RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Alberto Faccioli
During a recent call to PSS they recommended to stop/restart the store once in a while. They said this is a better consistency/integrity check than an online backup. They scared me a little by saying that online backups don't verify consistency/integrity as well as stopping /restarting the

RE: Can not add user to permissions List

2002-03-19 Thread Keith Mitchell
Have checked the users membership of groups, and they are in no domain security groups at all. In fact have another user who is in the same groups and I can add them. I have made a copy of the user, and still get the same results. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL

Outlook 98 Client Text Invisible

2002-03-19 Thread Tim Gowen
I have a user with an Outlook 98 problem. I sent a test message in HTML, RTF and plain text. The text in the HTML one is invisible on her system. If you change it to one of the other two formats, it becomes visible. Is this an IE thing, or an Outlook thing? I suppose Outlook 2000 would be

RE: Front-End/Back-End Topology - Ex2K

2002-03-19 Thread Myles, Damian
More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear text and since Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. Having said all that, I have to do HTTP over SSL with OWA and a front-end/back-end topology anyway ... so I'll just get my coat :) Mylo -Original

Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding

2002-03-19 Thread Nizar El-Assaad
Hello I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Louis Joyce
ROFLMAO Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 March 2002 23:58 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Tener?? -Original Message- From:

tightly coupled store on exchange 2000

2002-03-19 Thread George Skrimshire
hi all has Exchange 2000 got a tightly coupled message store .. as in the manner of Exchange 5.5 ? so that if a user sends a message to another user (both of which have their mailboxes located within the same store) the actual message transfer / delivery, or whatever, is a straight database

Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Leonard Lee
Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter. Cheers, Leonard

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Andy David
Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently. Watch the logs. Use good hardware. Never Drink Coors Lite. -Original Message- From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread Andy David
Which products? -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Transaction Logs We have Exchange 5.4 SP4 on Windows 2000. We have just started disabling Circular Logging. After doing a backup,

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread ExchDiscList
Tivoli EDP and NTBackup. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Martin Blackstone
Keep your AV up to date And other than what Andy says, pretty much leave it alone. It will thank you for it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread Martin Blackstone
Exchange aware? -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Transaction Logs Tivoli EDP and NTBackup. _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread ExchDiscList
Yes sir. The Tivoli product is Exchange Specific and NTBackup is being ran from the console of the Exchange server with the Admin installed. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread Tristan Gayford
And it is after a full backup and not diff? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 13:31 To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread ExchDiscList
Yes, all attempts have been full backups. And it is after a full backup and not diff? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe _ List posting

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread Tristan Gayford
Are the backups completing successfully each time or are there any events in the logs? - Tristan Gayford Deputy Systems Network Manager Cranfield University at Silsoe -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread ExchDiscList
Everything looks normal in the logs. I receive the 104 message: MSExchangeIS (1416) The database engine has stopped the backup procedure. Thanks, Jim -Original Message- Are the backups completing successfully each time or are there any events in the logs?

RE: BLB's

2002-03-19 Thread Ewins, James
Don't go holding your breath now boy. :) JDE -Original Message- From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: BLB's You all hit the nail on the head there, guys. Thanks for the VERY useful

RE: BLB's

2002-03-19 Thread Louis Joyce
Was wondering when you were going to wake up. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 19 March 2002 14:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: BLB's Don't go holding your breath now boy. :) JDE

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread Webb, Andy
The directory will not be empty. There will always be 4-8 log files left after even a full backup. If you have 20 left, then something's not set right. -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding

2002-03-19 Thread Hunter, Lori
Having the right to send mail via the IMS and the right to create custom recipients are two quite completely different things. Did the CR have any restrictions on it? Did you look at every tab? -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19,

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread Randal, Phil
I've seen this once before after switching from circular logging. What I noticed was a discontiguous range of log file numbers. After carefully examining the log file date / timestamps I deleted the oldest (leaving at least 2 days worth as we do daily full backups) and rebooted the server

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread ExchDiscList
Andy, These are the files we are seeing. Of note, I ran the backup @ 6:42 am. 03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edb.log 03/18/2002 01:46p 5,242,880 edb8.log 03/18/2002 03:03p 5,242,880 edb9.log 03/19/2002 04:10a 5,242,880 edbA.log 03/19/2002

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread ExchDiscList
Phil, I just replied to Andy with a directory listing. Does that look similar to what you were seeing? Thanks, Jim -Original Message- I've seen this once before after switching from circular logging. What I noticed was a discontiguous range of log file numbers. After carefully

RE: How Organizational Forms Work?

2002-03-19 Thread Hunter, Lori
I hope so - I'm about to get a new manager and that will be the topic of our first meeting, as soon as I find out who it's going to be! -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread Randal, Phil
That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have problems. Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: ExchDiscList

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Hunter, Lori
Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Backup everynight. Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently.

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Andy David
While wearing it. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance Wash thong daily. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server

2002-03-19 Thread Blunt, James H (Jim)
This may be a stupid question, but after just a quick glance at the product, what advantages does this product have over NetMeeting? Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief

2002-03-19 Thread Alister
Hi Well, I tried that and still no joy. I've verified that the ADC is working correctly and security is correct as per Q250989. AD has all Ex 5.5 information. Any Idea why I can't enter the Service Account info in Ex2k setup when I try and introduce a new server?? Thanks Ali -Original

RE: Transaction Logs

2002-03-19 Thread ExchDiscList
Thanks to all for the help and suggestions. I will monitor the directory to see if this becomes a problem. That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have problems. Phil -

RE: Exchange 2000 Conferencing Server

2002-03-19 Thread Mark Harford
Makes efficient use of Multicast for multi-user sessions. (in fact it is a good business driver to get multicast enabled on your network) The administrator can control use of bandwidth rather than leaving it to local user settings on Netmeeting. Again the multicast component helps dramatically

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Martin Blackstone
While Lori is wearing it. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance While wearing it. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori

connect

2002-03-19 Thread Kim Schotanus
Hi, When I turn off local DNS resolving, about 1 out of 20 messages produces an NDR, when I turn it on, another batch of mails generates an NDR... Any clues? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm

Creating alias within w2000 require new domain?

2002-03-19 Thread James Mike
Let say your domain is @testing and you create an alias for your user that is @nottesting. You want this address to send mail to this infomation store. Is the only option in 2000 to create a new domain called nottesting. If so how would you do this. Eg: Mr x has email account [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: connect

2002-03-19 Thread Andy David
Colonel Mustard, in the Organization Forms Library, with an ArcServe CD. -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connect Hi, When I turn off local DNS resolving, about 1 out of 20

RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding

2002-03-19 Thread Nizar El-Assaad
The CR has the right to send through the IMS, and the message is being delivered to both the original recipient and the forwarding address (CR). It is just the false NDR which is misleading, and rather annoying. Best Regards Nizar El-Assaad -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori

RE: connect

2002-03-19 Thread Louis Joyce
Help us a bit by posting some of the NDR's. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: connect Hi, When I turn off local DNS

RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding

2002-03-19 Thread Louis Joyce
Post the NDR. Is this CR on an external server to your domain? The clue may be in the NDR. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding

2002-03-19 Thread Louis Joyce
A restriction in the system NDR usually indicates a size limit being reached somewhere. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE:

ever seen this?

2002-03-19 Thread Woodruff, Michael
What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to solve this:) Here is the puzzle: Complete the last line: 1 11 21 1112 3112 211213 312213 212223 114213 31121314 _ List posting FAQ:

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread John Matteson
At the next TechEd? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones -Original

RE: Exchange 5.5 - 2000 Upgrade grief

2002-03-19 Thread Mark Harford
Are you able to install Exchange System Manager by itself? If so, drill down to the relevant Administrative Group and pull up the properties. In there you can reselect the Exchange 55 Service Account details that will have been stored in Active Directory the first time you tried installing

RE: ever seen this?

2002-03-19 Thread HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley)
41122314 -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ever seen this? What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to solve this:) Here is the puzzle: Complete the last line:

RE: ever seen this?

2002-03-19 Thread Randal, Phil
30 secons with google gave me this: http://www.madras.fife.sch.uk/maths/descriptive6.html Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

RE: ever seen this?

2002-03-19 Thread Butler, Simon (London)
One one 2 ones 1 one 1 two 3 ones 1 two Etc etc 41122314 Simon Butler Merrill Lynch HSBC -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 15:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: ever seen this? What is the answer to this. Sorry, off

RE: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients

2002-03-19 Thread TGreen
In Exchange 5.5 there is a registry entry that can do this. HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Parameters\MaxRecipient s It is a hexadecimal value, so I have mine set to 32 which equates to a max of 50 recipients. With this setting when one of my users sends out a mass e-mail

Re: Solution Creating alias within w2000 require new domain?

2002-03-19 Thread Mike Smith
Found the solution - thought I would share. To receive messages from two Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) domains in Exchange 2000: Contact the Internet Service Provider (ISP), and tell them to point both of the domain's MX records to the same Exchange 2000 computer. For additional

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Martin Blackstone
TechEd is for programmers. MEC is where it is at. -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance At the next TechEd? John Matteson; Exchange

RE: Delivery Restrictions and Mail Forwarding

2002-03-19 Thread Nizar El-Assaad
Following is the actual NDR received by the sender: -Original Message- From: System Administrator Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:12 AM Cc: Ramzi Chmaitilly; Billing Subject: Undeliverable: Bill closure for cycle 15 Importance: High Your message did not reach

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread John Matteson
I knew that. Although, has anyone asked Lori about it? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything.

RE: Creating alias within w2000 require new domain?

2002-03-19 Thread Chris Scharff
Create a new recipient policy in the ESM or modify an existing one depending on your needs. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne

RE: Can not add user to permissions List

2002-03-19 Thread Chris Scharff
How'd you make a copy of the user? Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne

RE: Can not add user to permissions List

2002-03-19 Thread Keith Mitchell
Active Directory Users and Computers, wanted to see if it was a messed up SID. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March 2002 16:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List How'd you make a copy of the user?

554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Whitlock, Teresa
I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header: 554 Invalid data in message Can anyone help point me in a good direction to

RE: Can not add user to permissions List

2002-03-19 Thread Chris Scharff
So you created a new mailbox enabled user with the same attributes? Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne

RE: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Louis Joyce
So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts and getting NDR's? Can you post the full NDR's please? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 March

RE: Foreign Connector to Win2K Exchange

2002-03-19 Thread Smith, Robert A.
Thanks for all the assistance, I have successfully setup two ADC connectors that are now replicating with the exchange 5.5 server. (?) Do I have to setup a connector on the 5.5 server to connect to the Exchange 2000 server or is it done just through the ADC. My apologize for the newbie

RE: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Whitlock, Teresa
Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL accounts that are getting bounces. Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account. Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this does not seem to affect every account.

Re: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
You'll need to turn on protocol logging to see the actual conversation and data being passed to understand why your server (rather, your firewall) is returning the error. Speaking of which, what are you running as a firewall (myfirewall.mydomain.com)? Speaking further of which: it's hard to do

RE: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Roger Seielstad
Ahhh - Service Unavailable is the clue, not the invalid data. Sounds like the firewall doesn't like one of the commands (probably an ESMTP command). Alternately, the firewall might be configured (possibly incorrectly) to not allow relaying. --

RE: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Martin Blackstone
Do you have a PIX FW? Do you have the SMTP fixup protocol on? If so, turn it off. -Original Message- From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Sorry I wasn't clear. It's

RE: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Martin Blackstone
I know. I hate this crap. It makes no sense. Believe me, if we want to find out this info, we can. Just cough it up. -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in

Re: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
telnet 207.212.40.254 25 220 wormhole.dionex.com Generic SMTP handler That ain't Exchange. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:28 AM Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message Ahhh -

RE: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Whitlock, Teresa
Well, I'm not sure why it's difficult if the names have been obscured since the addresses are all valid and I know it's not a problem with them. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: Exchange 5.5 Support

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Yes, that's what was going though my head. Thanks for clarifying. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Support Well, that's support as in creating

RE: Forms Assessment

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
I can't believe that MCS doesn't know how to backup forms. You can achieve what you want very easily. It's in Outlook, Options, Other... Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions

Re: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Daniel Chenault
The only address in the NDR you posted is the domain atom. Had to work backwards from there. Since the info is already public, as I just proved by posting it, why even bother obscuring it? Doctor, I have a pain. Where? Well, I'm not going to tell you except that it's above my waist and below my

RE: Journalling question

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Let me get this straight. Your vendor wants you to use journaling to a CR so that his product can capture all emails? Hello? At that point his product isn't doing anything. Why do you even need that vendor? Do you really want all of your company emails archived/stored at a location outside

RE: 554 Invalid data in message

2002-03-19 Thread Dillon, Jeff
It seems that Exchange Admin Advisory #7 applies: As there are no worthy recipients hosted on AOL/Hotmail, only cursory efforts shall be employed to determine causes of non-delivery. see also: SPAM nozzle / Matrix / portal-junkies / attachment Cuisinart -Original Message- From:

RE: OL e-mail filter type rule Q

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Option 1. Put the contacts in the GAL as CRs and apply delivery restrictions to the mailbox. Option 2. Write an event script that fires for each incoming message and serches through the contacts to see if the sender matches a contact. If it doesn't, the script deletes it, otherwise it leaves

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Exchange System Manager error

2002-03-19 Thread Roberto Glavich
We use an Win2000 Server with SP2 on this server there are Exchange 2000 with SP2 installed. In the beginning we could use Exchange System Manager to see how much every mailbox resource would use in KB and also total items in every mailbox. For some reason the Size KB and Total Items just

RE: OWA Default webpage modification

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
OWA 5.5 is open-source. All the ASPs are on the server as plain text. Use Notepad to change the code. Of course, you will need to modify multiple pages that are all interconnected. You know the ones that have been developed by scores of professional developers at Microsoft. Yeah, the very

RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
Amen. From the way you ask this question, I assume this is a user that goes offline quite a bit. Have him use an OST instead if that's the case. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:32 PM To: Exchange

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Mario Fernandez
Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so I drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner works great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of crap that builds on those drives. Mario Fernandez Network Administrator

RE: Recalculate Routing for MTA doesn't work

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
No. You've got to find out which connector is causing the incorrect routing and fix it. Then you recalculate routing, which will then eliminate your problems. That's the tool. Stop trying to pound in a nine inch nail using a jigsaw. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Mahesh

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
Great idea. I've got an Electrolux with a special fitting that would work great for something like this. We could even sell the bags of metal shavings on Ebay! -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange

RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
As Ed W. has explained in another post, Exchange does a great job of maintaining itself. All you need to do is: A. Make sure your nightly full backups are successful. B. Make sure you monitor the health and performance of your server. C. Make sure you don't do any foolish administrative

RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar

2002-03-19 Thread NetStar
Thanks all for the reply! Here is what I suggest user do: When using personal folder to accept all mail messages, there does not seem to be a way to have it update the server calendar. You would be accepting the meeting request for your local calendar. You can use one or the other but not both.

RE: Reminder Problems - first server?

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
It could be that you've downed the old server before the freebusy information completed replicating. Try running the good old /cleanfreebusy and /cleanreminders switches with Outlook. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March

RE: Personal folder Calendar and Server Calendar

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
One more thing to keep in mind is that if you use the PST calendar as primary, other people can see your free busy only when your Outlook is up. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
The Bernouli Principal only applies when throwing the drives at Lusers. -Original Message- From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Doesn't that screw up the bernouli effect?

RE: Restore challenge

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
You can obviously do this, but there are a lot of concerns. First off, what would cause a corruption so bad that you need to restore? It's usually something flaky with the disk subsystem. So, if you restore to the same box, you simply are asking for trouble. Of course, you can try to diagnose

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Mario Fernandez
Loosers? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator DataSynapse 632 Broadway 5th Floor New York, NY 10012 tel. (212) 842-8849 fax. (212) 842-8843 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here: e-mail disclaimer

RE: Restore challenge

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
While it is possible to run it over a network share, I have seen it cause more damage on a busy network (way back when in the Exchange 4.0 days, during an offline defrag operation). Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18,

RE: Rules Client or Server??

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
One clarification: if you copy to a public folder, it's client side. If you forward to the pf's email address then it's server side. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:

RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag

2002-03-19 Thread Thomas Di Nardo
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/luser.html -Original Message- From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag Loosers? Mario Fernandez Network Administrator

Q article confirmation

2002-03-19 Thread Finch Brett
I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It does not appear to work at all. If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo). http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010

Exchange 2000 Deferred Delivery gives incorrect Sent Date

2002-03-19 Thread Ray Beckwith
I have another issue that appears to be related to our upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 that I could use your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use either of the deferred delivery options (view, options and set do not deliver before [date] or File, Properties, Send Options,

RE: Q article confirmation

2002-03-19 Thread Andy David
Version and SP? [1] [1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Q article confirmation I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article.

RE: Tracking an Email Message

2002-03-19 Thread Soysal, Serdar
AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy that says something like we can look at your mail anytime we want, and by agreeing to work here you also agree to this there is nothing criminal about it. Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've suggested the vendors

RE: Q article confirmation

2002-03-19 Thread Finch Brett
Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend. Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to work in it's present form. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31 To: Exchange Discussions

Re: promoting E2K to a DC

2002-03-19 Thread John Q Jr.
I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and

RE: promoting E2K to a DC

2002-03-19 Thread Stidley, Joel
How is your network setup? Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or VPN? Do you have a GC close to the clients? Have you done a netmon trace to see at what point the problem is occurring? Joel -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March

Digital Signatures and Custom Forms

2002-03-19 Thread Stephens, Tara
Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms? We've been asked to implement a form for an approval process that must route to several levels of management within the company. We want to use digital signatures to make this a legal document. Right now, I have the form made (first draft)

RE: promoting E2K to a DC

2002-03-19 Thread Webb, Andy
all that will do is /increase/ the load. before doing the promotion, why not call PSS? Could be a whole lot cheaper. Or look to the network layer of the stack - do some packet captures, look at net bottlenecks, test your switch/hub, verify hard set duplex settings, etc.

RE: Q article confirmation

2002-03-19 Thread Hunter, Lori
The article says it's fixed in the next sp. Since there was no sp listed at the time of the article, and you're on sp4, they seem to think you shouldn't have the problem. -Original Message- From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange

RE: Tracking an Email Message

2002-03-19 Thread Dillon, Jeff
What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer. The email thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of which you attest under threat of non-employment. So when DO we start shooting the lawyers? -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar

  1   2   >