During a recent call to PSS they recommended to stop/restart the store once in a
while.
They said this is a better consistency/integrity check than an online backup. They
scared me a little by saying that online backups don't verify consistency/integrity as
well as stopping /restarting the
Have checked the users membership of groups, and they are in no domain
security groups at all. In fact have another user who is in the same
groups and I can add them.
I have made a copy of the user, and still get the same results.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL
I have a user with an Outlook 98 problem. I sent a test message in HTML,
RTF and plain text. The text in the HTML one is invisible on her system.
If you change it to one of the other two formats, it becomes visible.
Is this an IE thing, or an Outlook thing? I suppose Outlook 2000 would be
More an aversion to using something (POP/IMAP) with passwords in clear text and since
Outlook doesn't support APOP we have to go over SSL. Having said all that, I have to
do HTTP over SSL with OWA and a front-end/back-end topology anyway ... so I'll just
get my coat :)
Mylo
-Original
Hello
I have Exchange Server 5.5. I have configured the IMS to allow only some
users to send SMTP mail. A user who has the right to use IMS creates an
SMTP custom recipient and specifies that mail sent to his mailbox is
delivered to both the mailbox and the SMTP custom recipient (delivery
ROFLMAO
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 March 2002 23:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
Tener??
-Original Message-
From:
hi all
has Exchange 2000 got a tightly coupled message store .. as in the manner of
Exchange 5.5 ?
so that if a user sends a message to another user (both of which have their
mailboxes located within the same store) the actual message transfer /
delivery, or whatever, is a straight database
Like all good Exchange Administrators, our job is to look for ways to ensure
that the corporate messaging system is in functioning in condition by
practicing routine maintenance. I put it to the forum to supply their
thoughts on the best practices that they have on this matter.
Cheers,
Leonard
Backup everynight.
Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently.
Watch the logs.
Use good hardware.
Never Drink Coors Lite.
-Original Message-
From: Leonard Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Which products?
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Transaction Logs
We have Exchange 5.4 SP4 on Windows 2000. We have just started disabling
Circular Logging.
After doing a backup,
Tivoli EDP and NTBackup.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:
Keep your AV up to date
And other than what Andy says, pretty much leave it alone. It will thank you
for it.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 4:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine
Exchange aware?
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 5:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Transaction Logs
Tivoli EDP and NTBackup.
_
List posting FAQ:
Yes sir. The Tivoli product is Exchange Specific and NTBackup is being
ran from the console of the Exchange server with the Admin installed.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
And it is after a full backup and not diff?
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 13:31
To: Exchange Discussions
Yes, all attempts have been full backups.
And it is after a full backup and not diff?
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
_
List posting
Are the backups completing successfully each time or are there any events in
the logs?
-
Tristan Gayford
Deputy Systems Network Manager
Cranfield University at Silsoe
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Everything looks normal in the logs. I receive the 104 message:
MSExchangeIS (1416) The database engine has stopped the backup procedure.
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
Are the backups completing successfully each time or are there any events
in
the logs?
Don't go holding your breath now boy.
:)
JDE
-Original Message-
From: Louis Joyce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:RE: BLB's
You all hit the nail on the head there, guys.
Thanks for the VERY useful
Was wondering when you were going to wake up.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 March 2002 14:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: BLB's
Don't go holding your breath now boy.
:)
JDE
The directory will not be empty. There will always be 4-8 log files left
after even a full backup. If you have 20 left, then something's not set
right.
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:10 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Having the right to send mail via the IMS and the right to create custom
recipients are two quite completely different things. Did the CR have any
restrictions on it? Did you look at every tab?
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19,
I've seen this once before after switching from circular
logging.
What I noticed was a discontiguous range of log file
numbers.
After carefully examining the log file date / timestamps
I deleted the oldest (leaving at least 2 days worth as we
do daily full backups) and rebooted the server
Andy,
These are the files we are seeing. Of note, I ran the backup @ 6:42 am.
03/19/2002 06:42a 5,242,880 edb.log
03/18/2002 01:46p 5,242,880 edb8.log
03/18/2002 03:03p 5,242,880 edb9.log
03/19/2002 04:10a 5,242,880 edbA.log
03/19/2002
Phil,
I just replied to Andy with a directory listing. Does that look similar
to what you were seeing?
Thanks,
Jim
-Original Message-
I've seen this once before after switching from circular
logging.
What I noticed was a discontiguous range of log file
numbers.
After carefully
I hope so - I'm about to get a new manager and that will be the topic of our
first meeting, as soon as I find out who it's going to be!
-Original Message-
From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: How
That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps
growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have
problems.
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: ExchDiscList
Wash thong daily.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
Backup everynight.
Check backups and practice DR on recovery server frequently.
While wearing it.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
Wash thong daily.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL
This may be a stupid question, but after just a quick glance at the product,
what advantages does this product have over NetMeeting?
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Woodrick, Ed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Hi
Well, I tried that and still no joy. I've verified that the ADC is working
correctly and security is correct as per Q250989. AD has all Ex 5.5
information.
Any Idea why I can't enter the Service Account info in Ex2k setup when I try
and introduce a new server??
Thanks
Ali
-Original
Thanks to all for the help and suggestions. I will monitor the directory
to see if this becomes a problem.
That looks fine to me. If the number of log files keeps
growing and older logs aren't being deleted then you have
problems.
Phil
-
Makes efficient use of Multicast for multi-user sessions. (in fact it is a
good business driver to get multicast enabled on your network)
The administrator can control use of bandwidth rather than leaving it to
local user settings on Netmeeting. Again the multicast component helps
dramatically
While Lori is wearing it.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
While wearing it.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori
Hi,
When I turn off local DNS resolving, about 1 out of 20 messages produces
an NDR, when I turn it on, another batch of mails generates an NDR...
Any clues?
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Let say your domain is @testing and you create an alias for your user that
is @nottesting. You want this address to send mail to this infomation
store. Is the only option in 2000 to create a new domain called
nottesting. If so how would you do this.
Eg: Mr x has email account [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colonel Mustard, in the Organization Forms Library, with an ArcServe CD.
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 10:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: connect
Hi,
When I turn off local DNS resolving, about 1 out of 20
The CR has the right to send through the IMS, and the message is being
delivered to both the original recipient and the forwarding address
(CR). It is just the false NDR which is misleading, and rather annoying.
Best Regards
Nizar El-Assaad
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori
Help us a bit by posting some of the NDR's.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: connect
Hi,
When I turn off local DNS
Post the NDR. Is this CR on an external server to your domain? The clue may
be in the NDR.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
A restriction in the system NDR usually indicates a size limit being reached
somewhere.
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Nizar El-Assaad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 15:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to
solve this:)
Here is the puzzle:
Complete the last line:
1
11
21
1112
3112
211213
312213
212223
114213
31121314
_
List posting FAQ:
At the next TechEd?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything. --Allyson Jones
-Original
Are you able to install Exchange System Manager by itself? If so, drill
down to the relevant Administrative Group and pull up the properties. In
there you can reselect the Exchange 55 Service Account details that will
have been stored in Active Directory the first time you tried installing
41122314
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ever seen this?
What is the answer to this. Sorry, off the Exchange subject. I need to
solve this:)
Here is the puzzle:
Complete the last line:
30 secons with google gave me this:
http://www.madras.fife.sch.uk/maths/descriptive6.html
Phil
-
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
One one
2 ones
1 one 1 two
3 ones 1 two
Etc etc
41122314
Simon Butler
Merrill Lynch HSBC
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 15:44
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: ever seen this?
What is the answer to this. Sorry, off
In Exchange 5.5 there is a registry entry that can do this.
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchangeIMC\Parameters\MaxRecipient
s
It is a hexadecimal value, so I have mine set to 32 which equates to a max
of 50 recipients. With this setting when one of my users sends out a mass
e-mail
Found the solution - thought I would share.
To receive messages from two Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP) domains in
Exchange 2000:
Contact the Internet Service Provider (ISP), and tell them to point both of
the domain's MX records to the same Exchange 2000 computer.
For additional
TechEd is for programmers. MEC is where it is at.
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Recommendation for Exchange Routine Maintenance
At the next TechEd?
John Matteson; Exchange
Following is the actual NDR received by the sender:
-Original Message-
From: System Administrator
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 8:12 AM
Cc: Ramzi Chmaitilly; Billing
Subject: Undeliverable: Bill closure for cycle 15
Importance: High
Your message did not reach
I knew that.
Although, has anyone asked Lori about it?
John Matteson; Exchange Manager
Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards
(404) 239 - 2981
If I could wish for my life to be perfect, it would be tempting but I would
have to decline, for life would no longer teach me anything.
Create a new recipient policy in the ESM or modify an existing one depending
on your needs.
Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
How'd you make a copy of the user?
Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
Active Directory Users and Computers, wanted to see if it was a messed
up SID.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March 2002 16:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Can not add user to permissions List
How'd you make a copy of the user?
I'm starting to get some complaints from certain AOL and Hotmail accounts
that email is bouncing. I can send fine with my email, but I was forwarded
some of the bounced emails with the following message in the header:
554 Invalid data in message
Can anyone help point me in a good direction to
So you created a new mailbox enabled user with the same attributes?
Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244
Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne
So you have users in your domain who are sending to hotmail and AOL accounts
and getting NDR's?
Can you post the full NDR's please?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Data Support Analyst
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 19 March
Thanks for all the assistance, I have successfully setup two ADC connectors
that are now replicating with the exchange 5.5 server. (?) Do I have to
setup a connector on the 5.5 server to connect to the Exchange 2000 server
or is it done just through the ADC. My apologize for the newbie
Sorry I wasn't clear. It's not users in my domain, it's the Hotmail or AOL
accounts that are getting bounces.
Here is one of the bounces I had forwarded to my Hotmail account.
Please note that when I attempt to send from my Hotmail, it's fine. So this
does not seem to affect every account.
You'll need to turn on protocol logging to see the actual conversation and
data being passed to understand why your server (rather, your firewall) is
returning the error.
Speaking of which, what are you running as a firewall
(myfirewall.mydomain.com)?
Speaking further of which: it's hard to do
Ahhh - Service Unavailable is the clue, not the invalid data.
Sounds like the firewall doesn't like one of the commands (probably an ESMTP
command). Alternately, the firewall might be configured (possibly
incorrectly) to not allow relaying.
--
Do you have a PIX FW? Do you have the SMTP fixup protocol on?
If so, turn it off.
-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message
Sorry I wasn't clear. It's
I know. I hate this crap. It makes no sense. Believe me, if we want to find
out this info, we can. Just cough it up.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:27 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: 554 Invalid data in
telnet 207.212.40.254 25
220 wormhole.dionex.com Generic SMTP handler
That ain't Exchange.
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 11:28 AM
Subject: RE: 554 Invalid data in message
Ahhh -
Well, I'm not sure why it's difficult if the names have been obscured since
the addresses are all valid and I know it's not a problem with them.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 9:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
Yes, that's what was going though my head. Thanks for clarifying.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange 5.5 Support
Well, that's support as in creating
I can't believe that MCS doesn't know how to backup forms. You can achieve
what you want very easily. It's in Outlook, Options, Other...
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
The only address in the NDR you posted is the domain atom. Had to work
backwards from there. Since the info is already public, as I just proved by
posting it, why even bother obscuring it?
Doctor, I have a pain.
Where?
Well, I'm not going to tell you except that it's above my waist and below my
Let me get this straight. Your vendor wants you to use journaling to a CR
so that his product can capture all emails? Hello? At that point his
product isn't doing anything. Why do you even need that vendor? Do you
really want all of your company emails archived/stored at a location outside
It seems that Exchange Admin Advisory #7 applies:
As there are no worthy recipients hosted on AOL/Hotmail, only cursory
efforts shall be employed to determine causes of non-delivery.
see also: SPAM nozzle / Matrix / portal-junkies / attachment Cuisinart
-Original Message-
From:
Option 1. Put the contacts in the GAL as CRs and apply delivery restrictions
to the mailbox.
Option 2. Write an event script that fires for each incoming message and
serches through the contacts to see if the sender matches a contact. If it
doesn't, the script deletes it, otherwise it leaves
If you have drives that are faster than 7200rpm, tiny metal particles will
collect on your disks because they spin so fast. You should clean these out
by waving a powerful magnet over your disk drives.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
We use an Win2000 Server with SP2 on this server there are Exchange 2000 with SP2
installed.
In the beginning we could use Exchange System Manager to see how much every mailbox
resource would use in KB and also total items in every mailbox.
For some reason the Size KB and Total Items just
OWA 5.5 is open-source. All the ASPs are on the server as plain text. Use
Notepad to change the code. Of course, you will need to modify multiple
pages that are all interconnected. You know the ones that have been
developed by scores of professional developers at Microsoft. Yeah, the very
Amen. From the way you ask this question, I assume this is a user that goes
offline quite a bit. Have him use an OST instead if that's the case.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Exchange
Actually I've already thougt of that since they are 1rpm drives, so I
drilled a small hole and put in a pipe connected to a vaccum cleaner works
great you guy's should give it a try, you be amazed at the amount of crap
that builds on those drives.
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
No. You've got to find out which connector is causing the incorrect routing
and fix it. Then you recalculate routing, which will then eliminate your
problems. That's the tool. Stop trying to pound in a nine inch nail using
a jigsaw.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Mahesh
Great idea. I've got an Electrolux with a special fitting that would
work great for something like this. We could even sell the bags of metal
shavings on Ebay!
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Exchange
As Ed W. has explained in another post, Exchange does a great job of
maintaining itself. All you need to do is:
A. Make sure your nightly full backups are successful.
B. Make sure you monitor the health and performance of your server.
C. Make sure you don't do any foolish administrative
Thanks all for the reply! Here is what I suggest user
do:
When using personal folder to accept all mail
messages, there does not seem to be a way to have it
update the server calendar. You would be accepting the
meeting request for your local calendar. You can use
one or the other but not both.
It could be that you've downed the old server before the freebusy
information completed replicating. Try running the good old /cleanfreebusy
and /cleanreminders switches with Outlook.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March
One more thing to keep in mind is that if you use the PST calendar as
primary, other people can see your free busy only when your Outlook is up.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: NetStar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
The Bernouli Principal only applies when throwing the drives at Lusers.
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:00 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
Doesn't that screw up the bernouli effect?
You can obviously do this, but there are a lot of concerns. First off, what
would cause a corruption so bad that you need to restore? It's usually
something flaky with the disk subsystem. So, if you restore to the same
box, you simply are asking for trouble. Of course, you can try to diagnose
Loosers?
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
DataSynapse
632 Broadway 5th Floor
New York, NY 10012
tel. (212) 842-8849
fax. (212) 842-8843
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
View the DataSynapse email disclaimer here:
e-mail disclaimer
While it is possible to run it over a network share, I have seen it cause
more damage on a busy network (way back when in the Exchange 4.0 days,
during an offline defrag operation).
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 18,
One clarification: if you copy to a public folder, it's client side. If
you forward to the pf's email address then it's server side.
Serdar Soysal
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/luser.html
-Original Message-
From: Mario Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: only 6 Mb after online defrag
Loosers?
Mario Fernandez
Network Administrator
I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article. It
does not appear to work at all.
If someone has made the same registry, can you confirm that this works
and it is the correct registry entry (not a typo).
http://support.microsoft.com/directory/article.asp?ID=KB;EN-US;Q182010
I have another issue that appears to be related to our upgrade from Exchange 5.5 to
Exchange 2000 that I could use your input on. Since the upgrade, when senders use
either of the deferred delivery options (view, options and set do not deliver before
[date] or File, Properties, Send Options,
Version and SP? [1]
[1] Good Gawd, I sound like Precht
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Q article confirmation
I've made a change to the registry as outlined in this Q article.
AFAIK, as long as the company has a published and communicated policy that
says something like we can look at your mail anytime we want, and by
agreeing to work here you also agree to this there is nothing criminal
about it. Besides, if it was a criminal offense as you've suggested the
vendors
Oh sorry, I had posted on the weekend.
Exchange 5.5 SPK4 on NT4 SPK6a, my thinking is
a typo in the article as it doesn't appear to
work in it's present form.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:31
To: Exchange Discussions
I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange
server errors to users.
All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail.
I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues.
It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and
How is your network setup? Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or
VPN? Do you have a GC close to the clients? Have you done a netmon
trace to see at what point the problem is occurring?
Joel
-Original Message-
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March
Is anyone using digital signatures with custom forms? We've been asked
to implement a form for an approval process that must route to several
levels of management within the company. We want to use digital
signatures to make this a legal document. Right now, I have the form
made (first draft)
all that will do is /increase/ the load. before doing the promotion, why
not call PSS? Could be a whole lot cheaper. Or look to the network layer
of the stack - do some packet captures, look at net bottlenecks, test your
switch/hub, verify hard set duplex settings, etc.
The article says it's fixed in the next sp. Since there was no sp listed at
the time of the article, and you're on sp4, they seem to think you shouldn't
have the problem.
-Original Message-
From: Finch Brett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Exchange
What's clearly criminal is the length of Damien's disclaimer. The email
thingie is always covered in the company policy manual, the receipt of which
you attest under threat of non-employment.
So when DO we start shooting the lawyers?
-Original Message-
From: Soysal, Serdar
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo
