, choose to export the directory, and then choose
the file location - you need to select the file you
Exchange is quite capable of handling the load you're giving it. I have run
similar loads on similar (or lesser) hardware without the issues you're
describing.
Based on the description of the symptoms you're seeing, I strongly suggest
you revisit the switch/NIC settings - maybe even force both
Um, you're a bit off here. The items that are recoverable via deleted item
retention are just toomstoned objects within the store. Seeing as they have
to be somewhere to be able to be recovered, the Store seems like a logical
place to keep them.
Since Deleted items available for recovery are
Whoops - what I meant to say was storage limits - I hadn't drunk my morning
coffee by then. What I was trying to say is that deleting recoverable items
will not help the users storage limits as they aren't counted for that.
Now where's that cup
Tris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
this is probably very basic but I have looked through the faq and
read mails and am a bit stumped. The situation is as follows:
A client has approached me to resolve an issue where two Exchange
servers in separate locations are no longer
Okay.
What about the desktops we are dealing with? I haven't seen any information
on them in your entries so far (have I missed anything?).
What about binding order on the desktop? Make sure either RPC or TCPIP is
first in line?
How big are the attachments being opened? Are they larger
What is the schedule for the RAS connection set for?
- Original Message -
From: exchange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:16 AM
Subject: Connected Exchange servers have stopped connecting!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
I just figured this out, thanks.
The client had installed URLScan - as soon as I disabled it, the mail
ran. I now need to check out the correct URLScan settings for this
scenario.
Cheers,
Tom
Tom Raftery
__
Zenith
Thanks for your help on this. I did call Microsoft. There solution fixed one
problem, but created another. The solution was to modify the default domain
controllers policy by adding the administrators group and the Exchange
Enterprise Servers group to
Ok I received this email from someone in my company and I would like to
know if anyone else ever saw a msg like this. In no way would I ever
attempt on doing this but I would like to know what it really would do if it
was done. I think its a hoax that could damage your Gal not sure though.
Hello,
I have just added a Exch2K server to an existing 5.5 Organization. I moved
my own mailbox to it a couple days ago - no one else has been moved. Now
when I try to send email inside the org I get an NDR - text below. I can
receive from inside and out, and send outside the org. Anybody
It's been debunked on this list in the last 60 days.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:34 AM
To: Exchange
Nate,
In my case all of the desktops are new (less than 6 months old) Compaq
Deskpro EN's PIII866 upwards, 128Mb memory and oodles of HDD space
available. Protocols are all IP and bindings are fine. Attachment sizes
are below 2-3Mb. Mcafee Vscan is used on all desktops - updating via FTP to
Any news on this?
-Original Message-
From: Lantzos Antony
Sent: 28 November 2001 13:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: E2K wont receive mail in 5.5 site.
Sensitivity: Confidential
Does the Recipient ADC need to be in place before Installing Exchange or can
it be added after?
The ADC[1] is supposed to be installed before forestprep or domainprep are
run.
Not sure what effect it would have to install the ADC last, but I get the
impression its not a good thing.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems
Hello,
In an effort to justify not having to do brick level backups, I want to
increase the Deleted Item Retention period to something like 30 days.
My concern is the impact that it could have on the size of the information
store. I realize it's impossible to tell precisely, but I was hoping to
Ken,
Users rarely delete items anyway (based on the 500+ hoarders I have!) so I
think you would not find any noticeable size increases...
PBB
~ndi
-Original Message-
From: Jasa, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2001 15:20
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Impact on
Exchange 5.5 SP4. The last couple of days, two of our OWA servers stop
responding to users requests. Looking at the event logs I found Event ID 5
for the following:
Error: File /exchange/USA/forms/IPM/NOTE/read.asp Unexpected error
Error: File /exchange/USA/logon.asp Unexpected error
Error:
does anyone else think that Legato Networker sucks?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks, that is the truth of the matter. -they would wait 31 days to tell me
they deleted it.
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact on Priv size from increasing deleted
Typically you'll see one directory for the administrative Web service, one
for the OWA service, and one for the stash of MP3s that some 4axx0r in
Colombia is running off your server. Look in the MMC to see if you can
identify three separate sites. Alternately, browse the log files in each
That is why you establish a policy. All deleted email is kept for 30
days. After that point the mail is unrecoverable. Period.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
What version of Exchange 5.5? WHat service pack?
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Correct
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jasa, Ken
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Impact on Priv size from increasing deleted item retention
That would imply support from upper
How do I manage individual mailboxes in E2K? I see no permissions on each
mailbox only the IS.
Just migrated from 5.5 to 2K and forgot to read all of the Administrating
part of the manual, I am reading but any help is appreciated.
Thanks as always,
-John Q
Suggest they read the court transcripts from the DOJ vs. Microsoft trial,
and get back to you.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
I'm not sure exactly what you have in mind. But to view the permissions
on a mailbox, you go into AD Users and Computers. Then you open up the
individual in question, click on the Exchange Advanced tab, then click
the Mailbox Rights button.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr.
I did put that question forward fairly poorly, let me start again . . . .
I need to allow multiple AD accounts have access to one mailbox on Exchange
2K. Sp1.
How do I do this?
=John Q
- Original Message -
From: Robert Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange advanced tab on object in AD UC's, mailbox permissions button.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Messaging Consultant
Service Delivery Solutions Programmes
IBM Global Services
DDI: 01256 752845
Mobile: 07974 111867
Fax: 01256 754899
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
THANKS MIKE
-Original Message-
From: Mike O'Toole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: possible hoax but not sure
Richard,
I have seen this done at a few Fortune 500 companies. One reason was to give
the admin an
GREAT, thank you! Now if am missing that TAb in AD UC but have the other
three Xchange tabs any suggestions?
- Original Message -
From: Robert Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:19 AM
Subject: RE: Permissions on
View - Advanced features
Simon Butler
Merrill Lynch HSBC
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Permissions on mailboxes on E2K #2
GREAT, thank you! Now if am missing that TAb
First of all it is very quirky with all the prerequisites that need to be
done before you can restore a server to another machine (all the machines
need to be registered clients, the source machine has to be configured
with explicit remote permissions so that the other machine can perform a
You say I must manage it from the PDC emulator not the Exchange server it
will appear thanks, VERY tired.
Long migration!
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 9:23 AM
Subject: RE: Permissions on
No, you can't manage the mailboxes from the Exchange server, it has to
be done from within AD U C. (Unless your Exchange server is a DC--then
you can use AD U C on it.)
Rob
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:32 AM
To:
All servers are 5.5 SP3. Half of them still on NT 4 SP6a, one is on W2K SP2
I Installed the ADC first. But did not establish a Recipient Connection, as
it would not take it as below, So I went ahead and installed E2K, and joined
the existing 5.5 site. All this seems ok. It will send to
You can manage it from a machine where you loaded System Manager. You'll
find ADUC on this machine under Start\Programs\Microsoft Exchange.
Open ADUC and click on View/Advance Features (like Simon said (??)). Now
you'll have the page you need on user properties.
-Original Message-
http://www.vmyths.com/hoax.cfm?id=263page=3
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: possible hoax but not sure
THANKS MIKE
-Original Message-
From: Mike O'Toole
I got a hold of Microsoft regarding the issue of our OWA servers getting the
ASP 0115 and having to restart the IIS. They recommended that I upgrade the
systems to NT 6.0 spa, install the security patches, and apply the rollup
hot fix for CDO/CDOHTML. Has anyone else applied this hot fix?
Shit for brains right now...make that NT 4.0 sp6a. Been a long day.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: CDO/CDOHTML Hot Fix Q289606
I got a hold of Microsoft
I think that would be OT: Turkey shake Was: W3SVC? Directories.
I vehemently object to your email - what's with the paprika? Are you crazy?
- Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
Blackstone
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001
Exchange server doesn't have to be a DC. Just need to install exchange
admin tools on it (which includes AD UC) or type adminpak.msi at the
command line, which will install the admin tools, including UC's.
Regards,
Rob Ellis
Messaging Consultant
Service Delivery Solutions Programmes
IBM
Good afternoon,
Exchange 5.5 Outlook 98.
We are trying to implement Mailbox Manager on our test server. We have it
turned on and have our settings in place. We press Clean Now and nothing
happens. We also have it scheduled to run at 3:00 a.m. every morning. We
do have aged eMAIL in our
Yep, just about anyone using the event service has applied it. No troubles,
although it didn't fix what it said it would either.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Check both the permissions paper the exchange installation/setup
whitepaper at www.exinternals.com. You will need to establish a recipients
connection.
Mark H
x50668
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 November 2001 16:56
To: Exchange
IIRC, there are some annoying issues with Exchange 5.5 pre-SP4 and the ADC.
Make plans (including all necessary testing) to upgrade at least your
ADC-connected servers to SP4.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
I would violently object to his email, but only if I had to eat what it
describes...
Roger
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
http://www.peregrine.com
-Original Message-
From:
Exchange 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 SP6A.
Well, Microsoft has recommended that I upgrade to NT 4.0 SP6A to resolve the
OWA ASP 0115 error. Our OWA is now stopping ever few hours. They sent me a
link to follow for installing and securing the NT 4.0 system. The link to
secure the system is as follows:
I have two users (UserA and UserB) that send meeting requests on behalf of
a third user (UserC). When UserA sends a meeting request on behalf of
UserC and the recipient replies, UserB recieves the reply not UserA. Does
anyone have any ideas what could be causing this? Any assistance is
greatly
I'm looking for methods for directory syncing two Exchange organizations,
one Exchange 2000 and one Exchange 5.5. Yes, it's a corporate merger, and
the ultimate goal will be to build a single organization under a single
forest. Since that will take probably a year, we need an directory
Ok, so we had a disaster the other day. Co-Worker of mine ran eseutil
against the private IS to free up some disk space. We were at about 95%
capacity on the drive, and it would creep up to about 98% before the nightly
incrementals, which brought it back down. Now, I'm not positive what
What did you do wrong? You ran ESEUTIL!!!
We have been over this a dozen times in here
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: disaster debriefing
Ok,
The utility is dangerous in the wrong hands. It can take a very, very, very
long time to run. It also gets very snitty when you don't have enough room
on the HD (or network share) to create the temp file that is part of the
defrag processWhere did he attempt to create the temp fileon
grounds for termination in my mind
Thank you,
Erik L. Vesneski
Internal Network Manager
Epicentric, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Josefowski, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
The
Your lucky. The other guy should be regulated to making cables and coffee.
But make sure he gets trained on both. Running eseutil online gee wheeze
- Original Message -
From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:15
I've moved all the mailboxes in my site to a new server. (Both are NT4 Sp6a
running E5.5 Sp4) All is well but when a remote user tries to set up
Outlook Express to access his mail, which he was able to do before the move,
he gets the following message:
There was a problem logging onto your
POP3 clients will need to change the incoming mailbox location to the new
mailbox server. Outlook clients on your network will automatically pick-up
the new location.
Ron Pennell
IDA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001
(Exch 5.5 SP2, W2k Server, IIS 5.0)
Before I run off and try this I wanted to check with everyone. I seem to
remember reading somewhere that you could install OWA on a server that is
not associated with the Exchange Server. This server would be a standalone
system. I believe it stated that you
Never mind. Tried it anyway. It works!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OWA on different server?
(Exch 5.5 SP2, W2k Server, IIS 5.0)
Before I run off and try this I wanted
I know there are 3rd party apps you can buy to do this, but is there a res
kit or other (read MS or free) utility that will allow me to list all my Pub
Folder hierarchy? If someone says screen shots I will hunt you down grin
TIA
Chris
One never notices what has been done;
one can
He followed the KB article, whatever it was. Services were down. I think
he followed all the right procedures. The temp file was on a network
drive that had plenty of room. The defragged temp database exists on the
temp drive and is whole. That's how he figures it freed 3.5 gigs.
-Yanek.
You gonna pay for the training?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: disaster debriefing
Your lucky. The other guy should be regulated to making
cables and
I actually had a similar problem..after applying the rollout patch it
corrected the error I was having...good luck...
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:43 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Upgrade
Running eseutil on a raid drive subsystem may cause problems. That may have
something to do with to it. Best is to just buy more disk. Then run it
offline as per instructions. I don't trust networked drives. Exchange and
support SANs are another sticky point with MS. Well talked about on here.
I read about this somewhere. It's not so much of hoax but rather a fix
that doesnt work. Problem is, the send all will send to all the addresses
and then inform you of which ones could not be sent. The horses will be out
of the gate by the time you get notified. The good news is, you'll
Depends on how you like your coffee
- Original Message -
From: Yanek Korff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
You gonna pay for the training?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
PFAdmin will do what you want I think though it's not graphical...
DOS 6: Because there aren't enough problems in the world already.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Documenting
Sounds like he got impatient and didn't wait for the database to finish
being copied back to exchsrvr\mdbdata from the network share - which needs
to complete before you get your dos prompt back.
After he killed ESEutil, he could've also copied it back manually and
renamed back to priv.edb
Not only does it take a long time to copy back the defragd db but he could
have tested/verified the consistency of it before going on if it would have
dumped out on him. scary.
Thank you,
Erik L. Vesneski
Internal Network Manager
Epicentric, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange
I used ecora to do the old exch 5.5 here.
You can do like a one time shot for I think $25.00 or something of the
like.
They where nice enought to let me do it for nothing for doing some old beta
testing for them.
If it's still like 25 for the one time shot, you just can't do better for
the
Although not recommended I was forced to run it about a month ago with
perfect results. I defrag'ed the database to a network share because my
disk space was to low. I followed the Microsoft procedures found in the
following
q182903
q183888
q192185
q255035
I also read up on it first in Mark
You can use the List-Replicas part of PFADMIN to list all your public folders
and what servers they're on, but I don't know if it will show you how your
hierarchy is listed. If you just folder.txt at the end of the command, of
course, it will output to a text file.
-- Drew
He did wait an hour... And he's confident the copy was complete - same byte
count on both the network drive and the local drive.
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Exchange Discussions [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
How much white space was there before the defrag?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
He followed the KB article, whatever it
How much white space was there before the defrag?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
He did wait an hour... And he's
Alas, I don't know. Seeing as 3.5 G were cleared, can I assume there were
3.5 gigs of whitespace? Adding a drive isn't so easy as the system's
already full up on drives.
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001
Why in the world would you do a directory restore?
Michael Semiglia
-Original Message-
From: Yanek Korff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: disaster debriefing
Ok, so we had a disaster the other day. Co-Worker of
You're assuming that the Eseutil didn't chew up some of the database.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Only the dead have seen the last of war. - Plato
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
I want to know how much White Space was there before the defrag.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: disaster debriefing
You're assuming that the
Yanek, look for event 1221 or something like that.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
So let us not be petty when our cause is so great. Let us not quarrel amongst
ourselves when our Nation's future is at stake. Let us stand together
Yeah found it... it says 751. I can see where the services were stopped --
looks like the server was in process of doing online defrag (I suppose it
does this every night) when the offline defrag was started. Could cause
problems, yes?
-Yanek.
-Original Message-
From: Drewski
Within our site (1 of ~58 in the Org):
7 Servers
1 Exch Admin (me) - 1 Ex-Exch Admin (my Boss)
4 Helpdesk (all 1st level stuff including account setup)
1400 users
Resources adequate (if mis-managed at times)
-Original Message-
From: Antonietti, Bob P. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
For our blank tapes, we use a 5' high tape rack, nothing fancy. For used
tapes, a fire-proof[1] box for local storage and transport to off-site.
[1] Make sure that it is rated for tape media. Plastic melts well before
paper burns. If you already have a safe you can also get an insert for the
I'll probably love it later . . . from what I'm reading. What I can not find
is how to delete a Name in It . . . . I have duplicate names in the GAL
but when you go into the Default GAL in ESM and click on Properties . .
Preview I can not delete the mailbox as it is non exists! Have searched
I have tried twice now,to post a message to the list concerning an
Internet Mail Header, but when I do, I get a message back from Swynk
stating:
Dear subscriber,
Your message to exchange was rejected because it contained an
attachment. Due the increase of email viruses we are now
Bill,
When UserB sends a meeting request on behalf of UserC and the recipient
replies, does UserA recieves the reply, does UserB or do they both get it?
Does UserB get all mail sent to UserC?
If UserB is the only one to get recipient replies to meeting requests and
they get other mail sent to
Jim,
Happens to me all the time. Do not attach anything to your message and also
I tend to get rejections based on the fact that I have the unsub line in my
mail. I now delete the footers inserted automatically as well before
responding. When I used to use OWA it happened on every mailing I
Well, I tried deleting the ost's, I tried singing I feel pretty, I even
did a tap dance. NO DICE!!! Same error message when she posts new
appointments. But I must admit, the end user is now avoiding me. Maybe
that's a good thing :)
Any other ideas???
Thanx
Aaron
-Original Message-
I'm almost thinking I just need to reload the
user's Outlook.
Are you thinking that yet?
-Original Message-
From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unable to update public free/busy data error in
I just pray that I am never de-briefed before a disaster...
Andy
I want to know how much White Space was there before the defrag.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Drewski
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:38 PM
To: Exchange
de-thonged, you mean?
We pray that too, believe me.
-- Drew
Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now!
Pure religion and undefiled [...] is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in
their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
We have set up a calender in our Public Folders and would like it to default
to showing appointments as busy, at present it defaults to free. I have
looked at all options but can't see how to set this.
Thanks in advance.
Andy
_
The only way to check the dates blocked out is to open the calendar from
Public Folders. One work around is to create a mailbox, share the Calendar
and give delegate access to an admin in the group.
I think you meant that it is currently not showing any free/busy information
as opposed to
You know the really sick thing is I don't think he's kidding. I work
with a guy that was talking about making turkey shakes with leftover
Thanksgiving turkey. Ack! Dude, you couldn't get me to do that on a bet
after I had a twelve-pack in me.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Roger
95 matches
Mail list logo
